For 2020 and newer grants, please go to https://grants.ipmcenters.org/
PPMS
Home       Current RFAs       PD User Guide       Projects       Login      

Northeastern IPM Center Projects


Jump to a program year:

2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996

Display only most recent year



2020 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Applied Research

Early Detection of Potato Leafhopper Damage Using Unmanned Aerial Systems

Project Director: Chandi Witharana
Funding Amount: $49,783

Early detection of disease and insect infestation within crops is essential to lower production losses, reduce environmental risk, and promote environmentally conscious management practices. Innovative pest detection and monitoring methods that are inexpensive while being highly efficient can increase pest management decision-making based on estimates of pest population size. There is a growing interest in adaptation of remote scouting methods that are centered on remote sensing (RS) technologies, to produce low-cost, real-time/quasi real-time, repeatable, and spatially-explicit analytics for IPM applications. Unprecedented advances in unmanned aerial system (UAS) technology and the development of robust, autonomous and lightweight sensors present a unique opportunity for enabling RS technologies for IPM use. UASs are rapidly evolving into standalone RS systems that deliver information of high spatial and temporal resolution in a non-invasive manner. UAS platforms can rapidly survey areas and can be deployed where and when needed. Both the cost and complexity of the UASs have been reduced to the point where an individual can afford a drone and use it in the field with minimal technical expertise. In spite of the potential benefit, very few studies have been conducted to exploit the potentials of UAS for early detection of pest infestation. This reflects a clear knowledge and methodological gap between IPM science and UAS technology. Without a concerted cross-disciplinary effort - remote sensing science, computer science, and IPM science - to build bridges between the IPM community and this new UAS-enabled future, we will never fully capitalize on the plethora of possibilities afforded by centimeter-scale imagery. The proposed research will investigate the practicality of off-the-shelf UAS outfitted with lightweight multispectral and hyperspectral sensors - as remote scouting instruments- in early detection and discrimination of crop infestation by potato leafhopper Empoasca fabae in potato. We propose a two-year project, deploying UAS remote sensing coupled with proximal remote sensing to develop and validate models for assessing and distinguishing early damage by potato leafhopper using UAS spectral reflectance data.


Necessity is the mother of invention: innovative approaches to Northeastern hemp disease management.

Project Director: Heather Darby
Funding Amount: $49,565

With the passing of the 2018 Farm Bill, and the removal of industrial hemp from the list of controlled substances, hemp is now considered a legal agricultural crop. As a result, the hemp industry is growing rapidly and scientifically based research and education is critical to Northeastern farmers succeeding with this new crop. Hemp could be a significant economic driver and could help create new farming and business opportunities and potentially provide social and environmental benefits that complement current agricultural production systems in the Northeast. However, since industrial hemp production has only recently been reintroduced to the Northeast, much of the agronomic information that is currently available to Northeastern growers is either outdated or not relevant to the growing conditions of the region. The proposed project aims to provide this much-needed information to the Northeastern hemp industry through a program that integrates field-based disease management trials and a comprehensive outreach program.

Identifying pest problems and educating producers and service providers about hemp IPM will strengthen the viability of industrial hemp in the region. This project seeks to discover and deliver region-specific disease management practices to support the growth of the hemp industry in the Northeast. The objectives of this project are to expand the existing IPM toolbox for disease management available to Northeastern hemp growers, and enhance technical assistance through farmer friendly research-based outreach programs and materials, and opportunities for farmer-to-farmer learning exchanges in the Northeast. The distribution of hemp diseases in the Northeast, varietal selection, planting date, plant spacing, harvest timing, and post-harvest handling strategies will be validated as a means to manage disease pressure in industrial hemp. Our outreach and research will reach countless stakeholders through printed material and online resources and will add to the body of knowledge on regionally appropriate IPM strategies for industrial hemp.


Slug and Natural Enemy Phenology in mid-Atlantic Field Crops

Project Director: David Owens
Funding Amount: $27,830

Slugs are important pests of field crops in the mid-Atlantic, especially when crops are grown using reduced or no-tillage practices and with cover crops. Slug activity is heavily dependent on weather conditions, but when slug-favorable weather conditions occur during the crops most sensitive stages (germination to V3/V4), severe stand reductions can result requiring a field or portions of a field be replanted. Slug management recommendations include tillage (a highly disruptive tactic that impacts soil health and water quality) or application of expensive molluscicidal bait. There are two primary species of slugs present in mid-Atlantic corn and soybean fields: grey garden slugs and marsh slugs. These slugs overwinter either as eggs or as adults. Plant damage is most severe when germination coincides with slug egg hatch, and there is some evidence that a bait application is most effective when applied at slug egg hatch. This project seeks to develop a model that will predict slug egg hatch based on accumulated heat units. Fields across the mid-Atlantic will be sampled weekly for slug eggs and juveniles. Temperature and moisture sensors will be deployed in the same fields. In addition, not much is known regarding slug-pathogenic nematode distribution or activity in fields. Mobile stage slugs will be sampled and held for nematode emergence. It is anticipated that this line of research will help farmers identify time periods in which a slug bait might be most effective or a planting window that could be avoided.


[to top]

RFA: IPM Communications

Developing multimedia materials to educate health care providers on bed bug IPM

Project Director: Changlu Wang
Funding Amount: $19,757

The common bed bug, Cimex lectularius, emerged as a major urban pest in the U.S. since the late 1990s. Today, bed bug infestations are most commonly found in low-income, senior citizen homes where bed bug management is most challenging. A study shows an average of 12.3% of the senior citizen homes in low-income communities were infested with bed bugs in New Jersey. The resurgence of bed bugs has significant health, economic, and social impact. Health care providers are particularly affected by bed bug infestations. There are 84,000 health care providers in the northeastern U.S. They spend most of the day in clients’ homes and many clients are low-income seniors. They are at high risk of getting bed bugs or spreading bed bugs as they visit different homes. Most health care providers are unprepared for dealing with bed bugs. Educating them on the identification, prevention, early detection, and use of simple non-chemical methods to get rid of bed bugs is extremely important both for protecting themselves and for helping the clients in getting rid of early bed bug infestations. Yet, available educational materials on bed bugs for health care providers is scarce. User-friendly videos demonstrating how to recognize bed bugs and simple and effective methods to prevent and eliminate bed bugs is especially in urgent need. The objectives of this project are to: 1) develop an English and a Spanish short video demonstrating the bed bug biology, prevention, inspection, proper use of non-chemical control tools, 2) develop English and Spanish brochures on bed bug prevention and control for health care providers; and 3) partner with health care industry to educate health care providers on bed bug prevention and control using the new videos and brochures. Potential outcomes are increased knowledge on bed bugs and practice of IPM by health care providers and residents. Use of multimedia materials to educate health care workers will have the following immediate impact: reduced control cost, economic loss, pesticide use, and human health risks associated with improper bed bug control practices.


Knowing is half the battle: Increasing awareness of biocontrol as part of IPM through digital outreach

Project Director: Amara Dunn
Funding Amount: $19,997

The retirement of its creator necessitates the migration of the website “Biological Control: A Guide to Natural Enemies in North America” to a new domain where it can be maintained and continue to serve as an important resource to a range of audiences, including farmers, extension staff, and the general public. This migration also creates the opportunity to re-design and update the website so that it is more useful and usable to target audiences. Updates will include reducing text, adding pictures, adding additional biocontrol agents, creating and linking short videos, and creating a database of biocontrol agents. This database will make it easier to search for information about specific biocontrol agents, or biocontrol options in specific crops or settings. It will also enable the generation of on-demand fact sheets on biocontrol. These fact sheets will be easier to update and easier to distribute to stakeholders, including those who do not have access to the internet. Updates to the website will be planned using input from focus groups representing stakeholders around the Northeast. The updated Biological Control website will be a great resource for extension agents and stakeholders across all agricultural commodities and among the general public. By improving the usefulness and usability of biocontrol information, this website will increase knowledge and awareness of biocontrol as an important IPM strategy. This increase in knowledge and awareness has the potential to increase the successful use of biocontrol for pest management, decrease the use of chemical pesticides, and decrease risks to human health and the environment, while increasing effective and economical pest management in a variety of settings across the Northeast.


[to top]

RFA: IPM Working Group

A Working Group on Tarping and Soil Solarization

Project Director: Sonja Birthisel
Funding Amount: $19,350

Tarping and soil solarization are affordable technologies suitable to vegetable production in the Northeast, with particular applicability to organic systems. These practices have demonstrable utility for weed management, and may have additional IPM applications and benefits to farming systems. However, the mechanisms of action and long-term ramifications of these practices are poorly understood. Researchers at multiple universities in the Northeast are conducting disparate investigations of tarping and solarization, and no platform currently exists to facilitate sharing research results or building larger collaborations on these topics. We propose to form a working group on tarping and solarization that will improve coordination of research and extension efforts in the region.

The working group will include members affiliated with at least six land grant universities. The group will include members with research and extension expertise in weed, insect, and soil microbial ecology, as well as farmers with practical experience in the application of tarping and solarization for IPM. The working group will meet quarterly via Zoom video conference calls, and once in person over the course of one calendar year. We will develop several outreach presentations, and engage in collaborative preliminary data collection over this period.

We expect that the proposed working group will facilitate knowledge-sharing and aid us in prioritizing new outreach efforts and research questions that can be leveraged in developing larger multi-state proposals. Near term outcomes expected from this project include more farmers learning about and utilizing tarping and solarization. Long term outcomes could include: reductions in pesticide use through increased adoption of these effective non-chemical practices; increased yields and profits on organic farms due to improved pest management; and potentially climate resilience benefits through increased use of organic no-till and reduced-tillage systems.



2019 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: 2019 Partnership Communications Grants

A decision-making web application for beekeepers

Project Director: Robyn Underwood
Funding Amount: $20,001

Honey bee (Apis mellifera) colony losses have increased in recent years and the beekeeping industry is challenged with maintaining colony numbers to satisfy the need for commercial pollination and maintain the honey yield. Even with an intensive management regime, beekeepers in the United States are averaging 40% yearly losses. Various practices are used to manage colonies, with choices available from along the IPM pyramid. Deciding which practices to choose is complicated by regional climate differences, the costs of different treatments, and the vast amounts of information available. Therefore, we propose to create a science-based decision-making tool for beekeepers to streamline the process of diagnosing and treating problems as they arise.


School IPM best practices for the northeastern United States website updates and promotion

Project Director: Lynn Braband
Funding Amount: $17,058

Pest management in schools has received increased attention in the Northeast and nationwide. In 2013, the Northeast School IPM Working Group (NESIWG) received a Northeastern IPM Center Partnership Grant to develop a website on comprehensive, yet succinct and accessible, best practices for school IPM. This resource has received significant use and stakeholder feedback, while commending the value and need of the resource, indicated that its value will greatly depend on its being supported and kept up-to-date. NESIWG members have been working with the Northeastern IPM Center to update and improve the organization of the website. However, progress has been slow. In order to maintain the value of the resource, salary support is needed for someone to organize and facilitate the process. The organization and content of the NESIWG’s website also need to be addressed. With this project, we will update both websites utilized systematic feedback from stakeholder focus groups in four states and the NESIWG and promote the improved sites regionwide.


[to top]

RFA: 2019 Partnership Issues Grants

Development and evaluation of microclimate-based decision support tools, for sustainable strawberry production

Project Director: Mengjun Hu
Funding Amount: $49,802

Strawberry Botrytis fruit rot (BFR) and anthracnose fruit rot (AFR) both are devastating diseases that typically drive fungicide applications. Based on critical environmental factors (i.e. temperature and leaf wetness), the Strawberry Advisory System (SAS) was developed to predict real-time BFR and AFR risks to better time fungicide applications, avoiding unnecessary sprays and costs. However, SAS uses on-farm weather stations for data inputs, which are not capable of monitoring environmental conditions in modified environments. In areas outside Florida and California, row covers are critical to strawberry plasticulture production systems, to increase yield potential by accumulating degree days and increasing floral initiation during fall, and to minimize winter and frost damage. In this project, we propose to examine the precision of BFR and AFR predictive models, comparing canopy-based data inputs vs. weather-station data inputs into these models. Trials at three locations including one organic farm in Maryland and Virginia will allow us to assess the efficacy of the canopy-level sensor system in both “covered” and “non-covered” environments, to understand how row covers alter the environmental conditions related to disease infection. We anticipate that our proposed microclimate monitoring systems will improve the efficacy of disease forecasting, leading to higher marketable fruit yield and lower AFR or BFR incidence for both organic and conventional productions, in comparison with the SAS or calendar-based sprays. These sensor systems will also simultaneously provide frost and soil moisture information to growers for additional risk-management decisions. Furthermore, we will facilitate adoption of the microclimate system through a variety of extension activities.


Innovating organic grain growers' IPM toolbox with camera-guided cultivation and selective cutting

Project Director: Ellen Mallory
Funding Amount: $49,980

Spring annual weeds, in particular wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) and wild radish (Raphanaus raphanistrum), remain organic growers’ number one production problem for spring grains, limiting the viability of organic grain systems in the Northeast. When current practices fail to control these weeds, not only is the current crop affected but contributions to the weed seedbank result in increased weed pressure in subsequent crops, creating a vicious cycle. Two new IPM technologies, automated camera-guided cultivation and selective weed cutting, offer organic grain farmers new, scalable tools to reduce in-season weed pressure and weed seed rain. The sensor-based cultivation technology uses a camera and a robotic side-shift unit to guide inter-row sweeps, allowing precision cultivation at high working rates (e.g., 10 km hr-1) in crops seeded on standard 13- to 18-cm row spacing. Seed production by surviving intra-row weeds can then be reduced using the CombCut® (Just Common Sense AB), a novel implement with sets of angled and overlapping narrow knives that allow flexible small grain leaves to pass through but cut off flowers and seed heads of stiff-stemmed plants, like wild mustard and wild radish. When integrated with other weed IPM techniques (e.g., crop rotation, cover cropping, increased seeding rates, and blind cultivation), these new tools have the potential to dramatically improve organic grain farmers’ short- and long-term weed management and thereby reduce their production risks.

We will work with three experienced organic grain farmers to evaluate these new tools alone and in combination with other IPM strategies in on-farm and research station trials. The farmers’ experiences and the research results will be incorporated into a factsheet and two webinars on “Weed IPM for Organic Grains” with the goal of increasing farmers’ knowledge and confidence in using weed IPM.


Re-evaluate the role of water in disease prediction models of fire blight

Project Director: Quan Zeng
Funding Amount: $49,908

Fire blight, caused by a bacterial pathogen Erwinia amylovora, is listed as the #1 disease of apple by the Northeastern Fruit Pest Working Group and apple grower associations. As the pathogens enter trees through open flowers during bloom, antibiotic application to cover those flowers is the most effective and widely used chemical control in fire blight IPM. Because the replication rate of E. amylovora on apple flowers is heavily influenced by environmental factors, weather data can be integrated into disease prediction models to infer risk of disease on a given day / period of bloom. Based on the risk, antibiotics will only be used on days of high risk of infection but not on days with low risk of infection. Although the disease prediction models are of great importance, evidence has shown that their prediction accuracy requires further improvement as false positive predictions were produced in recent years. Based on our field observations, we noticed a strong correlation between water and fire blight incidences, yet none of the current models take water into consideration in determining the pathogen epiphytic growth. In this proposal, we will perform experiment validation, both in the laboratory and in the field, and use these data to improve the accuracy of the RIMpro model. Direct outcome of this grant will be an improved RIMpro model, which will lead to more effective control of fire blight and millions of dollar savings on unnecessary antibiotic sprays. Moreover, it will help to alleviate the impact of the unnecessary antibiotics on human health and the environment.



2018 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants 2018 - COMMUNICATIONS PROJECTS

A Varroa mite IPM program for New England honey beekeepers

Project Director: Kim Skyrm
Funding Amount: $19,997

Honey bees are vital pollinators to agricultural crops and honey producers in New England. However, over the past decade, populations have experienced significant declines attributed to a variety of stressors. Of these, the most common and detrimental is the Varroa mite, Varroa destructor. These parasitic mites feed on bees and transmit viruses reducing the fitness of individuals and success of colonies. While there are a variety of options available for monitoring and controlling Varroa mites, there is a serious deficit in the availability of information, education and training, especially for new beekeepers, on the action steps necessary to successfully implement an IPM program.

The goal of this project is to develop and promote a Varroa IPM program specific for New England beekeepers. This will be accomplished through education and demonstration of techniques for Varroa mite monitoring and management. This program will be specifically designed for New England beekeepers and apiaries, which face different challenges than other regions of the United States. The following objectives are needed to complete this project:

Objective 1. Create a collaborative network of state-level Apiary Inspectors and beekeepers that will address the regional concerns of Varroa mites by making this pest a priority for outreach efforts and hive husbandry of New England beekeepers;

Objective 2. Establish a set of protocols and workshops with demonstrations for Varroa mites that provide the most regionally appropriate IPM focused education utilizing both traditional and newly developed monitoring and treatment methods;

Objective 3. Collaborate with an existing online interactive geographical based Varroa mite monitoring website called MiteCheck (www.mitecheck.com) managed by the Bee Informed Partnership (BIP), to allow sharing of real time data collected by beekeepers implementing the Varroa mite IPM program. To reach additional beekeepers unable to attend workshops and demonstrations, all educational materials created in this project will also be posted on the Massachusetts and Maine state-level websites.

The success of this program will be evaluated by collecting data on attendance to workshops, traffic on the mite monitoring website, adoption of IPM protocols, and impact of IPM protocols after adoption. This project will result in healthier honey bee populations, directly benefiting New England agriculture through increased pollination and honey production.


Invasion Watch: tools for listing and visualizing invasive plant range shifts with climate change

Project Director: Jeff Garnas
Funding Amount: $19,963

Invasive species have negative economic, environmental, and human health impacts. Management, monitoring, and regulation of invasive plants aid in mitigating costs, but land managers and policy makers must prioritize which species to address. As climate continues to change, invasive plants currently in other parts of the United States are expected to shift their geographic distributions to the northeastern U.S., bringing with them their negative consequences to the agricultural, forest, and recreational lands of the region.

Opportunities exist to respond proactively to the invasion risk posed by range-shifting species. Previous research has forecast mid-century (2050) climate-driven range expansions of nearly 900 terrestrial invasive plants in the continental U.S. The resulting maps allow stakeholders to identify new potential invasive plants to the northeastern states before they arrive on the local landscape. The proposed project will translate the forecast maps into interactive online tools to visualize shifting distributions and create watch lists of range expanding species. The watch list tool will generate a list of invasive plants that have climate-driven range expansion potential into a user-defined geographic area based on user-controlled refinement criteria. Watch lists can be incorporated into stakeholder planning and prioritization for early detection and rapid response programs and proactive policy to stem the movement of species into new areas. Prevention is a widely recognized efficient and effective approach to mitigating invasive species impacts and this tool will aid in identifying prevention opportunities in the northeastern states and beyond.


Mobilizing existing infrastructure to obtain baseline tick surveillance data

Project Director: Dina Fonseca
Funding Amount: $20,000

Incidence of tick-borne disease (TBD) in the northeastern states is increasing. New pathogens have been identified and vector distributions appear to be expanding. Unfortunately, the information and expertise needed to assess risk, inform the public and act proactively is dramatically lacking. Surveillance is the basis of good IPM but requires trained personnel to collect data following standard protocols at multiple locations or over time. In areas without established tick surveillance programs, this would involve hiring and training personnel for a few days of work, making it logistically difficult for most agencies.

We propose to develop, optimize and communicate a methodology for obtaining baseline tick surveillance data by training and mobilizing existing personnel within local agencies such as mosquito control and/or health departments. In NJ these agencies exist in all 21 counties and many have been voicing frustration about the lack of data on TBDs. We will (1) organize a training workshop open to representatives from each agency, for training in basic tick biology, standard operating procedures (SOPs) for surveillance and best practices for educating the public about ticks. Following this event we will (2) organize a 1-day “tick blitz” in which representatives from each agency will go out on the same day at the same time with the same SOPs, collecting ticks from their local area. (3) The collected specimens will be expertly identified and tested for pathogens at the Center for Vector Biology. (4) Results will be shared with the partnering agencies and published in scientific journals.

At the conclusion of this project, lessons learned (how to approach agencies, encourage participation, pitfalls, etc.) and materials developed (curricula, SOPs, etc.) will be disseminated widely via a webinar hosted in a public website. Partnering agencies will improve their tick education and outreach efforts to the public and if they so choose, can use the “tick blitz” data to seek funds for additional tick surveillance in their area. A final output from this project will be a map of the American dog tick’s distribution and pathogen prevalence in NJ, addressing existing questions about changing patterns of spotted fever rickettsia transmission in the Northeast.


[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants 2018 - ISSUES PROJECTS

Testing ground barriers for swede midge IPM on at-risk small-scale brassica farms

Project Director: Yolanda Chen
Funding Amount: $50,000

Swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), is an invasive pest that has recently caused up to 100% losses for organic broccoli and brassica crops in New York, Vermont, and Eastern Canada. We have found that a single swede midge larva can cause broccoli and cauliflower heads to be unmarketable, so economic thresholds are extremely low. The lack of effect pest management strategies is undermining the competitiveness of organic brassica production in the Northeastern US. Current recommendations for conventional growers calls for the use of systemic neonicotinoids followed by weekly sprays of foliar neonicotinoids, which effectively reverses previous gains in IPM. Organic growers are currently changed by the lack of effective pest management options. There is especially a need for growers to break the cycle of midge population growth and to prevent the previous year’s infestation from infesting subsequent crops. Currently for organic growers, the only feasible option for crashing the midge population are long (3 years) and widely-spaced (~2 miles) crop rotations. We propose to study if ground covers could be used to effectively on small farms to “clean” the soil and prevent spillover effects from an infested crop to the subsequent the crop. Here, we propose to examine if different ground covers can be effective in: 1) preventing larvae from reaching the soil to pupate, 2) blocking adults from emerging, 3) causing adults to emerge earlier, and 4) reducing adult emergence in the field.


Assessing and controlling house mouse infestations in multi-family dwellings

Project Director: Changlu Wang
Funding Amount: $49,997

Among the common urban pests, the house mouse is arguably the most important public health rodent pest. They produce allergens, carry secondary pests (fleas, mites) and disease pathogens, and cause significant property damage. Surprisingly, there is little scientific research on this common pest in multi-family housing, creating a void in our understanding of house mouse ecology, monitoring, and best management strategies. This lack of knowledge has hampered the adoption of effective IPM programs for prevention, monitoring, and control of house mice. Contemporary control efforts are often via a hit-and-miss approach from building supervisors, the tenants themselves, or a contracted pest professional via an amateurish lay-down of sticky boards, snap traps, or poison baits per an individual monthly complaint basis rather than a necessary holistic building strategy. The result is a perpetual harvesting program that can (and often does) continue for decades with property management and tenant resources being repeatedly wasted. A highly organized plan is required for whole-building elimination of mice and prevention of re-infestation. Our objectives are to: 1) assess the spatial distribution of house mouse infestation in a multi-family dwelling; 2) evaluate factors associated with the presence of house mouse infestations; and 3) implement and evaluate building-wide house mouse preventative and control strategies for multi-unit dwellings. We will recruit a multi-unit dwelling with 221 units and with known house mouse infestations. In each apartment, as well as throughout non-living areas, we will conduct visual inspections, place monitors, and interview residents and staff. Using all the information gained, we will coordinate with the management office and the existing pest control service provider to implement a building-wide house mouse prevention and control program based upon an individualized treatment approach rather than a cookie cutter/recipe style approach. The effectiveness of the program and dynamics of the house mouse spatial distributions will be assessed at 6 and 12 months after the initial inspection. The anticipated outcome of this project is lower infestation rates and less severe house mouse infestations, reduced rodenticide applications, and scientifically-based house mouse management recommendations specific to multi-family dwellings.


Exploring methods to enhance biocontrol of turfgrass diseases in the urban landscape

Project Director: John Inguagiato
Funding Amount: $49,957

Pesticide bans on K-8 school grounds, athletic fields, and day care centers throughout the Northeast have out-paced science-based research to identify best practices to manage turfgrass pests in the absence of synthetic pesticides. Biofungicides for turfgrass disease control are available; however adoption has been limited due to ineffective or unreliable control. One reason for this is that introduced biocontrol antagonists must establish and persist in a niche already occupied by a complex biological community. The goal of this project is to enhance efficacy of biofungicides for pesticide-free and IPM through research to improve the establishment and persistence of introduced biocontrol antagonists applied to lawns and athletic fields. Greenhouse and field studies will be conducted to evaluate how pre-treatment of turfgrass with an OMRI-listed surface disinfestant can reduce competition of resident phyllosphere inhabitants and increase biofungicide efficacy against gray leaf spot (caused by Magnaporthe oryzae) and brown patch (caused by Rhizoctonia solani) in CT and MD, respectively. Greenhouse studies will evaluate population dynamics and disease control of introduced biocontrols with or without pre-treatment of a surface disinfestant. Field studies evaluating similar treatments will be conducted to validate greenhouse results on control of gray leaf spot and brown patch in CT and MD, respectively and demonstrate real-world efficacy. In addition to applied research, our approach involves Extension programming to educate regional athletic field managers on best practices for implementing biofungicides in the Northeast. Surveys of athletic field managers before and after research and Extension efforts will be conducted to assess practitioners' perceptions and use of biological controls in turf. Education of stakeholders to diversify and strengthen current pesticide-free and IPM disease programs will contribute to IPM recommendations for sustainable home and school communities. This project is closely aligned with the NEIPMC's IPM and Organic Systems Signature Program to strengthen knowledge and adoption of IPM practices.


Improving strawberry transplant vigor with bio-rational treatments for managing black root rot complex

Project Director: Mahfuz Rahman
Funding Amount: $59,878

Black root rot complex and crown rot of strawberry caused by soil-borne fungi are limiting factors of sustainable strawberry production in the Northeast. These problems are manifold higher for growers who utilize perennial matted row system with limited crop rotation options. In such cases, fumigation of soil with synthetic chemicals is necessary although organic and small growers who can’t use chemical fumigants due to new regulations and potential health hazards need alternate management options. Strawberry transplant (plug plant) production in probiotic bacteria amended planting mix or dipping plants in suspension of probiotic bacteria or biofumigation of fruiting fields are feasible options for transplant producers and fruit growers. Increased plant vigor due to early colonization of plug root systems by plant growth promoting microbes may exclude colonization of roots/crowns by root rot complex/crown rot causing pathogens and increase yield. From a recently completed SARE project on tomato soilborne disease management, we found that pre-colonization of transplant medium and seeds could significantly improve plant vigor (Appendix1), and those plants stayed infection free when planted in contaminated field soil. In a relevant study conducted abroad through USDA-FAS funding by the PD, we found that plant probiotic bacteria enhanced growth, yield and quality of strawberry (Appendix2). In the proposed work, we will test the hypothesis: ‘early colonization of strawberry plug plants prevents root infection by black root rot complex causing pathogens’ by working with a plug plant producer who has a wide customer base (fruit producers) in the Northeast. Fruit producers will evaluate these plants and non-treated plants on their farms in an experimental setting by planting either in biofumigated or anaerobically disinfested soil or non-treated plots. We anticipate method and result demonstration of advanced strawberry production technique (plasticulture) and IPM based options for management of these diseases will result in quick adoption of these methods by at least 150 growers. Higher yield due to enhanced plant vigor and low soilborne diseases will generate $150,000 additional income.


Prioritizing the impacts of range-shifting invasive plants for prevention, monitoring and management

Project Director: Bethany Bradley
Funding Amount: $40,000

Prevention of new invasions is the first and most effective stage of IPM, but prevention is only effective when novel invaders are identified and prioritized for management before they arrive. Climate change introduces new challenges for invasive plant management because species' ranges are shifting in response to warming temperatures. As a result, a new set of problematic weedy species is likely to expand into the Northeastern U.S., with a variety of potential negative impacts on crop systems, forests, and natural areas. Previous research has identified 75 invasive plant species that are not currently present in New York or New England, but are likely to expand into the region before 2050. This "watch list" affords a unique opportunity to proactively prevent novel invasive plant introductions as well as implement monitoring and early detection programs to target species when they first arrive. However, these species have a range of potential impacts, from minor reductions in the fitness of a single native species to major impacts such as hosting crop pests, altering fire frequency, or increasing allergens. As a result, some range-shifting invasive plants pose a much greater risk to the Northeast than others. This proposal will synthesize impacts studies for 75 watch list species to prioritize the most impactful species for management. We will use an existing international impacts assessment protocol to assess the potential impacts of each species on crop systems, forest ecosystems, and human health and will create a searchable database of known impacts. In collaboration with natural resource managers, we will use the impact assessments to identify the highest priority "watch list" species for management. We will disseminate this watch list through presentations at the Northeast Regional Invasive Species & Climate Change (RISCC) Management annual meeting and listservs of partner organizations. Additionally, we will convene a working group of representatives from state invasive species advisory councils to identify targets for regulatory listing as prohibited plants. This research will support proactive regulation and management of priority invasive plants expanding into Northeast states with climate change.



2017 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants 2017 - COMMUNICATIONS PROJECTS

A New England Tree Fruit Management Guide for the Next Generation

Project Director: Daniel R. Cooley
Funding Amount: $19,991

The New England Tree Fruit Management Guide (NETFMG) is an annual publication produced collaboratively by Extension and University tree fruit specialists in the six New England states. It provides tree fruit growers in the region with current recommendations on tree fruit production with a focus on pest management. Growers value the NETFMG and consider it one of the most important pieces in Extension’s educational programming. However, the Guide, while comprehensive and detailed, has become excessively lengthy (ca. 300 pp.). Quickly finding answers to pressing questions can be difficult. And while growers increasingly look to the web for answers, the PDF version of the NETFMG is similarly opaque, particularly on smartphones. Collaborators find the Guide difficult to edit and keep current. Finally, the present NETFMG emphasizes chemical control, presenting only limited information on new IPM tactics and technology, particularly decision support systems (DSS) for tree fruit production. Over the past 15 years, apple producers in the region have increased pesticide use while implementation of new IPM tactics has stagnated. In part this may be attributed to content, or lack of it, in the NETFMG. We propose to do a thorough revision of the Guide over the next year, moving it to a web-based content management system that addresses these problems. It will facilitate timely collaborator editing and updating; enable us to relatively easily produce clear and concise online and printed versions; and lay a foundation for linking NETFMG recommendations to other web- based tools for tree fruit management in the future. We believe that DSS technology is now sufficiently advanced that growers should and can use it, though most still need to learn how. The process of learning to use a DSS, and the basics of the models that make it up, is an effective way to educate growers in IPM. Therefore, in conjunction with producing a new NETFMG that places renewed emphasis on IPM we will focus on teaching growers what DSSs are and how to use them. Our goal is to renew New England grower interest in IPM and increase their confidence in trying new IPM methods, leading to more extensive use of IPM tactics in their orchards.


Engaging School Nurses as Key Change Agents to Promote IPM Adoption in Northeast Schools

Project Director: Kathy Murray
Funding Amount: $19,985

The incidence of vector-borne disease continues to increase in the northeast. Our region is experiencing an epidemic of Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses are increasingly prevalent. Climate change is expected to further increase the threat of emergent vector-borne pathogens. Allergen-producing rodents are very commonly found in schools, posing a risk of asthma exacerbations. Schools with higher student and staff asthma rates have higher absenteeism which negatively impacts academic success. Bed bugs and lice can also increase absenteeism.

Despite the solid evidence demonstrating the efficacy of integrated pest management (IPM) in reducing asthma allergens and in preventing and mitigating pests, schools are lagging in adoption of IPM practices and policies. IPM is not universally recognized by school administrators as an effective risk reduction strategy. There is a critical need for improvement in pest-prevention and management as an environmental and public health strategy in our region’s schools and communities. Although pest management professionals are often contracted for minimal pest monitoring and management, the responsibility for day-to-day management, monitoring, record-keeping, communication and prevention falls primarily on school staff. Few, if any, public health agencies offer support for tick monitoring and management. Many states do not have organized mosquito surveillance and management programs either. Schools need guidance in the management of public health pests, especially where little support is available from regional or state public health agencies.

The key person who can bring attention to and promote IPM is the school nurse. Nurses are on the frontlines of health-related pest concerns and are well-positioned to promote practices and policies to safeguard health. Although nurses may receive some training in public health, IPM is not part of their formal training. Our project will address this critical gap. We will partner with school nurses and their professional organizations to identify strategic approaches for engaging nurses in learning how IPM can be used to protect health. We will offer webinars to provide training nationwide. We will also offer training and outreach at the national, northeast regional and state school nurse conferences. We will outreach to nurses via their organizations’ newsletters and social media. In this way we will engage, inform and train school nurses to support their role as key change agents to promote IPM in northeast schools, thereby supporting health and academic success for millions of school children. The anticipated outcome is an increase in knowledge among school nurses about IPM as an effective means of reducing risks of health-related pests and pest management practices. We also anticipate an increase in the numbers of school nurses playing an active role in promoting, supporting and implementing IPM in northeast schools. The anticipated impact is improvement in the numbers of schools practicing effective tactics for safeguarding children and teachers from unhealthful exposures to pests and pesticides.


[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants 2017 - ISSUES PROJECTS

Developing Aesthetic Injury Level for German Cockroach IPM

Project Director: Changlu Wang
Funding Amount: $50,000

German cockroaches are the number one indoor pest in low-income housing. Chronic and high prevalence of infestations are common in residential settings. Cockroaches are not only a nuisance, but also produce allergens that are asthma triggers. Applications of insecticide sprays for cockroach control introduce additional health risks to the inhabitants. A recent survey in 258 apartments shows 26% of the apartments in a low-income community were infested with cockroaches and 71% of the surveyed residents applied insecticide sprays for cockroach control. IPM strategies are widely recognized as more effective than traditional insecticide applications for long-term cockroach management. Two critical steps in cockroach IPM are to accurately detect the presence of cockroach infestations and understand when people start to react to cockroach infestations, both are poorly studied. Our objectives are to: 1) determine aesthetic injury level (AIL) for German cockroach management in apartment buildings; 2) determine the association between AIL and the presence of current cockroach infestation, the apartment condition (sanitation and clutter), as well as the demographic background of the residents; and 3) evaluate the effectiveness of chemical and non-chemical treatments for cockroach elimination in apartments with very low cockroach counts. We will recruit at least 300 apartments from low-income communities where cockroach infestations are common. In each apartment, we will conduct resident interviews (cockroach sighting, insecticide use, non-chemical control method, etc.), inspect for cockroaches, and place glue boards for 2 and 14 days to determine which method best estimates cockroach populations. We will then determine the residents’ AIL based on trap counts, the association of AIL and residents’ background and presence of current cockroach infestations, and the association between AIL and residents’ sighting of cockroaches. Forty apartments with less than 10 cockroaches, based on trap counts, will be selected for elimination study. Twenty of them will be provided with sticky traps, the other 20 apartments will receive bait treatment for cockroach elimination. The cockroach population will be monitored monthly for 3 months to examine the effect of non-chemical and chemical methods on cockroach elimination. The anticipated outcome of this project is reduced insecticide applications, reduced cockroach management cost, and increased effectiveness of the cockroach IPM programs.


Developing IPM Tactics for Browntail Moth Outbreak

Project Director: Eleanor Groden
Funding Amount: $25,000

Browntail is an invasive moth introduced into North America in 1897. In addition to defoliating hardwood trees including oak, apple, and cherry, larvae pose serious human health concerns due to toxic urticating hairs that can cause a severe rash and/or respiratory distress. After its initial introduction into Massachusetts, the insect's range rapidly spread to six states and two Canadian provinces. By the 1930's browntails had contracted to relic populations in coastal Maine and Cape Cod, Massachusetts. These populations persisted until late 1980's-2003, when browntails went through localized epidemics. Following a brief subsidence, populations have risen to levels higher than anything seen since the early 1900's. In the spring of 2016 24,975 acres were defoliated by browntail caterpillars. This summer moths were trapped in various locations from close to the Canadian border to Millinocket, Maine (130 miles inland) and about 64,000 acres of defoliation by early instar larvae was mapped.

It is not clear what caused the initial collapse of the browntail's invasive range. As higher overwintering survival has been recorded in its coastal habitats compared to inland habitats, climate limitations via restrictions on natural enemies and/or interactions with host plant quality have been proposed. Hence, climate warming could be triggering a new expansion of this pest, and its initial invasive range suggests that it may have the potential to again spread further throughout the northeast.

Homeowners and town managers have requested assistance from state and university entomologists in developing management strategies. Of particular concern are heavy infestations in high risk areas surrounding schools and outdoor recreational facilities.

We propose evaluating two IPM strategies for management of browntails. We will compare fall and spring treatments using three biorationale products in combination with manual removal of webs. Subsequent reductions in pest populations, defoliation, and parasitism levels will be assessed. Results will be shared with local communities and colleagues via multiple outlets including Maine Forest Service and Cooperative Extension websites, community and professional meetings plus trainings for arborist and applicators. We expect to be able to provide information on how to more effectively manage this pest thereby reducing health consequences.


Exploitation of Ecological Traps for the Control of a Mosquito Disease Vector

Project Director: Allison Gardner
Funding Amount: $48,527

West Nile virus (WNV) is the most prevalent mosquito-borne pathogen of urban environments in the United States. Because there are no human vaccines available for WNV, vector abatement is the only viable option for the prevention and management of this infectious illness. However, the costs associated with mosquito control impose a substantial economic burden upon public health agencies, and further, concerns regarding the environmental safety of insecticides and public opposition to their application may limit their widespread use. Thus, we propose to develop the more sustainable, ecologically-friendly approach of “attract-and-kill” as an alternative to exclusive reliance upon insecticides for the larval-stage control of a mosquito vector for WNV, Culex pipiens. This strategy, which has gained traction in the management of forest and agricultural pests, uses insect attractants to lure target species to ingest toxins, eliminating the need for widespread and often non-specific insecticide application. Our previous research examining the role of leaf detritus from terrestrial plants in determining habitat attractiveness (i.e., oviposition site selection) and habitat quality (i.e., adult emergence rates) in mosquitoes has identified a naturally-occurring “ecological trap” for Cx. pipiens (leaves from a native plant, Rubus allegheniensis, in aquatic habitats), yielding high mosquito selection for a low-quality habitat. A field implementation further has demonstrated the viability of manipulation of leaf detritus inputs in storm water catch basins as a means to alter mosquito production in these important urban aquatic habitats. The proposed collaboration between vector ecologists Gardner and Lubelczyk and chemical ecologist Staples will advance the long-term goal of developing novel attract-and-kill mosquito control technologies. We propose to identify plant species that cover a range in attractiveness, then use a comparative approach to investigate the chemical basis for oviposition site selection and egg-laying in Cx. pipiens. Volatiles from decomposition of foliar materials from individual plant species will be collected at different stages of decomposition, characterized, and compared across plant taxa to identify common oviposition cues. Ultimately, we predict that combining naturally-occurring oviposition attractants with larvicides and/or toxic plant secondary compounds will enhance the effectiveness of existing mosquito control strategies and reduce the need for widespread application of insecticides.


Integrating Cover Crops for Weed Management in Plasticulture Systems

Project Director: Kurt Vollmer
Funding Amount: $49,875

Weeds cause significant yield loss in plasticulture production systems. Commercially acceptable weed control is difficult to achieve even with heavy reliance on herbicides. These herbicides often do not provide season long control of weeds in between rows, and several weed species in this region have become resistance to commonly used herbicides, including common ragweed, Palmer amaranth, and smooth pigweed. In order to control these escapes, many hours of hand labor are required. Cover crops have been adopted in many production systems, often to improve weed control. However, fall planted cover crops are not easily integrated into plasticulture systems for weed control due to the constraints of laying plastic mulch in the spring. This project will evaluate spring-seeded grass cover crops planted between rows immediately after the plastic mulch is laid, and integrated with herbicide treatments for weed management and improving soil health. The objectives of this research are to 1) evaluate the integration of a grass cover crop management with pre- or post-transplant herbicides for weed control in between rows of plastic mulch, 2) evaluate five different cover crop grass species for optimal weed control characteristics such as growth rate and biomass production, and 3) evaluate contributions of cover crop species to soil health. Two experiments will take place in the summer of 2017 and 2018. In the first experiment, cereal rye will be sown immediately after bed formation, two termination timings will be made to assess optimal biomass production in conjunction with herbicide applications made pre- or post-transplant. In the second experiment annual rye, barley, oats, cereal rye, and sorghum-sudangrass will be sown immediately after bed formation, and evaluated after two termination timings for optimal biomass production. The effects of each cover crop and/or herbicide treatment and its effects on weed growth and mortality, growth, and seed production will be assessed. In addition, potential soil health benefits from cover crops will be evaluated. Results from these experiments will help identify the benefits of cover crop for plasticulture production that integrates pest management while improving soil health.


[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants 2017 - WORKING GROUP PROJECTS

Establishing a Northeastern IPM Weeds Working Group

Project Director: Antonio DiTommaso
Funding Amount: $20,000

We propose a weed science IPM working group to survey the current state of knowledge in weed seed germination/seedling emergence ecology in the Northeast, and explore knowledge gaps and opportunities for development of a Northeast-specific weed seedling emergence prediction model. Such tools would increase the potential for IPM based weed management by providing real-time information to inform management selection and timing. This working group of weed science researchers will meet in January 2018 and 2019 at the annual Northeastern Weed Science Society (NEWSS) meeting.


Northeast Invasive Hardy Kiwi (Actinidia arguta) Working Group

Project Director: Jane Winn
Funding Amount: $20,000

Our forests in the Northeast are under pressure from invasive species and climate change. We are finding more and more locations where hardy kiwi (Actinidia arguta) is out of control in forests in the Northeast, but we do not have a handle on how extensive the problem is. We are aware of past and present eradication efforts at locations in NJ, NY, CT, MA, and VT - and yet, until this year, Cornell's website said that the only place where A. arguta is a problem is in Lenox, MA. We are concerned that one of the reasons we are seeing a major surge in the number and severity of infestations of A. arguta is that our changing climate is causing a longer growing season in the Northeast. To protect our forests, we need to get A. arguta under control before it becomes impossible. The fact that stakeholders in the Northeast are not communicating in any meaningful way about this invasive means that we have to quickly mobilize and coordinate our collective efforts before it is too late. Thus, we plan to form a Northeast Invasive Hardy Kiwi (Actinidia arguta) Working Group. This Working Group will be comprised of participants with knowledge of past and current efforts related to the problem. We will share resources and aggregate knowledge in an effort to develop protocols and methods focused on the goal of eradicating A. arguta in the Northeast. We will work closely with NEIPMC to share these methods across platforms to stakeholders in the region. We believe that the eradication is still a realistic goal, but time is of the essence. It is our hope that the Working Group will continue to collaborate on this challenge well beyond the grant period.



2016 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants 2016

Addressing Unique IPM Needs in Northeast Cider Orchards

Project Director: Terence Bradshaw
Funding Amount: $48,559

Growth both regionally and nationally in hard cider production presents new opportunities for fruit growers, as demand for fruit outpaces supplies of culled fruit from orchards managed for fresh market fruit. Cider processors ("cideries") are interested in purchasing both traditional dessert as well as specialty cider cultivars of fruit from orchards intentionally managed for cider apple production. Tolerance for pest damage in cider orchards is greater than for fresh fruit, yet presently promoted IPM programs do not address this reduced-risk approach. In addition, many specialty cider cultivars do not respond to traditional crop thinning materials such as carbaryl, and return bloom-promoting plant growth regulators may be preferable to carbaryl to maintain annual fruit production. This presents new opportunities and challenges for implementing IPM in cider orchards. In this project we will partner with fruit growers to conduct on-farm research to assess reduced-input IPM and alternative thinning programs that may decrease risks and production costs in cider orchards. One experiment will include a landscape-level study of standard IPM program and a reduced-input program tailored for cider apples replicated four times in 5-10 acre blocks across a whole farm planted to traditional dessert apples. A second experiment will include evaluation of standard carbaryl-based thinning programs with and without summer application of plant growth regulators to evaluate potential for improving return bloom on specialty cider apple cultivars with biennial production tendencies. Project results disseminated locally, within regional networks, and in national forums. Work will be coordinated with regional and national researchers similar projects related to cider apple production to increase program impact, address emerging needs, and inform future research based on project results. At project completion, a Cider Apple IPM Guide will be published and distributed to stakeholders. IPM practices will be identified and adopted by growers that reduce management costs while providing high-quality fruit to cideries. The impact of these novel IPM strategies will include increased orchard profitability, reduced pesticide use, and increased entrepreneurial activity through improved fruit supply to regional cideries.


Assessment and Evaluation of IPM for Tick Control on School Grounds

Project Director: Andrew Li
Funding Amount: $49,469

Children are a subpopulation at high risk for tick-borne Lyme disease. Schools with wooded perimeters, bushy vegetation, and wetlands can harbor ticks and their animal hosts. This project is designed to assess the risk of tick exposure at school properties and the effectiveness of integrated tick control measures. A survey will be conducted to determine the perceived risks of tick bites at schools in four Mid-Atlantic states and gain an understanding of rural and urban attitudes toward tick risk in endemic areas. Questions will be asked to elicit views on risk on school properties, knowledge of control methods and integrated strategies for tick control, access to control methods or guidelines, restrictions to tick management, and realized risk (confirmed tick bites or complaints on school property). Field studies will be conducted in Maryland to assess population density and infection status of the blacklegged tick and other species on school grounds. Six comparable schools with wooded perimeter in Prince George's County, Maryland will be selected, and each property will be divided into sampling plots both in the wooded perimeter and the school grounds. Tick sampling will be conducted by the sweeping method. Ticks collected will be sent to a collaborator for pathogen tests. Mice and other small animals will be captured with Sherman traps and examined for tick infestation. The effectiveness of integrated use of two tick control technologies, 4-Poster deer feeders and Select TCSTM bait boxes, that target adult and nymph stages of the blacklegged tick on deer and rodents, respectively. Control measures will be implemented at three of the selected schools, while the other three serve as untreated control. Tick population densities will be determined by bi-weekly tick sampling at schools to allow comparisons between treated and untreated schools, and before and after treatment at schools where the tick IPM measures are implemented. Results of tick risk survey will help public health and pest control agencies to address tick exposure risk at environment around schools. Evaluation of integrated use of two different tick control technologies will provide much needed efficacy data that can help implementation of more effective tick IPM practice in the Northeast.


Evaluate the efficacy of organic materials in controlling fire blight in the Northeastern United States

Project Director: Quan Zeng
Funding Amount: $49,988

Fire blight, caused by a bacterial pathogen Erwinia amylovora, is a devastating disease of apples and pears, in large part due to the lack of effective control methods. Application of the antibiotic streptomycin at bloom is by far the most effective management option for fire blight. However, the intensive, long-term use of streptomycin not only leads to the evolution of streptomycin resistance in the pathogen population, but also raises concerns about its potential impact on the environment and human health. On October 21, 2014, the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) terminated the use of streptomycin in organic fruit production in the U.S., making identification of effective, non-antibiotic control alternatives an urgent need in the pome fruit industry, particularly the organic pome fruit industry. Although the use of bio-control agents and other organic materials in fire blight management has been explored, efficacy is inconsistent and is largely affected by the climate and growing conditions of specific regions. In this proposal, we aim to identify effective organic management options of fire blight that are suitable for the northeastern U.S. We will achieve this goal by conducting a two-year field trial using various organic materials for fire blight control in two northeastern states, followed by continued testing in commercial cooperator's orchards. This study not only addresses the immediate needs of organic tree fruit growers, that is "what materials to use as the replacement of streptomycin for fire blight control in the northeast", but also lines up well with the goal of the NE-IPM Center and the National IPM Road Map to "minimize adverse environmental effects and human health risk from pesticide use" and "implement economical, effective, and environmentally sound pest management options".


Going underground: Conserving insect-pathogenic fungi for biological control

Project Director: Mary Barbercheck
Funding Amount: $50,000

Demand for organic feed grains in the U.S. far outstrips supply, and there is a critical need to facilitate organic grain production while maintaining environmental quality and beneficial processes such as biological control. Approved pest control materials are not economical to use in organic agronomic crops and growers rely on cultural practices and biological control to prevent pest outbreaks. Cover crops can promote insect natural enemies and increase yields, but little is known about their effects on an important but often over-looked group of natural enemy -- insect pathogens. We will investigate the effects of cover crops on Metarhizium, both as an endemic soil-borne insect-parasitic fungus and as a plant-protective endophyte growing inside of crop plants, in replicated organic research-station, on-farm, and greenhouse experiments. We expect that the prevalence, diversity, and efficacy of Metarhizium as an insect pathogen will vary according to cover crop type and mixture, and environmental characteristics; and that its ability to form a beneficial endophytic relationship with plants will vary among plant species and Metarhizium species and isolates. This project will benefit farmers who need or want to reduce insecticide use and improve biological control. Information on the role of insect pathogens as biological control agents will strengthen Extension capacity for serving organic growers. Increasing grower ability to produce high-value organic crops to use or to sell can contribute to farm economic viability. Everyone will benefit from reduced environmental and health risks associated with insecticide manufacture, transport, and application. This project supports the NE-IPM Signature Programs "IPM and Organic Systems" by focusing on the effects of production practices and environment on native natural enemies and conservation biological control, and "Next Generation Education" by providing new information for agricultural professionals about cover crops and the role of insect pathogens in biological control. This project leverages and adds a new dimension to the recently initiated USDA OREI-funded regional, multidisciplinary, integrated research-extension-education project, "Making diversity functional: Farm-tuning cover crop mixtures to meet grower needs." Information from the proposed research will be incorporated into the larger project's extension and educational activities and materials.


Northeast Grape Pest Management Strategic Plan

Project Director: Ann Hazelrigg
Funding Amount: $19,990

In the northeast, grapes are an important established crop in New York, Pennsylvania, and portions of New Jersey. They also are an emerging and expanding crop in southern portions of the NE region such as Maryland and throughout the New England states, where the introduction of new cold-tolerant cultivars now allows production in regions where low winter temperatures previously precluded cultivation of this crop. Grapes have become particularly popular in these new regions because they can provide growers opportunities with value-added wine production and unique agritourism offerings. Grape production is challenged by a wide array of diseases, arthropod pests and weeds, and pest management is a critical component of any sustainable production system. With increased movement of arthropod pests, diseases, plant materials, and invasive weeds, in addition to the pressures of climate change, the scope of pests and diseases causing problems in grapes is continually changing and expanding. The development of new bio-rational and conventional pesticide materials, the loss of key pesticides due to regulatory action and the development of resistant pest populations, plus ever changing market conditions also present ongoing challenges in pest management strategies even for experienced growers. Furthermore, the expansion of grape production into regions where there is little experience with this crop or extension infrastructure dedicated to its support entails an additional set of challenges for new growers of such a pest management-intensive crop. A Grape Pest Management Strategic Plan (PMSP) has never been developed in the northeast and has been a repeated top priority cited by the Small Fruit IPM Working Group, since all members expressed very limited knowledge of the pest management strategies associated with the crop. We propose to gather a diverse stakeholder group of northeast growers, researchers, organic association technical personnel, IR-4 reps, IPM practitioners and extension specialists to develop a Northeast Grape PMSP that accurately reflects the current insect, weed and disease problems in northeast grapes and their IPM management strategies. The PMSP will address all grapes grown in the NE region: interspecific hybrid cultivars, including the new cold-climate varieties used for wine and table grape production; Vitis vinifera cultivars that form the backbone of the premium-wine segment of the industry; and V. labrusca-based "native" cultivars, used for unfermented grape products, traditional sweeter wines, and table use. In addition to providing an in-depth educational opportunity for those participating in the development of the PMSP, the group will also identify critical priorities that can be used to develop a plan for future research, extension and regulatory needs for grapes in the northeast.


Online Course for Affordable Housing Providers on Bed Bug Management and Contracting

Project Director: Susan Aceti
Funding Amount: $19,971

It is well documented that bed bugs are an enduring problem that cause a variety of physical and mental health problems. Public and private affordable housing is as susceptible to this pest as other places where people live, work, or play. Bed bugs may be particularly difficult to eradicate in affordable housing because of a variety of factors, including low-quality pest control operators, ineffective treatment, and a lack of resident cooperation.

This project proposes to create an online course for affordable housing providers on bed bug management and contracting. This course will target the two factors that determine success or failure for providers in eliminating bed bugs: 1. Understanding which treatment methods are actually effective against bed bugs, and 2. Establishing a contract with a pest control company that is proactive, specifies inspection methods, and ensures the use of effective treatment methods.

Healthy Housing Solutions (Solutions) will use a proven instructional systems design method to design and develop the curriculum with input from stakeholders. Solutions will collect backgrounding information to define the learning need, hold a virtual meeting with stakeholders to brainstorm and develop several prototypes of the course, and go through a number of design and development cycles to produce the final course. Solutions will deliver the course four times using trainers and support infrastructure from the National Healthy Homes Training Center. Pre-, post-, and follow-up student assessments will provide the data needed for a comprehensive evaluation of the course impact.

Anticipated outcomes for this project are: 1. Affordable housing providers will increase their knowledge of non-pesticide strategies to kill bed bugs (e.g. vacuum, heat, steam, freeze, and encasements), and 2. Affordable housing providers will increase their knowledge of how to create an effective contract with a pest control service to treat bed bugs. These short-term outcomes should lead to a reduction in the use of higher-risk pesticides to kill bed bugs and an increase in the adoption of non-pesticide strategies to kill bed bugs.


Spotted Wing Drosophila Working Group to Identify and Prioritize Research and Extension Needs

Project Director: Juliet Carroll
Funding Amount: $20,000

The invasive species spotted wing drosophila (SWD) Drosophila suzukii continues to be a serious threat to fruit crops in all states in the Northeast Region, causing significant injury to fruit crops. Three prior SWD IPM Working Group meetings (2012 Geneva NY, 2013 Bridgeton NJ, 2014 Highland NY) successfully brought together stakeholder groups to develop, rank, and set priorities for research, regulatory, extension, and education for the region. It was clear from the presentations made at meetings in 2013 and 2014 that progress has been made on a number of the IPM priorities developed during our first meeting in 2012. Each year at closing of the meeting, the Working Group votes to continue meeting yearly to address the priority needs to manage this serious, invasive pest. Continuing the Working Group ranks as the #1 SWD IPM extension priority, www.northeastipm.org/neipm/assets/File/Priorities/Priorities-SWDIPMWG-2014-v2.pdf. Unlike many other fruit flies, SWD has the capacity to lay eggs into intact and marketable fruit. Berries, particularly fall raspberries and blueberries, are especially vulnerable. In addition to crop loss due to infestations, growers experienced significant increases in costs associated with increased monitoring, sorting of fruit and insecticide sprays. In addition, SWD has been reported from many other crops and wild plants. Reports of overall infestation levels have been lower in the Northeast since 2012, in part due to better research knowledge and extension information sharing achieved during the Working Group meetings. SWD is here to stay, creating significant IPM challenges for fruit growers in the Northeast. IPM programs for affected fruit crops still require restructuring, but we are at a point where specific IPM best management guidelines targeted against SWD are attainable. The principal objectives of the proposed IPM working group, therefore, will be to 1) increase networking among stakeholders on SWD IPM, 2) update, rank and set priorities for SWD IPM in the Northeast for vulnerable crops, 3) develop resources for SWD IPM and 4) share resources on SWD IPM.



2015 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2015

BMSB IPM Working Group: Addressing Consumer/Pest Management Professional Needs and Coordination

Project Director: Tracy C. Leskey
Funding Amount: $20,333

The BMSB IPM Working Group has established itself as the primary platform for facilitating and coordinating research and outreach efforts for brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (BMSB) across the United States. The first formal BMSB Working Group meeting was held at the Appalachian Fruit Research Station in Kearneysville, WV on June 15-16, 2010. Since that time, eight additional meetings have been held. Meeting attendance averages between 75-100 individuals with attendees from >15 states and several countries including Switzerland, Canada and Mexico and additional webinar attendees from numerous states and countries such as South Africa and Italy. Currently, BMSB has been officially detected in 41 states and the District of Columbia. Agricultural problems have been detected in at least 12 states including MD, WV, VA, NJ, PA, DE, NY, NC, OH, OR, TN and WA. Nuisance pest problems continued to be of significant concern to homeowners and businesses in more than 20 states. Despite the level of coordination and vigorous dissemination of research results and outreach efforts from the Working Group and other affiliated groups, there is still a great need for sustained efforts to reduce duplication of effort and leverage resources. In addition, although the BMSB IPM Working Group developed priorities for consumers, i.e. nuisance pest problems, few of these priorities have been addressed. Therefore, we propose to: 1) continue to coordinate other Regional IPM Centers, the NIMSS BMSB Multi-State Project and other affiliated groups to increase networking and reduce duplication of effort.; 2) identify and address needs of consumer and pest management professionals; and 3) update existing priorities based on outputs generated from a number of extramural projects and pest status in newly invaded regions.


BMSB IPM Working Group: Addressing Consumer/Pest Management Professional Needs and Coordination

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $20,333

The BMSB IPM Working Group has established itself as the primary platform for facilitating and coordinating research and outreach efforts for brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (BMSB) across the United States. The first formal BMSB Working Group meeting was held at the Appalachian Fruit Research Station in Kearneysville, WV on June 15-16, 2010. Since that time, eight additional meetings have been held. Meeting attendance averages between 75-100 individuals with attendees from >15 states and several countries including Switzerland, Canada and Mexico and additional webinar attendees from numerous states and countries such as South Africa and Italy. Currently, BMSB has been officially detected in 41 states and the District of Columbia. Agricultural problems have been detected in at least 12 states including MD, WV, VA, NJ, PA, DE, NY, NC, OH, OR, TN and WA. Nuisance pest problems continued to be of significant concern to homeowners and businesses in more than 20 states. Despite the level of coordination and vigorous dissemination of research results and outreach efforts from the Working Group and other affiliated groups, there is still a great need for sustained efforts to reduce duplication of effort and leverage resources. In addition, although the BMSB IPM Working Group developed priorities for consumers, i.e. nuisance pest problems, few of these priorities have been addressed. Therefore, we propose to: 1) continue to coordinate other Regional IPM Centers, the NIMSS BMSB Multi-State Project and other affiliated groups to increase networking and reduce duplication of effort.; 2) identify and address needs of consumer and pest management professionals; and 3) update existing priorities based on outputs generated from a number of extramural projects and pest status in newly invaded regions.


Cranberry Fruit Rot Working Group

Project Director: Erika Saalau Rojas
Funding Amount: $39,915

Cranberry fruit rot (CFR) is a key yield-limiting factor threatening the cranberry industry in North America. Fruit rot is caused by a complex of at least 15 different fungal pathogens, and its management requires multiple fungicide applications per growing season. There are currently 5 effective fungicides labeled for fruit rot control. In August 2014, the European Union, a primary market destination for U.S.-grown cranberries, severely reduced the allowable maximum residue level (MRLs) for chlorothalonil, a broad-spectrum fungicide that has been the foundation for managing CFR and fungicide resistance for over 30 years. With over 30% of US cranberries exported to European markets, severely limited CFR management alternatives, and increasing fungicide restrictions, growers now face an unprecedented crisis. Nevertheless, this emergency presents an opportunity to advance CFR research toward ecologically based disease management. To accomplish this goal, we propose to: i) create a multi-state, multi-disciplinary, industry-wide network to help the cranberry industry navigate changes in the cranberry disease management toolbox; ii) identify research needs and priorities that can reduce fungicide reliance; and iii) promote research collaborations between stakeholder groups. The main outcome of this project will be the development of a coordinated effort to support ecologically based CFR management research and promote development and implementation of IPM practices.


Enhancing Northeastern alfalfa/corn IPM stakeholder skills with On-line Resources and Field Training

Project Director: Ken L Wise
Funding Amount: $17,323

There are more than 4 million acres of field corn and 1.5 million acres of alfalfa in the Northeast. New York alone has about 1.9 million acres of field corn and alfalfa comprising 55% of the state's total tillable acres. Pests can significantly reduce quality and yield of these crops. We propose to develop 5 online integrated pest management training videos on field corn and alfalfa insect pests and diseases for agricultural professionals and producer/growers. We also plan to conduct three hands-on field meetings in alfalfa and field corn IPM. Field meetings will be strategically located in areas of NY that are adjacent to Vermont, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Connecticut and New Jersey to engage additional producers from these states. We will measure impacts of the meetings relative to the adoption of IPM practices at the completion of the program.


Enhancing Soil Resilience Through No-till Production Systems

Project Director: John M. Jemison
Funding Amount: $49,987

Despite slow adoption by producers in northern production areas, no-till agricultural production has the potential to improve soil quality, enhance water availability, reduce soil erosion losses and increase grower's yields. However, without the use of proper IPM and appropriate scouting methods, weed, insect, and disease issues can intensify due to the increased perennial weed pressure, habitat for insects and moisture for disease. Proper use of winter cover crops can alleviate some of the perennial weed problems associated with no-till and can improve nutrient efficiency by capturing left over nitrogen (N) in the soil. We propose to collect qualitative and quantitative data from early adopter farmers in the region to use to educate other farmers about advantages and risks associated with no-till production methods. At grower meetings, we will use the real time Climate Reanalyzer model to document increasingly variable weather patterns, use soil quality data to demonstrate how soil quality changes over time, and farmer interview data to help growers understand how IPM methods can alleviate risks and accentuate the benefits of no-till production. We will train other consultants and agricultural service providers, and provide hands-on assistance to help farmers transition to no-till methods. We will evaluate grower adoption at six months and one year following the educational programs. This project furthers the mission of the Northeast IPM center by decreasing the economic and environmental risk of climate related damage to soils, helping growers prepare for possible pest management issues, and improves long-term sustainability of agricultural production.


Evaluate, Engage, Educate, Empower: TickEncounter Web Portal Combining Tick Testing With Outreach

Project Director: Thomas Mather
Funding Amount: $19,999

"I just found this tick! Will I get Lyme disease?" These days, it's an all too common question in the Northeastern U.S. and across America. The TickEncounter Web Portal for Partners will be a user-friendly platform for combining tick risk assessment and testing with tick protection outreach. This new activity will link risk evaluation with education to empower TickSmart integrated tick management (ITM) actions. This emphasis, as well as access to additional engaging tick bite protection resources, has never been more critical with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) now indicating that more than 300,000 new cases of Lyme disease are diagnosed each year across America. More generally, tickborne disease statistics show that the Northeastern states report about 90% of all human and pet cases.

The TickEncounter Web Portal for Partners is a multi-state outreach activity that will integrate the two most popular tick reporting services in America (URI's TickEncounter and UMass's TickReport) into one powerhouse outreach tool for engagement. Our hypothesis is that tick bite victims who report and evaluate the "riskiness" of their tick will become more engaged and more likely to change practices and adopt best-in-class actions provided to them through customized email notifications hyperlinked to resources on TickEncounter and the TickEncounter web portal. This new communications tool will be available for local branding to external partners, and will enable their stakeholders to benefit from the full integration of TickEncounter and TickReport services, including:

* Reporting of tick bites with submitted digital image (TickSpotters)
* Verifying species and duration of attachment with customized e-mail
* Tools enabling submission of the biting tick for testing (TickReport)
* A detailed TickReport with additional customized health messages
* Simple mapping of verified data with ability to query the database
* Embedding of generated maps onto partner websites to enable a uniform risk assessment and protection message

Users will interact with this platform through 1) embeddable web forms that allow functionality to any existing web portal, and 2) integrated e-mail communications for rapid notifications regarding reports. Data aggregated in the system, including risk maps, will be available for use by stakeholders and researchers interested in assessing local risk or the need for taking specific tick bite preventive measures.


Integrated Weed Management to Tackle Herbicide Resistant Weeds

Project Director: Mark VanGessel
Funding Amount: $9,499

A renewed interested in Integrated Weed Management (IWM) from farmers, consultants, and governmental agencies has been the result of a number of factors. Use of cover crops, soil health interests, intensification of cropping systems, and herbicide resistance have all contributed to this renewed interest. This group of weed scientists from the Mid-Atlantic with research and extension responsibilities have agreed to work collaboratively to develop an on-line IWM publication addressing regional issues. This publication would be a companion to their existing Pest/Weed Management guides that emphasize chemical control. This IWM manual would be updated annually as additional research and information becomes available. The initial emphasis will be on corn and soybeans, but it could be expanded to other crops in the future.

This grant will provide the impetus and funding to bring this group together to discuss what regionally-specific data and experiences to include, agree upon the style and framework, provide funding for an editor to help finalize the IWM publication, and provide better understanding of research needs for future projects. The weed extension group of the Mid-Atlantic region have a long history of collaborating on extension publications. For instance, the current Weed Management Guides have been revised collectively for over 30 years and we foresee that collaboration continuing. Strengthens of this publication will be its regionally-specific recommendations and the ability to update it as additional information and data become available.


Manipulation of Winter Soil Conditions as an IPM Tool for Blacklegged Tick Ixodes scapularis Control

Project Director: Kirby Stafford III
Funding Amount: $45,860

Blacklegged ticks are major pests causing more human disease than any other arthropod in the U.S., but determinants of the annual fluctuations in population sizes of this species, and thus, tick-borne disease risk, are poorly understood. Preliminary analyses by the PD and co-PDs posit winter soil conditions as a major influence on such annual fluctuations. This project will address this hypothesis through a 2-year field experiment of winter soil conditions on blacklegged tick survival. Results will be important for the use of landscape modification as a tick IPM tool, as well as for the development of more accurate estimates of tick population sizes to be integrated into a tick IPM. Anticipated impacts include knowledge and behavior change among scientists, private landowners, public land managers, and vector control specialists. Insights from the project will provide new and much-needed insights into the effects of climate change on arthropod vectors of disease.


Monitor and prevent streptomycin resistance in Erwinia amylovora populations in New England

Project Director: Quan Zeng
Funding Amount: $49,988

Disease monitoring is a key component of the integrated pest management (IPM). One important aspect of disease monitoring is identifying resistance of pathogens to pesticides, which is critical for selection of management options with the best control efficacy and the least environmental impact. Fire blight, caused by a bacterial pathogen Erwinia amylovora, is a devastating disease of apples and pears. Properly-timed application of the antibiotic streptomycin is by far the most effective and widely-used control of fire blight. The intensive use of streptomycin since the 1950s has resulted in the development of streptomycin resistance in E. amylovora populations. Since first reported in 1972, streptomycin resistance of E. amylovora has been commonly detected in almost all apple-producing regions in the United States. In this proposal, a region-wide survey of E. amylovora will be conducted to determine streptomycin resistance status of E. amylovora populations in New England apple and pear orchards. Effective restriction of the spread of streptomycin resistant E. amylovora could be achieved through early detection and eradication of the resistant populations. Appropriate fire blight management options will be chosen based on the susceptibility of E. amylovora to streptomycin in a specific region. In addition, a multi-channel outreach program will be conducted to fruit growers in New England about how to prevent streptomycin resistance in E. amylovora. This outreach program aims to raise awareness of streptomycin resistance and promote practices that reduce the risk of inducing streptomycin resistance.


Multitasking marigold to strengthen organic IPM in lima bean and other bean crops

Project Director: Kelly Hamby
Funding Amount: $25,000

This is a seed research project aimed at creating organic tools to mitigate nematode and insect problems in lima bean and other Phaseolus (bean) crops. Yields and profits of bean crops are impacted by several high-priority insect and nematode pests. Current IPM programs in bean crops have their shortcomings and can be enhanced by the integration of organic tools. Our goal is to examine a new pest management strategy that centers on using marigold in concert with organic pesticides to suppress insect and nematode pests, and enhance the activity and density of beneficial insects. To accomplish this, we will conduct a combination of field and laboratory studies in DE and MD assessing the impacts of growing French marigold with lima bean on 1) pests and beneficial insects, 2) root-knot nematodes; and 3) bean yield; and determine mechanisms responsible for marigold's ability to suppress nematodes. This project will embody several priorities listed by the NE-RIPM center such as addressing stakeholders' priorities, using multi-disciplinary approach, reducing conventional pesticides dependency, and synergizing IPM and organic through the creation of organic IPM tools.


New England Small Ruminant IPM Working Group

Project Director: Jennifer Hashley
Funding Amount: $13,848

In 2013, the New England Small Ruminant IPM Working Group surveyed 165 sheep and goat producers to determine their most important IPM challenges. Respondents overwhelmingly indicated internal parasites as the most costly pests affecting both sheep and goat operations, regardless of farm size, enterprise type (meat, dairy or fiber), or location. Respondents identified Haemonchus contortus, or barberpole worm, as the species of greatest significance. The impact of H. contortus has been exacerbated by the overuse of chemical dewormers, which has helped the parasites develop widespread resistance to standard treatments. As resistance reaches epidemic levels in much of the U.S., non-chemical alternatives are critical for controlling internal parasites and protecting farmers' livelihoods. Proven IPM strategies are available for farmers, but as confirmed by the 2013 farmer survey, on-farm adoption is uneven. This project will fund continuing work of the New England Small Ruminant IPM Working Group, with a focus on increasing stakeholder knowledge and awareness of the IPM practices available and increased networking and collaboration between stakeholders to ultimately increase adoption rates of key under-adopted IPM strategies. These include the use of fecal egg counts as a monitoring and decision-making tool and strategic pasture management and selective breeding as tactics for reducing the impact of H. contortus and other internal parasites. This will be accomplished through a farmer workshop, an in-person meeting of farm service providers, expansion of the existing New England Small Ruminant e-list, and coordination of a system allowing farmers to borrow the equipment to perform fecal egg counts.


Northern New England Pollinator Habitat Working Group

Project Director: Amy Papineau
Funding Amount: $29,564

Pollinators play a key role in the successful production of agronomic crops and are essential to maintenance of biodiversity across the landscape. Decline of pollinators nationwide has been linked in part to habitat loss. As honey bee populations decline, there is an increased reliance on native bees to pollinate crops. The increase highlights a need for understanding of pollinator populations in our region and the habitats that support them.

A multi-state, multi-disciplinary working group (WG) was established in 2014 to share information, assess critical research and outreach needs, and identify emerging issues in conservation, maintenance and enhancement of pollinator habitat across northern New England (MA, ME, NH, and VT). The sixteen members of the group include researchers, educators, and stakeholders from across the region. The WG will continue and expand its current efforts to assess gaps in the regional knowledge base, identify research needs, prioritize research objectives, and develop and extend learning resources to stakeholders through WG meetings, stakeholder workshops, and development of an online resource guide.

The WG project provides members with opportunities to learn from each other, thus enhancing each individual's professional efforts. Collaboration and networking within the group positions members well to seek grants and other funding opportunities in support of related research and resource development. Redundancy in research and education is minimized while resources and information are more effectively shared across the region. Intended long-term impacts include protection of existing habitat on farms, roadsides and natural areas and integration of new pollinator plantings on small and large scales.


The Scientific Coalition of Pest Exclusion (SCOPE 2020) IPM Working Group

Project Director: Jody Gangloff-Kaufmann
Funding Amount: $36,897

Solid structural IPM plans for residential buildings should rely upon pest exclusion as a prerequisite to sustainable pest control and prevention. Unfortunately, this critical tenet of IPM is often ignored or overlooked, especially in aging structures. Teaching pest management personnel, landlords, residents and others how to exclude pests more effectively requires a better understanding of pest behavior. However, there are severe knowledge gaps regarding dispersal behavior of urban pests, and how they establish infestations. There is also a need for better understanding of different building structures and problems related to deterioration that allows pest access and how exclusion relates to programs for building improvements, such as weatherization efforts. We seek funding for a working group to investigate pest exclusion in residential buildings. The SCOPE 2020 (Scientific Coalition of Pest Exclusion) working group will study and promote the use of exclusion methods in existing buildings for improved urban IPM. This group will engage urban IPM stakeholders in a project to develop the foundations of known and needed pest exclusion research and training effort. Working with members from the Northeast, North Central and Southeastern regions, this coalition has already established an initial outline for project development, a list of interested supporters, a website and Facebook page. A robust network of partners from various industries and states will develop a strategic plan for SCOPE, publish a literature review of pest dispersal and exclusion research, develop priorities for research and outreach, build pest exclusion recommendations and manage a website and social media outreach.


Using Organic Methods and Restricting Brood Nest Size to Improve Honey Bee Colony Health and Control Varroa Mites

Project Director: Dennis vanEngelsdorp
Funding Amount: $45,870

Modern agriculture relies on managed pollinators to produce approximately 1/3 of the food we eat. Honey bee colony health is jeopardized by a multitude of stressors, including lack of forage, agricultural and in-hive chemical use, parasites, pests, and viruses. Organic beekeepers believe that one of the challenges facing colonies is the management practices used by conventional beekeepers. Conventional management practices include the use of comb foundation, sugar syrup feed, antibiotics, and in-hive chemicals for varroa mite control. Alternatively, organic beekeeping practices avoid the use of non-organic in-hive chemicals, non-bee collected feed, and artificial comb foundation in an effort to minimize beekeeper-associated stressors. This study will consist of a side-by-side comparison of honey bee health in colonies kept using organic and conventional management practices to quantify whether management philosophy significantly impacts honey bee health.

In addition, a comparison of a restricted brood nest and an unrestricted brood nest will be used to determine whether brood nest restriction is an effective varroa mite population control technique. The parasitic varroa mite, Varroa destructor, is the most destructive pest of honey bees on a global scale. Non-chemical control methods are somewhat effective in reducing mite levels, but pesticide treatments are often still needed. Adding a cultural control method for these mites, such as the restricted brood nest that will be studied here, will strengthen beekeepers' IPM toolbox and facilitate a reduction in the need for in-hive chemicals and preserve the purity of hive products, such as honey and wax.


Using Organic Methods and Restricting Brood Nest Size to Improve Honey Bee Colony Health and Control Varroa Mites

Project Director: Robyn Underwood
Funding Amount: $45,870

Modern agriculture relies on managed pollinators to produce approximately 1/3 of the food we eat. Honey bee colony health is jeopardized by a multitude of stressors, including lack of forage, agricultural and in-hive chemical use, parasites, pests, and viruses. Organic beekeepers believe that one of the challenges facing colonies is the management practices used by conventional beekeepers. Conventional management practices include the use of comb foundation, sugar syrup feed, antibiotics, and in-hive chemicals for varroa mite control. Alternatively, organic beekeeping practices avoid the use of non-organic in-hive chemicals, non-bee collected feed, and artificial comb foundation in an effort to minimize beekeeper-associated stressors. This study will consist of a side-by-side comparison of honey bee health in colonies kept using organic and conventional management practices to quantify whether management philosophy significantly impacts honey bee health.

In addition, a comparison of a restricted brood nest and an unrestricted brood nest will be used to determine whether brood nest restriction is an effective varroa mite population control technique. The parasitic varroa mite, Varroa destructor, is the most destructive pest of honey bees on a global scale. Non-chemical control methods are somewhat effective in reducing mite levels, but pesticide treatments are often still needed. Adding a cultural control method for these mites, such as the restricted brood nest that will be studied here, will strengthen beekeepers' IPM toolbox and facilitate a reduction in the need for in-hive chemicals and preserve the purity of hive products, such as honey and wax.



2014 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2014

Bringing IPM to the Hispanic Workforce in the Mid-Atlantic Mushroom Industry

Project Director: Ed Rajotte
Funding Amount: $40,000

We propose to increase risk management skills of English and especially Spanish speaking members of the mushroom farm community through the enhancement of the IPM implementation by 1) Adapting and developing culturally appropriate outreach and educational materials that are effective at reaching and communicating with Spanish speaking growers, supervisors and farm workers. 2) Developing innovative new IPM outreach, education and training programs in Spanish. 3) Developing programing in Spanish to help Hispanic growers and employees understand the content of the Private Pesticide Applicator Certification exam. This proposal is a resubmission, incorporating suggestions by last years IPM Partnerships grant panel as well as information gained over the last year through surveys funded by a IPM Partnership seed grant (ref. 2013 proposal funded by RIPM Center titled Strengthening and Expanding IPM Practices in the Mushroom Industry).

Traditionally the majority of Extension mushroom programming, trainings and educational materials available on IPM topics have been produced and directed towards an English speaking audience. However a demographic change is rapidly happening where the number of Hispanic managed/owned mushroom companies is increasing. Currently, more than 90% of mushroom industry employees are Hispanic/Spanish speaking. One activity of last years seed grant-funded project was creating a Hispanic Growers Advisory Group for IPM education and training. In addition, we administered a region-wide survey to judge the needs, attitudes and knowledge of a cross section of mushroom employees. The results of the present proposal should not only improve IPM education for a previously underserved audience, but also serve as a model for an agriculture commodity industrys preparing and delivering appropriate educational materials to the next generation of American farmers and farm workers.


Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (BMSB) IPM Working Group: Sustaining Coordinated Efforts and Multiplying Expertise

Project Director: Tracy C. Leskey
Funding Amount: $10,000

The BMSB IPM Working Group has established itself as the primary platform for facilitating and coordinating research and outreach efforts for brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (BMSB) across the United States. The first formal BMSB Working Group meeting was held at the Appalachian Fruit Research Station in Kearneysville, WV on June 15-16, 2010. Since that time, seven additional meetings have been held. Meeting attendance averages between 75-100 individuals with attendees from >15 states and several countries including Switzerland, Canada and Mexico and additional webinar attendees from numerous states and countries such as South Africa. Currently, BMSB has been officially detected in 40 states and the District of Columbia. Agricultural problems have been detected in at least 12 states including MD, WV, VA, NJ, PA, DE, NY, NC, OH, OR, TN and WA. Despite the level of coordination and vigorous dissemination of research results and outreach efforts from the Working Group and other affiliated groups, there is still a great need for expertise and training as BMSB spreads across the country as well as sustained efforts to reduce duplication of effort and leverage resources. Therefore, we propose to: 1) continue to coordinate other Regional IPM Centers and the NIMSS BMSB Multi-State Project to reduce duplication of effort; 2) hold a one-day intensive diagnostic clinic devoted to identification of all BMSB lifestages, crop injury diagnostics and key natural enemies; 3) facilitate discussions with key commercial companies to improve quality and availability of monitoring tools; and 4) update priorities based on outputs generated from a number of extramural projects and pest status in new regions.


New England Fruit and Vegetable Scouting Network

Project Director: Katie Campbell-Nelson
Funding Amount: $49,487

Both established and beginning farmers of diversified vegetable and fruit farms in New England have requested training and tools to help them with whole-farm Integrated Pest Management (IPM). In particular, farmers ask for on-farm training in procedures to scout, trap, and monitor pests as well as pest advisories tailored to reflect their own farms, local, and regional pest pressures. This project will address the need for a scouting and pest advisory network that spans the range of climate zones from north to south in New England and is responsive to seasonal fluctuations in weather and crop conditions. Using field walks and weekly scouting visits at sentinel farms in Vermont, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, we will provide growers with hands-on training in IPM methods for key pests and/or diseases in vegetable and fruit crops. With data gathered using a consistent, multi-state (VT, MA and RI) weekly scouting protocol, we will develop a pest advisory system that is suited to each state's needs and also linked among states. For Vermont and Rhode Island, this will establish a foundation for regular IPM pest advisories in fruit and vegetable crops. The impact of field walk training, scouting and the pest advisory system will be to prepare the next generation of IPM farm scouts to be familiar with pest life cycles and able to use available tools to make educated decisions in IPM with a better regional network of pest information.


Northern New England Pollinator Habitat Working Group

Project Director: Amy Papineau
Funding Amount: $17,100

A multi-state, multi-disciplinary working group (WG) will be established to share information, assess critical research and outreach needs, and identify emerging issues in conservation, maintenance and enhancement of pollinator habitat across northern New England (MA, ME, NH, and VT). Factors that threaten pollinators and their habitat in this highly-forested region may differ from those in other parts of the country.

The WG will assess gaps in the regional knowledge base, identify research needs, prioritize research objectives, and develop and extend learning resources to stakeholders. We will characterize high quality habitat for pollinators, explore methods to assess health and conservation status of some prominent pollinators in our region, and develop recommendations for habitat enhancement. Existing resources will be collected, examined critically for regional applicability, and compiled for easy stakeholder access. We will also identify the need for new resources and make a plan to help fill the gaps. The opportunity to learn from each other will greatly enhance each individual's professional efforts. The group will then be well- positioned to seek grants and other funding opportunities in support of related research and resource development. Redundancy in research and education will be minimized while resources and information will be more effectively shared across the region. Intended long-term impacts include protection of existing habitat on farms, roadsides and natural areas and integration of new pollinator plantings on small and large scales.


Regional Partnerships to Promote IPM in Urban Latino Communities

Project Director: Lyn Garling
Funding Amount: $40,000

Bed bugs, cockroaches, mice, rats and other urban pests negatively affect human health and wellbeing. Repeated indoor pesticide use wastes money, cannot solve chronic pest problems and poses further health risks to inhabitants. An IPM approach ensures improved longterm pest suppression and reduction of human health risks through informed decisions and communication. There is a great need for structural IPM education and training in the urbanizing Northeast, specifically targeting the rapidly growing Latino communities. Latinos are particularly at risk of poor pest management outcomes due to language barriers and lack of access to culturallyeffective IPM education.

This project will increase regional educators ability to understand and promote IPM within Latino communities through innovative partnerships comprised of diverse stakeholders. The Latino School and Community IPM Partnership based in Philadelphia serves as a model to engage partners in neighboring New Jersey and Delaware. Objectives include:
1) Expand PA Latino IPM Partnership to TriState area (PA, NJ, DE)
2) Collaboratively identify, adapt and/or develop bilingual educational materials
3) Deliver multiple levels of IPM programming in diverse venues in PA, NJ and DE
4) Expand networking with regional trainers/extension

Anticipated impacts include new collaborations across three states; new strategic partnerships with, understanding of and access to Latino stakeholders; increased number of and access to quality bilingual IPM resources; new bilingual urban IPM educators available in 3 states and measurable increases in IPM awareness knowledge and intent to adopt specific IPM practices by recipients of IPM education.


Spotted Wing Drosophila Working Group to Identify and Prioritize Research and Extension Needs

Project Director: Greg Loeb
Funding Amount: $10,000

The invasive species spotted wing drosophila (SWD) Drosophila suzukii continues to be a serious threat to fruit crops in all states in the Northeast Region, causing significant injury to fruit crops. The 2013 SWD Working Group meeting held in Bridgeton, NJ in late October successfully brought together stakeholder groups to re-examine and re-prioritize numerous research, regulatory, extension, and education priorities for the region. It was clear from the presentations made at the meeting that progress has been made on a number of the priorities developed during our first meeting in 2012. At closing of the meeting, the Working Group voted to continue meeting yearly to address the priority needs to manage this serious pest. Unlike many other fruit flies, SWD has the capacity to lay eggs into intact and marketable fruit. Berries, particularly fall raspberries and blueberries, are especially vulnerable. In addition to crop loss due to infestations, growers experienced significant increases in costs associated with increased monitoring and sorting of fruit and insecticide sprays. In addition, SWD has been reported from many other crops and wild plants. Overall infestation levels were probably lower in 2013 compared to 2012 partly due to greater use of insecticides. SWD is here to stay creating significant IPM challenges for fruit growers in the Northeast. IPM programs for affected fruit crops clearly require restructuring and specific IPM guidelines must be targeted against SWD. The principal objectives of the proposed IPM working group, therefore, will be to 1) update, refine and prioritize the research, regulatory, education and extension needs for SWD in the Northeast for vulnerable crops, and 2) enhance communication between research, extension, industry and regulatory personnel.


Strawberry Pest Management Strategic Plan

Project Director: Ann Hazelrigg
Funding Amount: $20,000

Strawberries are an important crop throughout the Northeast and represent a high value and critical component of many diversified vegetable farms. Strawberries are attacked by variety of pests, including insects, mites, pathogens (including nematodes) and weeds. With increased movement of insects, diseases, plant materials, and invasive weeds, in addition to the pressures of climate change, the scope of pests and diseases causing problems in strawberries is continually expanding. There have also been recent changes in many of the cultural practices in strawberry that can influence and increase the impacts from pests and diseases, including use of high tunnels and increased adoption of day neutral strawberries. The development of new bio-rational and conventional pesticide materials along with the loss of key pesticides also presents new challenges in pest management strategies. The most recent Northeast Strawberry Pest Management Strategic Plan (PMSP) done in 2007, based on a strawberry survey done in 2004, does not accurately reflect the current pests and pest management strategies critical for strawberries in the Northeast. We propose to develop and gather a diverse stakeholder group of Northeast (NY, ME, NH, MA, RI, NJ, CT, VT) growers, researchers, organic association technical personnel, IPM practitioners and extension specialists to develop a Strawberry PMSP that accurately reflects the current insect, weed and disease problems in Northeast strawberries and the IPM management strategies for those pests including conventional and organic approaches. The proposed PMSP will also provide critical priorities that can be used to develop a plan for future research, extension and regulatory needs for strawberries in the Northeast.


Strawberry Pest Management Strategic Plan

Project Director: Sarah Kingsley-Richards
Funding Amount: $20,000

Strawberries are an important crop throughout the Northeast and represent a high value and critical component of many diversified vegetable farms. Strawberries are attacked by variety of pests, including insects, mites, pathogens (including nematodes) and weeds. With increased movement of insects, diseases, plant materials, and invasive weeds, in addition to the pressures of climate change, the scope of pests and diseases causing problems in strawberries is continually expanding. There have also been recent changes in many of the cultural practices in strawberry that can influence and increase the impacts from pests and diseases, including use of high tunnels and increased adoption of day neutral strawberries. The development of new bio-rational and conventional pesticide materials along with the loss of key pesticides also presents new challenges in pest management strategies. The most recent Northeast Strawberry Pest Management Strategic Plan (PMSP) done in 2007, based on a strawberry survey done in 2004, does not accurately reflect the current pests and pest management strategies critical for strawberries in the Northeast. We propose to develop and gather a diverse stakeholder group of Northeast (NY, ME, NH, MA, RI, NJ, CT, VT) growers, researchers, organic association technical personnel, IPM practitioners and extension specialists to develop a Strawberry PMSP that accurately reflects the current insect, weed and disease problems in Northeast strawberries and the IPM management strategies for those pests including conventional and organic approaches. The proposed PMSP will also provide critical priorities that can be used to develop a plan for future research, extension and regulatory needs for strawberries in the Northeast.


Training Diverse Urban Ag IPM Practitioners and Facilitating Connections to Underserved Markets

Project Director: Jennifer Hashley
Funding Amount: $49,909

The New Entry Sustainable Farming Project (New Entry) is Massachusetts' leading non-academic trainer of small-scale beginning farmers, particularly socially disadvantaged growers of specialty crops. Since 1998, we have provided seed-to-sale training and technical assistance to hundreds of beginning farmers in Massachusetts. An ongoing challenge for new growers is adequately managing pests and diseases of specialty crops, especially given climate change and its associated production challenges. For this project, we will partner with urban agricultural training programs in Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire to improve beginning farmers' understanding and practice of IPM in specialty crops and facilitate access to IPM grown foods in underserved markets. Our core participants will be 120+ new growers, mostly immigrants, refugees, and beginning small-scale urban and peri-urban farmers, who want to expand production, improve crop quality, and grow sales of IPM-produced crops. Through 8 workshops, 300 hours of hands-on technical assistance, and regional site visits, we will address production, pest and disease management and prevention, and harvest, post-harvest, and marketing components of high value crops. Each organization has a commitment to connect growers' produce to low-income urban markets. We will reach hundreds of other beginning farmers via seasonal field-based and winter conferences and with online resources produced for wider audiences. Results will compare total production and sales/revenues changes by participating farmers between the 2014 and 2015 seasons. The project is intended to significantly improve their IPM skills and resulting output of high-value crops that sell well via direct markets in urban centers across the state.


Training Hispanics in Urban Agriculture and IPM to Address Food Deserts in Connecticut

Project Director: German Cutz
Funding Amount: $45,000

UConn Extension in collaboration with Nuestras Raíces, a grassroots organization from Massachusetts, will implement an Urban Agriculture and IPM training project in Fairfield County, Connecticut targeting Hispanic adults. This project includes three components: training on urban agriculture using lower-risk IPM tactics and organic production methods, vegetable and food production, and entrepreneurship. The proposed activities address two 2013 Northeastern IPM Center priorities: Synergizing IPM and organic methods and expanding urban agriculture.

Food deserts, defined as areas where fresh fruit, vegetables, and other healthful whole foods are scarce or very limited, are commonly found in urban and low-income neighborhoods. In Connecticut, food deserts are mostly found in Fairfield County, which has the largest population (925,899). Connecticut's four urban cities Bridgeport, Stamford, Norwalk, and Danbury are in Fairfield. These four cities comprise 46% of Fairfield's population (430,442 out of 925,899).
According to the USDA urban cities with concentrated poverty and minority populations are the critical factors in determining food deserts. Bridgeport and Danbury are two of the poorest cities in Connecticut, which also report the two largest Hispanic populations with 32% and 24% respectively.

The Urban Agriculture and IPM training project will produce fresh food locally to supply food desert areas in Fairfield County. This project will use contents of the Master's Gardeners (MG) curriculum to develop four training modules: Botany, Entomology, Vegetable production, and IPM (focusing on lower-risk tactics and organic production methods). MG materials will be translated into Spanish. Participants will be enrolled in the Farmer's Market program to be able to sell their produce.


Translation and promotion of a cranberry weed identification guide

Project Director: Hilary A. Sandler
Funding Amount: $18,504

This proposal seeks funding for the translation and promotion of a weed identification guide. Guide d'identification des mauvaises herbes de la canneberges, published in Quebec, Canada, is only available in French. No comparable cranberry weed guide is available in English that covers the breadth of information found in this French guide. Regional and international stakeholders have indicated a need to translate the guide into English; we have the expertise to accomplish this task. An English version of this guide will benefit stakeholders throughout the English-speaking production areas in the Northeast as well as other regions of the US and Canada, including cranberry and low-bush blueberry growers, research and extension personnel, IPM practitioners, and graduate students. After consulting with stakeholders, we will supplement the translated version with important weed species currently not in the French guide. We will evaluate the "nuisance potential", a rating scale developed by the Quebec authors, for each weed to confirm its appropriate relevance for a larger audience. We will promote the guide through Extension meetings and newsletters, and industry outlets. We will conduct training sessions in three Northeastern states on the use of the guide and provide hands-on experience in weed identification. We will create a short YouTube video to promote the guide and weed IPM. We will conduct surveys at the workshops and meetings to document increases in knowledge of weed biology and identification. We will survey buyers who do not attend workshops to gain information regarding the usefulness of the guide post-purchase.



2013 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2013

Barberry removal to decrease Lyme disease risk: a demonstration project

Project Director: Peter W. Rand
Funding Amount: $37,991

This proposal addresses two burgeoning, inter-related problems in northern New England, tick-borne diseases and the invasion of northeastern forests by Japanese barberry. Three previous studies report higher abundance of Ixodes scapularis, the deer tick vector of Lyme disease, in barberry habitat, and up to 60% reduction following barberry removal. The plants impenetrable structure and aggressive dominance not only prevent establishment of native growth but also provide sanctuary for tick hosts. The goal of this project is to expand on previous findings to increase the publics awareness of the benefits and importance of removing barberry. We will achieve this by measuring the effect of barberry removal on questing deer tick abundance and infection prevalence using multiple sections of recreational trails in southern Maine. From this we will prepare materials for presentation to stakeholders and the public via the internet, print and electronic media, and presentations to target audiences, with the goal of increasing barberry removal for the benefit of both the environment and public health.


Barberry removal to decrease Lyme disease risk: a demonstration project

Project Director: Robert P. Smith
Funding Amount: $37,991

This proposal addresses two burgeoning, inter-related problems in northern New England, tick-borne diseases and the invasion of northeastern forests by Japanese barberry. Three previous studies report higher abundance of Ixodes scapularis, the deer tick vector of Lyme disease, in barberry habitat, and up to 60% reduction following barberry removal. The plants impenetrable structure and aggressive dominance not only prevent establishment of native growth but also provide sanctuary for tick hosts. The goal of this project is to expand on previous findings to increase the publics awareness of the benefits and importance of removing barberry. We will achieve this by measuring the effect of barberry removal on questing deer tick abundance and infection prevalence using multiple sections of recreational trails in southern Maine. From this we will prepare materials for presentation to stakeholders and the public via the internet, print and electronic media, and presentations to target audiences, with the goal of increasing barberry removal for the benefit of both the environment and public health.


Bed Bug Response Action Teams (BRATs): Helping Communities Deal with Bed Bugs

Project Director: Dion Lerman
Funding Amount: $50,000

Bed bug (BB) infestations are wreaking health, economic and emotional havoc in low-income communities. Lack of accurate information about BB and their control; fear, blame, stigma, administrative barriers and lack of money make control exceedingly difficult. Organizations serving low-income children and families are very concerned and motivated to find solutions for chronic BB issues in their communities. Without any single public or private agency willing or able to take responsibility for BB issues, community members must themselves collaborate on finding community-level solutions. Site-specific BB eradication and containment requires the education and cooperation of decision-makers at those sites, including owners, landlords, facilities managers, administrators, and educators. Sites of infestation are connected by identifiable "transmission trails" allowing flow of BB back and forth to and from homes, childcares, work places and other places humans gather. Breaking the transmission cycle must involve collectively addressing and mitigating BB at each of these links - a sort of HACCP plan for BB prevention.

Our goal is to work with key partners to facilitate this process in 3 ways; convene a network of community partners willing to address BB collectively; pilot site-based "Bed Bug Response Action Teams" (BRATS) in 2 locations and produce a short video in English and Spanish to reduce stigma from BB. Anticipated impacts include more effective mitigation of BB transmission, less use of/risk of pesticide exposure, new educational outreach tools, teams where none existed before, a model of intervention that can be shared and communities empowered to take informed, collaborative action against BB.


Bed Bug Response Action Teams (BRATs): Helping Communities Deal with Bed Bugs

Project Director: Lyn Garling
Funding Amount: $50,000

Bed bug (BB) infestations are wreaking health, economic and emotional havoc in low-income communities. Lack of accurate information about BB and their control; fear, blame, stigma, administrative barriers and lack of money make control exceedingly difficult. Organizations serving low-income children and families are very concerned and motivated to find solutions for chronic BB issues in their communities. Without any single public or private agency willing or able to take responsibility for BB issues, community members must themselves collaborate on finding community-level solutions. Site-specific BB eradication and containment requires the education and cooperation of decision-makers at those sites, including owners, landlords, facilities managers, administrators, and educators. Sites of infestation are connected by identifiable "transmission trails" allowing flow of BB back and forth to and from homes, childcares, work places and other places humans gather. Breaking the transmission cycle must involve collectively addressing and mitigating BB at each of these links - a sort of HACCP plan for BB prevention.

Our goal is to work with key partners to facilitate this process in 3 ways; convene a network of community partners willing to address BB collectively; pilot site-based "Bed Bug Response Action Teams" (BRATS) in 2 locations and produce a short video in English and Spanish to reduce stigma from BB. Anticipated impacts include more effective mitigation of BB transmission, less use of/risk of pesticide exposure, new educational outreach tools, teams where none existed before, a model of intervention that can be shared and communities empowered to take informed, collaborative action against BB.


Best Practices to Manage Pests of Oilseed Sunflowers in the Northeast

Project Director: Heather Darby
Funding Amount: $37,736

Since most information on agronomic production of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) comes from the upper Midwest and Plains, and because sunflower is a relatively new crop to the Northeast, the majority of advice for growers is not specific to our region. In order for sunflower producers in the Northeast to produce a viable crop local research and outreach need to be expanded. Local oilseed growers express a need for more comprehensive tools to manage pest pressures, including birds, weeds, disease, and insects. To create a viable sunflower industry in the Northeast, pest management concerns must be addressed. Surveys of the sunflower crop in the Northeast have shown that though plant populations are similar to the national averages, estimated yield is lower, primarily due to pest issues. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies developed for sunflowers will help growers improve yields. Our field production research will build on previous projects that have examined best agricultural practices for oilseed production in the region. Through this project 4 research trials will be implemented to determine the impact of variety selection, planting dates, cover crop interseeding, and reduced tillage on disease, insect, bird, and weed pressure in sunflower crops. Two Vermont farmers with oilseed production experience will establish the on-farm demonstration/research trials. The on-farm projects are based on critical needs determined by area oilseed growers, and focus on IPM issues. Delivery of research based information, technical assistance, and farmer to farmer networking will compliment field research to deliver regionally-appropriate IPM strategies to sunflower growers.


Brown Marmorated Stink Bug IPM Working Group: Extending Knowledge and Reducing Duplication of Effort

Project Director: Tracy C. Leskey
Funding Amount: $10,000

The BMSB IPM Working Group has established itself as the primary platform for facilitating and coordinating research and outreach efforts for brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (BMSB) across the United States. The first formal BMSB Working Group meeting was held at the Appalachian Fruit Research Station in Kearneysville, WV on June 15-16, 2010. Since that time, five additional meetings have been held. Membership remains over 100 individuals with attendees from >15 states, Canada and Mexico participating. At the June 2012 meeting, the group updated Research, Extension and Regulatory priorities first established in 2010. Additionally, a set of consumer priorities were generated to establish the key issues posed by nuisance aspects of the BMSB problem for homeowoners and businesses. A national map that depicts recognized detections and pest status of BMSB across the United States and Canada also was updated. Currently, BMSB has been officially detected in 39 states and the District of Columbia. Agricultural problems have been detected in 10 states including MD, WV, VA, NJ, PA, DE, NY, NC, OH and TN. Despite the level of coordination and vigorous dissemination of research results and outreach efforts from the Working Group and other affiliated groups, the potential for duplication of effort still exists across the country as this invasive species becomes better established in new regions. Therefore, we propose to: 1) develop a National BMSB IPM Working group by coordinating with other Regional IPM Centers and the NIMSS BMSB Multi-State Project to reduce duplication of effort; 2) hold a biological control agent identification workshop to disseminate critical knowledge for identification of natural enemies to research and outreach specialists; and 3) update priorities based on outputs generated from a number of extramural projects and pest status in new regions.


Continued Support of Northeast Tree Fruit IPM Working Group

Project Director: Arthur Agnello
Funding Amount: $9,714

The New England and Mid-Atlantic states in the northeastern US have long been one of the country's most significant tree fruit production areas, particularly in apples, since the 1700s. In 2010, a NE IPM Partnership Grant facilitated the establishment of a formal Northeast Tree Fruit IPM Working Group. This group of fruit production professionals, representing multiple states and organizations (research and extension scientists: entomologists, pathologists, horticulturists, plus extension educators, industry advisors and IPM pest managers) from NY and the New England states, have met annually as the New England, New York and Canadian Fruit Pest Management Workshop for many years. The objectives of this proposal include a continuation of the joint meetings of the TF-IPM WG at this annual meeting (including representatives from some mid-Atlantic states and Canadian provinces) to further enhance regional collaborations, updating of IPM practices lists, and coordination of research and extension priority setting.
The previously identified outcomes envisioned from the continued functions of this WG include: 1) identification of priority tree fruit IPM needs and issues in the northeast region; 2) fostering of greater regional collaborations in IPM programs and expertise; 3) development and adoption of new IPM guidelines, management guides and pest alert systems; and 4) sharing of current and new IPM technologies, research results, and extension efforts during the annual meeting organized by the member institutions, as well as through electronic (online) proceedings of these meetings. Such outcomes, along with documentation of the impacts of successful fruit IPM strategies on human (including economic) and environmental health, are increasingly relevant to sustainable fruit production and quality of life in the northeast region, and will help to link northeast regional fruit IPM objectives to the goals of the National IPM Roadmap.


Expanding School IPM Implementation within the Northeastern United States: a Best Management Practices Approach

Project Director: Lynn Braband
Funding Amount: $42,650

Schools need help in adopting IPM practices. While numerous school IPM resources exist, the need exists for succinct, yet comprehensive, guidance documents and training for practitioners. This project will evaluate, incorporate, and augment existing resources in the development of a school IPM best management practices (BMP) document. We will pilot the document in train-the-trainer events in 3 states and systematically evaluate the document and training events. The project will strengthen and expand the multiplication of verifiable IPM to all schools throughout the 3 states and the Northeast by 2015.


Increasing Use and Reporting of IPM Practices with Mobile Technology and BOGS Tools

Project Director: Brian Wick
Funding Amount: $18,325

The Cape Cod Cranberry Growers Association seeks $18,325 to continue work on BOGS(Online Grower System) an Internet-based application we developed based upon the UMass IPM Chart Book, the gold standard for IPM in cranberries since 1983. BOGS enables growers to make better pesticide decisions and to track and report applications and results. BOGS helps them determine when to apply pesticides to minimize use, maximize effectiveness and produce best yields thus making IPM the most economical approach to managing pests on the bogs.

This grant project seeks funds to create a BOGS version for smartphones. While growers love using tablet computers, they are not practical in the field. Growers want pocket-size to free-up their hands. We will also add IPM tools, e.g., Out of Bloom calculations, pheromone trap counts, and revise the IPM Sweep Report. These tools will be designed to tie-back to work orders and/or pesticide application(s), for a full pest management view. Long term our goal is consistent with the NEIPM mission - to have 85-90% of growers utilize BOGS to make best IPM decisions and limit negative environmental impacts.


Northeast School IPM Working Group: Collaborative Support for Verifiable School IPM Adoption

Project Director: Carol Westinghouse
Funding Amount: $10,000

Project Summary. Schools need support and assistance to adopt IPM practices. The Northeast School IPM Working Group (NESIWG), established in 2008, includes broad representation of organizations and agencies serving schools throughout the northeastern states. We propose to collaborate regionally to 1) establish school IPM demonstrations and coalitions to support and promote adoption of IPM practices and policies, 2) identify and capitalize upon opportunities for collaboration with other organizations to support and promote implementation of healthy, effective and sustainable pest management practices for schools, 3) improve access to IPM resources for school and childcare stakeholders, and 4) strengthen the capacity of the NESIWG to accomplish its mission and goals.

We have leveraged additional funds to support establishment of school IPM coalitions in four states. With this proposal we are seeking funding to cover costs of communication and travel to support regional collaboration and resource sharing, complete projects underway, collaborate on national level to tackle new initiatives, and capitalize on our accomplishments to date.

We anticipate this project will minimize pesticide exposure risk in schools, increase compliance with state regulations, and safeguard the health of students and teachers in and around schools throughout the northeast.


Northeast Small Fruit IPM Working Group and Pest Issues Tour

Project Director: Ann Hazelrigg
Funding Amount: $10,000

Small fruits are an economically important crop for the northeast and are often an essential component of diversified vegetable farms. Pest identification and knowledge of successful integrated pest management strategies are crucial for the successful small fruit farm. A Northeast Small Fruit IPM Working Group that develops and directs IPM priorities for small fruit stakeholders in New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island and New England is an important resource for the small fruit industry.
We propose a three day meeting with approximately 15 small fruit and/or pest management specialists from NY, NJ, and New England. The group will focus on small fruit pest and disease issues on small fruit farms in southern Vermont and New Hampshire this year, looking at both conventional and organic pest management systems. Our first half day will be spent sharing new pest problems, new tools, websites and information among the group. The second day will be spent in the field looking at small fruit problems and the equipment and tools needed by the small fruit farmers to manage those pests and diseases. The management tools will include row cover systems (for Spotted Wing Drosophila and other pest management), cultivation equipment for weed management and innovative spray equipment for pesticide applications. The third half day will be spent discussing pest management strategies with an emphasis towards choosing reduced risk pesticides and non-pesticide strategies that lead to sustainable solutions. The group will also identify and prioritize specific research, extension and education needs for small fruit stakeholders in NE and the region.


Spotted Wing Drosophila as an Emerging Critical Issue for Berry and Stone Fruit Crops in the Northeast

Project Director: Arthur Agnello
Funding Amount: $49,953

The invasive species spotted wing drosophila (SWD) Drosophila suzukii has exploded onto the scene in all states in the Northeast Region, causing significant injury to fruit crops. The 2012 growing season proved to be worse than 2011, resulting in multimillion dollars of losses. Unlike many other fruit flies, SWD has the capacity to lay eggs into intact and marketable fruit. Berries, particularly fall raspberries and blueberries, are especially vulnerable. In addition, SWD has been reported from many other crops and wild plants. The short-term response to this new threat has been to dramatically increase the number of insecticide applications leading to increased production, environmental and human health costs. This is not sustainable and there is an urgent need for new, research-based IPM tools and increased education. The 2012 SWD Working Group meeting held in Geneva, NY in November successfully brought together stakeholder groups to develop over 70 research, regulatory, extension, and education priorities for the region. This IPM Issues proposal is in direct response to the working group findings. The principal objectives of the proposed IPM Issues grant, therefore, are to 1) Hold a regional conference to address critical issues for SWD in conjunction with the IPM SWD Working Group Meeting, 2) Investigate alternative lures and trap locations to achieve early detection of SWD in berry crops, and 3) Evaluate SWD risk for stone fruit crops.


Spotted Wing Drosophila as an Emerging Critical Issue for Berry and Stone Fruit Crops in the Northeast

Project Director: Greg Loeb
Funding Amount: $49,953

The invasive species spotted wing drosophila (SWD) Drosophila suzukii has exploded onto the scene in all states in the Northeast Region, causing significant injury to fruit crops. The 2012 growing season proved to be worse than 2011, resulting in multimillion dollars of losses. Unlike many other fruit flies, SWD has the capacity to lay eggs into intact and marketable fruit. Berries, particularly fall raspberries and blueberries, are especially vulnerable. In addition, SWD has been reported from many other crops and wild plants. The short-term response to this new threat has been to dramatically increase the number of insecticide applications leading to increased production, environmental and human health costs. This is not sustainable and there is an urgent need for new, research-based IPM tools and increased education. The 2012 SWD Working Group meeting held in Geneva, NY in November successfully brought together stakeholder groups to develop over 70 research, regulatory, extension, and education priorities for the region. This IPM Issues proposal is in direct response to the working group findings. The principal objectives of the proposed IPM Issues grant, therefore, are to 1) Hold a regional conference to address critical issues for SWD in conjunction with the IPM SWD Working Group Meeting, 2) Investigate alternative lures and trap locations to achieve early detection of SWD in berry crops, and 3) Evaluate SWD risk for stone fruit crops.


Spotted Wing Drosophila as an Emerging Critical Issue for Berry and Stone Fruit Crops in the Northeast

Project Director: Juliet Carroll
Funding Amount: $49,953

The invasive species spotted wing drosophila (SWD) Drosophila suzukii has exploded onto the scene in all states in the Northeast Region, causing significant injury to fruit crops. The 2012 growing season proved to be worse than 2011, resulting in multimillion dollars of losses. Unlike many other fruit flies, SWD has the capacity to lay eggs into intact and marketable fruit. Berries, particularly fall raspberries and blueberries, are especially vulnerable. In addition, SWD has been reported from many other crops and wild plants. The short-term response to this new threat has been to dramatically increase the number of insecticide applications leading to increased production, environmental and human health costs. This is not sustainable and there is an urgent need for new, research-based IPM tools and increased education. The 2012 SWD Working Group meeting held in Geneva, NY in November successfully brought together stakeholder groups to develop over 70 research, regulatory, extension, and education priorities for the region. This IPM Issues proposal is in direct response to the working group findings. The principal objectives of the proposed IPM Issues grant, therefore, are to 1) Hold a regional conference to address critical issues for SWD in conjunction with the IPM SWD Working Group Meeting, 2) Investigate alternative lures and trap locations to achieve early detection of SWD in berry crops, and 3) Evaluate SWD risk for stone fruit crops.


Spotted Wing Drosophila Working Group to Identify and Prioritize Research and Extension Needs

Project Director: Juliet Carroll
Funding Amount: $9,982

The invasive species spotted wing drosophila (SWD) Drosophila suzukii has exploded onto the scene in all states in the Northeast Region, causing significant injury to fruit crops. The 2012 growing season proved to be worse than 2011. The 2012 SWD Working Group meeting held in Geneva, NY in November successfully brought together stakeholder groups to develop over 70 research, regulatory, extension, and education priorities for the region. At closing of the meeting, the Working Group voted to continue meeting yearly, preferably twice per year to address the priority needs to manage this serious pest. Unlike many other fruit flies, SWD has the capacity to lay eggs into intact and marketable fruit. Berries, particularly fall raspberries and blueberries, are especially vulnerable and suffered severe losses in 2012, not to mention the increased costs associated with increased monitoring and sorting of fruit and insecticide sprays. In addition, SWD has been reported from many other crops and wild plants. In response to this new threat, some growers have resorted to twice-weekly insecticide applications. SWD is here to stay and could increase in its prevalence as has happened in other regions such as Michigan and Oregon in 2012, creating significant IPM challenges for fruit growers in the Northeast. Overall IPM programs for affected fruit crops clearly require restructuring and specific IPM guidelines must be targeted against SWD. The principal objectives of the proposed IPM working group, therefore, will be to 1) update, refine and prioritize the research, regulatory, education and extension needs for SWD in the Northeast for vulnerable crops, and 2) enhance communication between research, extension, industry and regulatory personnel.


Spotted Wing Drosophila Working Group to Identify and Prioritize Research and Extension Needs

Project Director: Greg Loeb
Funding Amount: $9,982

The invasive species spotted wing drosophila (SWD) Drosophila suzukii has exploded onto the scene in all states in the Northeast Region, causing significant injury to fruit crops. The 2012 growing season proved to be worse than 2011. The 2012 SWD Working Group meeting held in Geneva, NY in November successfully brought together stakeholder groups to develop over 70 research, regulatory, extension, and education priorities for the region. At closing of the meeting, the Working Group voted to continue meeting yearly, preferably twice per year to address the priority needs to manage this serious pest. Unlike many other fruit flies, SWD has the capacity to lay eggs into intact and marketable fruit. Berries, particularly fall raspberries and blueberries, are especially vulnerable and suffered severe losses in 2012, not to mention the increased costs associated with increased monitoring and sorting of fruit and insecticide sprays. In addition, SWD has been reported from many other crops and wild plants. In response to this new threat, some growers have resorted to twice-weekly insecticide applications. SWD is here to stay and could increase in its prevalence as has happened in other regions such as Michigan and Oregon in 2012, creating significant IPM challenges for fruit growers in the Northeast. Overall IPM programs for affected fruit crops clearly require restructuring and specific IPM guidelines must be targeted against SWD. The principal objectives of the proposed IPM working group, therefore, will be to 1) update, refine and prioritize the research, regulatory, education and extension needs for SWD in the Northeast for vulnerable crops, and 2) enhance communication between research, extension, industry and regulatory personnel.


Spotted Wing Drosophila Working Group to Identify and Prioritize Research and Extension Needs

Project Director: Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Funding Amount: $9,982

The invasive species spotted wing drosophila (SWD) Drosophila suzukii has exploded onto the scene in all states in the Northeast Region, causing significant injury to fruit crops. The 2012 growing season proved to be worse than 2011. The 2012 SWD Working Group meeting held in Geneva, NY in November successfully brought together stakeholder groups to develop over 70 research, regulatory, extension, and education priorities for the region. At closing of the meeting, the Working Group voted to continue meeting yearly, preferably twice per year to address the priority needs to manage this serious pest. Unlike many other fruit flies, SWD has the capacity to lay eggs into intact and marketable fruit. Berries, particularly fall raspberries and blueberries, are especially vulnerable and suffered severe losses in 2012, not to mention the increased costs associated with increased monitoring and sorting of fruit and insecticide sprays. In addition, SWD has been reported from many other crops and wild plants. In response to this new threat, some growers have resorted to twice-weekly insecticide applications. SWD is here to stay and could increase in its prevalence as has happened in other regions such as Michigan and Oregon in 2012, creating significant IPM challenges for fruit growers in the Northeast. Overall IPM programs for affected fruit crops clearly require restructuring and specific IPM guidelines must be targeted against SWD. The principal objectives of the proposed IPM working group, therefore, will be to 1) update, refine and prioritize the research, regulatory, education and extension needs for SWD in the Northeast for vulnerable crops, and 2) enhance communication between research, extension, industry and regulatory personnel.


Spotted Wing Drosophila Working Group to Identify and Prioritize Research and Extension Needs

Project Director: Dean Polk
Funding Amount: $9,982

The invasive species spotted wing drosophila (SWD) Drosophila suzukii has exploded onto the scene in all states in the Northeast Region, causing significant injury to fruit crops. The 2012 growing season proved to be worse than 2011. The 2012 SWD Working Group meeting held in Geneva, NY in November successfully brought together stakeholder groups to develop over 70 research, regulatory, extension, and education priorities for the region. At closing of the meeting, the Working Group voted to continue meeting yearly, preferably twice per year to address the priority needs to manage this serious pest. Unlike many other fruit flies, SWD has the capacity to lay eggs into intact and marketable fruit. Berries, particularly fall raspberries and blueberries, are especially vulnerable and suffered severe losses in 2012, not to mention the increased costs associated with increased monitoring and sorting of fruit and insecticide sprays. In addition, SWD has been reported from many other crops and wild plants. In response to this new threat, some growers have resorted to twice-weekly insecticide applications. SWD is here to stay and could increase in its prevalence as has happened in other regions such as Michigan and Oregon in 2012, creating significant IPM challenges for fruit growers in the Northeast. Overall IPM programs for affected fruit crops clearly require restructuring and specific IPM guidelines must be targeted against SWD. The principal objectives of the proposed IPM working group, therefore, will be to 1) update, refine and prioritize the research, regulatory, education and extension needs for SWD in the Northeast for vulnerable crops, and 2) enhance communication between research, extension, industry and regulatory personnel.


Strengthening and Expanding IPM Practices in the Mushroom Industry

Project Director: Ed Rajotte
Funding Amount: $13,649

Hispanics in the mushroom production industry have a great, unmet need for accessible IPM information, education and resources at the individual, organizational and community level. The social, linguistic and economic disadvantages faced by many Hispanics leave them less able than other groups to understand and manage environmental hazards. Low levels of education and English-language proficiency, especially among recent immigrants, limit their ability to access information.The objectives are: 1) Create a Hispanic Growers Advisory Group for IPM education and training 2) Collaboratively adapt and develop innovative culturally appropriate outreach and educational materials that are effective at reaching and communicating with Spanish speaking growers, supervisors and farm workers. 3) Collaboratively develop innovative new IPM outreach, education and training programs in Spanish. The plan to accomplish these goals begins with identifying and establishing cooperative relationships with mushroom growers across state boundaries (PA, DE, MD)and establishing a partnership between the American Mushroom Institute, mushroom growers, the Hispanic community and the PA Integrated Pest Management Program within Penn State Extension. During this phase, we will identify partner/stakeholder needs and priorities for bilingual IPM materials and programming, best methods by which these should be extended and archived. We will collect existing material, identify gaps and then develop new materials and programming to deliver locally, regionally and nationally as appropriate. Finally, we will evaluate the benefits achieved by conducting a survey among supervisors and farm owners


[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants Program - Northeastern 2013

A Novel Attract-and-Kill Approach for Managing the Invasive Pest Spotted Wing Drosophila in Multiple Small Fruit Crops

Project Director: Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Funding Amount: $175,000

This is a Joint Research-Extension project that will develop novel behaviorally-based approaches for monitoring and managing the invasive pest spotted wing drosophila (SWD) (Drosophila suzukii) in small fruit crops.

Small fruit crops are a multi-million dollar industry in the northeast US, where SWD has become a key pest since it was first detected in 2011. Current management practices rely on conventional applications of insecticides. These pesticides are subject to rigorous restrictions due to environmental and health concerns. Development of new alternatives is desperately needed to maintain sustainable farms. Existing management strategies will benefit from cost-effective, easy-to-use, and sensitive monitoring and management tools for SWD.


Developing a Sustainable Pest Management Program for the Invasive Swede Midge in Brassica Crops

Project Director: Yolanda Chen
Funding Amount: $83,175

This is a Research project. Swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii, is an invasive insect pest in the Northeastern US that can cause devastating losses to Brassica crops (up to 100%). Given the staggering losses caused by the midge and its recent rise in damage in the Northeastern US, there is serious need to develop sustainable pest management strategies prior to the onset of widespread economic losses.

Brassicas are a vital crop for Northeastern vegetable growers; New York is the top producer for fresh cabbage nationwide, and 2nd in processing cabbage (total value of $62 million per year). The current major pest management recommendation, aside from long and widely-spaced rotations, is to use systemic neonicotinoids at planting, followed by weekly applications of neonicotinoids. Alternatives to chemicals pesticides have not been developed.


Developing Economic and Ecological Sustainable Pest Management Practices

Project Director: Cerruti R.R. Hooks
Funding Amount: $83,058

This is a research project aimed at developing economic and ecological sustainable pest management plans to alleviate weed and insect problems in solanaceous and leguminous vegetable crops. Yields and profits of these crops are impacted by several high-priority pests including herbicide resistant weeds, Colorado potato beetle, flea beetles, spider mites, lepidopteran and stink bug pests. Growers mostly rely on high-risk pesticides to address these and other crop pests.

This project proposes to establish ecologically based tactics such as the use of reduced-risk insecticides, winter cover crops, stale seedbed practices, and conservation biological control to help mitigate these problems while at the same time, reducing production costs. Two economical important Northeast crops, eggplant and snap beans will be used as model systems.


Development and Optimization of Solid-Set Canopy Delivery Systems for Resource Efficient, Ecologically Sustainable Apple Production

Project Director: Arthur Agnello
Funding Amount: $60,000

This is a joint Research-Extension Project. A multi-disciplinary research and extension team in New York will work to develop, evaluate, and optimize a resource-efficient solid-set canopy delivery (SSCD) system for a diversity of critical uses by tree fruit producers, including application of pesticides, pheromones, thinners, and foliar nutrients.


Overcoming Slugs in No-Till Crop Fields with Cover Crops and Arthropod Predators

Project Director: John F. Tooker
Funding Amount: $60,000

This is a Research project. Slug populations in northeastern no-till field and forage crop fields are causing increasing damage and yield loss. Unfortunately, aside from tillage, growers have limited control options available for these slimy mollusks. Our preliminary research has identified factors that may be exacerbating slug problems, as well as support for two farmer- inspired, cover crop-based, cultural-control options, one involving crimson clover and the other using cereal rye. We propose a two-year project to explore the influence of these two cover crop species and the timing of cover-crop termination on slug and natural enemy populations. We also propose to share our results with growers, but are not requesting funds for these extension efforts, which will be incorporated into our regular and active extension programming.


Reducing Insecticide Use and Labor through Precision Bed Bug IPM

Project Director: Changlu Wang
Funding Amount: $60,000

This is a research project. Bed bugs continue to be an important public health pest in the U.S. and are very difficult to control. Low-income communities suffer disproportionally higher bed bug infestation rates. A survey of 16 New Jersey housing authorities in November 2012 revealed up to 40% of the units were infested. Once infestations are reported, pesticide sprays are typically used extensively to control bed bugs, regardless of bed bug distribution and population levels. After treatment, the results are not monitored and retreatment is dependent on resident complaints, which are highly unreliable.

Professional pest control companies usually require residents to prepare their residence following an extensive preparation list. The preparations are time-consuming, labor intensive and often over burdensome, especially for individuals that are elderly or handicapped. Furthermore, the exhaustive nature of the preparations facilitates bed bug dispersal and complicates treatment due to relocation of the infested personal items. These practices cause chronic infestations, large amount of insecticide usage, and high risk of pesticide exposure to humans and exacerbate the development of insecticide resistance in field populations of bed bugs. This in turn, results in more pesticide applications and even higher risks of pesticide exposure. There is a critical need to design and implement cost-effective and safer bed bug management programs.


Reducing Insecticide Use and Labor through Precision Bed Bug IPM

Project Director: Narinderpal Singh
Funding Amount: $60,000

This is a research project. Bed bugs continue to be an important public health pest in the U.S. and are very difficult to control. Low-income communities suffer disproportionally higher bed bug infestation rates. A survey of 16 New Jersey housing authorities in November 2012 revealed up to 40% of the units were infested. Once infestations are reported, pesticide sprays are typically used extensively to control bed bugs, regardless of bed bug distribution and population levels. After treatment, the results are not monitored and retreatment is dependent on resident complaints, which are highly unreliable.

Professional pest control companies usually require residents to prepare their residence following an extensive preparation list. The preparations are time-consuming, labor intensive and often over burdensome, especially for individuals that are elderly or handicapped. Furthermore, the exhaustive nature of the preparations facilitates bed bug dispersal and complicates treatment due to relocation of the infested personal items. These practices cause chronic infestations, large amount of insecticide usage, and high risk of pesticide exposure to humans and exacerbate the development of insecticide resistance in field populations of bed bugs. This in turn, results in more pesticide applications and even higher risks of pesticide exposure. There is a critical need to design and implement cost-effective and safer bed bug management programs.



2012 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2012

An Evaluation of the IPM in Multi-Family Housing Course

Project Director: Susan Aceti
Funding Amount: $29,946

Over the past five years, the National Center for Healthy Housing (NCHH) and the National Healthy Homes Training Center and Network (Training Center) have offered the IPM in Multi-family Housing course 49 times to more than 1,000 students. The challenge with any training is to determine if the course has the desired impact on the students. For this course, the desired impact is that students are able to implement IPM in the housing developments they manage. If they are unable to implement IPM, it is important to understand the barriers.



To achieve this, NCHH will: evaluate the impact of the IPM in Multi-family Housing course to determine if property managers who attend the course successfully implement IPM, and provide results of evaluation to interested stakeholders.



NCHH will interview two groups of students using a retrospective approach for one group and a prospective approach for the other. Based on the results, NCHH will recommend changes to the IPM course -- either by adding information or revising the current information. NCHH will develop two case studies based on interviews with property managers and owners, pest management professionals, and residents at two housing developments that best illustrate the results of the data analysis. We will draft a report on the results of the data analysis and any recommendations for action and provide the report to contacts at HUD, CDC, and EPA.



NCHH will disseminate the findings of this project through conference presentations and via conference calls and webinars with interested stakeholders including Healthy Homes Training Center partners, other IPM trainers, and any other stakeholders interested in the results of the survey.



Brown Marmorated Stink Bug IPM Working Group: Continuity, New Priorities, and Consumers

Project Director: Tracy C. Leskey
Funding Amount: $15,000

The BMSB IPM Working Group has established itself as the primary platform for facilitating and coordinating research and outreach efforts for BMSB across the United States. The first formal BMSB Working Group meeting was held at the Appalachian Fruit Research Station in Kearneysville, WV on June 15-16, 2010. Since that time, three additional meetings have been held: November 17, 2010 (Winchester, VA), June 20-21, 2011 (Biglerville, PA), and November 27, 2011 (Winchester, VA). Membership numbers over 100 individuals from 15 states and Canada. At the June 2011 meeting, the group updated Research, Extension and Regulatory priorities first established in 2010. As additional information regarding BMSB became available and the scale of the threat became more clearly defined, certain priorities were given much higher rankings in 2011 compared with 2010. Notably, identification of the BMSB pheromone rose from #6 to #2 in the rankings and identification of effective biological control agents rose from #17 to #4. Additionally, certain priorities were removed if they were no longer relevant. Clearly, posting Working Group reports and presentations and relevant links on the BMSB IPM Working Group web site has provided researchers across the country access to the most current information pertaining to this serious pest. In addition to research, extension, and regulatory stakeholders, the general public also uses this site to find information on this invasive species. In total, 20% of all web traffic directed to the Northeastern IPM Center site has been attributed to the BMSB Working Group web site. Here, we propose to (1) hold a two-day meeting of the entire BMSB Working Group membership to continuously evaluate existing and document new problems posed by BMSB; (2) refine priorities based on new information and perceived threats, and (3) hold a specific session dedicated to development of priorities to serve the needs of the general public and strategies for delivering needed information.


Continued Support of Northeast Tree Fruit IPM Working Group

Project Director: Arthur Agnello
Funding Amount: $8,250

The New England and Mid-Atlantic states in the northeastern US have long been one of the country's most significant tree fruit production areas, particularly in apples, since the 1700s. In 2010, a NE IPM Partnership Grant facilitated the establishment of a formal Northeast Tree Fruit IPM Working Group. This group of fruit production professionals, representing multiple states and organizations (research and extension scientists: entomologists, pathologists, horticulturists, plus extension educators, industry advisors and IPM pest managers) from NY and the New England states, have met annually as the New England, New York and Canadian Fruit Pest Management Workshop for many years. The objectives of this proposal include a continuation of the joint meetings of the TF-IPM WG at this annual meeting (including representatives from some mid-Atlantic states and Canadian provinces) to further enhance regional collaborations, updating of IPM practices lists, and coordination of research and extension priority setting.


The previously identified outcomes envisioned from the continued functions of this WG include: 1) identification of priority tree fruit IPM needs and issues in the northeast region; 2) fostering of greater regional collaborations in IPM programs and expertise; 3) development and adoption of new IPM guidelines, management guides and pest alert systems; and 4) sharing of current and new IPM technologies, research results, and extension efforts during the annual meeting organized by the member institutions, as well as through electronic (online) proceedings of these meetings. Such outcomes, along with documentation of the impacts of successful fruit IPM strategies on human (including economic) and environmental health, are increasingly relevant to sustainable fruit production and quality of life in the northeast region, and will help to link northeast regional fruit IPM objectives to the goals of the National IPM Roadmap.




Developing Bed Bug Educational Videos for Hispanic/Latino Communities

Project Director: Richard Cooper
Funding Amount: $13,222

In recent years, bed bug infestations have become a major concern throughout the U.S. The resurgence of bed bugs has caused significant economic burden and health impact among the urban communities. More alarmingly, bed bugs began to appear in work places, hospitals, schools, and other public places. Because bed bugs are a relatively new pest, most people are unprepared for dealing with them. Many educational materials have been developed. But most of them are in English. There is a shortage of user-friendly bed bug educational materials in other languages. Spanish is the second most widely used/spoken language in the U.S. Hispanic/Latino communities are subject to higher rates of bed bug infestations and misuse of pesticides due to their lower socioeconomic status. We propose to develop two Spanish bed bug educational videos that target Hispanic/Latino people. Such materials are in urgent need for conducting outreach work in these under-served communities. The objectives of this project are to: 1) develop a Spanish video introducing the bed bug biology and IPM; and 2) develop a Spanish video demonstrating the details of individual bed bug control techniques. This project fills an important gap in bed bug educational resources. It will increase the awareness about bed bugs, reduce bed bug spread, pesticide use, and human health risks associated with improper bed bug control practices. This project addresses the priority proposed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2009.


Developing Bed Bug Educational Videos for Hispanic/Latino Communities

Project Director: Changlu Wang
Funding Amount: $13,222

In recent years, bed bug infestations have become a major concern throughout the U.S. The resurgence of bed bugs has caused significant economic burden and health impact among the urban communities. More alarmingly, bed bugs began to appear in work places, hospitals, schools, and other public places. Because bed bugs are a relatively new pest, most people are unprepared for dealing with them. Many educational materials have been developed. But most of them are in English. There is a shortage of user-friendly bed bug educational materials in other languages. Spanish is the second most widely used/spoken language in the U.S. Hispanic/Latino communities are subject to higher rates of bed bug infestations and misuse of pesticides due to their lower socioeconomic status. We propose to develop two Spanish bed bug educational videos that target Hispanic/Latino people. Such materials are in urgent need for conducting outreach work in these under-served communities. The objectives of this project are to: 1) develop a Spanish video introducing the bed bug biology and IPM; and 2) develop a Spanish video demonstrating the details of individual bed bug control techniques. This project fills an important gap in bed bug educational resources. It will increase the awareness about bed bugs, reduce bed bug spread, pesticide use, and human health risks associated with improper bed bug control practices. This project addresses the priority proposed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2009.


From Healthy Homes to Hogares Saludables: Spanish IPM Video as a Resource for Low-income, Low-literate Latinos

Project Director: Michael P OLeary
Funding Amount: $15,000

Baltimore City Health Department (BCHD) was recently funded by the Northeastern IPM Center (NEIPMC) to translate, reproduce and distribute Integrated Pest Management "Do-it-Yourself" Booklets for low-literate Spanish speaking Latinos. BCHD has created a short companion IPM video that will improve IPM awareness and comprehension for low-literate residents. It provides vocal instructions and visual demonstrations on the benefits of IPM and how to practice IPM in the home. The video was designed to complement the booklet, but may also be used as a stand-alone resource. It may be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2MPoByymQE


With continued NEIPMC support, BCHD will translate the video into Spanish, distribute it to organizations and community groups serving Latino residents in Baltimore City, and provide copies throughout the region to state health departments and groups such as the Northeast IPM Center and National Center for Healthy Housing. Translation will omit references to Baltimore and reference general urban conditions to make the video applicable to all urban regions.


Latinos demonstrate a unique need for quality information and instruction on how to safely and effectively manage residential pests. Beset by low incomes, language and literacy barriers, and a propensity to not read labels, Latinos are predisposed to use widely accessible and promoted, inexpensive, dangerous and unhealthy, chemical pest control products.


BCHD will work with Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA) faculty and two bilingual students to translate the video, test translations on Latino clients of the Esperanza Center (partner on previously funded initiative) and BCHD clients, incorporate voice over and captions/sub-titles in the video, and produce the finished product. This will be the third video production partnership between BCHD and MICA.


By funding this Spanish-translated video, the Northeast IPM Center will produce an effective, enduring educational tool that will significantly reduce literacy and comprehension gaps among Latinos and will empower them to safely and effectively practice residential IPM.



Impact of Cover Crops on Beneficial and Pest Insects in Hops

Project Director: Heather Darby
Funding Amount: $25,947

Public interest in sourcing local foods extends into beverages, and the demand for local and organic brewing ingredients is on the rise. Although hops are not a new crop in the Northeast, they have not been grown on a commercial scale for almost 100 years. Today, 99% of hop production takes place in the arid regions of the Pacific Northwest (PNW) on hop farms averaging 450 acres. Pest management information developed for the PNW is generally not applicable to the humid Northeast leaving growers bereft of research-based information for sustainable pest management in hops. Additionally, pest pressures seen in the Northeast are different that those normally observed in the PNW, namely potato leafhoppers (Empoasca fabae), Eastern comma butterfly (Polygonia comma), and Japanese beetles (Popillia japonica). It is well documented that cover crops can provide a habitat to both beneficial and harmful insects, while maintaining a ground cover that can compete with weeds, but no research has been conducted on cover crops in hops in the Northeast. The objective of this project is to work collaboratively with growers to identify beneficial and harmful insects attracted to hop plants in the Northeast and create outreach materials to help farmers adopt IPM practices. We will also work with a partner farm to evaluate the impact of cover cropping on beneficial and harmful insects in hop production. Research that improves the economic and environmental sustainability of hops production will help growers produce a high-quality product that meets the demands of local brewers.


Integrating IPM into a School Environmental Management Plan

Project Director: Carol Westinghouse
Funding Amount: $10,000

Schools need help in adopting and institutionalizing IPM policies and practices as part of their daily facility operations. Most programs addressing this issue have focused on trainings for school stakeholders, but have not had a comprehensive tool that embeds IPM in facility operations, where it would typically be implemented. The project would use the environmental management system model, adapted from industry for schools by Lynn Rose, a project author under an EPA grant, to create an IPM Operations Workbook that merges Lynn's materials with the Maine School IPM Toolkit for school stakeholders to use to create an IPM Environmental Management Plan for their district.


This project would also build on and expand materials used for an EPA award winning training program developed by Lynn Rose and the Massachusetts Facilities Administrator's Association (MFAA). The new document would be generic and could be used in any state.



New England Small Ruminant IPM Working Group

Project Director: Jennifer Hashley
Funding Amount: $14,978

Small ruminants are susceptible to several organisms and diseases that can cause serious economic losses through casualties, reduced production, and cost of treatment. Internal parasites are particularly problematic, and their impact has been exacerbated by the overuse of chemical dewormers, which has helped the parasites develop widespread resistance to standard treatments. As resistance reaches epidemic levels in much of the U.S., non-chemical alternatives are critical for controlling internal parasites and protecting farmers' livelihoods. Proven integrated parasite management strategies are available for farmers, but feedback gathered from various farmers, veterinarians, and others familiar with small ruminant production suggests that awareness and adoption of these IPM strategies is lacking in New England. This project will found the first New England Small Ruminant IPM Working Group in order to increase awareness and adoption of IPM strategies to address internal parasites in small ruminant flocks, as well as other health concerns, such as external parasites and foot rot. The working group will aim to determine the most pressing IPM challenges for small ruminant producers in the region, the scope of those challenges, and what IPM strategies, if any, are being used to address them. Additionally, the working group will compile best practices and recommendations to share with a broader stakeholder audience, and will set priorities for future work and funding opportunities. The project will also result in the creation of an email-based technical assistance network.


Northeast School IPM Working Group: Collaborative Support for Verifiable School IPM Adoption

Project Director: Kathy Murray
Funding Amount: $15,000

Schools need support and assistance to adopt IPM practices. The Northeast School IPM Working Group (NESIWG), established in 2008, includes broad representation of organizations and agencies serving schools throughout the northeastern states. We propose to collaborate regionally to 1) establish school IPM demonstrations and coalitions to support and promote adoption of IPM practices and policies, 2) identify and capitalize upon opportunities for collaboration with other organizations to support and promote implementation of healthy, effective and sustainable pest management practices for schools, 3) improve access to IPM resources for school and childcare stakeholders, and 4) strengthen the capacity of the NESIWG to accomplish its mission and goals.


We have leveraged additional funds to support establishment of school IPM coalitions in four states. With this proposal we are seeking funding to cover costs of communication and travel to support regional collaboration and resource sharing, complete projects underway, collaborate on national level to tackle new initiatives, and capitalize on our accomplishments to date.


We anticipate this project will minimize pesticide exposure risk in schools, increase compliance with state regulations, and safeguard the health of students and teachers in and around schools throughout the northeast.



Northeast Small Fruit IPM Working Group and Pest Issues Tour

Project Director: Ann Hazelrigg
Funding Amount: $14,807

Small fruits are an economically important crop for the northeast and are often an essential component of diversified vegetable farms. Pest identification and knowledge of successful integrated pest management strategies are crucial for the successful small fruit farm. A Northeast Small Fruit IPM Working Group that develops and directs IPM priorities for small fruit stakeholders in New York, New Jersey and New England is an important resource for the small fruit industry.


We propose a three day meeting with approximately 15 small fruit and/or pest management specialists from NY, NJ and New England. The group will focus on pest issues in high tunnels on small fruit farms in the Albany area in eastern NY this year, looking at both conventional and organic pest management systems. Our first half day will be spent sharing new pest problems, new tools, websites and information among the group. The second day will be spent in the field looking at small fruit problems in high tunnels. The third half day will be spent discussing pest management strategies with an emphasis towards choosing reduced risk pesticides and non- pesticide strategies that lead to sustainable solutions. The group will also identify and prioritize specific research, extension and education needs for small fruit stakeholders in New England.



Spotted Wing Drosophila Working Group to Identify and Prioritize Research and Extension Needs

Project Director: Greg Loeb
Funding Amount: $10,264

The invasive species spotted wing drosophila (SWD) Drosophila suzukii has exploded onto the scene in essentially all states in the Northeast Region in the 2011 growing season, causing significant injury to fruit crops in several areas. SWD first appeared in California in 2008 and has been rapidly expanding its distribution ever since. Unlike many other fruit flies, SWD has the capacity to lay eggs into intact and marketable fruit. Berries, particularly raspberries and blueberries, are especially vulnerable. In addition, SWD has been reported from many other crops and wild plants. In response to this new threat, some growers resorted to twice-weekly insecticide applications in 2011. Every indication is that SWD is here to stay, creating significant IPM challenges for fruit growers in the Northeast: overall IPM programs for affected fruit crops will require restructuring and specific IPM guidelines will need to be developed for SWD. The principal objectives of the proposed IPM working group, therefore, will be to 1) identify and prioritize the research and extension needs for SWD in the Northeast for vulnerable crops, 2) develop effective lines of communication with other working groups within and outside the region and with affected industries and 3) Facilitate development of SWD IPM guidelines for the Northeast.


[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants Program - Northeastern 2012

Developing an IPM Program for Western Bean Cutworm, a New Corn and Dry Bean Pest in the Northeast Region

Project Director: John F. Tooker
Funding Amount: $150,896

This is a research project. Western bean cutworm (WBC; Striacosta albicosta) has invaded the Northeast Region in recent years. This pest species new to the Northeast attacks corn (Zea mays; including field and sweet corn) and both dry beans and snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), feeding on developing corn kernels or beans. Infestations of WBC larvae can reduce yield 30-40% and cause crop quality to be down graded or rejected by processors. Corn and bean production is vital to the diversified agricultural economy of the Northeast, including dairies and vegetable farms, and accounts for more than 7 million acres of cropland in the region. Our collaborative research proposal seeks to understand the spread of this pest species and the threat it poses, across a significant portion of the Northeast Region, where it has the potential to cause significant damage and prompt widespread increases in insecticide use, and begins the work of developing an IPM plan to manage WBC. Our objectives include: 1) Develop a regional western bean cutworm monitoring network; 2) Integrate existing Great Lakes regional trap capture data into the PestWatch system to understand the spread of WBC and develop a smartphone/web app to report larval infestations into the PestWatch system; 3) Evaluate the relevance for the Northeast of the Midwestern degree day model for predicting various activity periods; 4) Evaluate and improve the pheromone blend used to monitor WBC. These objectives combine practical efforts to understand the distribution of the WBC in the Northeast with promising applied efforts to manage this invasive pest species.


Diversified Partnerships: Building IPM Programming within Latino Communities

Project Director: Edwin Rajotte
Funding Amount: $24,322

This is an extension project. The overall goal of the proposed project is to increase IPM awareness, knowledge and skills within underserved Hispanic audiences, empowering them to adopt IPM practices. This goal is supported by four main objectives:


  1. Develop a Latino community IPM partnership

  2. Adapt/develop outreach materials using all media effective at reaching and communicating with Spanish-speaking audiences

  3. Collaboratively develop innovative new IPM outreach, education and training programs in Spanish and

  4. Explore venues and partners for development of job skills training and opportunities in urban IPM for Spanish-speaking job-seekers.


Plans to accomplish these goals begin with identifying and establishing cooperative relationships with Hispanic organizations, convening collaborators across state boundaries (PA, NJ) and establishing an official Latino IPM partnership. During this phase, we will more closely identify partner / stakeholder needs and priorities for bilingual IPM materials and programming, best media forms to use, and methods by which these should be extended and archived. We will collect existing material, identify gaps and then develop new materials and programming to deliver locally, regionally and nationally as appropriate. Finally, we will identify various partners in job skills, employment, regulatory and pest management fields to discuss details of potentially incorporating bilingual IPM/pesticide applicator trainings to their offerings.


The project supports the stated priorities of the NE Community IPM Working Group's focus on IPM in residential settings, namely use of diverse media to educate the public on implementing IPM in their homes, and development of creative tools for measuring the impact of public education related to IPM practices in residential settings on changes in awareness and behaviors of target audience.


Handheld Mobile Application Technology for Pest Identification and Scouting in Christmas Tree and Conifer Nursery Production

Project Director: Elizabeth Lamb
Funding Amount: $49,941

This project is an extension project. Pest identification and scouting are the backbone of good integrated pest management. Many conifer nursery and Christmas tree producers scout their crops, but availability of pest identification information, and tools for record keeping to measure the effects of control methods would help them reduce unnecessary pesticide applications. Providing these tools in a device they are already carrying into their fields, their phones, would encourage the use of pest id and scouting. In this project, we will create and demonstrate an application for mobile hand-held devices to assist growers in identification of insect, disease and weed pests of conifers, and in compiling and recording scouting data. Growers will participate in the development of the application as an advisory committee, evaluating the application on their farms. The application is designed to be useful for conifer producers throughout the NE region and participation by all states will be encouraged through training events held in conjunction with state Christmas tree and nursery organizations' education sessions. The project will evaluate the level of adoption of the application, increase in adoption of IPM, and the potential for use of the application to result in better pest management and economic benefits, through surveys at training events and after growers have had a chance to trial it, in order to measure knowledge and action impacts. Additional media outreach will extend the information to a national audience. The overall goal of the project is to reduce unnecessary pesticide applications, with the concurrent reduction in human health and environmental risks.


Implementing Swallow-wort Biocontrol

Project Director: Richard A. Casagrande
Funding Amount: $59,975

This is a research project. Two species of European swallow-wort, Vincetoxicum nigrum and Vincetoxicum rossicum, have become invasive in North America, where there are no effective natural enemies able to suppress populations and deter further spread. Swallow-worts are toxic to mammals, causing reduced grazing in pastures, toxicity, and death. They invade gardens, lawns, shrubs, fencerows, and a variety of forest types as well as ornamental plant nurseries, Christmas tree farms, and pine plantations. The twining climbing plants smother small trees and adversely impact monarch butterflies, inducing oviposition upon plants where larvae cannot survive. These problems will increase as swallow-worts continue to spread throughout the USA. Conventional control methods are largely unsuccessful in managing established infestations, and biological control appears to be the most promising alternative. At the request of local stakeholders, we initiated a program of classical biological control against swallow-worts a decade ago.


With Northeast Regional IPM funding in 2008 and 2009, we determined that the European leaf-feeding moth, Hypena opulenta has potential for successful biological control of swallow-worts. Host range testing shows that these larvae are monophagous on swallow-worts, not posing a risk to any native North American plant. This insect causes extensive defoliation of V. nigrum and V. rossicum under laboratory conditions in quarantine and it is expected that it would adversely impact plants under field conditions with repeated defoliation and in the presence of competing plant species. In November, 2011 we petitioned the USDA and Canadian authorities for the open-field release of H. opulenta as a biological control agent for V. rossicum and V. nigrum in the United States and Canada in 2012.


This research proposal requests funding to release and monitor this agent in plots carefully selected and pre-monitored to determine its potential for controlling both swallow-wort species in a range of habitats. Grant funding will cover agent release and three years of monitoring in the Northeast. We will also provide this agent to Canadian colleagues who will rear, release, and monitor H. opulenta. By conducting essentially paired experiments in Canada, we will have effectively bracketed the range of climates where swallow-worts grow in North America. This Canadian research, conducted at essentially no cost to this program, will greatly strengthen the value of research conducted in southern New England, allowing us to quickly determine whether to widely distribute this agent or to consider other agents presently under study. Through the permanent establishment and spread of effective biological control agents, we hope to end the use of herbicides against swallow-worts in agricultural enterprises and further control the weeds in natural areas where widespread use of herbicides is not an alternative.


This proposal meets 13 of the 14 goals of the current NE Regional IPM program and addresses several priorities established for IPM research in the Northeast. Evaluation includes monitoring establishment, spread, and impact of this biological control agent as well as establishing baseline data on swallow-wort control costs for RI land managers, against which we can measure impact of this biological control project in the future.


Invasive Insect and Disease Outreach, Detection, and Reporting

Project Director: Mary Kay Malinoski
Funding Amount: $26,751

This is an extension project. Invasive insects and diseases pose an enormous threat to our forests, agronomic crops and landscapes. Their threat is second only to habitat loss and biodiversity with an estimated annual cost of $1.4 trillion worldwide. Our national resources and ecosystems are under constant pressure from new and invasive species. Prevention is the first-line of defense, but unfortunately numerous pathways for introduction increase the possibilities of invasive entry. The best IPM option for invasives is early detection coupled with a rapid response. Early reporting of invasives increases the likelihood that localized populations will be found and eradicated. Utilizing new smart phone technologies such as phone apps enable easy reporting and location of new invasive species. This grant will enable us to modify an existing Mid-Atlantic Early Detection Network (EDDMapS) iPhone app and mobile web site and create a new Android phone app to report new key invasive insect and disease pests throughout the northeast and southern regions. The Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health (Bugwood) will program, maintain and house the phone apps and web sites. A key component of the new phone apps will be the enhanced flow of reporting information back to key local experts, and state and federal, agencies that have managerial responsibilities. In addition, sets of color identification cards featuring key invasive insects and diseases and a QR tag that will connect to the phone app will be distributed to further enhance successful identification and timely reporting.


Investigation and Exploitation of Light as a Non-Chemical Means to Manage Powdery Mildews

Project Director: David Gadoury
Funding Amount: $59,794

This is a research project. Our long-term goal is to exploit light as a natural and non-chemical means of controlling powdery mildews. Powdery mildews are an internationally important pathogen group attacking a broad variety of crops. The driving force of epidemics is abundant sporulation. Disease management is problematic due to widespread resistance to most fungicides. We have discovered a non-chemical means to disrupt sporulation, and have considerable preliminary data to show that light in the visible spectrum as well as brief exposures to ultraviolet B (UV-B) can be used to suppress disease. We will investigate the use of low-cost, low energy LEDs that produce specific wavebands to disrupt sporulation, both alone and in conjunction with UV-B. A diverse group of powdery mildews of rose, grapevine, strawberry and cucumber will be explored as model systems with potential for spinoffs and adaptation to other crops. The project is highly focused, short- term (12 months), and is well aligned with NE-IPM goals, and priorities. The research problem encompasses many of the top priorities of several stakeholder groups within the northeast region, nationally, and internationally. The project involved international collaboration, and represents a novel approach to disease management. The project directors and cooperators are internationally recognized leaders in research and outreach in this area. Effective outreach is inherent in the design of the project, and is seamlessly integrated into the transition between objective I (treatment investigation, quantification, and refinement) and objective II (demonstration).


Northeast Bugwood Node Expansion to Catalog Images for Use as Reference Tools by Diagnosticians and Extension Personnel

Project Director: Karen Snover-Clift
Funding Amount: $18,294

This is an extension project. Having created a Bugwood-Cornell node with NEIPM funding in January of 2012, our objectives for next year are to increase the activity of the image submission through the Cornell node. The Cornell facilitator will train new parties interested in submitting images, will edit images for accuracy of content and quality of images, and will provide support to the University of Maine diagnostician as needed. Several collections at various universities in the Northeastern region need a repository for their images and personnel from these sites are actively pursuing information to develop content in the image library known as the Bugwood system. Our newly established node can provide support for submissions that may include the Maryland consumer horticulture collection, the Vermont animal science collection, and the herbarium and international agriculture collections at Cornell. Expansion of the Cornell node will provide much needed resources for diagnosticians and extension educators for use in educating clients and creating presentations. The facilitator will pursue images that include diagnostic features of endemic diseases, diseases of high significance, and foreign and select agent pathogens when possible, as well as quality views of culture plates, spores, and mycelia. The key to getting the images needed is the facilitator and his/her pursuit of valuable content. The IPM priorities covered by this grant include focusing on pests and crops found in multiple states, filling a niche not filled, involving multiple states and regions of the US, and is interdisciplinary.


Spotted Wing Drosophila Management

Project Director: Richard S. Cowles
Funding Amount: $161,985

This is a research project. The spotted wing drosophila (SWD), Drosophila suzukii, is a highly invasive pest that infests small fruits (raspberry, blueberry, strawberry, and grapes) and tree fruits (most notably, cherries). First found in New England on August 19, 2011, this pest over the next month caused $500,000 - $1,000,000 in losses to fruit growers in New England due to unsaleable maggot-infested fruit. Late fruiting blueberries, most fall-bearing raspberries, many wine grapes, and day-neutral strawberries were lost. Current SWD management recommendations from the Northwest suggest weekly applications once fruit start to ripen with methomyl, malathion, advanced generation pyrethroids, or spinosyns. Except for spinosyns, sprays of these products will set back decades of IPM progress by eliminating the beneficial predators and parasites in these crops. Such intensive use of pesticides on these crops is expensive, selects intensively for insecticide resistance, and leaves residues on fruit. This project will test in four small fruit crops in three states attractant and phagostimulatory baits combined with insecticides, some of which are organically acceptable, to manage SWD. Methods to compare will be conventional spray, bait spray applied to the crop, attractant plus bait applied to vegetation surrounding the crop, and insecticidal bait stations. Efficacy will be assessed by measuring insect activity and fruit infestation. We will investigate dipteran-specific Bacillus thuringiensis and Entomophthora muscae for deployment either with bait sprays or stations. Pest management methods developed in this proposal will provide science-based pest management that improves human and environmental health by minimizing the need for sprays of broad spectrum insecticides.


Towards Implementation of a Novel Fungal Biopesticide for IPM of Bed Bugs

Project Director: Nina Jenkins
Funding Amount: $21,000

This is a research project to develop a novel formulations of fungal entomopathogens for implementation as components of IPM of bed bugs. This project addresses the NE RIPM Stakeholder priorities within the Community and Structural IPM setting. Specifically, a need for 'New and emerging technologies and techniques' that could be fully integrated with IPM strategies is identified. The overall aim of this project is to build on the work already conducted in this laboratory that demonstrates that conidia of Beauveria bassiana, formulated in oil and sprayed on surfaces, act as an effective residual pesticide capable of killing 100% of bed bugs that come into brief contact with the spray residue in 3-4 days and 90% of unexposed bed bugs that come into contact with exposed bed bugs in harborages. Our overall objective of this 12 month project is to develop this biopesticide technology to the point where it is ready for field testing and evaluation in collaboration with partners from other NE States as part of a Renewal Application. To achieve this, we will select one of two fungal isolates that are currently registered for use as biopesticides for other pests. Both are effective under our standard bioassay conditions, but we will select the isolate that demonstrates best long-term efficacy over the typical temperature range found in houses. Secondly, we will screen a range of different textiles to select the best material for creating a bed skirt or other barrier over which bed bugs must cross to reach a human host. This barrier should deliver the maximum number of conidia to the bed bug and support long-term viability of the conidia to maximize the time interval between treatments. Finally, we will design a suite of 'formulations' to include bed skirts/barriers, a spray formulation for the base board/carpet interface and a 'paint-on' formulation for application around electrical fitments, cracks, crevices and other likely harborages to create a complete treatment solution for implementation as part of an IPM program. These objectives will be achieved within 12 months and be ready for field testing in IPM settings by the end of 2013. Use of biopesticide technology will reduce the risks to human health posed by chemicals, and effect improved control of infestations via auto-dissemination of conidia to populations in harborages that cannot be targeted with existing chemical control measures.



2011 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2011

Advancing Public Action and Knowledge on Invasive Species in the Potomac Highlands

Project Director: Amy L Cimarolli
Funding Amount: $39,999

This Extension project is based in the South Branch Potomac River headwaters in West Virginia and Virginia and is designed to explore methods of having long-reaching benefits to rural communities throughout the Central Appalachian Mountains. Invasive species threaten the region's forest, river, and grassland based economies, and the Potomac Highlands Cooperative Weed and Pest Management Area (CWPMA) aims to promote and support IPM education for NNIS with private landowners, educators, and youth using multimedia tools and materials. Weed and pest management is traditionally pesticide-based in these communities so IPM theory and strategies will benefit both human and environmental health.

The project is designed to inform private landowners and managers through field-based experiential learning in natural settings about NNIS, pesticides, and IPM. Rural communities throughout the Central Appalachian Mountains experience similar NNIS issues. The CWPMA Coordinator, through direct contact and the website, will provide the outreach lessons and information developed by this project to regional educators and other CWPMA's.

With the expertise, support, and active participation of its 17 Cooperators, the CWPMA's Coordinator will lead this project. These activities will be intermixed with other CWPMA efforts to expand its reach in project area communities.

Through the implementation of this project, the CWPMA will have a long-lasting effect of raising scientific and environmental awareness among low-income and underserved people who depend on products from both forests and farms for their livelihood. In particular, this project directly addresses the priorities set forth for natural resources and recreational environments by the NE-IPM (2004).


Collaborative to Promote IPM in Child Care Facilities

Project Director: Carol Westinghouse
Funding Amount: $20,000

This project is designed to advance the adoption of IPM policies and the use of IPM practices in registered and licensed child care facilities through the establishment of a working group to foster the exchange of information between academia, nonprofits, extension, government etc. The working group will develop a road map for engaging child care facilities that can be utilized by others working on the issue.

Each state has a network of organizations that conduct trainings for child care providers. It is essential to know these networks in order to spread the message in an efficient way. The Work Group will identify these networks and develop a relationship with their organizations. We will also review existing resources, revise materials as needed for the specific child care audience and pilot the materials with existing trainers in these networks.

The project will address the issue of traditional IPM for insect and rodent pests as well as using the IPM method to address the use of antimicrobial pests.

The outcome of the project will be:

1. the inclusion of IPM training materials in continuing education programs and required provider trainings in at least 2 northeast state networks, and

2. a road map that details the steps needed to reach this goal for others working within their own states.


Continuation and Expansion of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (BMSB) Working Group Activities

Project Director: Tracy C. Leskey
Funding Amount: $20,000

The BMSB Working Group has established itself as the primary platform for facilitating and coordinating research and outreach efforts for BMSB across the United States. The first formal BMSB Working Group meeting was held at the Appalachian Fruit Research Station in Kearneysville, WV on June 15-16, 2010. Participants delivered relevant presentations encompassing BMSB research, field observations, stakeholder concerns, and other critical biological and ecological information. The group also generated and ranked a comprehensive list of research, extension, and regulatory priorities. A second meeting was held on November 17, 2010 at the AHS-AREC in Winchester, VA and included presentations of BMSB research updates, stakeholder concerns, and regulatory issues. A discussion session devoted to critical and emerging issues was held including fulfilling a request for input from a USDA-led Section 18 Working Group for BMSB. In addition, a planning session was held to facilitate research collaborations and competitive grant proposal submissions. Based on the profound and continuing threat posed by BMSB to agriculture and the widespread nuisance problems for homeowners and business, we propose to: (1) hold two meetings of the entire BMSB Working Group membership to continuously evaluate existing and document new problems posed by BMSB; (2) enhance the membership of the working group to include stakeholders from relevant crops and businesses, representative government agencies, and land grant universities; and (3) assist in coordination of research and outreach activities among working group members and the Northeastern IPM Center.


Creating a Northeast Hops IPM Working Group to Identify and Prioritize Research and Extension Needs

Project Director: Timothy Weigle
Funding Amount: $19,672

The remerging and geographically diverse hops industry in the Northeastern United States is being driven by a popularity of microbrews, home brewing and the buy local food movement. The production of hops in the Northeastern United States is currently, and will continue to be, typically a small operation (0.5 - 10 acres) that is being looked at as a second career or as an additional crop for those already in agriculture. Much of the IPM materials that have been developed are suitable for the production strategies and weather conditions of the Pacific Northwest, which vary widely from those, found in the Northeastern United States. Due to the relatively recent reemergence of the hops industry in the Northeast there are currently no priorities or PMSP's for Hops in the Northeastern United States This project addresses the need to define and prioritize the research and extension needs of the Northeast Hops industry as well as develop and deliver Hop IPM educational programming to the diverse audience found in the Northeast Hops industry.


Development of a Northeast Region Bugwood Node to Collect and Catalog Images for Use as Reference Tools by Diagnosticians and Identifiers

Project Director: Karen Snover-Clift
Funding Amount: $15,000

This is an Extension project. The proper diagnosis of pathogens affecting agricultural and natural ecosystem plants allows growers and plant managers to select the appropriate IPM management tactics. Plant disease and entomology diagnosticians have limited resources for the identification of pathogens, insects, and mites. Diagnosticians who are part of the National Plant Diagnostic Network (NPDN) work with all commodity groups including field crops, vegetables, fruit, turfgrass, and ornamental plants and are expected to diagnose a wide variety of pathogens and pests. To provide accurate diagnoses, plant diagnosticians require rapid access to detailed diagnostic images to learn about the organisms and plant problems present in samples submitted to their laboratories. Currently, diagnosticians do not have access to image libraries that contain a wealth of disease, pest, and specific organism images. Many university faculty and extension educators have acquired extensive image collections that may be lost if an effort is not made to preserve them in a library.


Development of the Interactive Cranberry Pest Management Tool for IPM

Project Director: Brian Wick
Funding Amount: $19,977

The Cape Cod Cranberry Growers' Association and the University of Massachusetts Cranberry Station seek $19,977 to develop an Interactive Cranberry Pest Management Tool for IPM. The goal of this project is to create an online decision making tool that deconstructs the existing, printed IPM management guide and turns it into a dynamic application for cranberry growers to make real-time management decisions.

The UMass Cranberry Station annually creates a management guide, in which they describe IPM guidelines, cultural controls, chemical compounds, growing conditions, and more, based on 100 years of work with this industry. In the past 10-15 years, the Management Guide has tripled in size and the grower is now faced with a confusing array of similar-sounding trade names that may have very different targets, risk status and modes of action. These new choices have a narrow range of target insect effectiveness and are specific to the life stage/size of the insect.

If the application of these newly introduced compounds is not right, the grower may not control the pest, is wasting money, could cause needless harm to beneficial insects, including pollinators, and could negatively impact water quality. Growers rely extensively on the Management Guide, but as a static document, it cannot tell a grower how to take the many factors into account to make a real-time decision.

Growers need access to comprehensive information to help make appropriate IPM decisions. We believe that the development of an Interactive Cranberry Tool can address the need for help in complex decision making.


Enhancement of the Northeast Tree Fruit IPM Working Group

Project Director: Arthur Agnello
Funding Amount: $10,970

The northeastern US, comprising the New England and Mid-Atlantic states, has long been one of the country's most significant tree fruit production areas, particularly in apples, since the 1700s. In 2010, a NE IPM Partnership Grant facilitated the establishment of a formal Northeast Tree Fruit IPM Working Group. This multi-state/multi/organization of fruit production professionals (research and extension scientists: entomologists, pathologists, horticulturists, plus extension educators, industry advisors and IPM pest managers) from NY and the New England states have met annually as the New England, New York and Canadian Fruit Pest Management Workshop for many years. The objectives of this proposal include a joint meeting of the TF-IPM WG at this annual meeting (including representatives from some mid-Atlantic states and Canadian provinces) to further enhance regional collaborations, integration of IPM practices lists, and priority setting coordination.
The previously identified outcomes envisioned from the continued functions of this WG include: 1) identification of priority tree fruit IPM needs and issues in the northeast region; 2) fostering of greater regional collaborations in IPM programs and expertise; 3) development and adoption of new IPM guidelines, management guides or pest alert systems; and 4) sharing of current and new IPM technologies, research results, and extension efforts during the annual meeting organized on a rotating basis among the member institutions, as well as through electronic (online) proceedings of these meetings. Such outcomes, along with documentation of the impacts of successful fruit IPM strategies on human (including economic) and environmental (including water quality) health, are increasingly relevant to sustainable fruit production and quality of life in the northeast region, and will help to link northeast regional fruit IPM objectives to the goals of the National IPM Roadmap.


Establishing a NE, Region-wide Pollinator IPM Working Group

Project Director: Christina Grozinger
Funding Amount: $12,247

The decline in both managed and non-managed pollinator populations continues to be a major reason of concern because of its potentially extensive negative implications for agriculture, the economy, and the environment. Since the onset of Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) in 2007, multidisciplinary scientific inquiry has revealed a multitude of stressors that can synergistically affect honeybees. Pathogen and pest infestation, inadequate diet, lack of genetic variability, pesticide contamination, and intensive management are some of the most frequently mentioned potential CCD-causing factors. Some of these factors, especially pesticide misuse and land development, can negatively affect the populations of non-managed pollinators as well, but the full extent of damage is virtually impossible to document.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture, pollinator-dependent vegetable, fruit and nut crops produced in the Northeast region in 2008 accounted for 1.8 billion dollars. In the Northeast region, more than 40 horticultural crops rely on or benefit from biotic pollination. Throughout the US over the past three years, both large and small beekeeping operations have experienced significant honeybee colony losses, with yearly averages exceeding 30%. As a direct result, this has created a shortage of the number of honeybee colonies available for commercial pollination, resulting in higher pollination fees for growers and, ultimately, more expensive produce prices for the consumer.

In an effort to minimize pollinator decline and its negative effects on the region's food production system and environment, we plan to establish the Northeast Pollinator IPM Working Group. The following are the main objectives of this WG: 1) Identify the northeast region's groups of stakeholders that have a vested interest in pollinators and their agricultural and non-agricultural ecosystem services; 2) Select representatives from the groups and invite them to formulate their interests and needs regarding pollinators and pollination services; 3) Establish the most feasible method/ technology for fostering dialogue between the representatives of these groups; 4) Gather their feedback on the need for pollinator IPM research, extension outreach, and policy making. Summarize and classify these needs into a set of priorities according to their timeliness and their feasibility for accomplishment; 5) Maintain open communication channel(s) over the years between the stakeholders for keeping them abreast of emerging issues.


Expanding Livestock Integrated Pest Management: IPM Training Opportunities for Northeast US Dairy Producers

Project Director: J. Keith Waldron
Funding Amount: $25,032

Dairy production is an integral component of many rural communities in the northeastern US, helping to sustain the economic viability of our region. There are 5,700 dairy producers in New York milking 626,000 cows New York State (NYS NASS, 2010). In 1997, northeast U.S dairy and beef cattle associated revenues totaled $4.4 billion (USDA Census of Agriculture, 1997). Many of these dairy producers use monthly applications of insecticides to control nuisance and biting flies in the barn and on pasture without regard to action thresholds, environmental concerns or human health issues. We propose two approaches to educate producers on Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies to control nuisance and biting flies of dairy cattle. The first approach will pilot a new dairy fly IPM educational program modeled from the highly successful field crop Tactical Agriculture (TAg) program initiated in 1990 by the NYS IPM Livestock and Field Crops program. TAg is a proven educational model that presents objective, proven, land-grant based IPM information in an experiential, intensive, hands-on training to small groups of producers on their own farms. The proposed program will teach dairy producers to better manage dairy fly issues, protect the environment and reduce health risks. Participants will be actively integrated into a season-long program, which builds on an understanding of pest fly identification and biology to develop an effective fly management program. The dairy Fly IPM TAg effort has the potential to successfully encourage participants to adopt IPM strategies. Impacts of the program will be measured by pre- and post-testing of subject matter and an exit survey to determine the percentage of adoption of IPM practices taught to producers
The second approach is a series of statewide traditional summer producer field meetings to reach a large audience of dairy producers and increase awareness of issues and IPM approaches to manage nuisance and biting flies on dairy cattle in and around confinement areas and for animals on pasture.


Expansion of the Northeast Vegetable IPM Working Group

Project Director: Christian A. Wyenandt
Funding Amount: $15,476

The vegetable industry in the Northeast consists of at least 12,000 farms that cultivate and harvest over 370,000 acres of vegetable crops annually. The Northeast Vegetable IPM Working Group (Vegetable IWG) was established in 2002 under the umbrella of the Northeast Pest Management Center. The group represents a diverse type of vegetable farmers, consultants, marketing specialists, processors, extension personnel, state agencies, and other agricultural professionals from the Northeast Region. The mission of the Northeast Vegetable IPM Working Group is to foster the development and use of IPM as a means to achieve ecological and economic sustainability of vegetable farms in the Northeast. At our annual meeting in November 2009 it was decided upon to restructure the Vegetable Working Group in order to strengthen our capacity and further our reach to stakeholders in the entire Northeast region. In doing so, a new' working group model will be enable us to foster stronger relationships between our membership and the vegetable community. The new working group will include an Advisory Committee, a Steering Committee and the working group membership. A website and listserv will be developed to act as a conduit of information and expertise for the vegetable industry in the Northeast. In addition to the restructuring of the working group and outreach platforms, the group will continue to meet on an annual basis to foster the core mission of the working group.


Fungicide Resistant Management Guidelines for Vegetable Growers in the Mid-Atlantic Region

Project Director: Christian A. Wyenandt
Funding Amount: $7,621

Because of the vast number of fungicides available and the potential difficulty in understanding FRAC groups and their importance in developing a proper fungicide resistance management programs for vegetable production a Fungicide Resistance Management Guide has been developed and distributed annually to vegetable growers in the mid-Atlantic and surrounding region. Since 2007, over 8,000 FRAC guides have been distributed to vegetable growers, extension agents and specialists, crop consultants, and industry representatives in the mid-Atlantic representing an estimated 100,000 acres of vegetable production.


Implementation, Coordination and Exploration of iMapinvasives Invasive Species Mapping in Vermont and New Hampshire

Project Director: Sharon Plumb
Funding Amount: $39,501

Invasive terrestrial plants are a threat to natural areas and working lands throughout New England. Unfortunately, land managers often do not realize there is a problem until an infestation is large and difficult to manage. State leaders and law makers who could develop effective policies and secure funding do not fully understand why invasives are a threat to the environment or economy or how extensively they are distributed.

Our long term goal is to reduce and manage these challenges. Over the past three years, TNC has provided outreach to thousands of Vermonters and successfully worked with organizations throughout the state to direct and implement invasive species prevention and management activities. Typically, the first steps are awareness to prevent new introductions, and mapping invasive plants in the project area so that management activities can be prioritized based on population, density, and proximity to valued resources. Next, we work with local partners to develop and implement an IPM plan.

Because of the resources required, to date this work has been limited to high priority locations. In an effort to expand this work, TNC recently developed an IPM template and training materials for community groups (conservation commissions) and conservation groups (land trusts) that will allow us to expand our geographic reach and more effectively provide technical assistance. This approach hinges upon our recent subscription to iMapinvasives, a geo-referenced web-based interstate invasive species database. This comprehensive database, currently in use by several other states including New York, allows our partners to submit and download invasive species data and use this information for strategic and effective prevention and management. Because invasives are not restricted by political boundaries, we are eager for partners and neighboring states to use iMapinvasives.

We request NE IPM funding to populate the iMapinvasives database in Vermont, to expand the subscription to include our partners in New Hampshire, and to use the database as an important tool to support community groups, conservation organizations and land managers in their efforts to manage invasive species using IPM techniques. Specifically this will include funding for the FY 12 iMap fees for both VT and NH, and funding for TNC to develop iMap outreach materials, train citizen scientists to use iMap, and match trainees with groups that need help gathering data and implementing prevention and IPM management plans.

We are confident that our unique collaboration among non-profit organizations, community partners and academic institutions will result in more strategic IPM plans. Furthermore, the information gathered by citizen scientists through this program and compiled through iMap can be also be used extensively by the research community to better predict areas prone to invasion and to improve detection, monitoring and control efforts, and by policy makers, who are often unaware of the extent of the invasive species threat in the region.


Increasing IPM in Privately-Owned Affordable Multifamily Housing

Project Director: Jane Malone
Funding Amount: $39,922

The presence of mice and roaches in housing has been associated with asthma. Many pesticides are known carcinogens, endocrine disruptors, and asthma triggers. Integrated pest management (IPM) prevents and eliminates insect and rodent infestations by excluding pests from the home, preventing pest access to sources of food, hydration, and harborage. By limiting the use of pesticides, it can also greatly reduce harmful chemical exposures for both residents and pest control operators. The effectiveness of IPM depends on coordinated actions by residents, property managers, and pest management professionals.

Due to the recent outbreak and media attention to bed bugs, affordable housing property owners have a keen interest in pest management. Thus, there is a window of opportunity for reaching these audiences with the latest information about bed bug treatments, and information about how incorporating IPM into housing maintenance can save money, protect residents, and ultimately reduce their pest problems.

We are proposing to supplement our existing IPM in Multi-Family Housing training to tailor it toward project-based Section 8 housing, which is separate and distinct from public housing the initial audience for the training. We will also refine the bed bug module to provide practical information to property owners who are struggling with this ubiquitous problem. Finally, we will offer the training between 6-8 times in the Northeast region.

As noted in the Logic model, this project will have a variety of impacts. Short-term impacts include an increase in knowledge about IPM among Section 8 property owners, managers and residents. Over the longer term, we anticipate that more owners, managers and residents will begin implementing IPM. They will increase the contracts with pest control operators who practice IPM, which will decrease the use of pesticides, decrease pest infestations and reduce the negative health effects associated with pests and pesticides.


IPM Working Group: Three Tiers of Growth and Development for IPM Produce

Project Director: Michael Rozyne
Funding Amount: $19,988

Fruit and vegetable producers who adopt advanced IPM need support from experts and other producers as they implement new practices, and they need recognition in the marketplace for the added value of their effort and the public benefits of IPM adoption. With support from NE IPM Center, Red Tomato has developed a successful Eco Apple program that delivers these benefits. In 2010 a pilot Eco Stone Fruit project was begun. Red Tomato proposes to further expand the Eco Apple Working Group (WG) model to other fruits and vegetables, with three mutually supportive tiers in different stages of development.

The bulk of this proposal will support formation of a third working group for IPM Tomatoes, building on the success of the existing WGs to develop an Eco Tomato program for the Northeast. Red Tomato will coordinate the Eco Apple WG, a mature program; Eco Stone Fruit WG, which is ready to move from pilot to market; and the new Tomato WG, for which the existing WGs will serve as models and mentors. Some support will be directed toward a joint annual network meeting including all three WGs.

Red Tomato, a non-profit organization, has several years of experience convening IPM Working Groups and bringing their benefits to the marketplace. The close working relationship among growers, scientists, and marketers has resulted in economic benefits to growers, expanded adoption of IPM practices, and increased public awareness of IPM benefits. This project will further extend those benefits to additional growers and crops.


Mid-Atlantic High Residue Cropping Systems IPM Working Group (HRIWG) Focusing on Slug Management

Project Director: Joanne Whalen
Funding Amount: $19,413

Growers across the Mid-Atlantic region have been reporting significant losses from slug populations in no-till production systems. In fact, many no-till growers identify slugs are their most challenging and frustrating pest to control. Extension agents, consultants, and producers report that economic losses, including stand reductions and reduced yields, from slugs occur annually on 20% of the Mid-Atlantic no-till corn and soybean acreage. In addition, damage from slugs and lack of cost effective management strategies pose a threat to continuous no-till systems. We have started to document a reduction in no-till acres in certain areas which could result in an increase in sediment loading into the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In January 2010, the Southern Region IPM Center funded an emergency planning meeting to establish a Mid-Atlantic Slug Working Group under their critical and emerging issues program. This proposal seeks continuation of the established group and expansion of membership to include additional extension agents and extension specialists, growers, private consultants and NRCS personnel from Delaware, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia. Anticipated impacts include the identification and prioritization of research, extension and education goals associated with slug management in no-till systems. This group will also serve as the planning group for the development of a larger grant to evaluate integrated slug management strategies including treatment thresholds, alternative controls, and the use of cover crops to increase beneficial species.


Native Pollinators of Eastern Apple Orchards and How to Conserve Them

Project Director: John Losey
Funding Amount: $19,923

In the Northeast, apple is an economically important crop that relies on insect pollination to set marketable fruit. Recent declines due to Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) and subsequent increases in hive rental costs make honey bees an increasingly risky pollination source for apple growers. Apple blooms during peak, wild bee activity in the Northeast; recent studies confirm that abundant and diverse native pollinators visit apple orchards. Grower interest in native pollinators and willingness to make management changes to enhance their pollination services in apple orchards are high. Quality guides on bee benefits for farming exist for national audiences, but are not widely distributed and inadequately address information needs of apple growers who want to optimize native pollination services.

This project seeks funding to produce an eastern region, apple-specific guide to native pollinators and how to conserve them. This synthetic publication would provide accessible information about native pollinator biology, importance and conservation, specifically in eastern apple orchards. Tables describing timing of bee activity within orchards and toxicity rankings of common pesticides will help growers minimize pesticide effects on pollinators. Steps to creating pollinator habitat will also be outlined as will links to NRCS government cost-share programs. The publication will be relevant to all eastern states, by including state-specific tables of bee and flower phenologies. The long term vision of such a publication is to promote sustainable, native pollination services for apple across the eastern landscape, by reducing the effects of pesticides on native pollinators and enhancing pollinator-friendly habitat.


Northeast School IPM Working Group: Building Coalitions and Improving Resource Accessibility

Project Director: Kathy Murray
Funding Amount: $20,000

Schools need help in adopting IPM practices. The Northeast School IPM Working Group (NESIWG), established in 2008, includes broad representation of organizations and agencies serving schools throughout the northeastern states. We propose to collaborate regionally to 1) establish school IPM demonstrations and coalitions to support and promote adoption of IPM practices and policies, 2) identify and capitalize upon opportunities to collaborate with other organizations to support and promote implementation of healthy, effective and sustainable pest management practices for schools , 3) improve access to IPM resources for school and childcare stakeholders, and 4) strengthen the capacity of the NESIWG to accomplish its mission and goals.

We have leveraged additional funds to support establishment of school IPM coalitions in three states and demonstration of K-12 teaching tools throughout the Northeast. With this proposal we are seeking funding to cover costs of communication and travel to support regional collaboration and resource sharing, complete projects underway, collaborate on national level to tackle new initiatives, and capitalize on our accomplishments to date.

We anticipate this project will increase compliance with state regulations while improving health and safety in the buildings and on the grounds of all schools throughout the northeast.


Northeast Small Fruit IPM Working Group and Pest Issues Tour

Project Director: Ann Hazelrigg
Funding Amount: $10,000

Small fruits are an economically important and rapidly expanding crop for the Northeast. Pest identification and knowledge of successful IPM strategies are crucial for the successful small fruit farm. A Northeast Small Fruit IPM Working Group that develops and directs IPM priorities for small fruit stakeholders in New York and New England is an important resource for the small fruit industry.

We propose a three day meeting with small fruit and/or pest management specialists from NY and New England universities, organic farming associations and NRCS. The first day of the meeting will be spent sharing slides/examples of pest issues encountered in our states and sharing information about our agencies' websites, diagnostic tools and IPM programs.

The second day will be spent in the field. One focus for this tour will be on propagation of clean nursery stock for small fruits. We will incorporate a tour of Nourse Farms, a large facility with a new Micro Propagation facility for producing plants for the small fruit commercial and home garden market. We will visit additional small fruit farms in the area including small fruit farms doing Farm to Table or School and high tunnel production. The third half day will be spent discussing pest management strategies with an emphasis towards choosing reduced risk pesticides and non-pesticide strategies that lead to sustainable solutions. The group will also identify and prioritize specific research, extension and education needs for small fruit stakeholders in New England.


Promoting Region-Wide Bee and Wasp Conservancy through IPM-based Publication

Project Director: David Biddinger
Funding Amount: $14,843

Bees and wasps are not only vital pollinators and, in the case of wasps, pest control agents for agricultural and natural environments, but they are also strong barometers of the level of sustainability in production systems. While their complete role in the natural environment is inestimable, in agriculture they are responsible for the production and pest control protection of many commercially produced commodities. The decline in both managed and non-managed pollinator species, including certain wasp species, continues to be a major reason of concern because of its potentially extensive negative implications for agriculture, the economy, and the environment. Since the onset of Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) in 2007, multidisciplinary scientific inquiry has revealed a multitude of stressors that can synergistically affect honeybees. Pathogen and pest infestation, inadequate diet, lack of genetic variability, pesticide contamination, and intensive management are some of the most frequently mentioned potential CCD-causing factors. Some of these factors, such as pesticide misuse and land development, can negatively affect the populations of non-managed pollinators as well, but the full extent of the damage is virtually impossible to document.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture, animal-pollinated vegetable, fruit and nut crops produced in the Northeast region in 2008 accounted for 1.8 billion dollars. In the Northeast region, more than 40 horticultural crops rely on or benefit from animal pollination. Throughout the U.S. over the past three years both large and small beekeeping operations have experienced significant honeybee colony losses, with yearly averages exceeding 30%. This has created a shortage of the number of honeybee colonies available for commercial pollination, resulting in higher pollination fees for growers and, ultimately, more expensive produce prices for the consumer. As a result, stakeholders from several Northeastern IPM Working Groups have raised the need for pollinator research and/or education programs.

Currently, there are no bee and wasp field guides available for the Northeast region or other regions of the Eastern United States. Through this project, we will develop a user-friendly publication on the 40 most common bees and wasps in the Northeastern United States. Aside from full color pictures and succinct lifecycle descriptions, this publication will provide the public and vegetable and fruit growers with valuable information regarding IPM-based methods of conservation and, when needed, control.


Sustainable Landscape IPM Working Group Plan of Work for 2011

Project Director: Mary Kay Malinoski
Funding Amount: $18,798

The Sustainable Landscape IPM Working Group formerly the Community IPM (CIPWG) working group has been active for many years, addressing land care, water quality, and pesticide use issues in the Northeast. With this plan of work we intend to refine the very challenging process of measuring change in attitudes and practices of the public. We have decided to focus our efforts on the adoption of a single lawn care practice: correct mowing height. This is the single most critical practice that homeowners need to do correctly to have a healthy lawn. All lawn IPM practices hinge on proper mowing. New members will include a large lawn care company, a small lawn care company, and the Smithsonian Institution. During our proposed meeting we will discuss the barriers to adopting this practice, discuss logistics of a multi-state, multi-organizational project, and roles of the working group members. We will develop a protocol for details of the project. Educational outreach tools will include a promotional 12 inch ruler with correct mowing height indicated, and revised Growing Green Lawns Magnets. The magnets will reinforce best management practices for lawns. Cooperators will distribute the rulers and magnets to clients according to the protocol developed at the working group meeting. Evaluation survey data will be collected and analyzed to determine adoption of the desired change in behavior: mowing practice.


[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2011

Development of Management Strategies Targeting the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys in Peppers

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $135,727

The brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) has spread throughout the east and portions of the Midwest and west. BMSB became a severe pest of tree fruit and vegetables in 2009 and 2010. Currently, no adequate pest management alternatives exist to prevent damage to peppers creating the potential for the illegal use of insecticides. This project proposes to develop BMSB monitoring methods, assess BMSB feeding injury in pepper, evaluate cultivar susceptibility differences to BMSB feeding, determine natural enemy species composition in different cultivars, and determines the toxicity and field efficacy of selected insecticides for BMSB control. Objectives 1 and 2 will be accomplished by sampling BMSB populations and determining damage levels caused by BMSB in unsprayed sweet bell peppers. Objectives 3 and 4 will be accomplished by sampling BMSB and natural enemy populations and determining damage levels caused by BMSB in a variety of unsprayed pepper cultivars. Objective 5 will be accomplished by spraying sweet bell peppers with different insecticides to determine efficacy in terms of BMSB toxicity and reductions in damage to fruit. We anticipate this project to safeguard human health and the environment by reducing illegal of insecticides, provide economic benefits by reducing the pepper damage caused by BMSB and promote IPM implementation by developing the tools that can be used by farmers to reduce damage caused by BMSB.


Identification of Factors Associated with Onion Bacterial Diseases to Facilitate the Development of an IPM Program

Project Director: Beth Krueger Gugino
Funding Amount: $179,788

During the past 5 to 10 years, bacterial bulb decay has assumed much greater importance in the Northeast region. In PA and NY, annual losses range from 5 to 40%. However, disease losses are variable, both among and within fields; in many cases, the full extent of disease losses is not evident until harvest or thereafter. This proposal seeks to determine the factors that are correlated with more extensive losses from bacterial diseases. We hypothesize that the presence of inoculum of several important bacterial pathogens in soil, transplants and possibly weeds and thrips is strongly correlated to disease incidence and severity. In addition, we hypothesize that high levels of nitrogen fertilization, thrips-induced injury and wind-induced injury contribute to the incidence and severity of bacterial diseases. Our approach is to conduct intensive small plot surveys of factors related to the presence of inoculum in commercial fields and to determine the extent of bacterial disease development in those fields during the growing season, at harvest and following harvest. In addition, replicated on-farm research trials will be carried out to assess the relationship between nitrogen levels, thrips-induced injury and wind-induced injury and resulting bacterial decay in onions. Currently, small-scale diversified fresh market onion growers as well as large-scale onion producers lack effective tools with which to manage bacterial diseases in onions. The goal of this proposal are to identify important relationships and utilize such knowledge to develop IPM-based recommendations to reduce the likelihood of severe losses from bacteria pathogenic to onions.


Management of the Asian Tiger Mosquito among Socioeconomically Diverse Urban Neighborhoods through Community-based Education and Involvement

Project Director: Paul Leisnham
Funding Amount: $124,174

This is a Joint Research-Extension project to advance management of the invasive Asian tiger mosquito among urban environments with diverse socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. The Asian tiger is a common human-biting mosquito in urban areas and important in West Nile transmission. Abatement efforts by public agencies are ineffective because it breeds in obscure water-containers spread across private-access land. This project will conduct: (1) research to identify mosquito exposure and evaluate education materials and "citizen science" strategies; and (2) extension with stakeholders to develop and implement management interventions appropriate for different socioeconomic and cultural contexts. This approach will reduce numbers of containers and adult mosquitoes by promoting lasting behavior change. It will reduce the use of temporary and ineffective adulticides. Mosquito populations and knowledge, attitudes, and practices of residents in Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD will be compared between education-intervention and non-intervention settings using entomological and social surveys in a Before-After-Control-Intervention design. Focus groups and interviews will evaluate individual materials and strategies and inform development of improved methods. Materials, workshops, and publications will disseminate knowledge to audiences to broaden the implementation of successful methods. This project addresses the priorities of the NEIPM's Community/Public Health IPM working group, which include using diverse media to educate the public on implementing IPM in their homes and landscapes, and developing creative tools for measuring the impact of public education related to IPM practices in residential settings on changes in awareness and behaviors of target audiences.


Scale Management in Christmas Trees

Project Director: Richard S. Cowles
Funding Amount: $90,500

Foliar sprays to suppress cryptomeria and elongate hemlock scales prevent implementation of IPM in Christmas tree plantations in the northeast because they are toxic to natural enemies. Three tools will transform growers' practices: (1) chemical control: a reduced-risk insecticide applied to the trunk of the tree is directly absorbed and translocated to foliage, where it selectively kills scales, (2) biological control: several fungi found to infect armored scales will be cultured and then applied to trees, with or without whey adjuvants, to cause infections, and (3) cultural control: decreasing nitrogen fertility should reduce the intrinsic rate of growth for scales so that the existing complex of natural enemies can maintain scale populations below damaging levels. In published research trials the basal trunk spray of dinotefuran suppressed scale populations while conserving natural enemies; extension specialists in NJ, PA and RI will demonstrate this technique to growers with infested plantations. Several fungi found to infect the two targeted armored scales may provide a higher degree of selectivity than commercialized insect pathogenic fungi; if effective, these fungi could be registered through the IR-4 program. Adjustments in soil nitrogen fertility are expected to create growing conditions optimal for Christmas trees and less favorable to scales. The options being developed should readily be adopted by growers because they will be less expensive, more effective, and less toxic to the applicator and to the environment than current practices. A scale management web guide will extend the findings to growers.


Training the Trainers: Expanding the use of seed heat treatment for management of bacterial diseases of tomato and other vegetable crops in the Mid-Atlantic and surrounding region

Project Director: Christian A. Wyenandt
Funding Amount: $69,606

This is a multi-region, Extension project seeking total funds of $69,917. This project will help promote effective bacterial disease management strategies for tomato and other vegetable crops which will lead to better industry practices in the mid-Atlantic region. The goals of this project are to educate and train vegetable growers, extension personnel, and seedsmen about the procedures and benefits of using hot water seed treatment for managing bacterial diseases of tomato and other vegetables. The Priority Pests identified by the Northeast Vegetable IPM Working Group in 2007 included bacterial pathogens of tomato and pepper, which remained on the list when up-dated in 2009. This project includes the expanded adoption of IPM (Part 4A) by serving the needs of small or isolated farm operations and/or highly diversified farms where monitoring services are not available. With the goal of growers being able to accomplish IPM independently, by placing an emphasis on preventative practices and encouraging application of IPM methods enhancing the success of organic farming systems, this project will address priority needs for the region (Part 4C). Another priority set by the region is to support professional training and communication across the region for agricultural professionals in vegetable IPM (Part 8). Extension personnel will gain the knowledge needed to establish their own heat-seed treatment programs and to train vegetable growers on how to properly heat treat seeds and educate these growers about all IPM practices that can be used in their farms, reducing bacterial diseases of tomato and other important vegetable crops.


[to top]

RFA: Urgent IPM Grant Program

An Educational and Monitoring Effort on Spotted Wing Drosophila: A New, Economically Important Pest

Project Director: Kathy Demchak
Funding Amount: $10,000

Spotted wing drosophila (SWD) is a recently introduced, invasive fruit pest that can inflict high levels of damage to the Northeastern fruit industry. Fruit crops in the Northeast IPM region that can be infested by SWD had a 2010 value of production of well over $300 million. Unlike its native counterparts, which feed only on overripe fruit, SWD infests otherwise marketable fruit with maggots. SWD has up to 13 generations per year and the ability to move from crop to crop during the season on small, diversified-crop farms.

Because of the newness of this pest to the Northeast, data on the current extent of damage is sketchy, although there are reports of nearly total losses of certain crops on several Northeastern farms in 2011. There is concern that because of increased quantities of cull fruit left in the field due to damage caused by the brown marmorated stink bug in the Mid-Atlantic region, food sources for SWD were abundant.

Through this project, extension educators and growers will be provided with SWD educational materials that will reflect the geo-climatic and socio-economic characteristics and needs of growers in the Northeast region. In addition, fruit growers and extension educators throughout Maryland and Pennsylvania will be provided with the tools needed to initiate a concerted SWD monitoring effort. This will result in minimized economic losses from SWD, as well as information for better timing of spray programs that manage SWD.


Custom Baits to Manage Spotted Wing Drosophila

Project Director: Richard S. Cowles
Funding Amount: $10,000

The spotted wing drosophila (SWD), Drosophila suzukii, is an extremely invasive direct pest affecting small fruits (raspberry, blueberry, strawberry, and grapes) and tree fruits (particularly cherries). I discovered this pest in New England on August 19, 2011, from traps designed to study strawberry sap beetles. In one month, this pest caused $500,000 - $1,000,000 in losses to fruit growers in Connecticut and Rhode Island due to unsaleable maggot-infested fruit. Late fruiting blueberries, nearly the entire crop of fall-bearing raspberries, many wine grapes, and day-neutral strawberries were lost. Current SWD management recommendations developed by Oregon State University and SCRI collaborators suggest weekly applications of methomyl, malathion, advanced generation pyrethroids, or spinosyns. Full foliar sprays of these products, except for spinosyns, will set back decades of IPM progress by eliminating the beneficial predators and parasites in these crops. Such intensive use of pesticides is very expensive, selects intensively for insecticide resistance, and leaves residues on fruit. This project complements an existing SCRI project on the west coast by discovering how attractive baits can be combined with insecticides, some organically acceptable, to manage SWD. Greenhouse trials during winter months with a laboratory colony will provide quantitative data on methods that can be implemented in the 2012 growing season. Pest management methods developed in this proposal will provide science-based pest management that improves human and environmental health by minimizing the need for full foliar sprays of broad spectrum insecticides to manage this new pest. Results will have local, regional, and national importance.


Developing Emerald Ash Borer First Detector Training for New York and the Northeast

Project Director: Mark Whitmore
Funding Amount: $9,974

Emerald Ash Borer, Agrilus planipennis, is a wood boring beetle that feeds on and kills ash trees, Fraxinus spp. Native to Eastern Asia, Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) first became established near Detroit, Michigan in the 1990's and has quickly become one of the most destructive forest pests in North America. It was first discovered in New York State in 2009, and since then has been detected in a total of 10 locations. New York State is home to approximately 900 million green, white, and black ash trees in yards, communities, fields and forests that are all at risk from the EAB. As it moves eastward New York is considered a gateway to New England, where management and outreach efforts will likely affect movement and population behavior into this region. Early detection and rapid response are a crucial aspect of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) for slowing the spread of EAB, which is the stated management goal of the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). Early detection and rapid response relies on not only professional forest managers, but also an aware public, knowledgeable industry professionals, prepared communities, and trained volunteers.


Manejo Sano de Controlar las Plagas en su Hogar: How-to IPM Instruction for Low-literate Latinos

Project Director: Michael P OLeary
Funding Amount: $10,000

Proposal Summary: The Baltimore City Health Department (BCHD) Healthy Homes Bureau (HHB), with Northeastern IPM Center (NEIPMC) support, will produce and distribute a low literacy Spanish language IPM booklet with a detachable quick reference tool. This booklet will enable Spanish speaking audiences in the Northeast Region and beyond to practice safe and effective home pest control (thereby addressing the 2009 Community IWG priority of using "diverse media to educate the public on implementing IPM in their homes, lawns and landscapes").

Local health departments and community organizations are extremely limited in their capacity to help residents respond to pest infestations in the safest way possible. Desperate for relief and unable to afford professional treatment, residents often turn to common, accessible methods -- loose baits, foggers, bombs, and spray pesticides. These products are not only ineffective against pests, but they are hazardous and frequently misused. Unsafe practices are often magnified in Latino populations that struggle with an urgent and unmet need for clear information on safe alternatives. In addition to language barriers, Latinos often face higher rates of poverty and crowding that favor pest problems. Additionally, Latinos are the fastest growing minority population in Maryland and the United States, making this Spanish language IPM booklet a much needed and timely resource.

This will be a clear, comprehensive, and culturally sensitive booklet for low literate Latinos on how to identify pests, pest problems and their health consequences, and how to benefit from and practice do-it-yourself household integrated pest management. Pests covered include rodents, cockroaches, and bed bugs. This grant will fund the adaptation, translation, testing, finalization, printing and distribution of an IPM booklet originally developed with EPA funding for a low literate English-speaking audience.


Spotted Wing Drosophila in New England: Rapid Response Training and Coordination

Project Director: Glen Koehler
Funding Amount: $9,993

The arrival of Spotted Wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, (SWD) in New England in 2011 poses significant risk to high value crops in the region with cumulative annual crop value over $150 million. Cooperative Extension IPM programs that help growers minimize pesticide use currently do not account for this new pest.

In order to help growers know if, when, and how they need to manage this pest, we need to educate ourselves about SWD identification, monitoring, life cycle, and host plant interactions. We also need to coordinate plans for 2012 field activity to determine SWD overwintering, dispersal, distribution, and timing in New England. We need to do this before the 2012 growing season to minimize potential economic, environmental, and human health impacts.

New England comprises a single biogeographic region with similar growing conditions and habitat. By working together across state lines we can efficiently use resources and expertise to provide commercial agriculture and home gardeners the best available support to deal with this significant new threat.

This proposal seeks support to organize an SWD training and coordination workshop; produce a regionally appropriate SWD Pest Alert factsheet; identify and rank SWD research, regulatory, and education priorities; develop a coordinated regional plan and provide traps for a standardized New England SWD trapping system; and build technical capability for centralized display, processing and analysis of SWD survey data.



2010 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2010

Community Education for IPM in Upper Manhattan

Project Director: Evan Hess
Funding Amount: $8,000

In upper Manhattan, the aging housing stock, characterized by extensive water infiltration, holes, cracks, and poor sanitation, results in an environment conducive to vermin. In response, NMIC proposes to increase awareness of IPM among residents, owners, building managers and superintendents as an effective method to eliminate rodent infestation in targeted areas, and diminish use of toxic pesticides. We will hold a total of 10 training workshops on IPM over the course of one year. Five will be targeted to low-income cooperatives and tenant controlled rental buildings, all with rodent infestation problems, and two with adjacent vacant lots, with the remaining five workshops targeting tenants associations, superintendents and building managers in privately owned buildings with rodent problems.

Our workshop curriculum will cover the basics of Integrated Pest Management. Our approach will be holistic -- we will discuss the neighborhood conditions that foster vermin infestations, such as the prevalence of deteriorated buildings and vacant lots, and review the laws and mechanisms available to residents to change these conditions. We will promote the long term cost effectiveness of controlling infestations, saving on the cost of violations given by the NYC Department of Health, as well as repeated use of pesticides. Bilingual (English/Spanish) materials will be distributed at all workshops.

To evaluate our effectiveness, NMIC staff will survey infestation in targeted buildings before workshops, creating a baseline. We will document all attempts to exterminate vermin using IPM. At the conclusion of the trainings, we will again survey the extent of the infestation to assess success. The service model will be promoted beyond New York for replication in other urban, immigrant communities in the northeast with aging housing stock.


Cultural Practices to Manage Bacterial Diseases in the Small-Scale Intensive Production of Fresh Market Onions

Project Director: Christine Hoepting
Funding Amount: $39,718

Small-scale diversified fresh market vegetable growers who grow onions intensively are constantly challenged by yield losses due to bacterial bulb rots, which greatly compromise the profitability of the crop. If bacterial diseases cannot be managed, the profitability of this industry will not be sustained or expanded. The focus of this project is to evaluate, demonstrate and encourage adoption of cultural tactics to reduce bacterial diseases in small-scale intensive production of fresh market onions. We will evaluate the effects of mulch type and planting configurations on incidence of bacterial disease of onions, yield, bulb size, economic return and grower adoption. This project will be a cooperative effort among the Cornell Cooperative Extension Vegetable Program in New York, Penn State University, Cooperative Extension in Pennsylvania and two grower cooperators in New York and Pennsylvania. Successful demonstration of research-based recommendations to modify planting configuration and/or mulch type will result in 50 to 100% adoption of the 54 onion growers in the Finger Lakes region of NY and Lancaster County, PA. Consequently, losses due to bacterial rot and number of copper bactericide sprays will decrease, while yield, profitability and acreage of intensively managed sweet onions will increase, and more locally grown produce will be available to the consumer, and the small-scale fresh market onion industry will be sustained.


Developing a Novel Low Risk Fumigation Technique for Bed Bug Control

Project Director: Changlu Wang
Funding Amount: $7,995

Over the past ten years, bed bugs have emerged as the most rapidly spreading urban pest and are challenging urban communities and pest management firms throughout the country. Unfortunately, little research has been conducted on bed bugs in over 50 years, particularly when it comes to techniques to effectively and safely eliminate existing infestations. Many bed bug infested items such as books, electronics, shoes, and other non-washable items cannot be treated by pesticides. Small portable heating containers are available for killing bed bugs hiding in non-washable small items, but they are expensive and inefficient. There is an urgent need for developing a safe and low cost technique to eliminate bed bugs from non-washable items. Our objectives are to: 1) determine the concentration-mortality response of bed bugs to carbon dioxide (CO2) fumigation; and 2) evaluate the effectiveness of containerized CO2 fumigation for controlling bed bugs. The CO2 source will be dry ice which is very cheap and does not contaminate the environment. The technique will have three major impacts: 1) creates significant savings to customers who experience bed bug infestations by avoiding the need to discard the infested items, 2) reduces potential re-infestation of the rooms from infested personal items, and 3) reduces the potential misuse of chemicals on personal items. This project will further the Northeastern IPM Center's mission by introducing another low risk technique into bed bug IPM programs.


Educating School Children and the Public about Container Mosquitoes and Their Prevention

Project Director: Kristen Bartlett
Funding Amount: $20,000

Container mosquitoes are serious nuisance pests to humans. Because these mosquitoes lay eggs in backyard containers, control of mosquito larvae is often too difficult over large areas. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) of these species relies heavily on public education (brochures, handouts, public service announcements, community events and website) to promote source reduction. However, these practices cannot target everyone and in general, are geared mainly toward adults.

Many mosquito control agencies in the US are developing mosquito-based curricula that can be used to teach school children about the use of IPM to control mosquitoes. This project proposes to produce and distribute mosquito IPM curricula and materials previously developed by the principle investigators to mosquito control agencies in NJ, the Northeast and nationally. In turn these agencies will promote the use of these materials in elementary schools in the areas distributed. By educating school children about mosquitoes and mosquito IPM, we will reach a larger proportion of the general public and thus have a greater impact on container mosquitoes.


Educating the Public With Plant, Turf and Pest Posters

Project Director: Mary Kay Malinoski
Funding Amount: $6,426

The Northeast Community IPM Working Group (CIPMWG) has been very active and successful in developing IPM content for web sites and colorful easy to read posters. This group's primary focus is IPM in residential settings. This proposal of 3 new IPM poster series is based on prior success with dissemination of IPM information to the public through many settings on a national, regional, and local level. The 1st poster series will feature 5 trees, 5 shrubs, and 5 herbaceous perennials that are considered relatively pest free and low maintenance. These 15 plants will be widely adaptable across the mid Atlantic, Northeast, and North Central regions. The 2nd poster series will be a redesign of 8 "Growing Green Lawns" lawn care posters. These lawn posters will be more user friendly and easier to read. The topics range from which grass cultivars to plant, to fertilizer, and pest control. The 3rd poster series will be 5 posters on common pest control issues in the home such as rats, mice, cockroaches, ants, and bed bugs. This proposal will design and print 2 complete sets of posters that will also be available on the CIPMWG web sites (growinggreenlawns.org and bughelp.org). Order forms on the web sites will request use statistics and feedback on poster usefulness. Poster sets will be printed on durable, weather-proof material so that they will stand up to many uses and weather conditions. It is hoped that this project will increase effective IPM messaging to the public on low maintenance plants, proper lawn care, and common household pests and become adopted by nurserymen, landscape professionals, turf maintenance personnel and pest control operators.


Enhancing Delivery of IPM Education to Fruit Growers

Project Director: Michael J. Fargione
Funding Amount: $7,942

Retention of information presented at IPM extension meetings is difficult due to the ephemeral nature of speaker presentations. Information retention is limited by growers' ability to scribe notes during presentations, because handouts are not always available from speakers, and especially because speakers' oral explanations are not available to growers when they review their notes or handouts months or years after the presentations. Handouts provide even less value for growers who did not attend the actual meetings. We propose to create multi-media educational packets relating to specific fruit IPM topics using the PowerPoint presentations and oral recordings of speakers from the Hudson Valley Regional Fruit Grower School. A collection of these packets will be made available to all NE fruit growers through the world-wide web. In addition, key segments of IPM presentations will be edited into limited PowerPoint slides plus brief audio vignettes that will be advertised directly to growers at time-sensitive periods in the growing season. Grower use of these new IPM educational materials will be evaluated to determine their effectiveness at enhancing IPM education and altering grower IPM practices.


Establishing an IPM Working Group on Invasive Species for New England and New York

Project Director: Ellie Groden
Funding Amount: $19,973

Invasive plant and animal species have caused considerable problems in both natural and managed landscapes, with resulting damage, losses, and efforts to manage them estimated to cost the United States economy over $120 billion per year (Pimentel et al. 2005). These problems do not conform to political boundaries, and are thus best addressed with interstate coordination. Regional efforts to address invasive species in the NE have generally been fragmented by target species, taxa, or ecosystems impacted with little coordination across species and taxa or between the many instate and regional groups working on these issues. Individual states and the NE region could benefit greatly from more coordination among the individuals, agencies and organizations working in this area, both within and among states. Because of the shared geographic characteristics (including climate, landscape and land-use features) in New England and parts of New York, it will be most productive for those working with invasive species in these states to coordinate and assess the threats to this subregion. This project will establish an IPM Working Group (IWG) on Invasive Species for New England and New York in order to exchange information among the states on within state coordination of invasive species efforts via councils, advisory boards and/or networks, and assist each other with instate coordination efforts and assessing the needs of stakeholders within individual states. The IWG will then prioritize specific regional IPM outreach and research needs for invasive species that reflect the input from each of the state invasive species councils.


Evaluation of Specialty Potato Varieties for Late Blight Resistance and Adaptation to Rhode Island

Project Director: Rebecca Brown
Funding Amount: $3,458

In 2009 late blight caused substantial crop losses for farmers growing potatoes in Rhode Island and throughout the Northeast. Most potatoes grown in Rhode Island are harvested for fresh market. Traditional eastern white potato varieties are being replaced with specialty potatoes which are popular with chefs, farmers' market customers, and CSA members. Growers serving these direct retail markets are more likely than wholesale growers to be certified organic or pesticide-free, making disease resistance a major component of their IPM strategy. There is little information available on the susceptibility of specialty potato varieties to the current populations of late blight. In addition, many of the newer late blight resistant varieties have not been tested for adaptation to the coastal climate of southern New England, and growers are not familiar with them. The objective of this project is to conduct a variety trial of specialty potatoes and late blight resistant varieties to determine their suitability for fresh market production in Rhode Island. Potatoes will be grown in replicated small plots and evaluated for disease and insect problems, yield, tuber quality and eating quality. The trial will be managed to encourage late blight; if natural infection is insufficient varieties will be tested in the lab using the detached leaf
method. Trial results will be communicated to growers through the August twilight meeting, a trial report, and recommendations in the 2012 New England Vegetable Management Guide. Trial results will benefit growers by permitting them to select less-susceptible varieties for planting, and adjust their use of preventative fungicides accordingly.


Increasing IPM Adoption in Potatoes

Project Director: Donald E. Flannery
Funding Amount: $15,000

The potato industry in the US and Canada has a long history of promoting the latest Integrated Pest Management (IPM) innovations and best practices. In 1997 the National Potato Council (NPC) initiated a industry-wide survey to measure adoption of IPM practices that reduce the risks to the environment of pesticide use while maintaining or increasing overall productivity. In 2008, the National Potato Council committed to updating its initial survey as part of its member strategy for the US EPA Pesticide Environmental Steward Program. Over the last eight months, a broad collaboration of producers, processors and buyers including NPC, Canadian Horticultural Council, McDonalds, Simplot, McCain, Lamb Weston and individual potato growers have been working to develop a survey tool that can be used by the majority of growers to evaluate the use and adoption over time of IPM and other best management practices. Here we are requesting funding to operationalize the survey and reporting components so that participating potato growers will be able to complete the survey online, and the potato industry will be able to generate IPM adoption statistics by state, region, intended market and overall, including contributing to the national effort to measure and evaluate IPM impacts. The industry has committed significant cash and in-kind resources (Approximately $37,500 by Jan 13, 2010) to develop the survey and will continue to do so as it tests the survey over the next three months, and then conducts outreach to ensure participation once the on-line survey is operational. During the first year of operation it is expected that a minimum of 350,000 acres (of 1,000,000 USA acres) will be reported on the site.


IPM Small Farms Working Group

Project Director: Stephan L. Tubene
Funding Amount: $8,000

Small farmers including limited-resource farmers, minority, women, and new immigrant farmers across Maryland and Delaware are diverse and produce a variety of vegetables. They have served over the years by Extension programs on issues such as risk management expect for IPM systems. Delaware and Maryland (Delmar) small farmers could benefit from the Small Farms Working Group by increasing their knowledge and understanding of IPM systems. This new initiative proposes to develop and establish appropriate mechanisms to provide effective IPM programs to Delmar small farmers. Project objectives consist of developing economical and effective IPM strategies for fruits and vegetables grown in Delmar region; training small farmers to apply effective IPM systems in order to achieve high quality produce, protect agricultural workers, and minimize risks to the agricultural and natural environment in Delmar region; and developing a model that can be used in other states and regions. Expected impacts include increased number of Delmar small farmers who will adopt effective and alternative IPM strategies; increased number of Delmar small farmers who will produce high-quality crops; and increased number of identified Delmar small farmers who will minimize risks to the environment, and protect workers' health. In addition, an IPM training model for small farmers will be developed for potential application to other states and regions. To accomplish project goal and objectives, the IPM Small Farms Working Group will prioritize project activities following project timetable, monitor and evaluate the progress of the project using the logic model.


IPM Working Group: Extending Advanced IPM Marketing to New Crops

Project Director: Michael Rozyne
Funding Amount: $8,000

Red Tomato, a non-profit organization, will convene and coordinate an IPM Working Group including growers, agricultural scientists and extension agents, and its own in-house team of salespeople, communications manager, and art director. The close working relationship among growers, scientists, and marketers adds depth and practicality to this project, and has previously resulted in a highly successful Eco Apple program which has grown 500% in four years.

In this project, the Eco Apple IPM Working Group will build on the success of the Eco Apple program by expanding this growing/marketing model to include other crops. Given its demonstrated effectiveness, expanding this proven model to other crops is a logical next step.

Red Tomato is proposing to expand the existing apple Working Group (IWG) to include other fruits and vegetables, adapting the Eco Apple model to these crops. We will evolve the current IWG for this purpose, exploring the right structure and support mechanisms to help growers to adopt IPM methods. This expansion will allow many other growers to reap the benefits of Red Tomato's years of research in marketing eco crops. This project will foster science-based pest management that safeguards human health and the environment, while at the same time generating economic benefits for those growers adopting IPM practices. It thus will further the implementation of IPM in the Northeast.


Minimizing the Impact of Pesticide Applications on Pollinators

Project Director: Ginger M. Pryor
Funding Amount: $25,000

Pollinators are not only vital players for agricultural and natural environments, but are also strong barometers of the level of sustainability in production systems. While their complete role in the natural environment is inestimable, in agriculture pollinators are responsible for the production of every third bite we eat. The ongoing decline in many pollinator species represents a worldwide environmental and economic threat. Recently, the US National Research Council's Committee underlined the magnitude of this threat and recommended that "as part of their outreach, federal granting agencies should make an effort to enhance public understanding of the importance of pollination as an ecosystem service through support for citizen-scientist monitoring programs, teacher education, and K-12 and general public education efforts that center on pollination". Northeast stakeholders from several IPM Working Groups have also raised the need for outreach efforts in pollinator education programs.

In this project, Extension Horticultural Educators and Master Gardeners will be provided with a train-the-trainer program on the most up-to-date pollinator-friendly IPM practices. The program will be delivered at nine sites (six in Pennsylvania and three in Maryland) for approximately 360 attendees, and each session will be broadcasted as a webinar for a total estimated 2,000+ off-site participants. At each site, the trainees will be provided with an intensive, full-day (8 hour) workshop covering pollinator biology, ecology, taxonomy, habitat requirements, and how to minimize the impact of pesticide applications on pollinators. Additionally, the participants will be provided with reference material that can be utilized in future educational programming. By participating in a train-the-trainer program, Extension Horticulture Educators and Master Gardeners will have the chance to improve their knowledge on pollinator species and importance; and how to better manage pollinators and their vital environmental services.


Multimedia Materials to Educate the Public on Bed Bug IPM

Project Director: Changlu Wang
Funding Amount: $19,998

The recent surge of bed bug infestations and management difficulties is, without question, a major concern facing both the public as well as the professional pest management industry. The resurgence of bed bugs has significant health and economic impact. Successful elimination of bed bug infestations requires the collaboration among residents, management staff, and pest management professionals. Multiple tools and steps are usually needed to achieve desired results and minimize environmental risks. Yet, because bed bugs are a relatively new pest, most people are unprepared for dealing with bed bugs. There is a shortage of user-friendly educational materials on best bed bug management techniques. Information on step-by-step approach to eliminate bed bugs is especially in urgent need. The objectives of this project are to: 1) develop a video demonstrating the bed bug biology, prevention, inspection, monitoring, proper use of non-chemical and chemical control tools, and step-by-step approach for conducting community-wide bed bug IPM programs, and 2) develop web sites demonstrating cost effective bed bug prevention and control techniques. Use of videos will help reduce control cost and economic loss, pesticide use, and human health risks associated with improper bed bug control practices. This project addresses the priority "Use diverse media to educate the public on implementing IPM in their homes, lawns, and landscapes" identified by Community IPM Working Group.


New England IPM Collaboration Working Group

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $16,937

The New England IPM Collaboration Working Group is a short-term ad hoc project to increase communication among the Cooperative Extension IPM Programs of the six New England states. We will organize a day-long workshop among the New England IPM Coordinators, state liaisons from the 2001-2009 PRONewEngland Pest Management Network, and up to two additional IPM program staff from each of the six New England states.

A regional IPM program census survey will be sent to participants before the workshop. At the workshop, a representative from each state will present a concise profile of IPM program staff, structure, funding, topics, and delivery methods for their state. The profiles and a summary of the regional IPM program census will be prepared before the conference and made available along with a discussion summary in a proceedings document published after the conference.

The bulk of the conference will consist of a facilitated group discussion of shared needs and available resources and capabilities; exploration of opportunities to harmonize existing activities or to add new coordinated components to existing IPM programs; and brainstorming on opportunities for new multistate IPM programs, publications, products, and other ways to synergize parallel activities in neighboring states to facilitate IPM funding, program operations, and outcomes.

The intent of the Working Group and of workshop is to plant seeds for regional collaboration among New England states for delivery of existing IPM programs and grant proposals for new efforts. At the close of the day, participants will complete a questionnaire to evaluate changes in awareness of ways to pursue those objectives. One year after the conference, a follow-up survey will be sent to participants to measure what activity has resulted from the information shared and personal networking done at the workshop. In addition, one year after the workshop we will repeat the New England IPM program census to acquire an updated status report that will be compared to the first census to see if changes have occurred.

The New England IPM Collaboration Working Group final report will include the workshop proceedings as described above, results from the initial and one-year follow-up participant evaluation surveys, results from the follow-up regional IPM program census, and a list of collaborative program activities and grant applications generated at least in part from the IPM Working Group activities.


New England Small Fruit IPM Field Manual

Project Director: Sonia G. Schloemann
Funding Amount: $19,220

This proposal seeks funding by the Northeast Integrated Pest Management Center under the IPM Partnership Grant program; section C (Regional IPM Publications), for the development of a New England Small Fruit IPM Field Manual. This publication will serve as a companion to the New England Small Fruit Pest Management Guide providing detailed information on pest identification and crop damage (photos), pest life cycles and crop susceptibility (graphics) for key small fruit pests along with the text describing monitoring methods, economic and action thresholds, and a suite of management tactics including cultural, biological, mechanical, and chemical methods. A variety of IPM information is available for small fruit growers in various print publications and on-line, but no single source currently provides all this information in one place for New England producers. As interest in establishing sustainability standards nationally and locally increases, growers need practical tools to guide them in implementing recommended practices. IPM methods are key to growers' success in this environment. This manual will provide the practical pest management information that growers need. Professionals from Extension, NOFA, Experiment Stations throughout New England will contribute content to this publication. Producers and independent crop consultants will participate in reviewing this publication. It will be available as a print publication, series of fact sheets, and as a searchable online resource for growers that will be accessible from each state's Extension website. A condensed form may be made into a pocket guide in the future.


New England Wine Grape IPM Tactic Survey

Project Director: Patricia Vittum
Funding Amount: $6,000

The wine grape industry is a rapidly growing industry in New England. In the past several years, New England Extension programs have been conducting research and education for this emerging industry. With the end of the initial funding of these activities, it has become important to identify the priorities for research, education and regulatory initiatives. Integrated pest management tactic surveys, crop files and strategic plans have been conducted and developed for many of the widely grown and important crops in the region, including apples, pears, peaches, strawberries, brambles, winter squash, and sweet corn. However similar efforts have not been conducted for wine grapes. In order to better understand the extent of the pest problems and crop management challenges, and to determine the adoption of IPM practices, we proposed to develop and conduct a Dillman method integrated pest management tactic survey for wine grapes that can be the first step to complete a New England Wine Grape Crop Profile and Strategic plan.


New York and New England Small Fruit Pest Tour and IPM Working Group (2010-2011)

Project Director: Ann Hazelrigg
Funding Amount: $8,000

Small fruits are an economically important crop for New England and are often an essential component of diversified vegetable farms. Pest identification and knowledge of successful integrated pest management strategies are crucial for the successful small fruit farm. A NY/NE Small Fruit IPM Working Group that develops and directs IPM priorities for small fruit stakeholders in New York and New England would be an important resource for the small fruit industry.

We propose a three day meeting with approximately 25 small fruit and/or pest management specialists from NY and New England. Pest management specialists from universities, organic farming associations plus NRCS will be invited. The group will focus on pest issues on organic farms as identified as a priority area in from our 2009 meeting. The first half day of the meeting will be spent sharing slides/examples of pest issues encountered in our states and sharing information about our various agencies' IPM programs. The following day will be in the field visiting organic blueberry, strawberry and raspberry farms plus a vineyard, examining the pest problems. The third half day will be spent discussing pest management strategies with an emphasis towards choosing reduced risk pesticides and alternative, non-pesticide strategies that lead to sustainable solutions. The group will also identify and prioritize specific research, extension and education needs for small fruit stakeholders in New England.

The continuation of an active and impactful Small Fruits IPM Working Group that addresses emerging IPM issues and priorities outlined in the National IPM Roadmap and by the NE IPM Center is one of the desired outcomes of the 3 day meeting. The second desired impact is improving the pest identification and integrated pest management knowledge in organic small fruit systems among specialists to benefit small fruit growers. A third desired impact is to increase knowledge of the different IPM programs offered by the different agencies at the meeting and to foster cooperation and transparency among the agencies.


Northeast School IPM Working Group 2010: Demonstrating and Supporting IPM Implementation and Education

Project Director: Lynn Braband
Funding Amount: $20,000

Schools need help in adopting IPM practices. The Northeast School IPM Working Group (NESIWG), established in 2008, includes broad representation of organizations and agencies serving schools throughout the northeastern states. We propose to collaborate regionally to 1) establish school IPM demonstrations and coalitions to support and promote adoption of IPM practices and policies, 2) identify and capitalize upon opportunities to collaborate with other organizations to support and promote implementation of healthy, effective and sustainable pest management practices for schools and communities and 3) strengthen the capacity of the NESIWG to accomplish its mission and goals.

We have leveraged additional funds to support two school IPM demonstrations, establishment of one school IPM coalition, and the facilitation of K-12 teaching tools throughout the Northeast. With this proposal we are seeking funding to cover costs of communication and travel to support regional collaboration and resource sharing which will enable us to capitalize on our successes and continue the work initiated in our first two years.

We anticipate this project will increase compliance with state regulations while improving health and safety in the buildings and on the grounds of all schools throughout the northeast.


Northeast Tree Fruit IPM Working Group

Project Director: Arthur Agnello
Funding Amount: $20,000

The northeastern US, comprising the New England and Mid-Atlantic states, has long been one of the country's most significant tree fruit production areas, particularly in apples, since the 1700s. Currently, a multi-state group of northeast fruit workers (research and extension scientists: entomologists, pathologists, horticulturists, plus extension educators, industry advisors and IPM pest managers) from NY and the New England states meet annually as the New England, New York and Canadian (NEng/NY/Can) Fruit Pest Management Workshop. This Northeast IPM Center grant proposes the formation of a Northeast (NE) Tree Fruit IPM Working Group, based on the nucleus of the current attendees of this meeting, with expansion of participants to include appropriate fruit IPM members from NJ, PA, and/or WV. The envisioned outcomes from the establishment of this WG include: 1) identification of priority fruit IPM needs and issues in the northeast region; 2) fostering of greater regional collaborations in IPM programs and expertise; 3) development and adoption of new IPM guidelines, management guides or pest alert systems; and 4) sharing of current and new IPM technologies, research results, and extension efforts during the annual meeting organized on a rotating basis among the member institutions, as well as through electronic (online) proceedings of these meetings. Such outcomes, along with documentation of the impacts of successful fruit IPM strategies on human (including economic) and environmental (including water quality) health, are increasingly relevant to sustainable fruit production and quality of life in the northeast region, and will help to link northeast regional fruit IPM objectives to the goals of the National IPM Roadmap.


Northeastern IPM Evaluation Working Group (2010-2011)

Project Director: William M. Coli
Funding Amount: $4,998

State IPM Coordinators, Extension Educators, Faculty researchers, other agency staff and others are in need of assistance planning programs whose impacts are quantifiable, and/or documenting impacts of previously conducted programs. The primary objective of the Working Group is to assist regional IPM Program professionals to better understand and utilize available techniques to document short-, intermediate-, and long-term impacts of adoption.

The Working Group will continue to function as two distinct sub-groups: one focused on agricultural IPM and one on Structural IPM in multi-family housing. Agricultural sub-group participants will meet face to face to complete development of an IPM Guideline for soybeans relevant to the states of Delaware, Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia. With separate NEIPMC funding, Agricultural sub-group members will also participate in converting the
completed Soybean IPM Guideline to a Dillman Method mail survey for measuring soybean grower IPM adoption levels. This separately-funded survey will be administered beginning in January, 2011.

The structural group will participate in a face to face meeting to discuss developing and deploying an on-line Survey Monkey instrument for housing authorities, health departments, grantees and selected others in the Northeast with the intent to catalogue existing types of impacts data. With such data in hand, this sub-group will discuss the feasibility of acquiring external funding to deploy a large-scale assessment of IPM impacts in multi-family housing as a component of National IPM Evaluation Group (NIPMEG) activities.

Overall impacts of the proposed activities will be to document IPM adoption in two very different focus areas, and to identify needs for future research and/or extension activities.


Organic Landscaping: Homeowners' Outreach

Project Director: Ashley Kremser
Funding Amount: $19,979

The greatest risk of pesticide exposure to the general population occurs where people live, work, and play. Landscaping pesticides used by homeowners on ornamental plants, lawns, and yards, carry the risk of negative impact on human health, particularly children's health, and the
environment. In the Northeast, where up to 70% of homeowners use pesticides outdoors, lawn care pesticides have been found in groundwater, surface water, and private wells. Both MA and CT have passed laws severely restricting pesticide use on school property.

The NOFA Organic Land Care Program trains and accredits professionals in organic landscaping methods that promote IPM strategies and we now have nearly 500 accredited professionals working in 19 states. The organic methods we teach focus on building healthy soil, proper plant
selection, and cultivating habitats that prevent pests. They avoid hazardous materials, prohibit invasive plants, minimize energy waste by avoiding synthetic fertilizer and pesticides, increase biodiversity, protect water resources and use local materials whenever possible. Our professionals have established that over the long term organic management techniques offer the same cultural benefits, such as beauty, functionality, and cost effectiveness as methods based on synthetic chemicals, but at a much lower environmental and health cost.

This past year we initiated a new project to extend our organic landscaping educational services beyond professionals to homeowners and property managers. Our homeowners' outreach project currently involves community workshops, website improvements, marketing, and seasonal
landscaping articles that provide information on IPM and ecological strategies for home landscaping.

We are now proposing to build on this homeowners' outreach work by developing three new outreach tools: a science-based "how-to" IPM and ecological landscaping guide for the homeowner; a full-color introductory brochure template customizable to locale; and an attractive educational display booth to use at the many outreach venues we table during the year. The overall goal of our homeowners' outreach project is to convert 100 acres per year from chemical management to ecologically minded, IPM.


Pest Resources Online (PRONewEngland) Website

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $7,931

The PRONewEngland web site (http://pronewengland.org) provides a single access point to the best IPM resources among the six New England states. The site provides the public with links to people and information from each state in an organized, coherent format.

The People directories provide email, web, telephone, and U.S. mail information for expert contacts for each pest topic in each state; all of the university, state and Federal programs active in each state; and for private sector groups with an interest in pest management issues active in each state (i.e. commercial agriculture associations and environmental organizations).

The best online resources for addressing New England pest problems are those produced within the region and which deal with specific needs. A key feature of the site is a database of 1099 pest fact sheets published by New England Land Grant Extension, Experiment Station, and state government agencies that site users can search by keyword.

For more direct access to the very best resources, there are subject-oriented directories for the topics of Biotechnology in pest management, Crop and Livestock pests, Health and Indoor pests, Invasive and Natural Resource pests, Integrated Pest Management and Biocontrol, Organic, Ornamental, Turf and Greenhouse pests, and Pesticide safety and reference information. The site features results from pest management tactic surveys, crop profiles, and pest management strategic plans produced in and for New England.

In addition, during the growing season PRONewEngland provides real-time site-specific weather based apple pest development and risk models for six locations in Maine, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. This system is known as Orchard Radar as it addresses apple insect and disease pests, as well as horticultural development models. The groundwork has been done to extend this methodology of site specific pest models to other sites and other crops (woody ornamentals pest, corn growth stages, etc.), and to allow users to download models with the latest weather observation and forecast data, and then customize model output according the growth stage and pesticide application dates for their specific situation.

The information provided in the contact directories, factsheet database, and publication directory links changes constantly. Staff assignments change, people change email addresses and phone numbers, new publications are issued and older ones are replaced, and web sites are routinely reorganized causing changes in web URL addresses. The purpose of this project is to keep the PRONewEngland website in operation; to validate and update all of the contact person and information links on the site; to move the apple pest phenology models to a more robust software platform; and to implement recently introduced capability for site visitors to customize pest model output by filtering it with their pesticide application dates.


Providing Northeast Growers Added Weaponry to Integrate into Their Arsenal Against Eggplant Pests

Project Director: Cerruti R.R. Hooks
Funding Amount: $8,000


Reducing Fogger Use and Increasing IPM in Rental Housing in Washington DC, Baltimore MD, and the Region

Project Director: Jane Malone
Funding Amount: $35,000

Excessive use of foggers and other pesticide products to combat cockroaches is the hallmark of outdated pest control strategies plaguing tenants with pest infestations in multifamily or attached dwellings in older cities. To address the misuse of pesticides comprehensively, important projects have engaged tenants, landlords, and pest control personnel in a simultaneous nexus to implement IPM. Fostering awareness of IPM by low-income tenants (who have low literacy skills, many demands for their attention just to make ends meet and keep their children in school, and limited mobility in the housing market) can start by educating them on how to reduce pesticide exposure pending building-wide practices and city-wide policies: cease fogger use and refuse to allow foggers or other liquefied products in or near their homes. The project will launch and sustain the Regional Fogger and IPM Awareness Campaign to educate tenants, property owners, pest control operators and other stakeholders in Baltimore and Washington about the health threats from exposure to pests and pesticides, the dangers of foggers and other liquefied formulations, and the merits of IPM. The Campaign will deliver targeted IPM education to 1000 tenants and 40 stakeholders, through tenant meetings, service provider outreach, and IPM training. The Campaign will also conduct policy and media briefings to spark systems change, and host regional meetings to advance the NE IPM work group on housing.


Soybean Adoption Survey for Delaware, Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia

Project Director: William M. Coli
Funding Amount: $29,755

Extension and research professionals, crop consultants and Department of Agriculture staff in the 4 Mid-Atlantic States of Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia and Virginia comprise a sub-group of the Northeastern IPM Working Group. Over the past year (2008-2009) they have collaborated to develop a draft of an IPM Guideline for soybeans relevant to their states. Over the winter of 2009-2010, the Working Group specialists will solicit further review of the current Guideline (See Appendix A) from industry contacts, and participate in converting the completed Soybean IPM Guideline to a Dillman Method mail survey.

Funding is sought for the resources needed to implement this survey beginning after soybean harvest in Fall, 2010. Using a statistically valid sample of the total 4-state soybean grower population, we will assess current soybean grower IPM adoption levels on a tactic-by-tactic basis and summarize them along a continuum of adoption. The survey will provide a baseline against which to measure changes in grower knowledge, behavior, and condition into the future. Further, retrospective questions will ask about IPM practices that growers have adopted over the past 5-10 years. These results will provide immediate data on impacts of IPM programming in the four states. They also will help soybean specialists to better understand future research and/or extension activities needs.


Vermont School IPM Project

Project Director: Carol Westinghouse
Funding Amount: $8,000

Most Vermont schools do not have a functioning IPM policy. Research has shown that exposure to pesticides can cause serious health effects in children including cancer, birth defects, nervous system disorders, reproductive issues, immune disorders, asthma episodes, and hormone disruption.

This project aims to educate school stakeholders on the hazards of using pesticides, the benefits of a verifiable IPM program, steps to implementation and ways to identify a legitimate IPM service program.

To address this problem, Informed Green Solutions (IGS) Project Director will:

*Participate in the NE School IPM Workgroup

*Coordinate a group of Vermont school stakeholders for a VT IPM Workgroup to

-identify mechanisms to educate school stakeholders

-develop a priorities list to identify critical issues in current pest management

-identify schools for pilot projects and participate in pilot projects

-generate/identify materials needed to educate stakeholders

-Add key IPM components to Informed Green Solutions' existing Cleaning for Healthy Schools Products and Practices Evaluations and materials

*Coordinate with the Envision (VT's Tools for Schools) Program to expand enrollment in the program through collaboration. (This program includes adoption of an IPM policy for each school enrolling.)


Working Group Meeting to Establish Objectives and Collaborations for Brown Marmorated Stink Bug

Project Director: Tracy C. Leskey
Funding Amount: $8,000

We will hold a two-day formal BMSB working group meeting that will provide a forum for sharing the latest research results and field observations, and establish research and extension priorities.


[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2010

A Trap Crop System for Managing Tarnished Plant Bug Damage in Northeast Strawberries

Project Director: Greg Loeb
Funding Amount: $80,756

This is a multi-state research project to develop an alternative to broad-spectrum insecticides to manage tarnished plant bug (TPB) in strawberries. TPB is a key insect pest of strawberries in the northeastern USA and many other regions of the country. The economic threshold for TPB is low in strawberry, and the application of broad-spectrum insecticides are frequently required leading to increased costs, and dangers to pesticide applicators and the agroecosystem, including negative effects on beneficial predators of strawberry pests. Our goal is to develop methods for using of winter canola, a highly preferred early-flowering crucifer, as a trap crop to attract and concentrate overwintered TPB adults from the surrounding areas thereby reducing colonization and damage in strawberry. Our specific objectives are to 1) quantify TPB abundance and strawberry damage as affected by proximity to and management of winter canola, 2) evaluate winter canola varieties to maximize attractiveness to TPB but minimize TPB population growth, and 3) quantify the benefits and costs associated with winter canola as a trap crop for commercial strawberry plantings in New York and Pennsylvania. Grower adoption of the results of this project could lead to substantial reduction in insecticide use and costs for strawberries grown in northeastern and north central states. The project addresses numerous objectives of the NE-RIPM program (e.g. reduce environmental and human risks, reduce dependence on pesticides, advance IPM principals in a relatively short timeframe, interdisciplinary) as well as the broad goal of advancing IPM knowledge and practices for multiple states in the northeast and surrounding regions.


Building IPM Capacity in Childcare and Early Educational Environments

Project Director: Edwin Rajotte
Funding Amount: $70,000

Our goal is to reduce risks to young children by increasing the capacity of educators, facilities managers and pest management professionals to teach and implement IPM in early educational settings. Such settings include public and private elementary schools, childcares, Head Start, and faith-based early learning programs. Successful IPM implementation in educational facilities requires a partnership between multiple individuals including:
* extension educators who provide information and programming to school communities;
* childcare/early education professionals who manage classrooms and children daily;
* facilities managers who assure building safety
* pest management professionals who provide pest management services.
The project develops innovative, targeted IPM programming for each of these groups, utilizing existing networks to reach new audiences.


Decision Support System for Tomato and Potato Late Blight

Project Director: William Fry
Funding Amount: $88,392

The research is required to provide data to achieve the overall goal, which is: to enable fungicides to be used more efficiently in late blight management. Late blight is a major constraint in both potato production and in tomato production, so experiments will occur in both agro-ecosystems. The delivery mechanism for information is a web-based interactive Decision Support System (DSS) that provides information to growers in real-time. Experiments to expand and improve the DSS are proposed. Evaluations of the final DSS will be conducted in research plots on research farms and in demonstration plots on growers' farms. The improvements to the DSS include: i) expansion of the system to include tomato late blight as well as potato late blight; ii) expansion of the system to include effective fungicides of low environmental impact; iii) identification of the conditions calling for the "first" fungicide application in tomatoes; and iv) development of active alerts to be sent to users when "high risk" conditions occur.


Development of a Baculovirus for Winter Moth IPM

Project Director: Joseph Elkinton
Funding Amount: $60,000

The winter moth, Operophtera brumata, is an invasive pest in a large portion of the Northeastern US including Massachusetts and Rhode Island. The expanding range and lack of adequate non-chemical control measures has led to identification of the development of integrated pest management (IPM) tactics for the control of this pest by the Pest Management Alternatives Program as a priority in the in Northeastern region. Based on successful attempts to control this insect in Nova Scotia using the tachinid parasitoid, Cyzenis albicans, we have initiated releases of this fly in Massachusetts to control winter moth. These releases have had limited success. In order to augment this biological control agent, we proposed to test the ability of the naturally occurring baculovirus O. bumata nuclelopolyhedrovirus (OpbuNPV) to become established in pest populations by introducing this agent into blueberry patches infested with winter moth. The naturally occurring biopesticide OpuNPV which we have recently found MA, is specific for O. bumata and can therefore be used with C. albicans in an IPM program to control winter moth without having a deleterious effect on other insect species including insect pollinators like honey bees.


Habitat and Resource Management to Enhance Biological Control in Greenhouses

Project Director: Jan Nyrop
Funding Amount: $58,844

Biological control holds the promise of sustainable and safe control of the most important greenhouse arthropod pest, western flower thrips. Release of the mite predator Amblysieus swirskii can lead to biological control, but often does not. Even though growers and extension educators have shown broad interest in biological control, a lack of consistent and reliable effectiveness impedes widespread adoption. We hypothesize that a solution is available and propose through a one-year effort to demonstrate this and set the stage for commercial-scale trials. Research has revealed that the predator, A. swirskii, quickly leaves plants that lack both leaf hairs (leaf trichomes) and a supplemental food source (pollen) and many greenhouse-grown plants are trichome free. We propose to mitigate this limitation by applying artificial leaf hairs (low densities of tiny fibers) and pollen to the canopy of plants lacking these resources. Over a twelve month period we will complete three objectives: (1) We will determine the influence of several types of artificial leaf trichomes and of several species of pollen on retention of and oviposition by Amblyseius swirskii and determine the influence of these pollens on oviposition by western flower thrips (WFT). (2) Based on these results we will determine the influence of select artificial leaf trichomes and pollen on the short-term dynamics of interacting populations of A. swirskii and WFT. (3) This will set the stage for conducting small greenhouse trials to determine the influence of artificial trichome and pollen augmentation on the effectiveness of biocontrol of WFT using A. swirskii.


Improved Timing of Control for the Grape Berry Moth (Paralobesia viteana) Using a Degree-Day Model

Project Director: Michael Saunders
Funding Amount: $166,904

Wine and juice grape production in the northeastern US is centered in the lakeshore regions of Pennsylvania, and New York and in the New York Finger Lakes region. The most serious pest of viticulture in the northeast is the grape berry moth, Paralobesia viteana (GBM). In recent years, this insect has become more difficult for growers to control using the traditional risk assessment protocol of applying insecticides at ten days post bloom, early August and late August. This protocol, although widely used, was developed in a time when most insecticides were broad spectrum contact poisons and is calendar based rather than phenology based. We propose to test and operationalize a degree day model for GBM to enable better timing of insecticide applications, especially to enable the effective use of new, low risk compounds that must be ingested in order to cause pest mortality. Our goals are to compare the efficacy of phenology model based spray timings to the traditional risk assessment timings, to identify user friendly biofix(es) for starting the degree day accumulations within each growing season, and to deliver these new timings by taking advantage of the NEWA network of weather stations. Pennsylvania will join this network by purchasing and installing two weather stations and linking them into NEWA and New York will add two stations to their existing network. This project responds to a regional stakeholder-organized meeting that developed priorities for addressing insect management issues.


Sustainable Management of the Small Hive Beetle (Aethina tumida), an Emerging Pest of Honeybees

Project Director: Daniel Gruner
Funding Amount: $56,107

With this joint research-extension project, we propose to develop and apply sustainable control practices for the small hive beetle (SHB, Aethina tumida), which infests honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies and vectors pathogens that may contribute to Colony Collapse Disorder. Honey bees - critical pollinators of a wide variety of fruit, nut and vegetable crops - are in protracted decline nationwide. The invasive SHB is rapidly expanding its range from the Southeast U.S., where it has been exceptionally destructive to colony health since 1998, into the mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions. Existing chemical controls are problematic for honey bee health because of exposure risks and associated costs. This project will develop, evaluate, and disseminate a multi-faceted, sustainable IPM strategy to disrupt the SHB life cycle. In functional hive experiments, we will evaluate two novel tactics - soil drenches of biopesticides and entomopathogenic nematodes to control wandering larvae - deployed in combination with in-hive trapping devices to capture invading adults (Objective 1). We will evaluate these IPM strategies through on-site demonstrations with cooperating master beekeepers and disseminate research results via eXtension education to help mid-Atlantic beekeeping associations rapidly implement recommendations (Objective 2). This project addresses thirteen NE-RIPM relevance criteria, three major priorities of the Northeast IPM center, and many specific directives from regional beekeeping organizations. Our approach will reduce environmental and human health risks by replacing hazardous pesticides with affordable traps, biorational organic-compatible pesticides, and augmentative biological control, and our demonstration and extension efforts will stimulate widespread adoption of IPM strategies across the region.



2009 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2009

Christmas Tree Crop Profile for New England

Project Director: Candace L. Bartholomew
Funding Amount: $8,078

This proposed project is to write a Christmas tree crop profile for New England. Data collected from the New England Pest Management Network Christmas Tree Pest Management Tactics Survey conducted in 2008 will be used to form the basis of the crop profile to be formulated under this proposal. There are no comprehensive IPM guidelines for Christmas tree production for New England. Christmas tree production in New England is substantially different from other parts of the country to justify development of a regional crop profile which would inform the development of IPM guidelines. No crop profile for Christmas trees currently exists for any New England states, except for Connecticut; a profile published in 1999 which is now out-of-date and no longer available. Completion of a crop profile follows the sequence of planning and assessment document development outlined in the request for proposals; survey, crop profile, strategic pest management plan.


Community IPM Working Group (2009-2010)

Project Director: Jody Gangloff-Kaufmann
Funding Amount: $15,000

In the densely populated Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic regions of the US, the environmental and health impacts of pests and pest control are important issues, given the amount of money spent on pesticides, fertilizers, and pest management services. Reaching people who are not affiliated with stakeholder groups, (the average citizen) has represented a challenge for cooperative extension. The Community IPM work group has begun to develop fresh approaches to large-scale public outreach through the use of eye-catching posters with clever messages delivered in public settings and through a mass-transit campaign. In 2009, the group plans to build upon the successes of these projects and learn from the shortcomings in order to plan better outreach and evaluation. For example, the current collection of landscape IPM posters, which were featured in the U.S. Botanical Garden in Washington D.C., will be offered to other botanical gardens using a portfolio to showcase the work. We will develop the means to share these posters through digital media, to allow local cooperative extension offices, stakeholder groups, and others to print and use them. Additional posters for pests of structures will be developed. The mass-transit campaign for www.growinggreenlawns.org will be evaluated and used as a model for outreach for a structural pest site titled www.bughelp.org which will tie in the structural IPM posters. The group will continue to collaborate with the North Central IPM Center, and members are organizing several sessions at the National IPM Symposium. Additionally, the group is joining with EPA's initiative for community-based IPM.


Conservation Activity Plans: An Opportunity for IPM

Project Director: Thomas Green
Funding Amount: $8,000

NRCS has launched a Conservation Activity Plan (CAP) pilot program for FY 2009. The plan provides a 75% cost-share to producers for preparation of conservation plans by qualified, pre-approved, private-sector Technical Service Providers (TSPs). A 90% cost-share is available to historically underserved producers. We propose to ensure effective participation in CAP program to advance adoption of IPM.


Delaware Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2009-2010)

Project Director: Susan King
Funding Amount: $5,000

King will respond to requests for information on pesticide use in Delaware.


Developing Improved Protocols to Assess Alfalfa Varieties for Resistance to P. sclerotioides

Project Director: Gary Bergstrom
Funding Amount: $37,351

Phoma sclerotioides, an economically important fungal pathogen with widespread distribution in the Northeast, causes brown root rot of alfalfa (BRR) and contributes to alfalfa spring black stem and leaf spot (SBS). Alfalfa varieties with effective resistance to P. sclerotioides are not available. BRR resistance of alfalfa varieties appears to differ by P. sclerotioides biotype, with no variety resistant to all biotypes. All varieties are at least moderately susceptible to SBS caused by P. sclerotioides. Current breeding protocols involve the use of a single isolate of P. sclerotioides to screen for resistance to BRR and do not include P. sclerotioides when screening for resistance for SBS. The proposed study will identify the minimum set of isolates needed to breed alfalfa for effective P. sclerotioides resistance and will investigate which P. sclerotioides biotypes contribute to SBS. Controlled studies will be conducted to test the virulence of isolates of each P. sclerotioides biotype to the alfalfa varieties Peace, Starbuck, and WL 347 LH. Preliminary studies suggest that the P. sclerotioides resistance of these varieties differs by biotype. Both foliar and root inoculations will be conducted. Field surveys will be conducted in New York and Vermont to evaluate which P. sclerotioides biotypes are associated with SBS in alfalfa production fields. The study will provide breeders with the tools necessary to develop alfalfa varieties with stronger, more effective resistance to both root and foliar disease caused by P. sclerotioides.


Developing Key Indicators for Greenhouse Grower Discovery and Implementation of Guardian Plants in IPM

Project Director: Carol S. Glenister
Funding Amount: $12,849

We propose to develop a database in which growers' observations can be recorded and shared. In order to do this, we propose to cooperate with growers to set up and evaluate a Guardian Plant monitoring template and develop a decision tree for growers interested in producing their own Guardian Plant. We will test this template and decision tree on 2 Guardian Plant systems at 3 grower sites, and together with the growers identify and quantify key indicators of Guardian Plants impact. The two Guardian Plant systems are: 1. black pearl ornamental peppers supporting thrips predator, Orius insidiosus and 2. lantana supporting whitefly parasites. We will revise the monitoring template and decision tree as needed, then publish these together with a Guardian Plant database that we compile from the 2009 work, 5 years of data developed in Guardian Plant and Habitat Plant work supported by NE IPM and NE SARE and all other Northeast grower records that we know of. In addition, we will set up grower presentations on their experiences at grower meetings in Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, New York and possibly Ohio.


Development of a New IPM Outreach Campaign: A Bold Website and IPM Messages on City Buses

Project Director: Steven B. Jacobs
Funding Amount: $20,000

The public can access structural pest information on numerous web sites. Their challenge is to determine which sites offer effective IPM solutions. The goal of this proposal is to reach under-served groups in inner cities and provide them with safe, viable IPM solutions that solve their pest problems. This project proposes an innovative, evidence-based approach through the use of pest specific posters on and in buses in New York City and Philadelphia. The first campaign will address the reemergence of bed bugs. These posters will direct inquiries to a new, easily remembered, structural IPM web site - www.bughelp.org . This site will provide linkages to university-based fact sheets and other web sites containing recommendations and suggestions on a wide range of household pests. Mirroring the efforts to educate the public utilizing posters in mass-transit buses by the NEIPM Community IPM Working Group (CIWG) in 2008, this program will offer valuable information to the public and will provide impact data on web traffic to www.bughelp.org - a new and previously unused site.


Eco Apple IPM Working Group (2009-2010)

Project Director: Michael Rozyne
Funding Amount: $20,000

Red Tomato, a non-profit organization, will continue to convene and coordinate an IPM Working Group including apple growers, agricultural scientists and extension agents, and its own in-house team of salespeople, communications manager, and art director. The close working relationship among growers, scientists, and marketers adds unusual depth and practicality to this project.

The Eco Apple program has grown at a prodigious pace, from $400,000 in sales in 2005 to over $1.9 Million in 2008. But we need to balance this rapid growth with a strengthening of the Eco Apple IPM Protocol and the program itself, to sustain this growth over the long term.

In this project, the Eco Apple IPM Working Group will build on the success of the Eco Apple program by strengthening its development of best practices - specifically, addressing the growing problem of internal Lepidoptera - and by strengthening its educational outreach to consumers. We propose to accomplish this latter goal by collecting and disseminating comparative pesticide use data of Eco vs. conventional apples, and by utilizing new technologies (including website blogs & videos, social networking, and DVDs) to reach consumers directly.

We also propose to expand the program by pursuing relationships with Midwest growers, by researching value-added Eco Apple products, and researching extending this model to other crops. This program can continue to grow rapidly, even expanding to other regions and other fruits, but we must minimize the associated risks to ensure that this growth is sustainable. We're on the fast track, but the research we are proposing will help to keep this project also on the right track.


Educating the Next Generation of IPM Users: Supporting and Promoting IPM Education in Schools

Project Director: Kathy Murray
Funding Amount: $40,000

Lawn and garden chemicals, disinfectants, repellents, flea and tick treatments, and insect sprays are routinely used in and around many homes. Many pesticides contain known or suspected carcinogens and neurotoxins, yet homeowners generally have no education on proper use of these toxic materials and little understanding of their risks. While pesticides, if used properly, are powerful tools to protect people, pets and property from disease or damage, the potential for misuse is high. In 2002, 93,532 people reported unintentional exposure to pesticides in the U.S. Forty-eight percent involved children under six years old. A significant portion of those incidents occurred in and around the home (Watson, et al. 2003). Education is needed, and school classrooms are an excellent place to start. Children are both current and future pesticide users, and an excellent conduit for educating parents. Integrated pest management (IPM) curricula have been developed and offered to teachers in Pennsylvania, Maine, and Connecticut. However, the extent to which these curricula are being used and the degree to which they are effective is not known. In order to make the most and best use of these curricula across the Northeast, we need to collaborate regionally to 1) identify and work with partners to assess needs, identify opportunities for partnership, and develop a plan for promoting and supporting K-12 IPM education; 2) develop and implement a survey to determine the extent of IPM education currently being taught in northeastern schools, 3) identify effective teacher-training approaches to promote utilization of IPM curricula, 4) align curricula to academic standards in three states; and 5) pilot a curriculum demonstration in three states. We anticipate this project will improve public understanding about IPM as a means to reduce pesticide risk, especially in and around homes and schools.


Enhancing Floral Resources for Conservation Biological Control in Urban Landscapes

Project Director: Ana Legrand
Funding Amount: $30,000

The most damaging turf insect pests are scarab beetle larvae or white grubs. During 1920's and 1930's USDA entomologists imported Tiphia vernalis Rohwer from Korea and Tiphia popilliavora Rohwer. (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae) from Japan for Japanese beetle control. Wasp releases were made throughout the northeastern United States. The primary target of these releases was the invasive Japanese beetle. However, T. vernalis and T. popilliavora can attack the Oriental beetle as well. The goal of the project is to determine if conservation biological control through the addition of floral resources can be used to enhance Tiphia spp. parasitism of Oriental and Japanese beetle larvae. The objectives of the project are: 1) to assess the parasitism rates of T. popilliavora on Japanese and Oriental beetle larvae; 2) to screen several flowering plant species that could be used to provide nectar resources to Tiphia vernalis during May and June; 3) to screen several flowering plant species that could be used to provide resources to Tiphia popilliavora during August and September; and 4) to test the hypothesis that the presence of food plants for Tiphia wasps will increase parasitism of Japanese beetle and Oriental beetle larvae by these parasitoids. The criteria for selection of floral resource plants will include that they are not attractive to the pest beetles. Results from this project will indicate which plant species the public can use to promote conservation biological control in residences or in public landscapes. The long term impact from this project will be in safeguarding human health and the environment. The proposed approach addresses an important IPM issue of developing more biological control options against the Oriental and Japanese beetles.


Facilitating Informed Decision-Making on Maryland Pesticides (2009-2010)

Project Director: Amy E. Brown
Funding Amount: $5,000


Fungicide Resistance Management Guidelines for Cucurbit Downy and Powdery Mildew Control in the Northeastern U.S.

Project Director: Christian A. Wyenandt
Funding Amount: $7,125

Cucurbit Downy and Powdery mildew are two of the most important diseases of cucurbit crops in the United States. In recent years, fungicide resistance has been detected in both pathogens in the Northeast and in other cucurbit production regions of the US. Importantly, most of the current fungicides recommended for their control have a high risk for resistance development because of their targeted modes-of-action. Because of this, and differences in state fungicide recommendations, regional IPM guidelines for effective resistance management and control need to be developed for cucurbit growers in the Northeast. Whilst these are two of the most important pathogens, they are not the only pathogens for which there are concerns about resistance development in the region. Thus, the principles that growers learn from this project will have far reaching impacts as they incorporate this knowledge into managing fungicide resistance development in other important pathogens in other vegetable crops. The purpose of this multi-state project is to develop and disseminate regional fungicide resistance management guidelines for cucurbit powdery and downy mildew control in the Northeastern United States.


New England Pumpkin IPM Tactic Survey

Project Director: Patricia Vittum
Funding Amount: $15,093

Pumpkins are a significant crop in New England. According to the 2002 Agricultural Census there are 6529 acres grown in New England and pumpkins are ranked as the third mostly widely grown vegetable in the region. Integrated pest management tactic surveys, crop files and strategic plans have been conducted and developed for many of the widely grown and important crops in the region, including apples, pears, peaches, strawberries, brambles, winter squash, and sweet corn. However similar efforts have not been conducted for pumpkins. Many diseases found in pumpkins have been listed at priority pests by the Northeast IPM Vegetable Working Group. In order to better understand the extent of the disease problem as well as other problem pests, and to determine the adoption of IPM practices, we proposed to develop and conduct a Dillman method integrated pest management tactic survey for pumpkins that can be the first step to complete a New England Pumpkin Crop Profile and Strategic plan.


New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2009-2010)

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $5,000

This proposal addresses the maintenance of a New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (NJinPAS) as an integral component of a Mid-Atlantic Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (MAinPAS) for the North Eastern Integrated Pest Management Center (NEIPMC). The Mid-Atlantic Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies is a planned collaboration of the land-grant universities of New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, and New York to maximize regional resources and communication. The purpose of these networks is to promote informed regulatory decisions on registered pesticides used on pests of commodities grown in the mid-Atlantic.

The NJinPAS will:

Answer queries posed by federal regulatory agencies (such as the EPA and the USDA Office of Pest Management Policy) regarding the use of pesticides and other IPM tactics throughout their state. Respond in a timely fashion to requests for information from these agencies, copy the appropriate individuals (as indicated on the query), record responses, and document all responses in year-end reports to the Center.

Help process, when necessary, subcontracts between the Northeastern IPM Center and other entities of the SNP leader institution to minimize total indirect costs; SNP leaders are expected to pass funds from the Center to any programs or individuals of the same institution that have contracts with the Center.


New York Information Network for Pesticides & Alternative Strategies (2009-2010)

Project Director: Ronald D. Gardner
Funding Amount: $5,000

The New York State Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies will serve as the State Network Project (SNP) designed to gather and disseminate information on pesticides and pest management. The SNP will be administered and staffed by the Pesticide Management Education Program (PMEP) at Cornell University. PMEP will seek to enhance the level of knowledge, awareness, and understanding of local, state, regional, and national pest management practices for stakeholders and others by enhancing our existing website so that information can be accessed directly from the Northeastern IPM Center and associated sites; our listservs will provide immediate and timely information to our membership from these sites.


Northeast School IPM Working Group (2009-2010): Demonstrating and Supporting IPM Implementation and Education

Project Director: Lynn Braband
Funding Amount: $20,000

Schools need help in adopting IPM practices. The Northeast School IPM Working Group (NESIWG), established in 2008, includes broad representation of organizations and agencies serving schools in all twelve of the northeastern states. We propose to collaborate regionally to 1) establish school IPM demonstrations and coalitions to support and promote adoption of IPM practices and policies, 2) identify and capitalize upon opportunities to collaborate with other organizations to support and promote implementation of healthy, effective and sustainable pest management practices for schools and communities and 3) strengthen the capacity of the NESIWG to accomplish its mission and goals.

We have leveraged additional funds to support one school IPM demonstration and establishment of one school IPM coalition. With this proposal we are seeking funding to cover costs of communication and travel to support regional collaboration and resource sharing which will enable us to capitalize on our successes and continue the work initiated in our first year.

We anticipate this project will increase compliance with state regulations while improving health and safety in the buildings and on the grounds of all schools throughout the northeast.


Northeastern Region IPM Evaluation Working Group (2009-2010)

Project Director: William M. Coli
Funding Amount: $20,000

The overall goal of the proposed project is to assist state IPM Coordinators and others in the region to better understand available techniques that can be employed to measure changes in adoption of IPM over time, and to then document short-, intermediate-, and long-term impacts of adoption. Participants will collaborate to develop one or more IPM Guidelines for a significant crop (or crops) or non-agricultural settings. Group members will learn how to use IPM Guidelines to measure end user IPM adoption levels, and how existing impact assessment models can be used to plan programs whose impacts can be quantified or to document impacts of previously-conducted outreach programs. A specific objective will be to make sufficient progress toward the stated goal that group members will be prepared to submit an IPM Planning and Assessment proposal to the Northeastern Center in 2009.


Pennsylvania State Network Project (2009-2010)

Project Director: Kerry H. Richards
Funding Amount: $2,500

The PA Pest Management Information Center can use established networks with the PA Division of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, the PA Dept. of Ag., extension specialists, and commodity groups to serve required functions by continuing to meet, but not limited to these objectives: 1)Serve as a primary source for requests regarding the use of pest management practices; 2)Interact, with IPM working groups; 3)Maintain communication pathways with the NE IPM Center, and others.


Pest Management Strategic Plan for Processing Peas in New York

Project Director: Julie R. Kikkert
Funding Amount: $10,845

New York is the 4th leading producer of processed green peas in the U.S. with approximately 20,000 acres planted each year. This proposal is to develop a Pest Management Strategic Plan (PMSP) for processing peas in NY. A planning committee composed of growers, crop consultants, processors, researchers, extension educators, and government officials will meet to discuss and prioritize research, regulatory and educational needs. The results of this meeting will be used to form the PMSP.


PRONewEngland Pest Management Network (2009-2010)

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $33,000


Small Fruit IPM Working Group (2009-2010)

Project Director: Ann Hazelrigg
Funding Amount: $19,966

Small fruits are an economically important crop for New England and are often an essential component of diversified vegetable farms. Pest identification and knowledge of successful integrated pest management strategies are crucial for the successful small fruit farm. A Small Fruits IPM Working Group, gathering specialists in all disciplines to develop and direct IPM priorities for small fruit stakeholders in New England would be an important resource for the small fruit industry in New England.

To gather the IPM stakeholders actively concerned with small fruit pest issues we propose a two day meeting with approximately 21 Extension small fruit and/or pest management specialists from all the New England states. The first day will be in the field examining pest problems at 4 small fruit farms plus a cranberry bog. The second day will be spent discussing what we identified in the field, in addition to sharing slides/examples of pest issues we have encountered in our own states over the past year. Management considerations for each pest and crop will be fully discussed with an emphasis towards choosing reduced risk pesticides and alternative, non-pesticide strategies that lead to sustainable solutions.

The group will also identify and prioritize specific research, extension and education needs for small fruit growers in New England. Another goal of the meeting will be to discuss the possibility of applying for future funds to plan and conduct a Small Fruit IPM workshop or conference for New England growers. The formation of a Small Fruits IPM Working Group to address future IPM issues and priorities outlined in the National IPM Roadmap and by the NE IPM Center is the desired outcome of the 2 day meeting in addition to improving the pest identification and integrated pest management knowledge of the New England IPM stakeholders working with small fruits.


Stored Grain IPM: Practical Information and Experience for On-Farm Storage Practitioners

Project Director: J. Keith Waldron
Funding Amount: $7,798

A train the trainer workshop will be organized and presented to introduce Stored Grain IPM principles to educators and practitioners with on-farm commodity storage clientele. A combination of lecture, laboratory, and an on-farm site visit opportunities will be offered. Cornell resources or other local expertise will collaborate with additional input from other stored grain specialists invited to participate via distance teaching technology (polycom). A post-program evaluation is planned.


Testing the Effectiveness of a Sanitizing Agent for Suppression of American Foulbrood in Beehives

Project Director: Douglas W. Dingman
Funding Amount: $7,645

American foulbrood (AFB), caused by the endospore-forming bacterium Paenibacillus larvae, can devastate honeybee colony health and result in the complete loss of the colony. The mandatory method for control of diagnosed cases of AFB in Connecticut is destruction by burning. A sanitation protocol that is effective, easy, and convenient to perform routinely will significantly benefit beekeepers. This investigation will ascertain the efficacy of a liquid sanitizing agent to suppress P. larvae spore levels in colonies with AFB. If shown effective, the experimental design will be modified using input from commercial and hobbyist beekeepers into a standard protocol that beekeepers can routinely use to sanitize beehives.


Trial of a Minimum-risk Botanical Compound to Control the Vector Tick of Lyme Disease

Project Director: Robert P. Smith
Funding Amount: $41,000

Lyme disease is a bacterial infection transmitted in the northeastern United States by the deer tick Ixodes scapularis. Over 20,000 cases are reported to US Centers for Disease Control annually. In northern New England, three deer tick-borne diseases now infect people, dogs and farm animals. The use of synthetic pesticides to control these medically important arthropods, while effective, remains controversial due to non-target impact, health risk, and persistence. Recently, certain minimal risk, botanically-derived compounds have gained interest for inclusion in IPM strategies to control deer ticks. Based on positive results from a preliminary project, we propose to test the efficacy of a rosemary oil-based insecticide, Eco-Exempt IC2 (IC2), to control all stages of the deer tick in southern Maine. Working with licensed applicators, we will record the abundance of nymphal and adult I. scapularis ticks before and following applications of IC2, bifenthrin (a widely used synthetic pyrethroid), and water during the peaks of their seasonal abundance. Multiple study grids will be established within triplicate 70m X 70m grids in forested, infested habitat. In addition, we will examine the compound's effect on all of the tick's life stages in their environment by exposing them to treated leaf litter within enclosures. The effects of IC2 on non-target organisms, including pollinators will also be examined by plot count surveys and pitfall traps. Ancillary studies will examine the persistence of IC2 when sprayed at the beginning of the deer tick nymphal season, and its effectiveness against Dermacentor variabilis, the American dog tick.


[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2009

Biological Control of Swallow-Worts in the Northeast - Part 2

Project Director: Richard A. Casagrande
Funding Amount: $24,290

Two species of European swallowworts, Vincetoxicum nigrum (black) and V. rossicum (pale) have invaded the USA and are spreading throughout the Northeast and beyond. Swallow-worts contain a haemolytic glycoside which is toxic to grazing animals. In addition to pastures, swallow-worts invade gardens, lawns, shrubs, hedgerows, forests, ornamental plant nurseries, Christmas tree farms, and pine plantations. The twining climbing plants smother plants, serve as alternate hosts for Cronartium rusts of pines, and induce monarch butterflies to lay eggs on these plants where larvae cannot survive.

Swallow-worts are difficult to control mechanically or chemically and native herbivores have little impact. In response to stakeholder requests, we initiated a biological control program on swallow-worts and in 2006 we collected insect herbivores throughout Europe. We presently have five European insect herbivores of swallow-worts in quarantine where we have made good progress on host range testing and already identified two agents as particularly promising. We seek support to continue host range testing of promising natural enemies and to measure their impact on the target weeds toward the goal of bringing North American swallow-worts under biological control.

The objective of this proposal is to evaluate the host range and potential impact of European insect herbivores under consideration for biological control of swallowworts in North America. We anticipate giving several research presentations, submitting five journal articles, and preparing a petition for biological control agent release during the funding period covered in this proposal.

This multi-disciplinary, international research project meets NEREAP-IPM goal 3: "...reduce unreasonable adverse environmental effects from pests and pest management practices." As serious weeds in ornamental nurseries and Christmas tree plantations, swallow-worts qualify under NEREAP-IPM priority one for 2006 and priority 3 (minor crop) for 2007.


Combined Resistance to Late Blight, Early Blight, and Septoria Leaf Spot in Tomato, and Complementary Fungicides for Northeast and Other Temperate U.S. Production Zones

Project Director: Martha Mutschler
Funding Amount: $133,720

This Research & Extension project targets improved control, with reduced pesticide load, of early blight (EB), late blight (LB), and Septoria leaf spot (SLS), the 3 main fungal diseases of tomatoes in the eastern US. These diseases occur in all NE states to the Southern region and are repeatedly listed as priority items. Another priority is strobilurin resistance found in EB isolates in NY, NC. This project unites breeders, pathologists, horticulturists, and conventional & organic growers in 4 states and two regions to meet priorities by developing LB/EB/SLS resistant tomatoes (adding SLS resistance to a LB/EB resistant line), and testing disease response of these lines with reduced sprays of low EIQ fungicides. Severe SLS damage across the NE in 2008 demonstrates the need for this resistance. We address strobilurin resistance by selecting appropriate replacements, scheduling use (TOM-CAST), and assess how reduced sprays and plant resistance can improve control and reduce grower costs. Conventional and organic grower-cooperators will serve as
multipliers.


Development of Advanced IPM for Northeastern Apples

Project Director: Daniel R. Cooley
Funding Amount: $164,626

A partnership among land-grant and USDA researchers, Extension and growers, has brought a unique skill set into development of an advanced integrated pest management (IPM) protocol for apples. The collaborators, including several growers, have worked on development of individual components of this system over recent years. The unique aspect of this project is it brings the most promising of these tactics together in a single management system. While the vast majority of apple growers in the Northeast use IPM tactics, progress in reducing toxic chemical inputs has stalled in recent years. The proposed system will introduce advanced IPM tactics that eliminate use of organophosphate pesticides, minimize the use of pesticides in general, and moves towards practical biointensive alternatives. The most important apple pests, including plum curculio, apple maggot, leafrollers and internal Lepidoptera, apple scab and the sooty blotch/flyspeck disease complex, will be addressed. The project also stretches beyond pest management per se to test alternative fruit thinning methods that will eliminate use of a carbamate pesticide. Because researchers in the project also have Extension appointments or significant experience with Extension, and have developed on-farm research and demonstration collaborations with growers, successful tactics will rapidly move into commercial use. Web-based communication will facilitate research and will provide collaborating growers and eventually the industry in general with access to ways to implement advanced IPM. Traditional Extension methods, including widely read newsletters and journals, well-attended meetings, and on-farm demonstrations will insure broad industry awareness of the program.


Improving the Control of Mummy Berry Disease While Decreasing the Use of Fungicides in Wild Blueberry Production of Northern New England

Project Director: Seanna Annis
Funding Amount: $105,633

This is a Joint Research-Extension project focused on improving control of mummy berry disease in blueberries while decreasing fungicide use in northern New England (NNE). This project will benefit lowbush and highbush blueberry growers, the public, and the environment near blueberry fields by decreasing the environmental impact and increasing the economic benefits of blueberry production. Mummy berry disease affects all species of blueberry and can decrease yield up to 50% in highbush and 100% in lowbush blueberries Currently the majority of growers in Maine, New Hampshire and Massachusetts are applying up to three fungicide applications using a calendar schedule which often results in incomplete control and unnecessary fungicide applications. The adoption of a mummy berry disease forecasting model (MBFM) will produce science-based pest management that safeguards human health and the environment and promotes economic benefits for growers. Our extension goals are: to increase the adoption of the MBFM by blueberry growers in NNE, and compare the MBFM with applications based on the calendar. There are few studies on the interactive effects of management inputs on disease in lowbush blueberry. Growers and consumers are also interested in reduced-risk fungicides and cultural techniques for managing disease. Our research goals are: to determine the interactive effects of weed pressure, fertility, and fungicide treatment on disease in lowbush blueberries, test low-animal toxicity fungicides and cultural amendments for their disease control efficacy and compare pollinators for their efficiency in spreading secondary fungal inoculum to blueberry flowers.


Prioritizing Cover Crops for Improving Root Health and Yield of Vegetables in the Northeast

Project Director: George Abawi
Funding Amount: $123,995

This is a multi-state joint research-extension proposal. The effectiveness of eight cover crops in managing root rot diseases of vegetables in replicated field trials under experimental and commercial production conditions in New York, Pennsylvania and Connecticut. One of the experimental sites in New York has been managed according to organic production guidelines for 15 years. The impact of the cover crops on soil health indicators will be assessed using the Cornell Soil Health Test. We will assess the efficacy of selected cover crops to reduce the severity of root diseases under varying disease pressure regimes as well as their impact on soil health parameters. The effects of the various cover crops will be determined using beans as the main indicator crop, thus enabling us to replicate conditions encountered on farms in the Northeast. For educational training, demonstration trials will be established in commercial fields during the third year using the most promising cover crops. At the end of the project we will publish a ranking of cover crops based on their ability to manage root diseases and improve specific soil health constraints. Results will be made available to stakeholders throughout the Northeast through incorporation in vegetable production guidelines, websites, fact sheets, presentations at local and regional meetings. Project leaders will collect impact data on farmer adoption of the developed cover crop recommendations for several growing cycles following the end of the proposed work.


Webcast Training for Small Fruit Pest Management

Project Director: Marvin Pritts
Funding Amount: $42,660

Few northeastern states have formal expertise in pest management for all of the berry crops grown in the region (cranberries, blueberries, raspberries, strawberries), despite the >$300,000,000 value. We are proposing to use new webcasting technology to educate ourselves about pest management challenges by holding a series of virtual meetings utilizing experts across the region. The technology allows an expert to give a presentation using voice and visuals from their computer, and allows others to hear and see the presentation over their computer - while being able to ask questions, take surveys, and use other interactive forms in real time. Presentations also can be archived for later viewing and made available to a wider audience. We will be able to educate ourselves about the latest pest management challenges without traveling, and learn to use a technology that will be beneficial in other educational venues.



2008 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2008

Adopting New IPM Methods for Cucurbit Virus Diseases

Project Director: Kathryne Everts
Funding Amount: $41,760

This proposal will address a priority need that was expressed by the IPM Vegetable working gropu in 2004, 2005, and 2007: the need for greater information on IPM for virus diseases of cucurbits. Our overarching goal is to help pumpkin producers in the region adopt new IPM methods to manage virus diseases. The primary pumpkin virus diseases in the mid-Atlantic are cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), papaya ringspot virus type W (PRSV-W), watermelon mosaic virus (WMV), and zucchini yellows mosaic virus (ZYMV). These diseases are spread by aphids in a non-persistent manner and therefore these viruses are primarily introduced into pumpkins by aphid transmission from a nearby cucurbit crop or from overwintering weed reservoirs. Insecticide applications, although used, are not effective. Recently virus resistance has become available in some cucurbits, most notably squash, and the release of commercial pumpkin cultivars with virus host resistance will increase in 2008 and 2009. Prevalence of each of the four viruses in the pumpkin crop and weed hosts will be evaluated in Maryland, Delaware, and southeastern Pennsylvania. The aphid vectors (including Aphis gossypii, a species new to the mid-Atlantic) will be monitored, enumerated, and speciated. This project will develop IPM strategies that encompass management of weed hosts, aphids, and host resistance. Growers will learn science-based concepts to effectively manage virus diseases in pumpkins.


Behaviorally Based Management Strategies for the Plum Curculio and Apple Maggot Fly in Northeastern Apple Orchards

Project Director: Tracy C. Leskey
Funding Amount: $7,222


Delaware Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2008-2009)

Project Director: Susan King
Funding Amount: $5,000


Developing a Fungicide Resistance Management Guide for Vegetable Growers in the Mid-Atlantic Region

Project Director: Christian A. Wyenandt
Funding Amount: $20,000


Eco Apple IPM Educational Video Production

Project Director: Michael Rozyne
Funding Amount: $8,000

In this project, the Red Tomato IPM Working Group will build on the success of the Eco Apple program by developing and producing a digital audio-visual tool for education and promotion of Advanced IPM practices, focusing specifically on Eco Apple production. The end product will be a digital slide show or video, 2-5 minutes in length, which combines images, audio and text to tell the Eco Apple Advanced IPM story. It will be designed for use on the Red Tomato website and for use in presentations, to be emailed, and reproduced in CD/DVD format for distribution to retail buyers, producers, and other associates. The video will include material from Eco Apple producers as well as scientists and other participants in the Working Group.

The Eco Apple program has grown at a prodigious pace, nearly doubling its sales from 2005 to 2006, and more than doubling again from 2006 to 2007  now over $1.4 Million annually, and rising.

This program can continue to grow rapidly, even expanding to other regions and other fruits, but we must ensure that this growth is sustainable. One factor that will support this growth is increasing awareness and understanding of the IPM principles used in production, and finding ways to communicate the benefits of Advanced IPM to buyers and consumers. This project will give us an effective educational tool that can be used by a variety of participants, and that will help to develop a market position for IPM produce of all kinds.


Facilitating Informed Decision Making on Maryland Pesticides (2008-2009)

Project Director: Amy E. Brown
Funding Amount: $5,000

We propose a State Network Project to enhance the function, activities, and processes of the Northeastern IPM Center. The Maryland Pesticide Education and Assessment Program (MPEAP) will provide a structure to gather and transmit information on issues relevant to both current and transitional pest management strategies, including pesticides.

MPEAP aims to promote, enhance, and facilitate informed regulatory decisions on registered pesticides used on commodities grown in Maryland. To meet these goals, MPEAP will gather pest management data from researchers, Extension educators, growers, crop consultants, and pesticide users in response to requests from USDA, EPA, the Northeastern IPM Center, or other agencies; analyze these data to estimate the impacts of changes in pesticide regulations on agricultural productivity in Maryland; and share this information with the Northeastern Integrated Pest Management Center, USDA, and the US EPA.


Guardian Plant Systems for Greenhouse IPM (Year 2)

Project Director: Carol S. Glenister
Funding Amount: $39,982

An innovative pest management system using eggplants as crop guardians has evolved over the last decade in Holland and Canada in peppers, tomatoes, fuchsias, and poinsettias. For whitefly control, the eggplants pull whitefly out of the crops, the growers apply natural enemies directly to the eggplants, and in some crops, the eggplants supply reproduction sites for the natural enemies. The eggplants have also assisted in determining if pesticide action thresholds have been reached by offering the grower an efficient snapshot of the natural enemy impact on pest populations within the greenhouse. Thus, the eggplants have been serving as indicator, trap and banker plants in a technique that we refer to as Guardian Plant Systems (GPS). These GPS have substantially enhanced grower confidence in biological control, reduced monitoring time, and reduced the purchases of natural enemies, thereby reducing the cost of biological control and IPM. In our 2007 NEIPM study, we demonstrated that eggplants reduce monitoring time for detecting both greenhouse and sweet potato whiteflies and the whiteflies' mortality. Importantly, the eggplants strongly attracted both the normal and the Q biotype strains of sweet potato whitefly adults. We also created guidelines for the best way to deploy eggplants in a crop. However, we need a second year of observations to refine and fully analyze the eggplant/crop/whitefly relationship.

Three experienced pest management groups from two northeastern states -- one from a university research laboratory (VT), and two from private industry (NY) -- will each demonstrate one of the following two Guardian Plant/crop combinations for the second year: eggplants in poinsettias or eggplants in specialty annuals. All of the demonstrations will occur at commercial greenhouses. Each cooperator will gather and compare data on whitefly and natural enemy incidence in the crop with data on whitefly and natural enemy incidence on the GPS. They will also compare costs, depending on available data, between conventional chemical treatments and biological control, or between biological control with and without GPS. Participants will share information by meeting for the purposes of comparing data, results and styles of observation and analysis.

All cooperators will actively share the project information with many grower groups and with the GO IPM Working Group of NE IPM. This project will encourage rapid innovation by timely sharing of methods to seed rapid implementation by greenhouse growers. This project addresses the working group priority to develop practical, user friendly methods of less toxic methods of pest management implementation


IPM for Homeowners and Gardeners: Outreach Through Brochures, a Presentation, and the Web

Project Director: Amy E. Brown
Funding Amount: $18,400


Master Gardener-Facilitated IPM Education for Homeowners

Project Director: Amy E. Brown
Funding Amount: $37,250

We propose a multi-state IPM Issues Project to maximize the effectiveness of outreach to homeowners by working through Master Gardeners in Maryland, Delaware, and West Virginia. We will develop, implement, and evaluate educational materials aimed at increasing homeowners' knowledge and adoption of IPM and safe pesticide handling practices. Outreach materials will include a Web-based IPM education tool as well as educational brochures and a PowerPoint presentation. The brochures and presentation will be distributed/implemented by Master Gardeners at various venues.

Evaluation of program success will be a key element of the project. Homeowners' attitudes, knowledge, and use of IPM strategies will be assessed prior to and following outreach. Those who contact Master Gardeners either in person or by telephone will be asked to answer a brief questionnaire concerning IPM knowledge and attitudes before and after the interaction with the Master Gardener. They will also be solicited to participate in a survey to be conducted at the end of the growing season. Users of the Web-based tool will also be solicited for participation in the post-season survey. Data will be analyzed and results will be used to refine the program in future years. The materials developed and subsequently refined using the feedback from the study will be made available to the other states in the Northeast. The procedures used to implement the program can also be adapted for other states at that point.


Multiregional Working Group on Sooty Blotch and Flyspeck of Apple in the United States

Project Director: Daniel R. Cooley
Funding Amount: $20,000


New England Maple Syrup Pest Management Concerns Survey; PMSP for Brambles in New England

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $33,460

a. New England Maple Syrup Pest Management Concerns Survey.

Two thirds of U.S. maple syrup production comes from New England. The EPA lists maple syrup production in New England as a high priority need for information on pest management practices. New and increased pest threats to sugar maple trees have emerged in recent years. The PRONewEngland team has developed expertise and a track record for conducting statistically rigorous pest management surveys. This survey will help maple syrup producer associations, Extension, state agencies, USDA and EPA identify the IPM priorities for a $26 million/year industry.

b. Pest Management Strategic Plan for Brambles in New England (PMSP).

Raspberry and other brambles contribute over $4 million annually to the small farm economy in New England. Using results from the PRONewEngland raspberry survey completed in 2007, the raspberry crop profile which is currently in draft review, and their own experience and knowledge, growers and Extension specialists will identify regulatory, research, education, and extension IPM priorities, and strategic plans for existing and potential pest challenges. The resulting document will be provided to the national PMSP database.


New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2008-2009)

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $5,000

This proposal addresses the maintenance of a New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (NJinPAS) as an integral component of a Mid-Atlantic Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (MAinPAS) for the North Eastern Integrated Pest Management Center (NEIPMC). The Mid-Atlantic Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies is a planned collaboration of the land-grant universities of New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, and New York to maximize regional resources and communication. The purpose of these networks is to promote informed regulatory decisions on registered pesticides used on pests of commodities grown in the mid-Atlantic.


New York Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2008-2009)

Project Director: Harvey Reissig
Funding Amount: $5,000

The New York State Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies will serve as the State Network Project (SNP) designed to gather and disseminate information on pesticides and pest management. The SNP will be administered and staffed by the Pesticide Management Education Program (PMEP) at Cornell University. PMEP will seek to enhance the level of knowledge, awareness, and understanding of local, state, regional, and national pest management practices for stakeholders and others by enhancing our existing website so that information can be accessed directly from the Northeastern IPM Center and associated sites; our listservs will provide immediate and timely information to our membership from these sites.


Northeast Community IPM Working Group (2008-2009)

Project Director: Jody Gangloff-Kaufmann
Funding Amount: $20,000

This proposal details the plan of work for the NEIPM Center Community IPM Working Group. Members represent the broad range of stakeholders that are covered in the Community IPM area. They have been proactive in passing information from the Center to their own organizations and peers. This serves to engage stakeholders with the Northeastern IPM Center and among the diverse stakeholders in Community IPM. The Community Working Group addresses priorities covered in one of the primary focus areas in the National IPM Road Map: residential and public areas. "The greatest general population exposure to pests and the tactics used to control them occurs where people live, work and play."

The Working Group sponsored the recent successful "Green-Blue Summit: Clean Water Through IPM" that featured speakers from across the nation. The group also contributed to the content of a series of educational posters that were produced by the Pesticide Education Program at Penn State University for the 2007 Philadelphia Flower Show. The series featured "bloopers" or common mistakes that residents make in the landscape. Several sets of the posters have been produced in a smaller size and distributed to several northeastern states.


Northeast School IPM Implementation Working Group (2008-2009)

Project Director: Lynn Braband
Funding Amount: $20,000

Implementation of integrated pest management in schools is important to reduce risks to children and other school occupants from both pests and pesticides. The status and needs of school IPM will be described in the pending national School IPM Pest Management Strategic Plan which has the goal of implementing IPM in all of the nation's schools by 2015. We propose developing a diverse and representative working group that assists states in the Northeast in working towards that goal. We will cooperate with school IPM efforts throughout the United States, especially the pending national school IPM working group and existing/pending school IPM working groups sponsored by the other three regional IPM Centers. We will serve as a multiplier of K-12 IPM teaching and learning tools. The development of such curricula has been a major activity of several states in the Northeast. We will establish research, extension, education, and implementation priorities for school IPM in the Northeast and develop a focused project for 2009.


Northeast Vegetable IPM Working Group (2008-2009)

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $27,403


Pennsylvania State Network Project (2008-2009)

Project Director: Kerry H. Richards
Funding Amount: $5,000


Planning a PMSP Workshop in Ornamentals

Project Director: Brian A. Kunkel
Funding Amount: $8,000

The primary goal of the meeting is to examine the ornamental industry and choose a section to develop a pest management strategic plan.


PMSP for Commercial Greenhouses in the Northeastern U.S.

Project Director: Elizabeth Lamb
Funding Amount: $26,239

Commercial greenhouse production in the Northeast is a large, diverse and valuable industry with critical pest issues and the potential for increased use of IPM. Issues that affect commercial greenhouses include labeling of pesticides for a wide variety of crops, the need for rapid responses to new pests, management techniques that are appropriate to both wholesale and retail greenhouses, and the limited number of research and Extension personnel working on greenhouse pests. A Pest Management Strategic Plan (PMSP) is one way to effect change in pest management alternatives. Creating a regional PMSP for commercial greenhouses serves to focus research and outreach on those issues of most importance to growers.

The objective of this grant is to increase utilization of IPM in commercial greenhouses by focusing research and outreach on the needs of the end users. In order to accomplish this, we propose to develop a PMSP for commercial greenhouses in the northeastern US. The process will also serve to encourage regional collaboration on IPM for commercial greenhouses.

Background information on production methods and statistics, and current pest management alternatives, will be collated into a draft PMSP. Using this as a starting point, stakeholders from throughout the NE region will meet with research, Extension, and regulatory representatives to identify and prioritize the pest management needs of the commercial greenhouse industry for the final PMSP. The creation of a PMSP for commercial greenhouses in the NE will result in greater cooperation among the research and outreach personnel in the region to develop and implement new tools for IPM that meet the growers' needs.


Production of Disease-Free Onion Bare Root Transplant Seedlings

Project Director: Christine Hoepting
Funding Amount: $7,999

The first recommendation in an Integrated Pest Management strategy for controlling the neck rot disease of onion, caused by Botrytis allii, is to start with clean seed and transplant seedlings. In New York, major outbreaks of Botrytis neck rot of up to 80% loss in some varieties have occurred in association with the increase in growing onions from imported bare root transplants from Arizona over the last 6-7 years, especially during the very wet growing seasons of 2000 and 2004. A study conducted by Hoepting et al. in 2005 and 2006 revealed that 78% of 56 imported bare root onion transplant seedling samples (variety by grower) had some level of B. allii infection prior to their being transplanted into the ground in New York. Infection per sample (variety by grower) ranged from 1 to 66% of the individual transplant seedlings. Comparatively, no B. allii was detected in plug transplants or in seedlings of similar age and size as transplant seedlings that were direct seeded in local onion fields. These results confirmed that bare root transplant seedlings produced in Arizona are not produced free of the neck rot pathogen and serve as an important source of inoculum for this potentially devastating disease.


PRONewEngland Pest Management Network (2008-2009)

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $75,093

a. A six-state PRONewEngland Pest Management Network to represent New England practices and needs in federal pesticide regulatory decisions, and to manage Northeastern IPM Center grants in the New England states.

b. Operate the PRONewEngland.org website as a primary access channel to IPM resources for New England citizens and to enhance IPM coordination among the six states.

c. Project administration to provide coordination, financial oversight, and quality control.


Publicizing Projects that Promote IPM and Reduce Asthma Triggers in Urban Populations in the Northeast

Project Director: Edwin Rajotte
Funding Amount: $8,000

Urban populations include a large number of individuals at risk of chronic pest infestations as well as over and misuse of pesticides. At-risk populations include low-income children, pregnant women and the elderly as well as asthmatics of all ages. Besides potentially acute and chronic effects, both pests and pesticides can trigger asthma, which in urban areas is at epidemic proportions. Asthma, caused and/or exacerbated by pests and pesticides, is rampant in children living in substandard housing.
In the United States, rates of childhood asthma soared 50% between 1980 and 2000, with particularly high rates in poor, urban communities.

Cities across the Northeast are beginning to address these problems via coordinated mechanisms to reach these diverse populations with messages of safer, more effective pest control practices (IPM), proper pesticide choices, uses, storage and disposal. However, many people are unaware that these programs exist in urban areas. Community organizations, cooperative extension and other state IPM programs may be unaware of urban IPM projects in other cities in the Northeast and of the collaborative opportunities that may exist. We propose developing a comprehensive communications strategy to reach a diverse audience including urban residents, community organizations, state IPM programs, cooperative extension and others in Northeastern cities in which the Northeastern IPM Center is funding urban IPM projects.


Quantifying the Exposure and Effect of Farmer-Applied Pesticides on Northeast Migratory Operations Pollinating Crops in PA, NJ, ME, and MA

Project Director: Dennis vanEngelsdorp
Funding Amount: $8,000

In the fall of 2006, widespread losses of bees came to be associated with symptoms known as Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD). Colonies rapidly declined, leaving behind few or no adult bees in the hive along with ample food supplies and a large area of brood. In an attempt to investigate the cause of these die offs a multi-factorial analysis of possible causes was initiated (vanEngelsdorp, Pettis, Cox-Foster, Frazier, Tarpy, et al (unpublished)). The role of parasites, pathogens, pesticides and nutrition were investigated. To date no one factor has been isolated as the sole cause of collapse. One limitation of this study, however, was the fact that samples were collected from colonies only once, in essence taking a snap shot of the colony health on the date of collection.

To help address this short coming, a longitudinal study was initiated in 2007, which followed tagged colonies in 3 migratory operations as they moved from Florida up and down the east coast to pollinate a variety of crops (Citrus, high bush blueberries (NJ), low bush blueberries (ME), apples (PA), cucumbers (NJ), squash (NJ), pumpkin(PA)). Samples of pollen, wax, adult bees, and detailed colony measurements were taken each time these colonies were moved to a new crop. While funding some funding has been secure for the analysis of bee samples for pesticide exposure this funding is only part of that needed to do to complete the analysis.

To date a total of 45 different agricultural pesticides have been found in the pollen stores of the 92 colonies examined. These include colonies sampled as a part of the initial CCD study. The most frequently detected pesticides are shown in Table 1. While none of these or other pesticides have yet been identified as the sole cause of CCD, it is possible that pesticide contaminated pollen and/or pesticide build-up in the colonies, is one of important factors contributing to CCD and declining bee health.


Second Regional Workshop with the Natural Resources Conservation Service to Foster IPM as a Conservation Practice

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $21,917


Trapping for Brown Marmorated Stinkbug

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $10,000

This project requests $10,000 to examine the use of mass trapping as a management tactic for the brown marmorated stink bug in an industrial park setting. The brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), is an exotic stink bug that has spread throughout DE, MD, NJ, OR, PA, VA, Washington D.C., and portions of OR and CA and become a severe nuisance. It has also been found in MS, ME, NY and WV. Currently, there are no adequate pest management alternatives to prevent overwintering adults from entering commercial buildings resulting in illegal use of bug bombs and treatment of exterior walls and eaves with insecticides.


Trial of a Novel, Pasture-Safe, Botanical Compound to Control Lyme Disease Vector Ticks

Project Director: Peter W. Rand
Funding Amount: $7,785

We propose to conduct a pilot study to compare the effectiveness of two sprayed pesticides: one a relatively safe
compound composed of food quality rosemary oil suitable for use in the problematic circumstance of pastures for horses and other grazing animals; the other a synthetic compound, though not labeled for use in pastures, is approved for use by homeowners and commercial applicators to control deer ticks.


Web-based Vegetable IPM Resource Database: Publicity and Upkeep

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $15,974


West Virginia Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2008-2009)

Project Director: John F. Baniecki
Funding Amount: $5,000


[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2008

Biological Control of Swallow-Worts in the Northeast - Part 1

Project Director: Richard A. Casagrande
Funding Amount: $50,000

This is a research project. Two species of European swallow-worts, Vincetoxicum nigrum (black) and V. rossicum (pale) have invaded the USA and are spreading throughout the Northeast and beyond. Swallow-worts contain a haemolytic glycoside which is toxic to grazing animals. In addition to pastures, swallow-worts invade gardens, lawns, shrubs, hedgerows, forests, ornamental plant nurseries, Christmas tree farms, and pine plantations. The twining climbing plants smother plants, serve as alternate hosts for Cronartium rusts of pines, and induce monarch butterflies to lay eggs on these plants where larvae cannot survive.

Swallow-worts are difficult to control mechanically or chemically and native herbivores have little impact. In response to stakeholder requests, we initiated a biological control program on swallow-worts and in 2006 we collected insect herbivores throughout Europe. We presently have five European insect herbivores of swallow-worts in quarantine where we have made good progress on host range testing and already identified two agents as particularly promising. We seek support to continue host range testing of promising natural enemies and to measure their impact on the target weeds toward the goal of bringing North American swallow-worts under biological control.

he objective of this proposal is to evaluate the host range and potential impact of European insect herbivores under consideration for biological control of swallowworts in North America. We anticipate giving several research presentations, submitting five journal articles, and preparing a petition for biological control agent release during the funding period covered in this proposal.

This multi-disciplinary, international research project meets NEREAP-IPM goal 3: "...reduce unreasonable adverse environmental effects from pests and pest management practices." As serious weeds in ornamental nurseries and Christmas tree plantations, swallow-worts qualify under NEREAP-IPM priority one for 2006 and priority 3 (minor crop) for 2007.


Combining a Disease and Weather Monitoring Network with Measurements of Inoculum Potential for Disease Forecasting in Vineyard IPM for Southern New England

Project Director: Francis J. Ferrandino
Funding Amount: $128,738

This is a Joint Research-Extension project focused on improving control of vineyard diseases while reducing pesticide inputs. This will be accomplished by providing growers via the internet with disease support information on the risk of infection of disease in real time. The system uses weather based disease-risk models. We will establish weather monitoring stations in research and commercial vineyards throughout southern New England. These stations will be connected through cellular modems to a central location. Initial inoculum levels will be directly assayed at test vineyards and the survival and maturation of the over-wintering stage pathogens will be evaluated. In addition, inoculum potential will be evaluated each week using potted trap plants and mechanical spore samplers to determine the concentration of airborne inoculum. Crop growth and disease severity will be assessed each week during the growing season. Trap plants will be sprayed with systemic fungicides to obtain information on the development of fungicide resistant strains in the endemic powdery mildew populations. All disease forecast and recommended management information obtained will be accessible to the growers via the internet. At the end of each season we will report our findings to the growers at an annual meeting.


Development and Implementation of Diagnostic Tools to Assess Bee Colony Health

Project Director: John P. Burand
Funding Amount: $150,000

This research project is aimed at improving bee health in the Northeast region and focuses on bees in cranberry and blueberry, two of the most economically important crops in the region. The proposed work addresses priorities developed by the NE-IPM fruit working group http://www.northeastipm.org/work_fruipriority.cfm including studies of "Effective monitoring strategies for key pests in which techniques currently do not exist," and a focus on the extension priorities "Education regarding monitoring techniques, etc." and "Education for growers to recognize new and/or emerging pests and associated damage." We plan to produce assay tools to identify and monitor current and emerging diseases/parasitic mite pests of bee pollinators. Honey bees and bumble bees are the major pollinators of cranberries and blueberries. Since the level of production of these two small fruits is linked to the pollination of bees, factors that affect the health of bees in the region will untimely impact the commerce of both of these small fruits.


Development of Enhanced, Web-Based New York and New England: Tree Fruit Pest Management Guidelines

Project Director: Harvey Reissig
Funding Amount: $55,000

Cornell's Pest Management Guidelines for Tree Fruit Production have traditionally been a primary information source for producers. Printed guidelines cannot deliver IPM information in "real time" during the season. Web-based IPM sites that have access to weather data can provide pest development forecasts so that pest populations can be sampled and monitored at appropriate times and insure that pesticide applications and other control tactics are properly timed. Websites can also help growers choose the most appropriate pesticide when necessary. Most of this information is currently available on various Cornell websites or in the printed guidelines, but it is scattered among different sources. This project will integrate all of this information into a single user-friendly website. Users will be able to access pest forecast models linked to weather conditions at particular sites that will predict when sampling and monitoring is necessary and provide information about different management tactics. When pesticides are recommended, the site will provide a link to a pesticide decision table which includes the following categories of information to help users choose the most appropriate material: Common name, trade name, rate, Re-entry interval, Pre-harvest interval, efficacy against various pests, bee toxicity, effects on natural enemies, cost/acre, general comments and use restrictions.


Development of Novel Application Technology for the Control of the Asian Tiger Mosquito in Urban Environments

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $60,000

This is a Community IPM, Joint Research-Extension project to address the control of the invasive vector mosquito Aedes albopictus (the Asian tiger mosquito) in urban residential environments. The Asian tiger mosquito is responsible for most complaints to mosquito control programs. These programs rely on controversial and ineffective area-wide applications of broad-spectrum adulticides to combat this mosquito. While larvicides work effectively, it is impractical if not impossible to identify and treat all sources by hand. Without any efficient means of control, many mosquito control programs ignore this pest. The area-wide application of larvicides would solve the problem, but the technology has not been developed sufficiently for use in urban residential environments. This project will develop novel technologies for the area-wide low volume application of the bacterial larvicide Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis to control Ae. albopictus. We will develop this new biocontrol strategy by adapting low-volume truck-mounted adulticide equipment commonly in use by mosquito control programs to apply liquid Bti in an outdoor urban residential setting. After application the larvicide will drift and settle in containers of water where the larvae reside, providing quick, efficient, cost effective control. This IPM approach will reduce the abundance of this pest, the dependence on broad-spectrum adulticides, non-target impacts, and the development of resistance through the use of novel application technology, host-targeted applications of biological larvicides, and training programs for stakeholders. Efficacy of the program will be evaluated by monitoring larval mortality, adult presence, droplet size and distribution, and pesticide persistence. We will also prepare workshops and materials to train mosquito control personnel throughout the northeast and beyond in the use of this technology. The proposed project addresses the priorities of the Northeastern Integrated Pest Management Center's Public Health IPM Working Group, which include evaluation of novel IPM methodologies for vector-borne diseases, and the dissemination of IPM guidelines and educational programs for the control of insect vectors and vector-borne diseases.


Fungi, Predatory Mites, and Habitat Plants for Thrips IPM in Greenhouse Ornamentals

Project Director: Margaret Skinner
Funding Amount: $59,077

This is a Research project testing a novel approach for IPM of western flower thrips (WFT) in spring bedding plants, combining predatory mites, granular entomopathogenic fungi and indicator plants into one effective "habitat plant system". Adult WFT will be attracted from the crop to flowering marigolds, where they will become established. A portion of the immature WFT will serve as prey for the predatory mite, Neoseiulus cucumeris, sustaining the mite population, and encouraging dispersal throughout the greenhouse. A portion of the WFT escaping predation will drop to the soil to pupate, where they will be targeted with fungi. The granular formulation will enable the fungus to colonize the potting mix, eliminating the need for repeat applications. This concept represents a sustainable, low-cost, ecological approach to combating the most serious pest facing greenhouse growers today. This project addresses all three RIPM program goals. It will contribute to safeguarding human health and the environment by reducing growers' use of chemical insecticides, thereby lessening exposure of applicators, growers, agricultural workers and the public to toxic compounds. This study tests an innovative IPM strategy that could offer economic benefits to growers by reducing WFT damage, increasing plant quality, and minimizing production costs by providing a sustained source of biological control agents within the crop. This could lead to wider adoption of IPM by growers, thousands of whom in the Northeast struggle annually with WFT control. Growers would surely adopt this IPM strategy if they knew it worked better and cost less than chemical control.


Winter Grain and Short-Season Corn Double Crop Forage Systems: An Integrated Weed Management Strategy for Organic Dairy Producers

Project Director: John M. Jemison
Funding Amount: $68,459

As a result of this multi-state research and extension project, organic dairy producers will adopt an environmentally sustainable winter grain, short-season corn double crop forage production system as an alternative to intensively cultivated full-season silage corn. Organic dairy production is a strong growth area of Northeast agriculture, but sustainability of this growth is largely dependent on production of high quality feed while minimizing weed pressure. Due to high feed costs, producers must maximize on-farm forage and grain production. Field trials will be conducted at two university experiment stations and two organic dairy farms. The weed management IPM program that is the product of this work is primarily designed for northeast organic dairy producers, but it is applicable to all dairy producers. This project meets many goals identified by NE IPM including working with underserved audiences, and the development of easily implemented IPM systems and non-chemical pest management strategies where few alternatives exist. Growers will understand and implement this production system through involvement in an effective extensive Extension outreach program. Organic producers will attend grower field day presentations, on-farm twilight meetings, and other educational meetings. Production system fact sheets and a web site will be developed for this project, and information will be incorporated into an eXtension organic communities of practice led by co-PI Heather Darby. Within two years of project completion, 40% of organic dairy growers that grow corn will use this system, improve weed management, and produce high quality forages which will lead to increased milk production and improved economic and environmental sustainability.



2007 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: Green-Blue Grants - 2007

Educating Capital District Consumers about Lawn Care and Water Quality

Project Director: David Chinery
Funding Amount: $2,500

Download Full Proposal


IPM and Water Quality Training for Home Gardeners

Project Director: George Kingston
Funding Amount: $187

Download Full Proposal


IPM in Suburbanizing Watersheds: Workshops for Changing Communities

Project Director: Brian A. Kunkel
Funding Amount: $622

Download Full Proposal


Outreach to Professional Lawn Care Providers in Southern Maine

Project Director: Richard Brzozowski
Funding Amount: $2,500

Download Full Proposal


Teaching Sustainable Lawn Care Practices to Professionals and Residents

Project Director: Jennifer Coffey
Funding Amount: $2,500

Download Full Proposal


Turf Love Workshops for Nursery Retailers and Landscapers

Project Director: Dianne Olsen
Funding Amount: $2,240

Download Full Proposal


UNH Train the Trainers: Landscaping at the Water's Edge Program

Project Director: Sadie Puglisi
Funding Amount: $1,979

Download Full Proposal


[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2007

A Partnership for Developing IPM Protocols for Bed Bug Management

Project Director: Jody Gangloff-Kaufmann
Funding Amount: $35,524

The common bed bug, Cimex lectularius, is a blood-feeding parasite of humans that has reemerged as one of the most significant indoor pests of our time. Although it is well understood that integrated pest management is necessary for bed bug control, effective protocols and standardized IPM practices are lacking, particularly for multiple-unit dwellings, including homeless shelters. The integration of pesticides with physical controls is unsystematic and often ineffective. Sufferers of bed bug infestations are regularly taking matters into their own hands, by applying pesticides and discarding furniture and other possessions. The economic and health risks associated with bed bugs are presumably great. Bed bugs have reversed the benefits achieved in Urban IPM over the past fifteen years, by reintroducing frequent, unrestricted, household pesticide use. A standardized bed bug management strategy that relies on IPM is desperately needed.

This project will address the management of bed bugs in long-term homeless shelters in New York City, where bed bugs continue to be a major concern. Protocols for managing bed bugs and preventing their introduction and spread will be used and evaluated in shelters. Protocols will be made widely available and will be applicable to other multiple-unit dwellings. These protocols will be developed into training resources and a training session will be held in the New York City area and open to the public, but targeted at pest control professionals, shelter staff, and building managers. This project furthers the mission of the Northeast IPM Center by applying IPM to a critical emerging pest issue to directly reduce the impact of bed bugs and pesticides on human health and economic well-being.


Colony Collapse Disorder Monitoring and Surveillance Sample Collection

Project Director: Dennis vanEngelsdorp
Funding Amount: $8,000

In Fall 2006, beekeepers reported extensive losses of colonies across the nation, without recognizable underlying
causes. This phenomenon has been named "Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD)". An estimated 23% of the beekeepers in the nation have been affected by this condition, and those affected have lost on average 57% of their colonies between September 2006 and March 2007. These losses threaten the pollination industry and production of commercial honey in the United States.

We received grant monies from the National Honey Board to conduct CCD monitoring and surveillance work; however, at the time of the original NHB grant submission, we believed that honey (which is easily collected and requires no specialized shipping and handling) would be a good indicator of colony pathogen load. Our subsequent work with CCD bees has shown this not to be the case. To properly monitor colonies for viruses and other pathogens, we need to obtain bees that are collected and shipped on dry ice, which requires more frequent site visitation than originally envisioned (or budgeted). In addition, we have partnered with Jeff Pettis at USDA-ARS to test comb sterilization and monitor stresses associated with colony movement; this has resulted in an increased number of tested colonies, from a budgeted 16 to 200 colonies. While USDA-ARS has and continues to contribute monies to this project, we require additional funds both to collect and ship samples from the field. These emergency funds will enable collection of essential samples and aid in finding the cause and prevention of CCD.


Community IPM Working Group (2007-2008)

Project Director: Lynn Braband
Funding Amount: $20,000

This proposal details the plan of work for the NEIPM Center Community IPM Working Group. Members represent the broad range of stakeholders that are covered in the Community IPM area. They have been proactive in passing information from the Center to their own organizations and peers. This serves to engage stakeholders with the Northeastern IPM Center and among the diverse stakeholders in Community IPM. The Community Working Group addresses priorities covered in one of the primary focus areas in the National IPM Road Map: residential and public areas. "The greatest general population exposure to pests and the tactics used to control them occurs where people live, work and play."


Delaware Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2007-2008)

Project Director: Susan King
Funding Amount: $15,000


Developing a Fungicide Resistance Management Guide for Vegetable Growers in the Mid-Atlantic Region

Project Director: Christian A. Wyenandt
Funding Amount: $10,000

Because of the vast number of fungicides available and the potential difficulty in understanding FRAC groups and their importance, vegetable producers need a simplified reference tool for the management of fungicide resistance in their farm operation. In the mid-Atlantic region, five states (NJ, MD, DE, PA and VA) share the use of a common commercial vegetable productions guide which is developed by university personnel from multiply disciplines on an annual basis. Each year over 3,500 copies of the production guide are distributed to growers who plant 221,000 acres of vegetable crops throughout the region on an annual basis. Although the recommendations guide includes FRAC groupings, a simplified version is necessary to help vegetable growers understand FRAC groupings and their importance in fungicide resistance management.


Development of a Pest Identification and IPM Manual for Christmas Tree Growers and Conifer Producers in New York and New England

Project Director: Elizabeth Lamb
Funding Amount: $19,940

There are over 3,500 Christmas tree growers in the six New England States plus New York State, according to the 2002 Census of Agriculture. Conifer producers in the Northeast can face serious pest management issues but limited information is currently available to producers regarding long-term management strategies for pest control. Producers have expressed a need for a pest management manual for conifers that is up to date, is specific to production sites in the Northeast, and includes user-friendly descriptions of species, damage caused, and cultural and chemical management strategies for key weeds, insects, and pathogens.

Therefore, we propose to develop a comprehensive integrated pest management guide for Northeastern conifer producers, that is user-friendly and presents pictorial and text descriptions of key conifer disease, insect and weed pests, with an emphasis on integrated methods of control. Our intent is that the manual will provide a tool for scouting and making pest management decisions. By emphasizing the integrated aspects of production and pest management, and encouraging early pest identification and scouting, we wish to encourage the development and utilization of effective and environmentally sound management practices for production of conifers and Christmas trees. The intended audience consists of a variety of stakeholders. Small and large-scale producers of cut or select-and-cut Christmas trees, and of 'balled and burlapped' or container-grown conifers as nursery stock in the Northeast, and Cooperative Extension personnel are primary populations of interest.

Cooperators from New England states, with expertise in Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, have been identified. They will review the manual to ensure that it is of use to growers throughout the region. They will also assess stakeholder reaction to the manual. Project directors and cooperators will gather feedback from stakeholders on their interest in and evaluation of the manual in a variety of ways. Potential venues include grower workshops, state or regional grower organization's annual meetings, trade shows, in-service training, etc. The final manual should fill an existing and stated need, have the potential to enhance the use of IPM in Christmas tree and nursery conifer production, and enhance the multi-directional flow of information on conifer pest management in the Northeast.


Dissemination and Vectoring of the Fire Blight Pathogen (Erwinia amylovora) by Potato Leafhopper (Empoasca fabae)

Project Director: Kathleen Leahy
Funding Amount: $7,950

Fire blight is a serious disease of apple trees caused by a bacteria, Erwinia amylovora. This disease can not only destroy the current year's crop, but can destroy the tree altogether, especially in young plantings. Warmer conditions during the susceptible period in late spring and early summer, and the conversion of many orchards to new, more fire blight-susceptible varieties, have made this disease of even more concern in the Northeast in recent year. Most research on fire blight epidemiology has focused on its transmission during the spring, from bud break until after bloom. However, transmission is also possible during the summer, and insects have long been suspected of contributing to the movement and introduction of bacteria into the growing shoots during the summer.

Evidence from several research projects has led to increased focus on the potato leafhopper, a migratory pest that feeds in the phloem of a wide variety of plant species, as an important facilitator of fire blight during the summer. Potato leafhoppers may be uniquely capable of introducing bacteria into apple foliage because of the damage they cause to the plant vascular system during feeding. Controlling potato leafhoppers has been shown to significantly improve summer fire blight control. The threshold level of leafhoppers needed to transmit the disease is still unknown, as is the question of whether these insects carry bacteria from tree to tree in addition to introducing the bacteria into leaves during feeding. This project seeks to address these two important questions, which could lead to improved control of summer fire blight with significantly less pesticide use.


Fostering IPM as a Resource Conservation Practice in Collaboration with the Natural Resources Conservation Service

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $22,759

Note: This project continues work from previously funded projects

Vegetable Educator Exchange Grant Program and IPM Resources for NRCS

and

Collaborating with NRCS to Promote IPM on Northeast Vegetables


Guardian Plant Systems for Greenhouse IPM (Year 1)

Project Director: Carol S. Glenister
Funding Amount: $37,985

An innovative pest management system using eggplants as crop guardians has evolved over the last decade in Holland and Canada in peppers, tomatoes, fuchsias, and poinsettias. For whitefly control, the eggplants pull whitefly out of the crops, the growers apply natural enemies directly to the eggplants, and in some crops, the eggplants supply reproduction sites for the natural enemies. The eggplants have also assisted in determining if pesticide action thresholds have been reached by offering the grower an efficient snapshot of the natural enemy impact on pest populations within the greenhouse. Thus, the eggplants have been serving as indicator, trap and banker plants in a technique that we refer to as Guardian Plant Systems (GPS). These GPS have substantially enhanced grower confidence in biological control, reduced monitoring time, and reduced the purchases of natural enemies, thereby reducing the cost of biological control and IPM.

Four experienced pest management groups from three northeastern states -- one from a university research laboratory (VT), one from the Department of Agriculture (PA) and two from private industry (NY) - will each demonstrate one of the following three Guardian Plant/crop combinations for 2 years: eggplants in tomatoes, eggplants in poinsettias and eggplants in specialty annuals. Three of the demonstrations will occur at commercial greenhouses, 2 of which already use whitefly natural enemies in their crops (tomatoes and poinsettias). At the third commercial greenhouse, we will be testing the eggplant GPS in a crop where there is no prior history of GPS use: specialty annuals. Each cooperator will gather and compare data on whitefly and natural enemy incidence in the crop with data on whitefly and natural enemy incidence on the GPS. They will also compare costs, depending on available data, between conventional chemical treatments and biological control, or between biological control with and without GPS. Participants will share information by meeting once a year for two years for the purposes of comparing data, results and styles of observation and analysis.

All cooperators will actively share the project information with many grower groups and with the GO IPM Working Group of NEIPM as the project progresses. This project will encourage rapid innovation in Guardian Plant management by timely sharing of methods to seed rapid implementation by greenhouse growers.


Holding a Working Group Meeting for Setting Objectives for Wireworm IPM in the Mid-Atlantic States

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $3,000

Wireworms are difficult pests to manage because: 1) they are capable of feeding on a wide range of host crops; 2) often there is more than one species or variant in the same field; 3) they are soil insects with the inherent problems of estimating populations, observing behavior and feeding habits; 4) they have a poorly understood biology (larvae and adults) including conditions that provoke severe crop loss; 5) the Melanotus communis species is actually a species complex with incomplete taxonomy that may reflect different behaviors; 6) all wireworms tend to be lumped together regarding their damage and control; and 7) they have multi-year life cycles.

The current, most practical and consistent recommendation that can be made to growers for reducing wireworm injury is to avoid planting susceptible crops in fields known to be infested.

Acknowledging the lack of effective wireworm pest management recommendations, two informal conferences on wireworms have been held; Harrisburg, PA, 2003, and Charlottesville, VA, 2006. These conferences were open forums discussing wireworm management problems and included representatives of private industry and university and extension personnel. Encouraged by these conferences we are now attempting to develop a coordinated approach to improving IPM recommendations for wireworm management in the Northeast and the Mid-Atlantic States.


Identification Guide to Crane Fly (Insecta: Diptera: Tipulidae) Pests of Turfgrass in the Eastern U.S.

Project Director: Jon Gelhaus
Funding Amount: $7,560

An ease of use identification guide is needed at this time by extension agents, turf grass care specialists and homeowners to separate the species of crane flies likely to be found associated with turf grasses, and focusing on the species implicated in causing turf grass damage.


IPM Education and Outreach in a Latino Urban Community

Project Director: Anne Rahn
Funding Amount: $8,000

The Preschool Project (The PSP) is a non-profit organization that began in 1988 as a grassroots effort of neighborhood parents and preschool teachers concerned with the lack of services and supports for families with young children in the Kensington area of Philadelphia. Today, the PSP offers training, education and technical assistance for early care and education professionals working with young children; and direct service programs for children and families. The PSP staff includes 30 full-time and 6 part-time personnel. Forty percent of staff members are Latino.

Recently, The PSP has recognized the dangers of pest infestations and extensive, repeated use of pesticides by residents. The potential health hazards associated with pests and pesticides directly impact the health of our target audiences: child care providers, parents, children and infants. In addition, data show that in other eastern urban Latino communities, "under the counter" sales of dangerous illegal pesticides (i.e. "Chinese chalk" and "Tres Pasitos") are widespread. We can assume this is a potential problem in Philadelphia as well. Education on IPM, including causes of infestations, non-chemical interventions, informed decision-making about pesticides, hiring pest control services, and applying safe practices, can help mitigate the health risks and lead to more effective control of pests. Currently, few IPM resources, outreach tools and educational venues are available in Spanish for Latino urban communities.

To address this need, we propose to begin to create and incorporate bilingual IPM education for child care professionals, caregivers, parents and the children in their care within The PSP's extensive community-based educational programs and services.


IPM Tactics Survey for Christmas Tree; Peppers PMSP for New England

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $23,207


IPM Tactics Survey for Ornamentals; Ongoing Crop Profile Updates; Green Pepper Pest Management Strategic Plan (PMSP) for Delaware, Eastern Shore Maryland, and New Jersey

Project Director: Susan King
Funding Amount: $25,000


Lily Host Resistance to Lily Leaf Beetle, Lilioceris lilii

Project Director: Ellie Groden
Funding Amount: $7,627

The lily leaf beetle (LLB), Lilioceris lilii Scapoli, is a serious pest of native and exotic lilies in much of New England and has been attributed to economic losses for commercial horticulturists. Garden lilies (Lilium spp. and hybrids) are a popular and unique addition to gardeners' summer and early fall perennial gardens. They also constitute an important commercial commodity for bulb growers, vendors, garden centers, landscapers and landscape gardeners. However, the invasive lily leaf beetle threatens the use of garden lilies in our region. Evidence suggests that the damage caused by this beetle has resulted in many gardeners eliminating lilies from their garden choices.

Native to Europe, LLB was introduced to the eastern U.S. in 1992 and first appeared in southern Maine in 1997 (Folsom 2006, pers. comm.; Livingston et al. 1996). Since then, it has steadily moved northward and is currently the limiting factor in lily growth and production in Maine. Larvae and adult beetles attack all aboveground plant parts, and defoliation reduces plant vigor and flowering, greatly diminishing the aesthetic quality of the plant. In addition, even limited feeding by larvae reduces quality, as all larval stages envelop themselves with a fecal shield for predator protection. Insecticides are registered for LLB control. However, the risks to other invertebrates and to humans associated with these materials, require efforts to investigate alternative LLB management strategies. We feel that host plant resistance may play a significant role in reducing the impact of LLB, as well as reducing pesticide use in commercial and home settings.

The goal of this project is to investigate the genetic potential of garden lilies to reduce LLB survival and to deter larval and adult foliage feeding.


Maryland Information Network for Pesticides & Alternative Strategies (2007-2008)

Project Director: Amy E. Brown
Funding Amount: $15,000

The Maryland Pesticide Education and Assessment Program (MPEAP) serves as the primary source for information on pesticide policy at the state and federal levels, as well as on use, usage, economic and social benefits, and economic, environmental, and health risks. MPEAP maintains long-established connections throughout Extension, as well as with state, local, and federal authorities, growers, consultants, and other stakeholders. The Maryland Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (MINPAS) is based within MPEAP and has an especially close tie with the Maryland Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program. Since 2002, MINPAS has functioned as the SNP, serving as the link between the Northeastern IPM Center, the land grant institution at large, Extension and state government programs on pesticides and on IPM, other key agencies such as the Maryland Farm Bureau, and the grower community.


New England Pest Management Network (2007-2008)

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $100,000


New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides & Alternative Strategies (2007-2008)

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $15,000

The NJinPAS will:
(1) Deliver pesticide regulatory information to Extension educators, growers, crop consultants, and pesticide users;
(2) Deliver IPM information to Extension educators, growers, crop consultants, and pesticide users;
(3) Share this information with other states in the Mid-Atlantic region, the Northeastern IPM Center, the U.S. EPA, and the USDA;
(4) Solicit information from other states in the Mid-At1antic region on shared commodities;
(5) Respond to queries for information from federal agencies such as EPA and USDA;
(6) Create and maintain an advisory committee;
(7) Update and promote a website;
(8) Distribute Center related information; and
(9) Help process subcontracts between the NEIPM Center and other entities at Rutgers Univerrsity receiving funding from the center.


New York Information Network for Pesticides & Alternative Strategies (2007-2008)

Project Director: Harvey Reissig
Funding Amount: $15,000

The New York State Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies will serve as the State Network Project (SNP) designed to gather and disseminate information on pesticides and pest management. The SNP will be administered and staffed by the Pesticide Management Education Program (PMEP) at Cornell University. PMEP will seek to enhance the level of knowledge, awareness, and understanding of local, state, regional, and national pest management practices for stakeholders and others by enhancing our existing website so that information can be accessed directly from the Northeastern IPM Center and associated sites; our electronic lists will provide immediate and timely information to our membership from these sites.


Pennsylvania State Network Project (2007-2008)

Project Director: Kerry H. Richards
Funding Amount: $15,000

This proposal outlines how the Pennsylvania State Network Project (PA-SNP) through the Pennsylvania Pest Management Information Center (PMIC) can use currently established networks with the Pennsylvania division of the National Agricultural Statistics Service (PA-NASS), the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA), University extension specialists, and commodity groups to serve the required functions by continuing to meet, but not limited to, the following objectives:


Production of IPM in and around the Home: Northeast Guidelines

Project Director: Jennifer Grant
Funding Amount: $19,944

Three-fourths of the households in the Northeast region use pesticides to deal with pests in their homes, lawns, and gardens. According to the EPA (2004), 90 million pounds of conventional pesticide active ingredients were applied to homes and gardens in the United States in 2001-2002. In New York alone, thousands of products are registered for residential use: 747 for the home garden, 1,335 for household use, 1,123 for turf and ornamentals, and 311 for structural pests (PMEP 2006). A recent survey of urban apartment dwellers by the New York State Attorney General's Office found that, statewide, 69% of respondents applied pesticides in their own homes and 33% did so at least once a week (Surgan et al. 2002). It is likely that other Northeastern states show similar rates of use.

Unfortunately, it is difficult for the Northeast's 54 million residents to find resources that synthesize, index, and package IPM solutions to their pest problems in ways that are easy to read and use. The few guides that do exist are usually heavily pesticide oriented, or written in a dry, academic style that is unappealing to the consumer and doesn't compete well with commercial books. Extension educators, master gardeners, and garden center employees also lack suitable references for resolving consumers concerns and providing sound IPM advice.

In 2005 we received a Regional IPM Grant Award from NE IPM to produce IPM in and around the Home-Northeast Guidelines (working title). This guide will be a major resource for millions of homeowners as well as the master gardeners, Extension educators and garden retail employees that advise them. It will compete with other popular books that are not IPM-based; many, in fact, are industry and product-oriented. Although our guide comes from an independent university perspective, it goes far beyond the former guidelines available in some states and is written in a reader-friendly, easy-to-use format lacking in other guides-while retaining accuracy and an IPM orientation. The production of these guidelines for the Northeast is well justified, as validated by the NEIPM funding we have already received. Unfortunately, the project did not include a production budget. In order to be able to complete the project and print and distribute the guide through the Northeast, we are seeking additional funding.


Raspberry Crop Profile for New England

Project Director: Sonia G. Schloemann
Funding Amount: $3,814

This proposal seeks funding by the Northeast Integrated Pest Management Center under the IPM Partnership Grant program; section B (Tactics Surveys, Crop Profiles, and Pest Management Strategic Plans), for the development of a raspberry crop profile for New England (6 states inclusive). It is a continuation of a previous proposal submitted by the New England Pest Management Network (NEPMNet) and funded in the last funding cycle, which included the design and implementation of a pest management tactics survey for raspberries in the New England states. Data collected from the survey will be used to form the basis of the crop profile to be formulated under this proposal. No crop profile for raspberries currently exists for any New England state, except for New Hampshire; a profile published in 1999 and which is now largely out-of-date. Additional impetus for development of the crop profile and eventual Pest Management Strategic Plan for New England raspberries comes from the fact that raspberries are among the crops commonly consumed by children. In fact, since a high percentage of the crop is sold on a PYO basis, many children are also exposed to the fields in which the raspberries are grown, increasing the risk of exposure to pesticides. The crop profile proposed here will be developed in close collaboration with state liaisons and growers in each of the 6 New England states. It will be developed using the NEPMNet crop profile template, which insures compliance with USDA Crop Profile requirements.


Red Tomato Working Group: Communicating IPM Benefits to Consumers

Project Director: Michael Rozyne
Funding Amount: $20,000

Apple growers in the Northeast are hungry for ways to differentiate their products and improve their market share and financial return. Their survival depends on it. The combination of consumer interest in health and safety, a demand for local Northeast apples, and a lack of commercial organic apple production in the Northeast creates the foundation for developing a differentiated product that will obtain a price premium and capture consumer loyalty. The key to rewarding growers for their innovative and often risky adoption of advanced IPM practices lies in building demand in the marketplace for advanced IPM farm products. Building demand requires the education of (i) trade buyers (the gatekeepers to the supermarket and food service industries), (ii) store-level department managers (the service providers who interact with shoppers), and (iii) consumers, the ultimate spark and source of demand. In this project, Red Tomato will develop educational/promotional vehicles for its Eco-Apple program, targeted primarily at the buying public.


Season-long Use of Horticultural Oil on Vinifera Grapevines

Project Director: Alice Wise
Funding Amount: $8,000

We aim to establish the feasibility of oil for season long powdery mildew control. This is of great interest to growers interested in organic techniques. We will further address the issue of fruit quality in a related project. It is absolutely essential to have a healthy preharvest canopy to maximize fruit ripeness, the holy grail of winegrape growers. We will be able to determine the impact of repeated oil application on cuticle development, if control of late season PM is enough to keep DM in check, and if loss of PM control is related to rate of oil. This work will lay the foundation for future work to fully understand strategies for the use of horticultural oil in winegrape vineyards.


Surveying and Identifying Thrips Species in Vegetable Crops Throughout the Mid-Atlantic Region

Project Director: Gerald Brust
Funding Amount: $7,984

This proposal will identify the temporal and spatial occurrence and damage potential of important thrips species found in vegetable crops in the mid-Atlantic region.


Vegetable IPM Working Group (2007-2008)

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $19,948

The mission of the Northeast Vegetable IPM Working Group is to foster the development and use of IPM as a means to achieve ecological and economic sustainability of vegetable farms in the Northeast.

Goals of the Northeast Vegetable IPM Working Group
1. Identify and prioritize regional vegetable and strawberry IPM needs, in particular gaps in research, extension and regulation.
2. Represent the views of vegetable and strawberry farmers and other stakeholders to the Northeast IPM Center.
3. Develop, facilitate or implement appropriate research and educational projects that address work group priorities.
4. Strengthen partnerships and exchange of information among vegetable farmers, agricultural professionals, and other stakeholders throughout the Northeast region.


Web-based Vegetable IPM Resource Database and Northeast Vegetable and Strawberry Pest Identification Supplement

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $21,708


West Virginia Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2007-2008)

Project Director: John F. Baniecki
Funding Amount: $15,000

Stakeholders in agriculture need to be kept abreast of current trends in pest management. It is important for their livelihood. Pest management strategies are in need of changing due to restrictions and replacement of long term used chemical pesticides. Stakeholders may also need to express comments dealing with maintenance of pesticides important for managing certain pests. Alternative methods are moving to the forefront. In West Virginia, crops requiring pest management are apples, peaches, small fruit, tomatoes, potatoes, sweet corn, and alfalfa and field corn used for feeding livestock. For instance, new chemistries with activity against the current insect problems on fruit tree are desperately needed. Disease resistance has developed with mainstay fungicides used on fruit (i.e., fire blight resistance is a continual threat). Currently, there are no effective alternatives and no alternatives to build a resistance management strategy.

The West Virginia State Network Project as a component of the Mid-Atlantic Information Network for Pesticides and Alternatives Strategies has provided reliable information dealing with IPM programming, including pesticide usage, linking to stakeholders and West Virginia researchers and maintaining contact with northeast partner universities with State Network Projects, the agricultural industries, and the West Virginia and federal regulatory agencies. The purpose of the Mid-Atlantic Information Network for Pesticides and Alternatives Strategies is to promote informed regulatory decisions on registered pesticides used on commodities grown in states of the Mid-Atlantic region. Emphasis is placed on decisions related to the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA).

The WV State Network Project will continue to contribute to informed pesticide decision-making through maintenance of an advisory committee, coordination and communication with allied programs within the state and the region, and maintenance of linkages with federal partners and state clientele. Pesticide and pest management information is communicated throughout the state through meetings, direct contact, mail, e-mail, print, newsletter, and website information.


[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2007

An Integrated Approach for Enhanced Soil Fertility, Improved Plant Health and Suppression of Plant Diseases and Pests

Project Director: Stellos Tavantzis
Funding Amount: $59,911

The overall goal of this project is to improve crop production through the integration of sustainable practices promoting soil regeneration, reduction of disease pressure, and enhancement of plant growth. The specific objectives of the proposed work are (1) to improve crop production through a combination of sustainable practices promoting soil regeneration, reduction of disease pressure, and enhancement of plant growth, (2) to better understand the ecological processes occurring as a result of these sustainable practices, to allow their further development, and (3) to evaluate the efficacy, sustainability, and economics of these systems. To accomplish these objectives, the following soil amendments will be used alone or as combinations: A) Organic matter in the form of mature conifer compost which would be a) capable of supporting ample microbial biomass, and b) rich in phenolics to suppress virulence of Rhizoctonia solani; B) Biocontrol agents, such as Bacillus subtilis, and Trichoderma spp., that suppress Rhizoctonia and other soilborne diseases; C) A hypovirulent strain of R. solani, which provides biocontrol against Rhizoctonia disease, and enhances plant growth, and; D) Biofumigation brought about by a Brassica cover crop. Effects on soil chemical, physical, and biological properties, soil microbial communities, plant diseases and insect pests, and crop yield and quality will be monitored and evaluated on a potato crop through two consecutive field seasons. A cost/benefit analysis will be conducted to determine the relative economic feasibility of the sustainable treatments included in this study. The proposed work will be conducted on an organic potato farm, owned by Jim and Megan Gerritsen, and on the University of Maine Aroostook Research Farm, to determine the ecological impacts of the above practices on an organic and a conventional agro-ecosystem, respectively. The work proposed here was formulated on the basis of priorities set by stakeholders in Maine, other Northeastern States, and the General IPM Priorities for the Northeast (http://northeastipm.org/priority/2005/generalpriorities.htm).


Developing a Decision Framework that Optimizes Cover Crop Integration for Weed Suppression in Northeast Cropping Systems

Project Director: William Curran
Funding Amount: $166,900

Cover crops can contribute to weed management and help eliminate herbicide use. No-till is important for a number of reasons, but reduced herbicide use is not generally part of the program. Cover crops and no-till may allow both reduced herbicide inputs and effective weed suppression. This project will examine ways to incorporate cover crops most effectively into no-till systems that rely less on herbicides for weed control. We will examine options for increasing the impact that cover crops can have on weed suppression and its effect on crop yield.


Development and Implementation of Novel Trapping Systems for Monitoring Cranberry Fruitworm and Cranberry Weevil Populations

Project Director: Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Funding Amount: $130,000

The proposed research will investigate the role of host-plant volatiles as attractants for the cranberry weevil (CBW) and cranberry fruitworm (CBFW), two major pests in cranberries and blueberries in the Northeast US; with the goal to develop traps that can be integrated into a reduced-risk pest management plan. Most current control methods for CBW and CBFW involve applications of broad-spectrum organophosphates and carbamates. Since more rigorous restrictions for the use of broadspectrum insecticides were implemented in cranberries and blueberries, the need for effective methods to detect, attract, and monitor these two insect pests has attained great importance. New selective, reduced-risk insecticides will require a more precise method for monitoring these pests to better assess application timing. Monitoring adult CBFW populations has relied on the use of pheromones to attract adult males. These pheromone traps, however, have failed to predict fruit damage in cranberry and blueberry fields. A trapping system for monitoring female fruitworm populations is desperately needed. No pheromones have been identified for CBW. We will investigate the behavioral and antennal electrophysiological responses of CBW and CBFW to host-plant volatiles to identify attractants for the development of new traps. After laboratory evaluations, we will conduct on-farm demonstrations to: a) identify "optimal" host-plant volatile blends to attract CBW and CBFW and b) implement traps baited with these blends into reduced risk IPM programs, and deliver an educational program on the appropriate use of the new technologies in New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Michigan (states involved in this proposal).


Immune Status of Lambs, Born of Protein-Supplemented Periparturient Ewes and Creep-Grazed in Spring, Against Haemonchus contortus

Project Director: William Bryan
Funding Amount: $50,000

Lamb production from pasture has great potential for expansion in the US Northeast. Combined with increased consumer appreciation for grass-fed animal products is an emerging demand for lamb by a rapidly increasing ethnic population. Since most sheep producers make frequent use of anthelmintics, resistant populations of gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes are now common. Although most conventional sheep producers believe that gastrointestinal parasites cannot be controlled with grazing management alone, preliminary studies with the sheep flock on the WVU Organic Research Farm gave favorable results. Following 5 years of observations we now propose to test protein supplementation of periparturient ewes, forage allowance and creep grazing of lambs as management regimes for the control of Haemonchus contortus (the most prevalent and lethal of the internal parasites for sheep) in lambs. In 2005 we compared 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-days of occupancy as part of pasture management to control Haemonchus contortus. In 2006 we supplemented periparturient ewes (2 wk before and 1 wk after lambing) with a high (18%) or low (12%) protein diet (fed at the rate of 270 g per head per d on a DM basis), introduced a creep gate and increased forage allowance (>2x the daily forage DM intake per animal). In spite of the fecal egg count being relatively high (>1000 egg/g), creep-grazed lambs showed no symptoms of nematode parasitism. Furthermore, the packed cell volume was within range for a normal lamb (30 - 33%), and daily gain was >150 g/d at weaning. The FAMACHA scores were between 2 and 3, with >50% of the lambs scoring a 2 or better indicating that the lambs were resilient to H. contortus parasitism (if score is greater than 3, dosing is recommended for lambs). Further testing of forage allowances and creep grazing of lambs born of protein-supplemented ewes in a replicated trial is essential to allow us to provide recommendations on the effectiveness of using grazing management alone to control Haemonchus contortus. Therefore we propose to randomly assign 64 ewes and their approximately 96 lambs to four replicates each of four treatments, two forage allowances (2.5x or 1.5x the daily forage DM intake) with creep or no creep in a replicated study. Animals will occupy a paddock for 7 days and each paddock will be rested for 28 days. This grazing management will assure that the pasture will have infective stage larvae. All animals will be weighed, sampled for feces and blood, and scored for body condition (ewes only) and anemic status, at start of experiment (early April), at weaning (late June), in August and late in October. Treatments will be compared using body weight changes, fecal egg counts, packed cell volume, body condition score (ewes) and FAMACHA scores. Forage allowances will be controlled by adjusting paddock area weekly. The experiment will be repeated a second year to evaluate year-to-year consistency of results. This field experiment, combined with experiments already conducted, will result in grazing management recommendations for both conventional and organic sheep producers in the US Northeast. We expect to provide a solution to deal with Haemonchus contortus parasitism using non chemical means.


Integrated Management and Resistance Management of Annual Bluegrass Weevil on Golf Course Turf

Project Director: Richard S. Cowles
Funding Amount: $90,000

This multi-state research and extension project will evaluate biological and selective chemical alternatives to pyrethroids for managing annual bluegrass weevil (ABW) in low-cut golf course turf, and will improve the basic biological and ecological understanding of ABW relevant to its management. Over the past ten years golf course superintendents have become dependent on pyrethroids for managing ABW and other insect pests. Recent laboratory tests and field observations demonstrate that populations of annual bluegrass weevil are developing resistance to pyrethroid insecticides -- resulting in control failures and severe injury to turf. We will determine the geographical extent of pyrethroid-resistant ABW populations throughout the northeast. Failure of pyrethroids due to insecticide resistance is anticipated to motivate superintendents to accept selective pesticides or biologicals for managing ABW populations, thereby opening the door to managers' acceptance of other IPM practices. Promising candidates for control of ABW that we will test include natural product insecticides and insect pathogenic nematodes. A transition away from broad-spectrum insecticides should reduce the risk to workers, golfers, and the environment, and permit greater activity of beneficial generalist predators and insect pathogens, improving ecological stability.

This proposal coordinates turf entomology expertise from the Northeast Region to find solutions to superintendents' problems with ABW. Dr. Koppenhöfer (Rutgers Univ.), an insect pathogenic nematode expert, will coordinate the nematode component. Dr. Cowles (Conn. Agric. Expt. Station) has expertise in dose-response testing to evaluate insecticide performance, and will bioassay weevils sent by all participants for pyrethroid resistance with Dr. Alm's Ph.D. student (Univ. RI). Dr. Li is a mycologist and will lead the laboratory-based testing of biocontrol fungi to determine their compatibility with fungicides used in the field. Dr. Peck (Cornell) has expertise in field and population ecology, will lead in phenology analysis, sampling methods and publication of extension literature. All other collaborators have special expertise in working with ABW, and they will be conducting field efficacy tests (all participants except Dr. Peck), and developing web-based resources (Dr. Vittum).


IPM to Control Vector Ticks on Public Lands

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $60,000

This is a Joint Research-Extension project to address control of the medically important vector ticks Ixodes scapularis (the blacklegged tick) and Amblyomma americanum (the lone star tick) at a high-use County-owned facility. After a detailed ecological assessment of tick populations and human risk, we will develop a flexible Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach to the control of ticks that minimizes the use of area-wide chemical applications through the use of habitat management, host-targeted chemical applications, judicious use of acaricides in only high human risk areas, and education programs for facility employees. Efficacy of the approach will be assessed by monitoring abundance of questing ticks in treated and control areas, as well as the rate of human-tick encounters, over the three years of the study. We will also prepare training workshops and materials on the assessment and management of vector ticks for managers of public lands. Development of an IPM approach to tick control will include the creation of an Integrated Tick Management (ITM) Demonstration Project at the Monmouth County Reclamation Center (MCRC) in Tinton Falls, New Jersey. The proposed Demonstration Area will use multiple control techniques and will be able to accommodate the addition of new techniques for non-chemical or low-chemical tick control as they arise. Once the Demonstration Area is established it can be utilized as a training tool for the current technologies as well as a research area for inventing/integrating new techniques in the future. The proposed project addresses the Public Health Integrated Pest Management Priorities of the Northeastern Integrated Pest Management Center's Public Health IPM Working Group, which include evaluation of novel IPM methodologies for vector-borne diseases, such as Lyme disease, the most common vector-borne disease in the United States, and the dissemination of IPM guidelines and educational programs for control of ticks and management of vector-borne diseases.


Predicting Inoculum Availability for Peach Scab: Development and Validation of a Forecasting Model

Project Director: Norman Lalancette
Funding Amount: $20,000

This research project investigates the quantitative epidemiology of peach scab, caused by the plant pathogenic fungus Fusicladosporium carpophilum. Eastern states produce 62% of the total U.S. fresh production of peaches with an annual value of $179 million. Crop profiles for most peach growing states in this region, including NJ, PA, WV, and New England, list scab as a disease of major importance. Since resistant cultivars are not available and cultural controls alone are inadequate, scab is primarily managed by application of consecutive fungicide sprays on a calendar basis. This approach results in unnecessary fungicide applications when environmental conditions are unfavorable and loss of disease control when conditions are highly favorable. The New Jersey Pest Management Strategic Plan states "a better understanding of the epidemiology should allow more effective and efficient use of newer fungicides". The major goal of the proposed project is to develop a forecasting model for predicting inoculum availability for infection. Specifically, sporulation of overwintering twig lesions, the major source of inoculum, will be quantitatively described as a function of temperature. A forecasting model algorithm will be created from this temperature relationship and previously published results. Predictions of this model will be field validated over two seasons. Implementation of the model will allow optimized fungicide application timing, thereby simultaneously reducing the potential for fungicide overuse and the likelihood of yield loss. Improvements in fungicide application efficiency will decrease amount of fungicide in the environment, enhance grower profitability, reduce applicator and field crew pesticide exposure, and decrease risk of pesticide residues on harvested fruit.



2006 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2006

Community IPM Working Group (2006-2007)

Project Director: Lynn Braband
Funding Amount: $15,000

This proposal details the plan of work for the NEIPM Center Community IPM Working Group. Members represent the broad range of stakeholders that are covered in the Community IPM area. They have been proactive in passing information from the Center to their own organizations and peers. This serves to engage stakeholders with the Northeastern IPM Center and among the diverse stakeholders in Community IPM. The Community Working Group addresses priorities covered in one of the primary focus areas in the National IPM Road Map: residential and public areas. "The greatest general population exposure to pests and the tactics used to control them occurs where people live, work and play."

The Working Group had a major role in organizing the first Northeast Regional Community and Urban IPM Conference in Manchester, NH during March 2005. We also investigated the Great Valley Conference Center and Longwood Gardens (both in Pennsylvania) as possible sites for the next conference in 2007. In setting research and extension priorities for the Northeast IPM Center, the Working Group recommended that community IPM efforts should focus in the near future on residential settings. We are organizing three sessions (all with a residential IPM focus) at the Fifth National IPM Symposium in St. Louis during April 2006.


Cover Cropping Strategies for Management of Hairy Galinsoga and Corn Chamomile

Project Director: Daniel Brainard
Funding Amount: $30,000

Both hairy galinsoga (Galinsoga ciliata) and corn chamomile (Anthemis arvensis) have been identified as particularly problematic species for vegetable growers, reducing yield and quality in a variety of crops. Crop rotation strategies involving use of short-duration cover crops may be helpful in managing these pests while reducing dependence on herbicides and building soil health. Successful management of these species would also benefit from improved understanding of their biology and ecology.


Delaware Crop Profile Revisions; Multistate PMSP (DE, MD, NJ, NC, VA): Watermelon

Project Director: Susan King
Funding Amount: $14,737


Delaware Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2006-2007)

Project Director: Susan King
Funding Amount: $15,000

The goal of this project is to promote informed regulatory decisions on registered pesticides. Major activities of this project are: serving as an information source for federal and state partners and as a liaison among the NE IPM Center, the University of Delaware, and other Key agencies in Delaware; and providing information networking for Delaware stakeholders.


Development and Dissemination of an Integrated Management Plan for Bacterial Canker of Tomato

Project Director: Christian A. Wyenandt
Funding Amount: $39,942

This project was undertaken to address the growing occurrence and severity of bacterial canker of tomatoes in New Jersey. Nine commercial growers in Hunterdon, Morris and Warren in northern New Jersey counties were asked to participate in this study based on their involvement in the Rutgers Cooperative Extension Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program and their history of bacterial canker on tomato. Participants were provided information regarding practices that would help prevent the development and spread of bacterial canker. Additionally, participants were strongly advised to heat treat all tomato seeds prior to sowing to eliminate bacterial pathogens that might be present. Heat treatment of seed was a new practice for NJ growers. Heat treatment facilities were provided by the RCE IPM Program and one of the project participants.

Growers were asked to follow as many of the practices as were possible. They were surveyed at the end of each season to determine what varieties they grew, which practices they were able to complete and what their overall impressions were of the progress (or lack of) as a result of the project. The occurrence, severity and characteristics of bacterial canker infections (if present) were documented on each farm. The primary goal of these activities was to examine the tomato production activities on all farms and attempt to use the information to determine where weaknesses that contributed to bacterial canker infections occurred. All developments were reported at local, state and regional grower meetings; commodity working group meetings, and industry advisory meetings. A document entitled: Bacterial Canker of Tomato: Background and Management Strategies was produced and will be distributed at grower meetings.


Development of Northeast Regional Interactive Tree Fruit IPM Guidelines

Project Director: Harvey Reissig
Funding Amount: $15,000

In 2005, a decision was made to cease production of the New England Apple Pest Management Guide due to constraints in staff and financial resources at the land-grant universities in the New England states. At that point, tree fruit producers and consultants in New England did not have a pest management guide specific to their region. In many cases, growers and consultants were using the Cornell Tree Fruit Guidelines as a substitute; a guideline tailored to New York growing conditions.

Cornell has been using an electronic system to produce many of the Cornell Pest Management Guidelines for several years. This system was adapted for use by the New England tree fruit specialists to produce their own tree fruit pest management guide once again based on the Cornell Tree Fruit Guidelines. The Cornell Tree Fruit Guidelines were converted into easily editable electronic files and revised by New York tree fruit specialists. These revised files were then made available to the New England tree fruit specialists for revision to reflect New England growing conditions. The revised files were then used by the Pesticide Management Education Program (PMEP) at Cornell (producers of the Cornell Guidelines) to compile a complete New England Tree-Fruit Pest Management Guide. PMEP printed copies of the New England Guide and distributed them to each New England state for redistribution to their growers and consultants. Electronic versions of the New England Guide were made available to those states wishing to use them as part of their Extension program's web site.


Maryland Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2006-2007)

Project Director: Amy E. Brown
Funding Amount: $15,000

We propose a State Network Project to enhance the function, activities, and processes of the Northeastern IPM Center. The Maryland Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (MINPAS) will provide a structure to gather and transmit information on issues relevant to both current and transitional pest management strategies, including pesticides. MINPAS has been previously funded by USDA.

MINPAS aims to promote and enhance the adoption of integrated pest management, and to facilitate informed regulatory decisions on registered pesticides used on commodities grown in Maryland. To meet these goals, MINPAS will formally link (1) the IPM and (2) pesticide education units of the Maryland Cooperative Extension and (3) the Maryland Department of Agriculture; deliver pest management information and pesticide regulatory and policy information to Extension educators, growers, crop consultants, and pesticide users in the state; gather pest management data from researchers, Extension educators, growers, crop consultants, and pesticide users in response to requests from USDA, EPA, the Northeastern IPM Center, or other agencies; analyze these data to estimate the impacts of changes in pesticide regulations on agricultural productivity in Maryland; solicit input from other states in the mid-Atlantic region; and share this information with other states in the mid-Atlantic region, the Northeastern Integrated Pest Management Center, USDA, and the US EPA.


New England IPM Tactic Survey: Raspberry; New England Crop Profile: Pepper; New England PMSP: Strawberry

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $33,000


New England Pest Management Network (2006-2007)

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $130,000

The New England Pest Management Network serves as the operational arm of the Northeastern Integrated Pest Management Center for team-building, communication, stakeholder participation, and information services to promote integrated pest management in the New England states.


New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides and Alternatives Strategies (2006-2007)

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $20,625


New Jersey IPM Tactic Surveys and Crop Profiles: Arugula, Basil, Brussels Sprouts, Leaf Lettuce, Leeks, Parsley, Radishes; PMSPs: Brussels Sprouts, Leeks, Parsley

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $20,000

New Jersey currently produces over 70 vegetables. Many of these crops are grown by numerous growers in fields that are typically less than one acre is size. As a result, statewide acreage for crops such as arugula (baby and other), basil, Brussels sprouts, leaf lettuces, leeks, parsley, and radishes tend to be less than 1,000 acres each year. This small acreage; however, masks the importance of these crops. Growing ethnic populations and resultant markets in Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York City, Washington DC and New Jersey have made these small acreage
crops valuable commodities. As a result, more attention is being paid to their production by growers.

Unfortunately, small acreage means little attention by researchers, state governments and pesticide manufacturers. In New Jersey, surveys conducted jointly by NJDEP and NJinPAS have historically lumped small acreage crops into larger categories making it difficult to determine usage patterns and access pest management needs. Because of the small acreages involved statewide and nationally, chemical manufacturers spend little or no develop effort on new materials for these crops and as a result, few pest management options exit when product cancellations or problems such as resistance occur. Finally, few, if any, crop profiles exist for arugula (FL), basil, Brussels sprouts (AZ, CA, MI), leaf lettuce (CA), leeks, parsley (AZ, CA, OH) and radishes (OH) crops and no pest management strategy plans exist for these crops. All of these issues point to the need for pest management tactic surveys, crop profiles and pest management strategies plans for these crops. This project proposes to develop these items for arugula, Brussel sprouts, leaf lettuce, leeks, parsley and radishes.


Northeast Vegetable and Strawberry Pest Identification Guide

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $12,242

The Pest Identification Supplement will be a field IPM tool that will enable growers to identify pests more accurately and make appropriate and timely decisions on pest management. The process of creating and using such a guide will also enhance communication among vegetable specialists in the region.


Online Garden and Pest FAQ

Project Director: Mary Kay Malinoski
Funding Amount: $15,000

The overall objective of this online FAQ is to provide clients the ability to access a growing database of over 12,400 specific questions (many with photographs) along with detailed answers to those questions. This will enable HGIC to provide yet another way for clients to receive answers to their questions. It has been our experience that many questions are repeatedly submitted by clients. Having a searchable FAQ would in many cases, save the client from having to submit a question and have to wait a day or so to receive an answer. They would be able to search this ever-growing database for their specific problem and have an immediate answer. All of the answers in the database contain IPM solutions to the questions. Answers have all been screened by Regional Specialists at the Home and Garden Center for accuracy. Clients would also be able to just browse general categories if they desire. Personal information such as email addresses will not be available to the public.


Optimization of a Fixed Spraying System for Commercial High-Density Apple Plantings

Project Director: Arthur Agnello
Funding Amount: $20,000

The application of pesticides to fruit throughout the Northeastern US, as in the rest of the world, gives rise to concern, primarily due to inaccurate application, which often results in high residues and environmental pollution. Inaccuracy, due to over/under application, may result in high levels of disease or insect activity. Air and water pollution is a major concern due to pesticide drift. There is also a growing concern for food safety and accountability among consumers who purchase fruit.


Pennsylvania State Network Project (2006-2007)

Project Director: Kerry H. Richards
Funding Amount: $15,000


Red Tomato Working Group: Educating Wholesale Trade Buyers to Promote IPM (2006-2007)

Project Director: Michael Rozyne
Funding Amount: $15,000

The key to rewarding growers for their innovative and often risky adoption of advanced IPM practices lies in building demand in the marketplace for advanced IPM farm products. Building demand requires the education of (i) trade buyers (the gatekeepers to the supermarket and food service industries), (ii) store-level department managers (the service providers who interact with shoppers), and (iii) consumers, the ultimate spark and source of demand.

In this project, Red Tomato develops two educational/promotional vehicles for its Eco Apple program, both targeted at supermarket trade buyers and store-level department managers.

Because organic apples are next to impossible to raise in the northeastern United States at a wholesale/supermarket volume and quality standard, advanced IPM offers an extraordinary opportunity to provide millions of shoppers who are searching for the best locally-grown produce available, with earth-friendly, advanced-IPM (certified), Northeast apples.

Red Tomato, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization will convene and coordinate an IPM Working Group including apple growers, agricultural scientists and extension agents, and its own in-house team of salespeople, communications manager, and art director. It's the close working relationship among growers, scientists, and marketers that adds unusual depth and practicality to this project.


Vegetable Educator Exchange Grant Program and IPM Resources for NRCS

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $20,145


Vegetable IPM Working Group (2006-2007)

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $16,732

The Northeast Vegetable IPM Working Group (Vegetable IWG) was established in 2002 under the umbrella of the Northeast Pest Management Center. The group represents diverse types of vegetable farmers, as well as consultants, University, state agency, and other agricultural professionals from the Northeast Region. Several Vegetable Working Group projects have been funded by the Northeast IPM Center, including a vegetable IPM resource database, a regional Sweet Corn Pest Management Strategic Plan, and a project which is building stronger collaboration with Natural Resource Conservation Service personnel and programs to increase the use of IPM on vegetable farms. The Northeast Vegetable IPM Working Group proposes to continue working to increase the use of IPM practices among vegetable growers, with the associated environmental, health and economic benefits in support of sustaining a thriving and diverse vegetable industry throughout the Northeast. We seek to provide practical and accessible tools that farmers will use to help them implement IPM, and to do that by building new partnerships and strengthening existing ones. This proposal seeks funds to hold an annual meeting in 2006, and to coordinate projects that have been initiated by the working group.


West Virginia Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2006-2007)

Project Director: John F. Baniecki
Funding Amount: $15,000

The purpose of the Mid-Atlantic Information Network for Pesticides and Alternatives Strategies is to promote informed regulatory decisions on registered pesticides used on commodities grown in states of the Mid-Atlantic region. Emphasis will be placed on decisions related to the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA). To meet this goal, the West Virginia Information Network for Pesticides and Alternatives Strategies program, as a member of the Mid-Atlantic region, will (1) deliver pesticide regulatory information to Extension educators, growers, crop consultants, and pesticide users in the state; (2) gather pest management data from university researchers, Extension educators, growers, crop consultants, and pesticide users; (3) analyze these data to determine the impacts of changes in pesticide regulations on agricultural productivity in West Virginia; (4) collect environmental and economic impact data to supplement crop profile information, essential to assist the policy makers in making informed decisions; (5) increase the awareness and usage of newly registered pesticides as pest management tools for agricultural producers; (6) solicit information from other states in the Mid-Atlantic region on shared commodities; and (7) share information with other states in the Mid-Atlantic region, the Northeast Pest Management Center, U.S. EPA, and USDA. Mechanisms for establishing these connections include fact sheets, newsletters, meetings, conferences, web sites, electronic mail, and other forms of communications, as appropriate.

The West Virginia- Information Network for Pesticides and Alternatives Strategies program will maintain communications and cooperation with other states in the Mid-Atlantic region to foster the goals of the Information Network for Pesticides and Alternatives Strategies. The WV-Information Network for Pesticides and Alternatives Strategies program will contribute to informed pesticide decision-making through establishment of an advisory committee, coordination and communication with allied programs within the state and the region, and maintenance of linkages with federal partners and state clientele. Pesticide and pest management information will be communicated throughout the state through meetings, print, and electronic media.


[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2006

A Grower Decision Tool for Optimized Disease Management in Snap and Dry Beans

Project Director: Helene R. Dillard
Funding Amount: $46,196

White and gray molds are the primary fungal diseases on snap and dry beans in NY and PA that trigger the use of fungicides. Both fungi are aggressive and have a very wide host range that makes rotation from non-hosts difficult. Producers are in need of a decision tool that provides guidance on the strategic and prudent use of materials for pod mold control. The proposed research does not develop a forecasting tool, but develops user-friendly decision trees for action based on weather conditions and pathogen behavior. The decision tool will effectively remove the guesswork from disease management practices.


Design and Delivery of IPM Outreach Programs to Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods

Project Director: Edwin Rajotte
Funding Amount: $175,000

Inner-city urban residents face cumulative health risks from multiple sources of environmental pollutants and toxins both indoors and out. Particularly in low-income urban communities, exposure to pests and pesticides are a ubiquitous, pernicious health threat inside homes. The most vulnerable populations include infants and children, pregnant women and the elderly. This project assesses inner-city residents' knowledge and behavior concerning pests and pest management. In addition, it will develop new and improved outreach materials and deliver educational programming about pests and pesticide misuse.


Identification of Host-plant Attractants for Cranberry Weevil and Cranberry Fruitworm

Project Director: Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Funding Amount: $50,000

The two insect pests in this study, the cranberry fruitworm (CBFW) and cranberry weevil (CBW) can cause major economic losses in the northeast US. Both insects feed on the plant's reproductive organs (flower buds, flowers, and fruit), which makes them major direct pests in blueberries and cranberries in the growing areas where they occur; thus, even few individuals may cause a substantial loss to growers. Current limitations on adequate monitoring techniques limit the management of CBFW and CBW populations. This study, if successful, will develop cost-effective and reliable monitoring techniques for CBFW and CBW based on host-plant attractants, which can be implemented into IPM programs in cranberries and blueberries across the northeast and other US regions. The proposed research will investigate the role of volatiles from flower buds, flowers, and fruit as attractants for the CBW and cranberry CBFW. Host-plant volatiles may find application in the development of traps to monitor CBW and CBFW populations. In the past, pheromone traps used for monitoring adults of the CBFW have failed to predict fruit damage, and no traps are available to monitor CBW populations. New monitoring tools will prevent unnecessary insecticide applications, reduce management costs, and decrease the development of resistant populations. This proposal will investigate the host-plant volatile emissions and the behavioral and antennal electrophysiological responses of CBW and CBFW to these volatiles.


Implementation of the IPM and Environmental Education Curriculum

Project Director: Donna Ellis
Funding Amount: $62,412

The implementation of the IPM and Environmental Education Curriculum into Connecticut schools will result in a more environmentally-aware citizenry who will be better prepared to make knowledgeable decisions to protect the environment. In addition, the public will be more appreciative of the efforts made by farmers to protect the environment. Considerable interest has developed for the use of the Connecticut IPM curriculum as the basis for developing IPM curricula for other Northeastern Region states. It is anticipated that similar results will be realized throughout the nation.


IPM of Pest Ants in the Urban/Suburban Landscape

Project Director: Ellie Groden
Funding Amount: $150,055

Ants in the exterior urban/suburban landscape can cause considerable problems associated with: a) nuisance and health problems of stinging species, 2) exacerbation of plant pests by homopteran-tending species, and 3) contributions to interior nuisance and structural problems from outside nesting invaders. Problems associated with ants in the landscape are encountered by homeowners, building managers, park and open space managers, school officials, and business owners, yet region-specific information on the pest species and their management is not available. The European fire ant is an invasive species that has become a serious pest in many coastal communities in northern New England over the past 10 years, and populations have developed at several locations in Massachusetts, Vermont, and New York. Densities of this aggressive, stinging ant can average 1.4 nests/m2 with 300-10,000 foragers per nest, literally driving people out of their yards and displacing native fauna. A need exists for an effective, yet safe means for managing populations of this pest and to prevent further spread. The purpose of this study is to investigate 1) the potential to manage M. rubra around buildings and homes with liquid vs. solid bait stations, and 2) survey PCOs in the NE to determine the most commonly encountered pestiferous ants in the urban/suburban landscape, and 3) develop and distribute region specific information on pestiferous ant species and options for least toxic management of ants.


Potato Varietal Mixtures for Potato Leafhopper Management on Organic Farms

Project Director: Abby Seaman
Funding Amount: $16,194

Organic farmers in several northeast states experience significant yield reduction from the effects of potato leafhopper feeding. Currently, only one control option exists, application of an approved insecticide. Organic certification standards discourage reliance on pest management approaches that rely on chemical controls. This project examines the potential for planting mixtures of potato leafhopper susceptible and resistant varieties to protect the susceptible varieties from leafhopper damage.


Reducing Potato Leafhopper (PLH) Impacts on Alfalfa through PLH-resistant Cultivars Intercropped with Perennial Forage Grass

Project Director: Don Viands
Funding Amount: $79,470

Potato leafhopper is the most damaging alfalfa insect pest in the Northeast. Forage grasses in mixture with alfalfa can cause PLH to emigrate and are environmentally beneficial, but may reduce forage quality. Producing high quality forage is a key to profitability in livestock production systems. Some recent alfalfa cultivars have glandular hairs and PLH-resistance, yet are not immune to damage from PLH. Potato leafhopper-resistant alfalfa cultivars intercropped with perennial forage grass could be an IPM strategy that would have environmental, agronomic, and economic benefits to forage producers.



2005 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2005

An Observational Early Warning System for Detecting Soybean Rust Incursions into the Northeast Region

Project Director: Erick DeWolf
Funding Amount: $25,000


Collaborating with NRCS to Promote IPM on Northeast Vegetables

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $20,000

These grant funds are being used to engage vegetable IPM educators, consultants and farmers in a collaborative partnership with NRCS agencies across the northeast region in order to establish a network and develop plans for sharing expertise, resources and outreach activities. We have held a regional meeting that broke new ground in building understanding among members of these two very distinct agencies and opened the door for further collaboration. Many activities have supported the goal of developing IPM resources and educational programs for agricultural professionals in the Natural Resources Conservation Service, land grant universities, state agencies and other organizations and for vegetable farmers, to foster adoption of IPM through NRCS conservation programs.


Community IPM Working Group (2005-2006)

Project Director: Lynn Braband
Funding Amount: $15,000


Delaware Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2005-2006)

Project Director: Susan King
Funding Amount: $20,000

The goal of this project is to promote informed regulatory decisions on registered pesticides. Major activities of this project are: serving as an information source for federal and state partners and as a liaison among the NE IPM Center, the University of Delaware, and other Key agencies in Delaware; and providing information networking for Delaware stakeholders.


Delaware PMSPs: Tomato, Snap Bean

Project Director: Susan King
Funding Amount: $7,286


Inadequate Control of Trichoderma Green Mold on Mushrooms

Project Director: Daniel Royse
Funding Amount: $23,000

We provide suggestive evidence that the recurrence of Trichoderma green mold on cultivated mushrooms, a disease that reached epidemic proportion in the 1990s in the northeastern U.S., is due to the emergence of formidable resistance in the pathogen to the only fungicide available for disease management. We also present data that proposes a direct relationship between disease incidence and on-farm sources of pathogen contamination. Our project findings were published in the major mushroom industry trade journal and presented in a series of grower meetings in which farm hygiene was emphasized as the first and foremost defense in an IPM program for green mold disease. With a reduced fungicide efficacy, farm hygiene now forms the principal tactic for disease control for the mushroom industry in the Northeast.


Increasing IPM Implementation Through Identifying Stakeholder Needs and Increasing Customer Awareness

Project Director: Margaret Skinner
Funding Amount: $9,750


Maryland Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2005-2006)

Project Director: Amy E. Brown
Funding Amount: $15,000


New England Crop Profile: Strawberry

Project Director: Sonia G. Schloemann
Funding Amount: $4,411

This proposal seeks funding by the Northeast Integrated Pest Management Center under the IPM Partnership Grant program; section B (Tactics Surveys, Crop Profiles, and Pest Management Strategic Plans), for the development of a strawberry crop profile for New England (6 states inclusive). It is a continuation of a previous proposal submitted by the New England Pest Management Network (NEPMNet) and funded in the last funding cycle, which included the design and implementation of a pest management tactics survey for strawberries in the New England states. Data collected from the survey will be used to form the basis of the crop profile to be formulated under this proposal. No crop profile for strawberries currently exists for any New England state, except for New Hampshire; a profile published in 1999 and which is now largely out-of-date. Additional impetus for development of the crop profile and eventual Pest Management Strategic Plan for New England strawberries comes from the fact that strawberries are among the crops commonly consumed by children. In fact, since a high percentage of the crop is sold on a PYO basis, many children are also exposed to the fields in which the strawberries are grown, increasing the risk of exposure to pesticides. The crop profile proposed here will be developed in close collaboration with state liaisons and growers in each of the 6 New England states. It will be developed using the NEPMNet crop profile template, which insures compliance with USDA Crop Profile requirements. A special effort will be made to include issues related to organic strawberry production. Supplemental funding (e.g., from the New England Vegetable & Berry Growers Association, NOFA or USDA) may be sought to assist in this aspect of the crop profile, if needed.


New England IPM Tactics Surveys: Residential Turf, Pepper, School IPM; PMSPs: Highbush Blueberry

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $30,000


New England Pest Management Network (2005-2006)

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $121,000


New Jersey Crop Profiles: Cucumber, Pumpkin, Blueberry; PMSPs: Honeybees, Blueberry

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $18,000

Crop profiles for two new and one previously published commodities in New Jersey will be researched and written. Five crop profiles currently under production will be finalized.

Procedure II.2: Crop Profiles - Crop profiles for cucumber and pumpkin will be researched and written in 2005. Additionally, the previously published crop profile for blueberry will be reviewed and revised. The crop profiles for green pepper, kale, sweet potato, blueberry, and tomato in New Jersey will be profiled during the NEIPMC no cost grant extension period to June 30, 2005. Attachment 5 provides the schedule for completion of all crop profiles under the New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides & Alternative Strategies (NJinPAS) project for 2004 and 2005.

USDA and EPA have determined that production of many fruits, vegetables, and grains eaten by children may depend heavily on pesticides targeted for regulatory action by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA). NJinPAS has chosen crops to be profiled in accord with the PMSP matrix released by Jonathon Becker of the USEPA (23); see Attachment 8 for a table of the New Jersey crops extracted from the EPA matrix for ease of view. Cucumbers were chosen to be profiled since EPA has classified them as "kids' foods". Further, cucumber, and pumpkins are important commodities in New Jersey. In 2000, 537,000 pounds of cucumbers were produced with a value of $10,525,000. In 2000, 360,000 pounds of pumpkins were produced with a value of $4,032,000.

Most insecticides used on cucumbers pests are either organophosphates (OPs) or carbamates (2,3). Several of the fungicides registered for use on cucumbers and pumpkins are carbamates or potential carcinogens (B1's and B2's). Loss of OPs, carbamates, and/or potential carcinogens (B1's and B2's) on these crops would seriously affect production. Because the Food Quality Protection Act will first review OPs and carbamates, it is critical to gather information for crop profiles on these crops.

Private pesticide applicators have furnished their current usage records that will be evaluated in each of the six proposed crop profiles (2). Rutgers Cooperative Extension integrated pest management scouts will continue to work with local growers in monitoring pest activity during the growing season; significant issues will be addressed in each crop profile as appropriate.

Crop profilers will be provided with the national crop profile guidelines as published by Burr; see http://nepmc.org/rese_profinstr.cfm for information to be collected and discussed. The crop profiles for New Jersey will address major insect pests and plant pathogens. See Attachment 6 for a list of known pests to be evaluated for these commodities. Organophosphate, carbamate, and B1 and B2 carcinogen pesticides used for control of the target pests and weeds for cucumbers and pumpkins are included as Attachment 7.

The two new crop profiles proposed for completion under NJinPAS in 2005 will be reviewed by recognized New Jersey experts, including Extension specialists and growers, to insure that the insect, disease, weed, and nematode pest components of the crop profiles are technically accurate. Reviewers will be provided the key required components of crop profiles (www.pestmanagement.rutgers.edu/NJinPAS/CropProfiles.htm). Technical Reviews will be documented in project files. After review, profiles will be revised and transmitted to the Northeastern Integrated Pest Management Center for review and approval. Once approved, Final Crop Profiles will be published by the NJinPAS Project Coordinator on the NJinPAS website on the Crop Profile web page at www.pestmanagement.rutgers.edu/NJinPAS/CropProfiles.htm. Availability of new profiles will be announced to New Jersey stakeholders via the NJinPAS Network listserv and to other states in the mid-Atlantic via the MAINPAS listserv.

Objective II.3: Pest Management Strategic Plans - Transition strategies to new pest management systems for certain commodities in the mid-Atlantic region may be needed as pesticides registered for use may no longer be available. Two Pest Management Strategic Plans will be developed within the proposed NJinPAS project duration of one year. Further, New Jersey will participate in the development and evaluation of regional PMSPs.

Procedure II.3: Pest Management Strategic Plans - Transition strategies to new pest management systems for certain commodities in the mid-Atlantic region may be needed as pesticides registered for use may no longer be available. Pest Management Strategic Plans for honey bees and blueberry for New Jersey will be developed within the proposed project duration of one year. NJinPAS will also lead in the preparation of a "PMSP for Green Pepper for Delaware, New Jersey, and the Eastern Shore of Maryland". Attachment 5 provides the schedule for completion of all PMSPs under the New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides & Alternative Strategies (NJinPAS) project for 2004 and 2005.

PMSP for Honey Bees for New Jersey - The New Jersey Information Network for Pesticide and Alternative Strategies Advisory Committee has designated honey bees for the development of a Pest Management Strategic Plan for New Jersey. At the most recent Advisory Committee meeting in November 2004, the group decided that since an extensive crop profile had been completed for honey bees for New Jersey has just been published that developing a PMSP for honey bees would be a logical next step. EPA Region 2's Audrey Moore volunteered to participate. It was strongly recommended that the Mid-Atlantic Apiary and Extension Consortium become involved. Accordingly, the principal investigator will assemble a Work Group of participants representative of stakeholder interests for honey bee. The participants in the Work Group will include commodity and technical specialists: NJDA State Apiarist Paul Raybold, RCRE Extension Specialist Mike Stanghellini, apiarists, IR-4, researchers, County Agricultural Agents, and other specialists in pest management. The PMSP Work Group will draft an outline for the PMSP. Under NJinPAS, information will be collected for the target commodity; it will include key pests; current pest management practices; reasons why existing alternative practices, including currently registered pesticides, are not being used; and possible new alternative practices or safer pesticides. The impact of these new practices on current IPM programs will also be addressed. A realistic estimate of the time it will take to transition to new practices without greatly affecting the crop production for the commodity will be determined. Pat Hastings, and selected Extension Specialists will finalize the Plan and submit it to the NEIPMC for approval. Once approved, it will be published on the NJinPAS web site on the PMSP web page at www.pestmanagement.rutgers.edu/NJinPAS/PMSP.htm. The Plan will be announced on the NJinPAS Network and MAINPAS listservs so that it is available to local and regional stakeholders.

PMSP for Blueberry for New Jersey- Gary Pavlis, Dean Polk, and William Sciarrappa will be the Work Group Leaders for this PMSP. The Strategic Plan will review control measures for major pests, anticipate changes in pesticide registrations and discuss possible alternatives for at risk pesticides. Growers and processors will identify critical priorities in research, extension, and regulation. The existing blueberry crop profile for New Jersey will be used as the starting point for this PMSP. Once finalized the document will be submitted it to the NEIPMC for approval and we will post it to the NJinPAS PMSP web page and announce it to the NJinPAS Network listserv.


New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2005-2006)

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $20,000

This proposal addresses the maintenance of a New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (NJinPAS) as an integral component of a Mid-Atlantic Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (MAinPAS) for the North Eastern Integrated Pest Management Center (NEIPMC). The Mid-Atlantic Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies is a planned collaboration of the land-grant universities of New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, and New York to maximize regional resources and communication. The purpose of these networks is to promote informed regulatory decisions on registered pesticides used on pests of commodities grown in the mid-Atlantic. The NJinPAS Project Director will facilitate this process for the members of MAinPAS.

The NJinPAS will:
(1) Deliver pesticide regulatory information to Extension educators, growers, crop consultants, and pesticide users in the State;
(2) Gather pest management data from researchers, Extension educators, growers, crop consultants, and pesticide users in New Jersey;
(3) Analyze this data to determine the impacts of changes in pesticide regulations on agricultural productivity in New Jersey;
(4) Share this information with other states in the mid-Atlantic region, the Northeastern Integrated Pest Management Center, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); and
(5) Solicit information from other states in the mid-Atlantic region on shared commodities.

The information gathered and distributed by NJinPAS is key to informed decision-making on pest management practices in New Jersey. Thus, an advisory committee will be assembled to guide and assess the activities of the NJinPAS so that stakeholder needs are addressed. Growers and pesticide users need to know of anticipated changes in pesticide registrations so they can voice their concerns before decisions are made final. These stakeholders need to know of the outcomes of regulatory decisions so they can modify their cropping practices to retain a competitive edge. The NJinPAS will provide pest management compliance advisories and assistance to stakeholders via the nine NJinPAS listservs to enhance productivity and global competitiveness. There is a NJinPAS website which will continue to host all of the resources developed in this project; it includes pages on crop profiles, PMSPs, a listserv archive, pesticide use surveys, the Advisory Committee, and pesticide registrations.

Rutgers Cooperative Extension currently networks with State stakeholders; the NJinPAS has expanded this State network to coordinate and communicate its activities with federal (USDA, EPA) and regional (NEIPMC, MAinPAS) stakeholders. This will also include other programs such as the Integrated Pest Management (IPM),Pesticide Applicator Training (PAT), and the Inter-Regional-4 minor-use (IR-4) programs. Mechanisms for successfully accomplishing the activities of the NJinPAS will include fact sheets, newsletters, meetings, conferences, web sites, and electronic mail. Other methods will be implemented or innovated as appropriate. To maximize resources, the NJinPAS Project Director will pass funds from the Northeastern IPM Center to any programs or individuals of the same institution that have contracts with the Center.


Online IPM Resource Database for Vegetable Crops

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $7,361

Update, verify and promote the Northeast Vegetable Crop and Pest Management Resource Database.


Pennsylvania Crop Profiles: Pumpkins, Cantaloupes, and Cabbage

Project Director: Kerry H. Richards
Funding Amount: $15,000


Pennsylvania Pest Management Information Network

Project Director: Kerry H. Richards
Funding Amount: $12,500


Regional Crop Profile: Sweet Corn

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $4,602

Develop a regional sweet corn crop profile for New England, based upon 2004 survey conducted by the New England Pest Management Network, into the regional sweet corn pest management strategic plan.


Regional Website: Phenology Models for Apple, Forage Corn, Vegetables, and Woody Ornamentals

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $19,753


Vegetable IPM Working Group (2005-2006)

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $15,000

Strengthen the capacity of the Vegetable IPM Working Group to network effectively, implement its priorities, and promote use of IPM by Northeastern vegetable farmers for one year


West Virginia Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2005-2006)

Project Director: John F. Baniecki
Funding Amount: $15,000


[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2005

Field Testing of Resistant Tomato Lines to Control Late Blight and Early Blight in Conventional and Organic Growing Systems

Project Director: Martha Mutschler
Funding Amount: $122,364

Dramatic losses in tomato yields and quality during the past several years have been recorded in the Northeast U.S. Late blight (LB), caused by Phytophthora infestans, and early blight (EB), caused by Alternaria solani and A. tomatophila, are the two most prevalent diseases responsible for these losses. Currently growers must rely upon the extensive use of fungicides to control both diseases. Unless these fungicides are used preventatively, satisfactory control is not obtained. New and more aggressive LB strains have displaced the previous indigenous strains, and these new strains are more difficult to control with fungicide sprays. Repeated use of protectant fungicides and newly introduced strobilurins has lead to loss of effectiveness in the case of protectants, and fungicide resistance in the case of strobilurins, and has made EB control more difficult. Clearly, new alternatives for LB and EB control are long overdue, and we must move forward with new IPM practices in the NE. The goal of this project is to provide immediate relief to Northeastern tomato growers by testing advanced tomato lines developed at Cornell and Penn State with multiple genetic resistance for all known races of late blight and phenotypes of early blight in the NE. This joint research and extension proposal will deploy the resistance into conventional and organic production systems. The objectives are to characterize tomato selections for disease resistance, plant maturity, yield and other desirable horticultural characteristics, while testing them at multi-sites and in two states.


IPM in and around the Home: Northeast Guidelines

Project Director: Jennifer Grant
Funding Amount: $49,997

Three-fourths of the households in the Northeast region use pesticides to manage pests in their homes, lawns, and gardens. Some of these applications could be avoided. Good sources of information about alternatives to pesticides exist, but these are not synthesized, indexed, and packaged in ways that homeowners in the Northeast or even Extension educators, Master Gardeners, and other multipliers can use. An existing set of guidelines, produced by Cornell University, has the potential to be an extremely useful resource. Our plan is to substantially revise it by creating a team of subject matter experts from nine Northeastern states; hiring a project coordinator/writer who will integrate two separate volumes into a printed document called IPM in and around the Home: Northeast Guidelines; producing, marketing, and distributing the printed version to Northeast audiences; hiring a webmaster to create, post, and advertise a web-based version that users can access for free; assessing the effectiveness of the project; and helping to ensure its sustainability in the Northeast.

The broad-reaching goals are to provide educators, homeowners, retailers, and other multipliers with clear, current, and reliable information on pests and pest management on a continuum from nonpesticidal tactics to conventional (nonrestricted) pesticides; build consumers' ability to make informed choices confidently about weed-, insect-, disease-, and wildlife management; increase use of IPM methods among NE consumers; and decrease the negative environmental impacts of conventional pest management by helping to educate the 54 million people in the aforementioned part of the Northeast Region to be environmentally aware and responsible.


Leveraging Biologicals into the Turfscape: Combining Controls and Exploiting Synergisms for White Grub Management

Project Director: Daniel C. Peck
Funding Amount: $15,000

White grubs are the most widespread and damaging pests in turfgrass habitats of the Northeast. In this extensive and rapidly expanding component of our urban and rural landscapes, management is highly dependent on chemical pesticides. Ten insecticides once offered a variety of control options, but only two preventive (counter to sound IPM) and one curative option (under FQPA review) still exist. Insecticide applications for grubs can be avoided 80% of the time by using sampling as a decision-making tool. Alternative biological control options are limited and largely non-efficacious. Advancing biologically-based pest management in this system may depend on the tactical combination of biological and chemical controls. This opportunity is based on recent investigations showing increased efficacy of biocontrols when insects are challenged by other stressors, such as reduced rates of preventive insecticides. The driving need is based on providing new curative options to replace preventive applications and thereby improve IPM. To seriously evaluate this approach, we will test a range of biologicals - singly and in combination with insecticide synergists - to control white grubs. These detailed laboratory studies will identify the most promising products and synergistic combinations for continued studies, and measure how efficacy varies across different white grub species. In this "critical step" research, we anticipate finding one or more truly synergistic combinations that will open the door for biologically-based curative control options. Documenting this new approach will help guide the development of biologically-based pest management options for soil insect pests in other turfgrass and horticultural systems.


Long-term Evaluation and Improvement of Golf Turf Management Systems with Reduced Chemical Pesticide Inputs

Project Director: Jennifer Grant
Funding Amount: $93,535

This project will provide long-term information on the costs and turfgrass quality associated with golf course turf managed with few or no chemical pesticides. Many golf courses in New York State and other areas of the U. S. are being compelled, or are choosing, to reduce or eliminate the use of chemical pesticides. Turfgrass managers need better information on how cultural practices and alternative pest management strategies can be combined to maintain acceptable, playable golf course turf. Furthermore, those advocating pesticide-restrictive policies are often unaware of the costs of implementing the policies and the resulting impacts on turfgrass quality. Our project was established in 2001and was funded through 2004 by the U.S. Golf Association. It explores total management systems, as practiced by turf managers, rather than focusing on individual technologies and isolated practices. We are requesting an additional three years of funding to continue this project and establish a long-term research site. Two cultural and three pest management systems are being compared in a factorial design, utilizing all 18 greens of a high-use public golf course. The site is a living laboratory, research and demonstration site and results have already provided a great deal of information on low- and non-chemical turfgrass management. This project addresses important scientific, environmental and social aspects of golf, and compares them in ways that are useful to golf managers as well as the general public. Our project's research is long-term and dynamic by nature, and three more years will provide critical and comprehensive additional information.


Perimeter Trap Cropping in Butternut Squash: A Systems Approach to Control Striped Cucumber Beetle and Enhance Pollination and Yield

Project Director: Lynn Adler
Funding Amount: $59,180

Pollination services are required for yield in many fruit and vegetable crops. However, conventional management practices generally focus on pest control. The extent to which yield is reduced by pests compared to insufficient pollination is unknown, and recent bee declines due to pesticide use, disease and parasites suggest that management of pollinator as well as pest populations may be essential to maintain crop yield.

Our proposal combines research and extension to evaluate perimeter trap crops for reducing pesticide use and increasing yield via resistance to cucumber beetles and attraction of pollinators in butternut squash. Northeastern stakeholders rank the cucumber beetle-bacterial wilt complex as a region-wide problem that causes significant reduction in yield and results in high pesticide use. Perimeter trap crops (PTC), or the use of an attractive crop to surround and protect main crops from herbivores, have proven effective in reducing pesticide use by 95% compared to conventional management practices. Here we propose to (1) screen 20 cucurbit cultivars for potential as effective PTCs via interactions with pests and pollinators, (2) test 5 PTC cultivars in experimental plots for potential to increase yield through reduced damage and increased pollination, (3) select 3 PTC cultivars to compare with conventional management practices on growers' farms. Results of these studies will be communicated to growers through electronic and printed publications and educational programs. This research will further the goals of IPM by providing growers with several PTC options to reduce pesticide use and increase pollination services.


Promoting IPM Implementation in Greenhouses: Banker Plants, Grower Education and an Assessment of Consumer Attitudes

Project Director: Margaret Skinner
Funding Amount: $86,743

This project will promote ways of reducing risks associated with the use of chemical insecticides by increasing opportunities to use biological control, and IPM education. First, we will assess the utility of banker plants for on-site production of predatory mites for control of spider mites on spring bedding plants. Banker plant systems provide a steady release of natural enemies into a crop, offering extended suppression of pests while reducing the cost and increasing the quality of the biocontrol agents. Second, many natural enemies are released innundatively into a crop, several times over a growing season. Shipping costs for these beneficials are considerable. We will determine whether cheaper shipping options, i.e., ground vs. overnight, impact the quality of the natural enemies received. We will also define a simple method to empower growers to perform their own quality control tests on mite shipments. Third, we will continue to develop and present innovative hands-on IPM workshops for growers in ME, NH and VT. Specialists from Europe and North America will participate, and results from our research will be incorporated into the program to aid technology transfer. Finally, we will perform a follow-up survey to measure changes in consumer attitudes and knowledge about IPM, and to see if our efforts to promote IPM have influenced the criteria people use when purchasing greenhouse-grown plants. This will follow a customer survey we will perform in 2005, which will be accompanied by the development and distribution of educational materials on IPM in the intervening years to raise public awareness and appreciation of the importance of IPM to them and the environment. Over time, consumer awareness will be critical to increase growers' use of non-pesticidal management tactics. If customers demand plants that with no (minimal) pesticide residues, growers will have to change their production practices. Together, these initiatives will promote a decreased reliance on toxic pesticides while creating an appreciation among growers' clientele about the benefits of IPM, and greater demand for plants grown using IPM practices.


Site-specific Management of Resistance (SMOR) in the Control of Apple Scab: Final Phase of Development and Implementation

Project Director: Wolfram Koeller
Funding Amount: $177,785

Apples are the most important fruit crop grown in the NE-IPM region, with a value of $260 Million in 2003. The profitability of producing processing apples has sharply declined, and the sustained viability of the industry will rely on the fresh apple market. One of the most serious and most common causes of intolerable blemishes on fresh apples are scab lesions caused by Venturia inaequalis. The disease is ubiquitous in the NE and must be managed with 4-10 applications of fungicide per season.The arsenal of scab fungicides includes conventional protectants such as mancozeb or captan. These nonspecific and purely protective fungicides have been under continuous scrutiny regarding their toxicology and their poor fit into IPM programs. Several classes of "low-risk" fungicides with post-infection activities are available as alternatives. Unfortunately, all "low-risk" fungicides have developed or will develop resistance, rendering them ineffective in scab control. Outbreaks of scab caused by resistance are unexpected by the growers affected and have become increasingly damaging. Our research over the past 15 years has shown that levels of resistance can vary considerably from orchard to orchard. Many growers, who still could effectively use particular classes of "low-risk" fungicides, have converted back to the conventional protectants to avoid potential crop losses caused by resistance. Other growers continue to apply "low-risk" fungicides in spite of resistance, thereby risking unexpected and severe losses.The goal of the proposed work is to establish and implement Site-specific Management Of Resistance (SMOR) as a service to apple growers. The novel SMOR concept consists of orchard-specific sensitivity tests combined with management recommendations based upon the sensitivity of the particular scab population to all "low-risk" options available. SMOR will allow growers to utilize "low-risk" fungicides without risking unexpected damage. Implementation of SMOR will require to validate the diagnostic precision of our orchard-specific sensitivity test, and to establish an infrastructure allowing the implementation of SMOR as a service on demand. The proposed work will be conducted in cooperation between New York as the most important apple-producing state, Massachusetts representing New England, and West Virginia as one of the southern regions of apple production in the NE.



2004 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: IPM Partnership Grants - 2004

A Field Guide to Tree Fruit Insect Pests, Beneficials, and Diseases of Eastern North America

Project Director: Arthur Agnello
Funding Amount: $10,000

The northeastern US is affected by a suite of tree fruit insect pests, diseases, and beneficial species that is among the largest of the world's production areas. Growers may typically need to be familiar with as many as 25 key species during a given season, plus possibly dozens of additional secondary species on a less frequent but still predictable basis. There are a number of excellent information resources and references available to help familiarize growers, consultants and orchard managers with diseases, pests and beneficial species for the purpose of making informed management decisions; however, most are either too detailed, incomplete, or cumbersome to be used as a convenient field identification guide in the variety of fruit crops likely to be found on modern commercial farms. This project will result in the publication of a comprehensive yet easy-to-use field guide on over 130 arthropod species and 70 diseases occurring in apples, pears, cherries, peaches and nectarines, apricots and plums in the US and Canada east of the Mississippi. For each entry, a single page will contain the species' classification, descriptive biological information, principal period of activity or occurrence, feeding habits or hosts, and number of generations per year, accompanied by high-quality photographs of the adult, immature, and damage (for arthropods) or disease symptoms. Diagnostic keys will help the reader correctly identify pests and diseases on the basis of damage symptoms; a cross-referencing index and a glossary will facilitate finding and explaining the entries. The book will be 200+ pages, and printed in a 4.25 x 7.25-inch "pocket-size" format that is easy to carry.


Crop Profile for Delaware Soybeans; PMSP for Delaware Pickles

Project Director: Susan King
Funding Amount: $7,933


Delaware Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2004-2005)

Project Director: Susan King
Funding Amount: $20,000

The Delaware Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies, is a component of the NE IPM Center. The goal of this project is to promote informed regulatory decisions on registered pesticides. Major activities of this project are: serving as an information source for federal and state partners and as a liaison among the NE IPM Center, the University of Delaware, and other Key agencies in Delaware; and providing information networking for Delaware stakeholders.


Developing the First Regional IPM Core Training Manual for Wildlife Control Operators in the Northeast

Project Director: Jill Shultz
Funding Amount: $10,000

The American public places a high value on wildlife, yet at the same time, "nuisance" wildlife may cause formidable and expensive problems. They may damage property or threaten human health and safety. National estimates of the cost of wildlife damage to agriculture range up to $1.5 billion dollars annually, with equal costs associated with accidents caused by collisions between wildlife and cars or planes. Wildlife can spread diseases to people, livestock, or pets. Nearly all segments of society are vulnerable to wildlife damage.

Traditionally, government agencies handled many of these conflicts. Public demand for wildlife control services has increased but government support for on-site assistance has not kept pace. Consequently, the commercial pest control industry is filling this need. Several state wildlife agencies are facing increasing public pressure to strengthen their oversight of this rapidly expanding industry. More than three-quarters of the Northeastern states lack training programs for wildlife control operators (WCOs), while half either lack regulations or are in the process of developing regulations for this industry.

We propose to develop a regional core curriculum for wildlife control operators in the Northeast that promotes IPM solutions to wildlife damage problems. This comprehensive, scientifically-based training manual could serve as the foundation for educational and regulatory programs while also enhancing professionalism within the industry. The manual will focus on the best practices for nuisance wildlife control, describing the IPM decision-making model; a broad array of tools, techniques, and resources; and management strategies for two dozen species most commonly encountered in nuisance situations in the Northeast. Currently, there is no such publication for the Northeast.


Development of a Pest Profile and a Strategic Plan for the Resurgence of Bed Bugs in the United States

Project Director: Jody Gangloff-Kaufmann
Funding Amount: $25,000

Bedbugs have become a significant economic pest in the many places where people sleep, including homes, rental units, hotels and college dormitories. Risks associated with bed bugs include sleeplessness, itchy bites, anemia, stress, and possible overexposure to pesticides for bed bug control. The recent increase in bedbug complaints across the US indicates a need for a national survey of the problem and the development of a pest profile and strategic plan to understand the true status of bed bugs as a pest problem and to address this emerging pest situation with research and outreach.

This project was designed to characterize the status of bed bugs as a pest of significance in the community environment. A survey tool will be developed by a national group of entomologists familiar with bed bugs in their region, with help from a professional survey research institute. The survey will be administered in six regions of the United States to gather information from the pest control industry about the prevalence of bed bugs, control options that work or do not work, and innovative techniques used by companies. The survey of methods will be used to create a national pest profile similar to currently used crop profiles. A larger work group will be assembled to develop a pest management strategic plan for bed bugs that will outline priorities for research and outreach to address the crisis. From these documents, best management practices can be created that address many audiences such as the pest control industry, municipal housing agencies, college dormitory managers, private multi-unit dwellers, departments of health and travelers. Our goals are to direct scientific and public interest toward bed bugs as a significant (non-vector) public health issue to foster the development of standard best management practices and improve public awareness while reducing human health and economic risks associated with bed bug infestations.


Development of a Region-wide Strategic Pest Management Plan for Sweet Corn in the Northeastern U.S.

Project Director: Ruth Hazzard
Funding Amount: $19,136

The Northeastern IPM Vegetable Working Group proposes to develop a region-wide Pest Management Strategic Plan for sweet corn. Sweet corn comprises approximately 40% of vegetable crop acreage and is important to vegetable producers in every state in the Northeast. Pests and pest management concerns in sweet corn are similar throughout the region, and pose serious challenges to producers. Despite the presence of sweet corn IPM programs in many states, sweet corn production depends heavily upon many insecticides and herbicides that are targeted for restriction under FQPA. Sweet corn is the most likely candidate among vegetable crops for widespread adoption of genetically-modified crops for IPM purposes, a prospect which raises far-ranging issues for producers, distributors, consumers, and regulators. Sweet corn is also ranked high in importance to the diet of children. The migratory characteristics of some of the most important insect pests of sweet corn necessitate region-wide communication and cooperation. A focused effort among all northeastern states to collaborate on setting priorities for development of improved sweet corn IPM practices and programs will have the widest benefits to producers, consumers and the environment.

At its 2003 meeting the Vegetable IPM Commodity Working Group set this project as its major goal for the coming year. Funding will enable the CWG to hire staff to coordinate the project and to bring growers and agricultural professionals from the region together for a meeting. We will collaborate with the New England and Pennsylvania Network Projects, who will be conducting pest management surveys and preparing crop profiles for sweet corn during the same period. The Penn State Network director will prepare the preliminary and final documents for the PMSP. The outcome will be a comprehensive Pest Management Strategic Plan (PMSP), which will guide the research and implementation of more advanced integrated pest management systems in sweet corn throughout the region. The project will also lay the groundwork for further region-wide collaboration to address Vegetable IPM priorities.


IPM Tactics Surveys, Crop Profiles, and PMSPs

Project Director: Glen Koehler
Funding Amount: $36,374


Maryland Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (MINPAS) (2004)

Project Director: Amy E. Brown
Funding Amount: $20,000


Measurement of Worker/Scout Exposure to Pesticides in "Standard" and "Reduced Risk" IPM Systems for New England Apples

Project Director: William M. Coli
Funding Amount: $39,999

Many commonly used crop protection chemicals, including highly toxic, broad-spectrum, long residual, organophosphate and carbamate insecticides, certain fungicides that are possible human carcinogens, and other pesticides with estrogenic effects, are now thought to represent a significant risk to human health, to beneficial natural enemies and other non-target organisms and to the environment. The passage Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA), raised the prospect that future pest management systems may be far less reliant on these relatively inexpensive, but often riskier materials. To help growers prepare for such an possible outcome, it is critical for the public sector to develop, test and analyze innovative, economically viable pest management programs that use lower risk pesticides in the context of an IPM strategy. Only when such systems are fully characterized and demonstrated to be both affordable and effective, can we anticipate that growers will willingly adopt them.

The proposed project would be in keeping with USDA's and EPA's current emphasis on risk measurement and reduction, as described in the USDA "IPM Roadmap". The project is consistent both with an IPM Working Group (IWG) Priorities grant and with a Critical/Emerging Issues grant.

The team will work collaboratively with private sector partners to describe the current standard integrated management (SIPM) system for New England apples using Crop Profiles and input from growers, along with a reduced risk IPM (RRIPM) system. The SIPM protocol will involve choice of material, rates and frequency of application by cooperating growers based solely on efficacy and cost. RRIPM protocols will involve deliberate choice of materials that either are considered "low risk" by EPA, or are determined to be so using as a model the Benbrook et al. multi-attribute toxicity rating.

Potential dermal and inhalation exposure to various organophosphate, pyrethroid and carbamate pesticides on the part of researchers conducting typical worker and/or IPM scout activities will be determined utilizing dosimetry (i.e., residues on cotton suits, gloves and air samplers). The experimental design will provide a variety of exposure situations in which we can determine "risk". The dosimetry group will wear cotton long-sleeved shirt, long pants, neck hoods, and gloves as passive collectors for dislodgeable pesticide residues. Inhalation exposure will be measured using personal air sampling pumps with pesticides absorbed onto various sorbents, depending on the pesticide. Sample analyses will be conducted at the Massachusetts Pesticide Analysis Laboratory (MPAL), a USEPA/MA Department of Food and Agriculture (MADFA)-supported FIFRA pesticide analytical laboratory.


Monitoring Resistance in Colorado Potato Beetle Populations to Imidacloprid and Other Neonicotinoids

Project Director: Galen Dively
Funding Amount: $14,674

Heavy selection pressure from soil treatments of imidacloprid has led to shifts towards resistance in Colorado potato beetle populations. Given the history of this insect, resistance development and its potential impacts on other neonicotinoids and potato pest management is an emerging issue in the northeast. Using previous baseline data on susceptibility to imidacloprid, a monitoring program will be conducted to detect early stages of resistance in potato beetle populations from Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, and Maine. Collaborators in each state will collect and ship beetles to Maryland where diet-incorporation bioassay will quantify concentration-mortality responses. Populations will also be tested for thiamethoxam susceptibility since this related neonicotinoid exhibits cross-resistance and has replaced imidacloprid on many potato farms. Bioassay results documenting departures from baseline susceptibility will help to convince growers to use insecticides with different modes of action or implement other resistance management practices before field control fails. Questionnaire surveys will document adoption of resistance management practices.


Multi-Tactic Management Strategies for Internal Lepidoptera Infesting Northeast Apples

Project Director: Harvey Reissig
Funding Amount: $32,106

Apple in the eastern United States is a high value crop and a cornerstone of the region's agriculture. Apple production provides a large quantity of fresh fruit and fruit products, contributes to agri-tourism, and offers bucolic amenities to an increasingly urban and suburban landscape. During the last several years, fruit growers in New York and Pennsylvania have suffered severe financial losses because infestations by internal fruit feeding Lepidoptera have led to numerous loads of apples being rejected by fresh fruit markets and processing plants. The tree fruit industry in these states is already in an economic crisis because of depressed markets, increased production costs, changes in pesticide registrations, and foreign competition. If this new crisis is not solved quickly, it could hasten the decline of this already beleaguered industry. Furthermore, if growers are forced to revert to calendar spraying at 14-day intervals and use harsh materials such as synthetic pyrethroids to control internal Lepidoptera in these outbreak areas, more than 30 years of IPM research and implementation may be subverted.


New and Revised Crop Profiles

Project Director: Robert Weaver
Funding Amount: $0

Funding part of 2004-2005 SNP grant


New England Pest Management Network (2004-2005)

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $144,718


New England Pest Management Network (NEPMNet)- A Regional Web-Based System to Communicate Real-Time Crop and Pest Forecasts for Apples, Vegetables, and Woody Ornamental Plants

Project Director: Glen Koehler
Funding Amount: $15,185


New Jersey Crop Profiles and PMSPs

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $19,939


New Jersey Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2004-2005)

Project Director: George C. Hamilton
Funding Amount: $19,996


Pennsylvania Pest Management Information Center (2004-2005)

Project Director: Robert Weaver
Funding Amount: $28,580


Pocket Pesticide Calibration Guide

Project Director: James Dill
Funding Amount: $9,242

Human error is arguably the most common source of pesticide related accidents. A lack of knowledge involving common conversion factors can cause mistakes in the field. These errors cause improperly calibrated application equipment, and improperly mixed materials.

The Pocket Pesticide Calibration Guide (PPCG) has long been a useful resource for pesticide applicators throughout the northeast. The PPCG was first published in the late '60's and was a useful and concise on site guide for pesticide applicators in all fields. The Northeast Pesticide Safety Educators and Coordinators (NEPSEC) performed a survey on the usefulness of the PPCG publication. The positive responses from applicators combined with the continuing stream of requests for the guide show the need for a new revised printing. Furthermore, many of the examples in the PPCG involve chemicals such as DDT that have been taken off the market. The result is a need to update the examples and to revise the format.

The objective is to revise the PPCG in order to remove outdated examples, and to reformat it for better accessibility. The publication will be revised using information from northeast land grant universities, revisions from NEPSEC and other sources with current information.

The opportunity available is to create an updated guide for northeastern pesticide applicators. The proper calibration of equipment and the proper mixing of materials in order to reduce on site pesticide related human injury, crop injury, reduce costs, and reduce the improper release of pesticide into the environment is the goal.

Literature Review, Previous Work, Related Experience:

For over three decades pesticide applicators have been using the Pocket Pesticide Calibration Guide (Boys and Murphey). However, supplies of the PPCG have been depleted in most states. State pesticide safety coordinators have stated that requests for the guide are still being made. Overall, it's still a very useful field reference for determining proper conversion factors and calculations involving pesticide application equipment calibration and chemical mixing. In 2000 at their annual meeting the Northeast Pesticide Safety Educators and Coordinators voted this their top publication need. (Personal comment)

The problem lies in the content of the PPCG. Many of the examples use DDT and other canceled chemicals in them. To those unfamiliar with the guide, it could be seen as a state supported recommendation for materials that have been previously limited or removed from the market. Another issue with the PPCG is the organization of the content. The content is not always easily accessible due to the print size and format of the guide.

Many states have pesticide equipment calibration information online, or in their pesticide applicator training manuals (Unruh, 1993) (Casady and Downs, 1997), however, they do not have any on site references for pesticide applicators. The University of Maine Cooperative Extension in cooperation with the NEPSEC would like to produce a pesticide calibration guide for on site use. The pest management office staff has put together calibration references before (Dill and Yonker 1980) (Barry and Fish 1989) (Dill, Dwyer, and Morrow 1993), and has created a number of pesticide applicator training publications. By updating the PPCG, we have the opportunity to update the examples and information into a less politically hazardous format. We also have the opportunity to increase the ease of use and accessibility of information. These attributes will help the guide to become an easily accessible onsite resource, to prevent guessing, and to promote informed decision making.


Regional Pest Alert on the Brown Marmorated Stinkbug, Halyomorpha Halys (Stal)

Project Director: Carol Holko
Funding Amount: $3,000


School IPM Leadership Training Program: Developing a Learning Community

Project Director: Lynn Braband
Funding Amount: $53,785

Children, because of their size and developmental stage, are more vulnerable to pesticides than adults. To protect them we must decrease pesticide use in schools. Yet we cannot compromise the quality of pest control because pests such as cockroaches and mice present equally important health hazards. Pest management in schools is challenging because of the variety of heavily used settings, including classrooms, cafeterias, auditoriums, and playing fields. A 2002 statewide survey revealed that many New York State schools want to adopt IPM but they need in-depth training, technical assistance, and on-going support.

Our long-term goal is to help all of the state's 703 school districts adopt IPM, protecting over 3 million students by reducing the risks posed by pests and pesticides. We've laid the foundation for this effort by working with over 150 schools. Now, the next step: developing a model school IPM program that can be replicated throughout the state (and later, the region) and training local leaders to guide IPM adoption in schools.

We'll begin with school buildings and grounds personnel in four school districts. As part of their intensive hands-on training, they, with their peer mentors and IPM trainers, will develop and refine the model. Each school will be alloted up to $6,000 to help implement its IPM plan. Their goal: become eligible for the national "IPM STAR certified school" standard created by the IPM Institute of America. The level of risk reduction achieved by each school will be evaluated using this standard. Later, our IPM leaders will educate and mentor their peers.


West Virginia Information Network for Pesticides and Alternative Strategies (2004-2005)

Project Director: John F. Baniecki
Funding Amount: $20,000


[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2004

Assessment of Efficacy and Cost of Banker Plants for Aphid Control in Spring Flower Crops

Project Director: Roy Van Driesche
Funding Amount: $40,453

NE US spring flower crops contribute ca 0.5 billion dollars annually to the economy. Dominant northeast crops are impatiens and geraniums. Pests include whiteflies, thrips, aphids and mites. We have developed effective, cost competitive biological controls for whiteflies in flower crops and are mid way toward doing the same for thrips. Aphids commonly appear in crops under biological control management. Non chemical controls for aphids are needed if growers are to be able to employ whitefly and thrips biological control without risk. Aphids make flowers unsightly and unsaleable. Aphid biological control options in greenhouse vegetables are well understood and in use. Application to flower crops has lagged. Greenhouse production in the northeastern US is over 90% flower production. We need to adapt the banker plant technology currently in use in Europe and Canada on vegetable crops, to flowers. The dominant aphids are Aphis gossypii and Myzus persicae. For each of these species, we need to assess the degree of efficacy and cost of Aphidius colemani banker plants under spring flower production conditions. We will run the needed trials in University greenhouses in MA and then in commercial greenhouses in both MA and NY. Controls that work in these states will work for the whole NE region. Ancillary activities needed in support of these trials include an initial aphid survey in the crop and screening potentially selective aphicides to find a compound to use for spot treating infestations of less common aphids, of species not susceptible to A. colemani.

Problem, Justification, and Background

Problem:

Floral Crops Sales Top Half of a Billion Dollars Annually in the NE Region. Nationwide, in 1998 sales of flats, pots and hanging baskets of such plants as marigolds, impatiens, geranium, petunias, and cyclamen were approximately 2.5 billion dollars (Appendix I), which was 64% of all greenhouse floriculture sales (National Agricultural Statistical Service, 1999). The majority of these sales are concentrated in the spring crop. In 1998 in MA, CT, NY, NJ, MD, PA, and VA combined, there were over a half a billion dollars in sales of such floral crops, 20% of all U.S. production. Greenhouse businesses employ a large labor force, averaging 16 employees per business. Thus the 446 greenhouse operations in MA in 2001 (New England Agricultural Statistics Service, 2002) and the ca. 965 operations in NY likely generated over 20,000 jobs.

This is an important industry whose pest control needs merit serious attention. Because climatic conditions and the level of greenhouse technology in MA are about average for the region, solutions that work in MA and NY will work for the Northeast region as a whole. Greenhouse crops, pests and conditions are much more similar across the region than are outdoor crops and pests, which respond more to local variation in soils, temperatures and vegetation. Thus the work proposed here is directly relevant to the entire region.

Importance of Aphids. Aphids (especially Aphis gossypii and Myzus persicae) are a common problem on a wide variety of spring floral crops. In a survey of MA flower growers in 1996, growers reported applying an average of three pesticide applications per crop for aphids, second only to thrips (Smith, 1998). While this survey has not been repeated recently, little has changed in this regard. Failure to control aphids to low levels makes plants unsaleable. Use of pesticides for control of aphids can disrupt biological control of thrips, mites and whiteflies. For growers wishing to minimize pesticide use, aphid biological control options are needed. Current practice is proceeding based on an inadequate research base, largely guided by guesswork and insectary recommendations.

Background: (abbreviated)

To determine the relative importance of the various flower crops in MA and NY, data from the USDA National Agricultural Statistics (1999) were summed in terms of sale value, combining MA and NY information. For flowers produced in two or more forms (bedding plants, pots, hanging baskets, etc), all categories were pooled. Crops with sufficient production in MA and NY to merit a state break out in the data were as follows, with crop value in parentheses: chrysanthemums (potted plants [$2,631,000] and hardy fall mums [$8,395,000]), cyclamens ($1,599,000), lilies (exclusive of cut) ($11,088,00), geraniums ($18,038,000), garden impatiens ($12,044,000), New Guinea impatiens ($7,236,000), and petunias ($5,257,000). Excluding fall hardy mums and lilies (not grown in same season as crops that are the focus of this proposal) and potted mums (grown mostly by specialized producers) and combining the two forms of impatiens (garden and New Guinea), the relative rank order of crop importance in MA and NY becomes impatiens ($19,280,00), geraniums ($18,038,000), petunias ($5,257,000), and cyclamens ($1,599,000). Based on this information, plus our own impressions of crops seen in growers' greenhouses, impatiens and geraniums are the most relevant crops to use in our proposed work.

Justification:

The justification for funding this proposal is as follows:

1. Greenhouse floriculture is an important, expanding segment of agriculture in the northeast.

2. Spring flower crops are a major part of greenhouse floriculture in the northeast. (Point "b" of the NE-IPM base priorities, crop importance)

3. The Massachusetts Flower Growers Association and grower surveys have clearly indicated that aphids are a very important insect pest. (Point "c" of the NE-IPM base priorities, pest importance)

4. Currently, control of aphids is narrowly based, being entirely chemical. This situation is not desirable and growers would benefit if either biological control options or IPM packages that combined biological and chemical control were available. (Point "a" of the NE-IPM base priorities, risk reduction)

5. Parasitoids of aphids or more effective than predators or fungal pathogens but the species of interest, A. colemani, is expensive to produce in insectaries.

6. Banker plants provide a means for growers to reduce the cost of A. colemani by only purchasing a starter colony, and then allowing natural reproduction to produce more. Also, banker plant technology is preventative rather than curative, and attacks the problem at the earliest time, an important consideration for insects such as aphids that reproduce rapidly.

7. Field trials with banker plants for aphid control have shown the approach to be successful in many vegetable crops, but trials have not been run in flower crops. Since the greenhouse industry in the northeast U.S. is over 90% flowers rather than vegetables, there is a clear need to assess this control option for flower growers.

8. Because MA and NY greenhouses are fairly typical of the northeast in terms of crops, pests, level of technology used, and production conditions, controls that work in MA and NY will be useable in all of New England, NJ, PA, DE, MD, and VA without much need for modification or local research. Banker plants systems are already being sold to growers in Canada, and Koppert Biological Systems Inc. (world's largest supplier of such products) is looking at setting up production facilities for banker plants in the U.S. This trial is likely to have the beneficial effect of stimulating Koppert to begin U.S. production of banker plants, which would confer an immediate important benefit to our growers. Even before such availability, banker plant systems can readily be constructed by growers (Point "d" of the NE-IPM base priorities, likelihood of implementation).

9. This research will contribute to the following goals:
a. pesticide reduction (if parasitoids replace insecticides in whole or in part)
b. better aphid control, leading to higher quality plants and higher profits from reduced plant losses.


IPM Displays for the Public

Project Director: Jennifer Grant
Funding Amount: $13,000

Research has shown that citizens are interested in pest management and alternatives to chemical pesticides but remain uninformed about IPM and how to practice it at home. Because few public audiences have the opportunity to learn IPM "by doing," we will design three educational exhibits with our local science center for its 80,000 annual visitors and for use by Northeastern states. All exhibits will complement and complete the IPM interpretation underway in an adjacent city park. The first interactive IPM exhibit will help users of all ages to better understand IPM concepts. The second, traveling interactive IPM exhibit, will focus on biological control; in Year Two of this project, this exhibit will be loaned to other sites in the Northeast Region. The third project element, which will take the form of an educational kit focusing on IPM from an organismal perspective, will be loaned to visitors in the Sciencenter's Discovery Space. Upon completion of the exhibits, our community extension educator will present at least one program on IPM at the Sciencenter. We will finish an existing list of pest-resistant trees and shrubs (many of which are visible on the grounds and in the adjacent part) and print it as a brochure for visitors to take home. We will also reprint an existing introductory IPM brochure (Get the Bugs Out, NYSIPM 2003) and provide it with the exhibits. Finally, we will design an informational packet and web page for IPM programs in the Northeast so they can borrow the display and modify the brochures, helping people in the Northeast to reduce risks to human health and the environment.

Problem, Justification, and Background

Pesticide use and environmental challenges
More than three-fourths of American households use pesticides. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, about 80 million pounds of conventional-pesticide active ingredients were applied to homes and gardens in the United States in 1999 (EPA, 2002).When agricultural pesticides and wood preservatives are considered, about 2.2 billion pounds of pesticides are used in the country each year -- approximately eight pounds for every citizen (Curtis and Profeta, 1993). A recent survey of urban apartment dwellers by the New York State Attorney General's Office found that, statewide, 69% of respondents applied pesticides in their own homes and 33% did so at least once a week (Surgan et al., 2002).

Water sources contaminated by pesticides are well documented. According to the United States Geological Survey (1999), "decades of pesticide use have resulted in their widespread occurrence in streams and ground water." Results from a combination of scientific studies in the past 30 years show that more than 50 percent of stream samples contained 5 or more pesticides. At least 1 pesticide was found in almost every water and fish sample collected from streams. According to the USGS, "Results indicate a high potential for problems in many streams, particularly in urban areas, where concentrations of more than one pesticide often approached or exceeded established water-quality guidelines." Volk (2003) writes that "non-point source pollution is currently the dominant threat to water quality, contributing up to 65% of the pollution in impaired streams in the northeastern United States."

About 67 million wells in the country are contaminated by pesticides to some degree (Stapleton, 2000). Nearly 25 percent of groundwater samples in the studies reported on by the USGS contained two or more pesticides, and at least one pesticide was found in about half of all wells sampled (USGS 2000). Residential neighborhoods can be a major source of non-point source pollution (Connecticut River Joint Commission, 1998) when pesticides and fertilizers are washed from parks, lawns, driveways, and roads into waterways.

Adverse effect of pesticides on humans are still being uncovered. The Natural Resources Defense Council claims that at least 107 different active ingredients in pesticides have been found to cause cancer in animals or humans (1993). Landrigan et al. (1999) discuss how children are highly vulnerable to pesticides because they play close to the ground, place objects in their mouths, grow rapidly, ingest large quantities (in proportion to their body mass) of previously sprayed fruits and vegetables, and have less ability to detoxify chemicals. The authors assert that children in cities are at special risk because chlorpyrifos and pyrethroids are the registered pesticides most heavily applied there. Chlorpyrifos may be a developmental neurotoxicant and certain pyrethroids may alter neurological and reproductive development.

In addition to these effects, the repeated use of pesticides is known to cause pesticide resistance in weeds, insects, and diseases. According to Stapleton (2000), at least 535 insects have demonstrated resistance to insecticides.

The need for IPM "brand recognition" and education
When George Hamilton (2002) and Patricia Hastings (personal communication, 5/23/02) of Rutgers University investigated the possibility of "Making IPM a Household Word," they summarized four separate Northeastern surveys from 1989 to 2001 by Burgess, Hollingsworth, Govindasamy, and Mahar. Prior to the individual surveys, 73% of respondents in New York had not heard of IPM. Similarly, 61% of respondents in Massachusetts and 69% and 75% (respectively) of respondents in New Jersey had not heard of IPM. Conclude the authors, "Despite its benefits, IPM was identified as an underutilized pest control approach by the National IPM Forum sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1992. Notably one of the top ten constraints to the implementation of IPM was the 'lack of emphasis on urban IPM programs as a means to educate the general public.'"

Despite citizens' lack of understanding of IPM, some studies indicate that citizens are thinking about pesticides, aware of alternatives, and willing to learn more. Burgess et al. (1989) found that 96% of consumers surveyed in New York were at least somewhat concerned about the use of pesticides in growing food. According to a homeowner survey in Montana (Lajeunesse et al., 1996), 43% of those surveyed were "very interested" and another 38% "somewhat interested" in learning more about least-toxic methods of pest management. They considered the most effective methods for learning to be printed materials, hands-on participation, educational videos, and demonstrations by specialists.

Mary Kay Malinoski, who directs Maryland's Home and Garden Information Center, reports (personal communication and fax, 10/24/03) that in the past three years the center has responded to nearly 7,000 email inquiries from all 50 states and the District of Columbia about pest control, pesticide safety, lawns, gardens, wildlife, and other related topics.

Community IPM outreach in the Northeast generally does not focus on interactive displays for the public. One exception would be how the Pennsylvania IPM staff at Penn State, through an IPM curriculum, BugMobile, displays, publications, and other educational initiatives, have reached many thousands of homeowners and students.

All states in the Northeast Region would benefit from interactive exhibits and brochures -- emphasizing nonpesticidal tactics -- that they could share and build upon. To meet this goal, we propose building two interactive IPM displays and an educational IPM kit that would help teach people about Community IPM. Two IPM brochures (one already in existence and one to be completed) would complement the exhibits.

Program staff at the New York State IPM Program, since the program's inception in 1985, have set up static displays at fairs, conferences, symposia, workshops, meetings and other venues. We have offered hundreds of thousands of people a handshake and our publications about IPM, but only in rare circumstances have we conveyed to our audiences a sense of excitement and wonder about integrated pest management itself. Many of the intriguing aspects of vertebrate behavior, competition among weeds, insect life cycles and pheromones, prevention of disease, and technological advancements are rarely shared with citizens who would understand these concepts if they were "brought alive." An exhibit that encourages the viewer to move its components -- such as manipulating an imitation bat's wings to collect insects -- conveys understanding about how bats can really eat 500 insects an hour, thereby decreasing both agricultural and urban pests.

Interactive displays embody the third part of the adage: "I hear& I forget; I see& I remember; I do& I understand." [Attributed to Confucius, c 500 BC]

The demonstration site being considered for these IPM exhibits, the Sciencenter, is situated in an urbanized section of downtown Ithaca where the population density is 8,000 residents per square mile. On one side of the Sciencenter is the Mutual Housing Association of Tompkins County -- affordable new housing for 30 families with a total of 51 children. A second side of the Sciencenter borders Cascadilla Creek, which passes through the city on its way to one of New York's Finger Lakes -- the nearby Cayuga Lake. Hundreds of residents influence the health of the creek each day as they fertilize and tend to their lawns and gardens, walk their dogs, and dispose of their refuse. On a third side of the Sciencenter is a city-owned park that serves 900 neighbors who otherwise would have little access to public green space. The City of Ithaca, the Sciencenter, and neighbor associations are enthusiastic about IPM interpretation in this area, which already models thoughtful decisions about appropriate plantings.

Addressing regional priorities
This project addresses, in part, three of the ten priorities developed in 2003 by the Northeastern Pest Management Center's Community IPM Work Group.

*(Priority #2): Develop outreach to homeowners, retailers of homeowner pest management products, and 'multipliers' (e.g., libraries, teachers).

IPM Displays for the Public will be available to the Sciencenter's 80,000 annual visitors, many of whom are homeowners and teachers. Located in the City of Ithaca, the museum has more than 2,600 family and individual members and serves the Finger Lakes Region of New York State. The goal of the Sciencenter is "to inspire people of all ages and backgrounds to discover the excitement of science through programs and exhibits that promote learning through interaction." The traveling display will be made available to the Tompkins County Public Library and a notice of the pest-resistant plants brochure will be posted with the NYS Library Document Depository Program (http://www.nysl.nysed.gov/nysdep.htm) and corresponding programs in other Northeastern states.

*(Priority #4): Research, develop and outreach methods for low-input landscape and turf maintenance strategies including development and distribution of a pocket field guide for the pest management of landscapes and turf.

This project will be situated adjacent to a park where low-input landscape and turf maintenance strategies will be featured, and the indoor exhibits will point visitors to the site. One theme under consideration for our exhibit is nonpesticidal weed management.

*(Priority #8): Research and outreach on wildlife pest management including landscaping "Do's and don't's".

The brochure on pest-resistant trees and shrubs will provide citizens with background information on how landscaping choices were made that help ensure long-lived plantings that resist damage from vertebrates.

Furthermore, objective 5.2 of the five national priorities set by USDA-CSREES is "To increase the capacity of communities, families, and individuals to improve their own quality of life." By providing community members with opportunities to learn about pests and integrated pest management, we are increasing their capacity to improve their personal health, the health of their yards and neighborhoods, and, ultimately, their quality of life.

Linking to previously funded projects
In 1998, Mary K. Malinoski, Jon Traunfeld, and David Clement were funded by the NE IPM Regional Grants Program for "A Diagnostic, Problem-Solving Web Site for Plants, Pests, and Landscapes" by which the Home and Garden Information Center was more fully developed. Two years prior, B. Maynard, R. Casagrande, M. Gold, S. Gordon, and K. Lagerquist received funding for "Selling the nursery industry on sustainable trees and shrubs." We plan to incorporate some of the information developed in both of these projects into the pest-resistant trees and shrubs brochure. Additionally, we have already learned which questions are most commonly asked by those who contact the HGIC, and these will inform our interactive IPM exhibits.


Landscape Ecology and Management of Strawberry Sap Beetle in the Northeast

Project Director: Greg Loeb
Funding Amount: $127,355

Strawberry sap beetle Stelidota geminata is a serious emerging threat to strawberry growers in the Northeast. The adult beetle feeds on the underside of ripe and overripe berries creating holes and likely spreading rot organisms. Of more significant concern, larvae contaminate harvestable fruit leading to consumer complaints and the need to prematurely close fields at great cost to the grower. Although strawberry sap beetle (SSB) has been reported from the Northeast for over 50 years and is widely distributed, only recently has it risen to high priority among growers (see below). Only two pyrethroid pesticides are labeled for its control. Their use is problematic for several reasons. First, they need to be applied as SSB adults move into the fields just prior to harvest, a prospect not relished by growers concerned about public perceptions of pesticide risks. Second, because of the secretive behavior of the adults and the protected position of the larvae, the insecticides are not particularly effective in the field. And third, the repeated use of broad-spectrum insecticides can disrupt biological control of other secondary pests such as spider mites. Sound IPM practices, developed over the last 20 years, are in flux due to SSB problems. Consequently, the overall goal of the research proposed here is to acquire the necessary background knowledge to develop and test cost effective and environmentally sound management alternatives for SSB.

Justification

Agriculture in the Northeast is changing. This seems especially true for fruit and vegetable growers. Starting in the late 70s there has been a trend toward direct marketing of produce through roadside stands and U-Pick operations. For example, revenue from direct marketing of fruit in New York has increased from $12.8 million in 1987 to $36.7 million in 2000 (NY Agricultural Statistics Service, 2002). Strawberry production is a big part of direct marketing operations in New York, involving about 600 growers who sell nearly 70% of production directly to consumers worth an estimated $5.3 million in gross value (NY Agricultural Statistics Service, 2002). Direct marketing of agricultural produce is increasing in other states in the region as well. In fact, national state ranking for total value of direct sales of agricultural products is California, Pennsylvania, New York, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin and Massachusetts, respectively. Massachusetts ranks second, nationally, in value of average direct market sales per farm at $16,000 per farm. Worcester County, Massachusetts ranks fourth among all counties in the United States for the value of direct sales of agricultural products to consumers at nearly $5 million or 25 percent of the state's total (New England Agricultural Statistics Service, 1998).

This trend has several important implications for SSB pest management. First, preventing the build up of ripe, overripe and damaged fruit in U-Pick fields is problematic. Poor sanitation provides an opportunity for SSB to build up in strawberry fields. Second, in order to maintain a diverse selection for marketing, growers are tending to diversify the types of crops grown. It is not atypical to find strawberries, raspberries, cherries, apples, melons, and sweet corn, all potential food sources for SSB, growing on the same farm. It is probable, yet still unproven, that residues from these other crops promote higher overwintering populations of SSB that then can colonize strawberry fields in the spring. Thus, changes such as these may be responsible for the apparent increase in SSB problems in the Northeast. Note, too, that problems with other generalist arthropod pests, such as tarnished plant bug and western flower thrips, may be exacerbated by more diverse agriculture. Our proposed work on use of alternative habitats should help us develop more informed management practices specific to SSB but also relevant to other generalist pests.

Another consequence of changing agriculture in the Northeast is the reduction in research personnel allocated to pest management of fruit and vegetable crops. More and more, growers and extension educators rely on regional expertise for information. This is the case for strawberry pest management. G. English-Loeb, at Cornell University, has explicit responsibilities for small fruit entomology. There is not an equivalent position at Pennsylvania State University or University of Massachusetts. Thus, by taking a multi-state approach to this project, we will be able to expand the reach of entomological research beyond New York to other states in our region.

Over the past 20 years major strides have been made in developing an integrated approach to pest management in strawberries (Kovach et al. 1993). Over this time, pesticide use in New York, for example, has decreased from over 16 pounds per acre to about 4 (National Agriculture Statistics Service, Agricultural Chemical Usage Summaries). This reduction has come about through improved sampling protocols for arthropods, establishment of economic thresholds, and better timing of fungicides. Problems controlling SSB has the potential to disrupt a successful program because of the need to treat with broad-spectrum insecticides multiple times near or during harvest. Strawberries are an important crop in the region (economic value in NY in 2002 = $8.8 million and $10 million in Pennsylvania) with high public visibility (National Agricultural Statistics Service 2003). We are proposing research to understand why SSB has become a more severe problem in recent years and to test new approaches to its management that rely more on cultural practices and selective use of pesticides than are currently followed. Results from this research will be applicable to other strawberry producing states outside of the Northeast region, such as Michigan and Ohio, which also have serious problems with SSB.


Organic Acids as Alternative Controls and Resistance-Management Tools in Parasitic Honey Bee Mite IPM

Project Director: Dennis vanEngelsdorp
Funding Amount: $54,875

Honey bees are the only reliable commercial pollinator for over 80 crops in the United States, whose cumulative annual value exceeds $47 billion. Parasitic bee mites are the greatest challenge to beekeepers and a serious threat to bee-pollinated crops. Since the introduction of tracheal and varroa mites, there has been a severe reduction in the managed honey bee population (from 4.5 to 2.7 million colonies).

Tracheal mite control with menthol is highly variable. Chemical overuse for varroa control has resulted in mite populations that are resistant to fluvalinate (Apistan?) and coumaphos (CheckMite+ ?), and pose honey contamination risks. Non-chemical control strategies are considered too laborious by many beekeepers. Mite-resistant bee breeding endeavors show promise, but are not yet fully realized or may be hampered by open-mated (uncontrolled) commercial queen rearing practices.

Organic acids (formic and oxalic acid) may offer beekeepers effective, sustainable alternatives for controlling parasitic mites. If successful, these organic acids represent practical, economically viable alternatives for reducing or eliminating the use of conventional pesticides to control parasitic mites of the honey bee.

Problem, Justification, and Background

Honey bees are the only reliable commercial pollinator for over 80 crops grown in the United States (Delaplane and Mayer 2000; Free 1993; McGregor 1976), with an annual summed value estimated at $47 billion (Morse and Calderone 2000). Of this amount, approximately $14.6 billion are directly attributable to honey bee pollination in terms of increased fruit set and quality. Honey bees also pollinate plants that serve as food resources for wildlife, as well as unknown millions of dollars worth of fruits and vegetables in the home garden. Although less than the value of pollination, the revenue generated by the sale of honey, beeswax, and other hive products is also considerable (ca. $250 million/year).

With the number and diversity of crops that require bee pollination in mind, it becomes clear that honey bees are an indispensable aspect of US agriculture. Moreover, the viability of the honey bee industry influences more that just the livelihood of individual beekeepers, but has far-reaching implications throughout society that extend from crop growers to the shipping and packaging industries, through wholesale and retail marketing networks, and so on, eventually reaching the end-user of these commodities, the consumer. Thus, if the honey bee industry were to be compromised, it would have a cascading, negative effect on the US. This is especially true now, as we address the potential threat of bioterrorism in relation to food safety issues. While the US will always import a vast amount of foreign-grown products, it is also essential that we have a sustainable, domestic source of food as much as possible. Honey bee pollination is one of the major keys to the sustainability of US agriculture.

Unfortunately, a compromised honey bee industry is exactly what we now have. In the mid-1980's, two honey bee parasitic mites, the tracheal mite (Acarapis woodi) and varroa mite (Varroa destructor), were introduced into the US. In the 18 years since mite establishment and due to their continual nationwide presence, there has been a severe reduction in the number of managed honey bee colonies (from 4.5 to 2.7 million colonies; before and after mite introduction, respectively). Even with control measures in place, beekeepers annually report 40-80% colony mortality (De Jong 1997). Together, these two parasites pose a serious threat to US beekeeping and may have eventual, negative impacts on domestic crop yields, consumer food availability, and food safety.

Tracheal mites are endoparasites that infest the breathing systems of adult worker honey bees. The results of heavy infestation are many, and include a reduction in worker bee life expectancy (Maki et al. 1986), injury to the hypopharyngeal (food) glands (Lui et al. 1989), destruction of flight muscle tissue (Komeili and Ambrose 1990), and impairment of thermoregulatory ability (Skinner 2000). Altogether, these stresses drastically reduce the overwintering success of honey bee colonies, particularly in the colder regions of North America (De Jong et al. 1984). Colony mortality is often two or more times greater in northern states than in southern states (Furgala et al. 1988).

Varroa mites are ectoparasitic on pupal and adult honey bees. Low infestations result in decreased vitality of individual worker bees through loss of hemolymph (Shimanuki et al. 1992), which may impair the ability of bees to perform hive duties (e.g., brood rearing, comb construction, and nectar collection). High varroa infestations result in the outright death of pupating bees, the malformation (shortened abdomens, misshapen wings, deformed legs) of emerging bees, or a reduced life expectancy of adult bees (De Jong 1997); all of which have negative effects on the viable population and hive dynamics of the honey bee colony (De Jong et al. 1982; Schneider and Drescher 1987). Varroa parasitism is further complicated by the ability of these mites to transmit bee viruses (Ball et al. 1999; Nordstrom et al. 1999), leading to additional stresses on individual bees and the colony as a whole. Without chemical intervention by the beekeeper, honey bee colonies will typically die within 6-18 months of varroa infestation. This fact is supported by the near total loss (> 95%) of feral honey bees which are not actively managed by beekeepers (Ambrose 1997). Varroa mites have spread to all of the beekeeping continents, and can be considered one of the greatest threats to global beekeeping endeavors.

Current bee mite control in the United States

Effective varroa mite control strategies currently rely on conventional pesticides. For over a decade, US beekeepers have used Apistan® (tau-fluvalinate; Wellmark) to control varroa mites. Varroa infestations occur such that two treatments per year are needed to keep bee colonies alive. Non-rotational use, misuse, and abuse of this product eventually led to the development of varroa strains resistant to fluvalinate (Baxter et al. 1998; Elzen et al. 1998), the occurrence of which is now reported in many states throughout the US. Under emergency use registration (Section 18), another product became available in the 1997, CheckMite+® (coumaphos; Bayer). This product is effective against fluvalinate-resistant mites, but presents a greater user-risk and hive product contamination hazard due to the lipophilic nature of organophosphates. Thus, there is an increased likelihood of pesticide residues in honey and beeswax. Because the safe use of CheckMite+® requires careful attention, many states have registered coumaphos as a restricted-use pesticide that requires the beekeeper to undergo and obtain pesticide application training. Other states have chosen not to register it. CheckMite+® is therefore more difficult to obtain, presents a hazard to user and product, or is simply unavailable to many beekeepers. To exacerbate the problem, reports of varroa resistance to coumaphos have been recently documented, even though this product has only been available for several years (Elzen and Westervelt 2002; Nasr 2002). As a final note to demonstrate the need for alternative varroa treatments, pyrethroid- and organophosphate-based pesticides are both known to contaminate honey and beeswax (deGreef et al. 1994; Gamber 1990; Slabezki et al. 1991; Wallner 1999), which creates additional stress on beekeepers and damages the wholesome reputation of honey.

Tracheal mite control is predominantly attempted in the fall with menthol crystals and vegetable shortening patties (Shimanuki et al. 1992). Menthol crystals are positioned above the honey bee brood nest and require consistent temperatures above 21OC (70OF) for several weeks to achieve adequate sublimation of menthol vapors and subsequent mite control. Vegetable shortening patties (e.g., Crisco®) interfere with tracheal mites' ability to detect and attach to new worker bee hosts and/or suffocate the mites by coating their bodies (Delaplane 1992). Due to temperature, colony size, and other factors, the efficacy of either treatment varies considerably by colony and location, and both are typically less effective in northern states than in southern states (Scott-Dupree and Otis 1992; Wilson et al. 2000). Therefore, tracheal mites and winter bee mortality are more problematic for beekeepers in the northern regions of the US.

Alternative methods for mite control

Several alternatives to conventional pesticides have been developed and show a wide range of efficacy for controlling varroa mites. Physical controls such as screened bottom boards remove varroa mites as they fall off their adult bee hosts in the brood nest. This device is not a stand-alone strategy (14-28% control), and colonies still require eventual chemical intervention (Pettis and Shimauki 1999). Cultural controls such as the trapping of varroa mites in drone brood comb show higher efficacy than modified bottom boards (Grobov 1997; Rosenkranz and Engels 1985; Calis et al. 1998, 1999; Buchler 1997), but the technique is labor intensive, and requires specialized drone comb and freezers to kill mites. Moreover, the removal of infested drone brood from active bee colonies must be timed precisely so that the beekeeper does not accidentally amplify the varroa population by allowing varroa to emerge from drone combs. The essential oil product, ApiLifeVAR®, has shown 70-95% efficacy, but is more expensive than conventional pesticides (three applications are needed), can only be used for fall control, and may negatively affect queen performance (Ellis et al. 2001; Stanghellini unpublished). The breeding of bee stock that is tolerant or resistant to tracheal and varroa mites shows great promise (Danka 2000; Rinderer et al. 2001; Harris and Harbo 2001), and can be considered the ultimate option for controlling these parasites. However, these breeding programs may have to incorporate a second tier of breeding for tolerance to mite-transmitted bee viruses, require large-scale adoption by commercial queen breeders, and will likely be subject to variable queen performance due to open-mated (uncontrolled) commercial queen rearing practices. Much more work is needed on the logistical aspects of specialty queen stock before these genotypes gain the dominant role in nationwide tracheal and varroa mite control practices.

Due to variable queen stock and the labor-intensive nature and incomplete control of physical and cultural tactics, most beekeepers must still rely on hard chemicals for varroa mite control. This is especially true for commercial beekeepers, which typically do not have the time or resources to perform these strategies on their 500-50,000 bee colonies.

Another, possibly more practical, approach is the use of reduced-risk compounds to control tracheal and varroa mites. Biopesticides may offer beekeepers a safe, practical, yet effective means of parasite control, and are strong candidates for incorporation into an overall parasitic bee mite IPM program. These compounds could reduce or eliminate the need for hard chemicals by keeping mite populations below the established economic thresholds, and can serve as resistance-management tools for treating bee colonies suspected of hosting fluvalinate- and/or coumaphos-resistant varroa mites. Some biopesticides, such as formic acid, have the additional benefit of efficacy against both bee mite species. Most of these biopesticides represent negligible or nonexistent risks to beekeepers and hive product quality and/or safety.

European scientists have conducted a considerable amount of research on varroa control with organic acids (formic and oxalic acid) and essential oils (thymol, eucalyptol, and others) (Imdorf et al. 1996, 1999; Fries 1997; Nanetti et al. 2003). While these compounds have proven to be effective alternatives for pyrethroids and organophosphates, their efficacy and timing of application depend on temperature, nectar flow, brood status, and bee and parasite population development. Therefore, it is essential that these alternative control methods be evaluated and adapted to regional environmental conditions and bee management practices.

Organic acid use against bee mites

Formic acid occurs naturally in honey at levels dependent on the plant species from which bees have collected nectar. Formic acid has been approved for use by beekeepers in the US for the control of both tracheal and varroa mites. However, the only approved method for treating bee colonies with formic acid has been the gel formulation, Apicure® (Feldlaufer et al. 1997). Despite reasonable efficacy against both mite species (ca. 60-80% for both species), Apicure® was removed from the market shortly after its introduction in the late 1990's because of handling and storage safety problems. While the label gave detailed directions for the use of this product, some beekeepers unknowingly exposed too much or too little gel surface area, leading to several problems. Mishandling of open packets sometimes released the gel, resulting in skin irritations and minor burns on the beekeepers' hands, or the gel dripped into the hive and killed bees. Large openings in the gel packet released too much vapor, repelling adult bees and/or killing brood. Small cuts in the packet gave low vaporization rates and did not adequately control mites. No other formulation of formic acid has yet been approved in the US, leaving a gap in the beekeepers' arsenal of known anti-mite products.

In Canada, single application formic acid treatments (MiteAway® pads) were developed and are used by many beekeepers in that country (Nasr 1996). As part of a multi-tactic bee mite IPM strategy, these pads are effective against both bee mites and their use is considered safe to beekeepers and bees (Nasr et al. 1996). As a singular, non-IPM approach, MiteAway pads soaked with formic acid were tested in New York for the fall control of varroa, but provided insufficient control (< 60%) (Calderone 1999; Calderone and Nasr 1999). The low efficacy of formic acid was attributed to insufficient formic acid release rates, which are dependent on daily temperatures and the evaporating surface areas of the pads. Calderone (1999) and Calderone and Nasr (1999) concluded that considerable adjustments in the release characteristics of formic acid pads must be made before the device can be used for effective control of varroa mites. Tracheal mites were not addressed in these reports.

In late 2003, a preliminary evaluation of a new formic acid release pad (MiteGone®; MiteGone Enterprises Inc., BC, Canada) was conducted in New Jersey for the late fall control of both tracheal and varroa mites (Stanghellini, Appendix I). These pads are different from MiteAway pads in design, composition, placement within the hive, and vapor release characteristics. Efficacy against varroa with MiteGone pads was greater than the levels reported for MiteAway pads (Calderone 1999; Calerdone and Nasr 1999), and averaged 71.9% (ca. 20% increase in efficacy compared to MiteAway pads). Adjusting the application time, duration of treatment, and/or vapor volume might increase the efficacy of formic acid in MiteGone pads above 71.9%. This preliminary test was also designed to evaluate the effects of formic acid on tracheal mites, but these data were still being processed at the time this proposal was written.

Alternating a formic acid treatment with a hard chemical would reduce the use of conventional pesticides by 50%, and would serve as a tool to combat mite resistance. Formic acid pads represent a strong candidate for incorporation into a parasitic bee mite IPM program. However, to achieve effective mite control, more work must be done on the optimal conditions, dosage rates, delivery methods, and timing of formic acid treatments in different regions of the US, particularly the northern US where the windows for tracheal and varroa mite treatment are shortened due to overall environmental factors (e.g., cooler fall temperatures).

Oxalic acid is a naturally occurring compound in many vegetables, ranging from 0.01 (sweet corn) to 1.70 (parsley) g/100g (USDA 1984). It is also present in some honeys, depending on the floral source of the nectar (Brodsgaard et al. 1999). While the exact mode of action is unknown, various formulations and treatments have been tested in Europe against varroa mites, where some treatments reached greater than 90% efficacy (Thomas 1997; Brodsgaard et al. 1999; Buchler 2000; Nanetti et al. 2003). Like formic acid, oxalic acid is inexpensive compared to conventional miticides, and poses a low to no honey contamination risk (Mutinelli et al. 1997).

Scientifically explored methods for applying oxalic acid into beehives have focused on the spray and trickle methods for the late-fall control of varroa (Nanetti et al. 2003). Direct spraying of adult bees with an oxalic acid solution provided effective control of varroa, was well tolerated by the bees, but may be considered too labor-intensive for most beekeepers (Brodsgaard et al. 1999; Thomas 1997). Less invasive and equally effective is the trickling method, whereby variable concentrations of oxalic acid (1.8-4.5%) are dissolved in sugar syrup (0-60% concentrations) and trickled onto adult bees, the volume of solution depending on bee colony size and strength (30-50 ml/colony) (Nanetti et al. 2003). In addition to a wide array of concentrations, the interpretation and applicability of European data to US conditions is complicated by differences in beehive design (e.g., Dadant versus Swiss hives) and brood cycling, which varies by region (e.g., southern versus northern Europe). A Canadian-based company (Heilyser Technology Ltd., Sidney, British Columbia, Canada) also offers an oxalic acid-impregnated plastic strip (Oxamite®) and an oxalic acid fogger device for use against varroa mites. However, there are, as of yet, no published scientific reports on the efficacy of either of these products. Regardless of application method, there are conflicting reports as to the effects of oxalic acid on bees, ranging from no deleterious effect (Nanetti et al. 2003) to impaired queen performance and overwintering success (Hiiges et al. 1999). The effect of oxalic acid on tracheal mites has been largely unexplored, as tracheal mites are less problematic in Europe. Recent studies (Brodsgaard et al. 1999) also indicate that spring treatments with oxalic acid are possible, despite the conflicting reports on its effects on bees and brood. The effects of two oxalic acid applications within the same season have not been explored.

In late 2003, a preliminary evaluation of a 3.2% oxalic acid solution applied by the trickling method was conducted in New Jersey for the late fall control of both tracheal and varroa mites (Stanghellini, Appendix I). The efficacy of this oxalic acid treatment against varroa mites averaged 86.9%, and is similar to the results found by European researchers using similar concentrations and methods of application. Adjusting the timing of application, dosage rate, and/or frequency of treatment might increase the efficacy of oxalic acid above 86.9%. This preliminary test was also designed to evaluate the effects of oxalic acid on tracheal mites, but these data were still being processed at the time this proposal was written.

The natural occurrence of oxalic acid in honey and vegetables, and its efficacy against varroa mites, make oxalic acid a prime candidate for incorporation into a parasitic bee mite IPM program. However, it is apparent from the European literature and my preliminary trials in New Jersey that more work needs to be done to determine the most efficacious delivery technique, dosage rate, timing of application, and conditions suitable for treatment with oxalic acid. Treatment efficacy and bee safety issues for oxalic acid should be explored in detail under various US conditions before any commercialization of a product is attempted.

Stakeholder inputs and needs assessment

Beekeepers face numerous challenges including microbial diseases, agricultural pesticide use, and bulk honey importation issues; yet it is the continual battle against mites that creates the greatest hardships. Due to need for parasite control, beekeeping today requires a substantially greater investment of time, labor, and money than in previous decades.

Based on a conservative estimate of $7 per colony, it can be calculated that American beekeepers are spending over $18.9 million dollars per year for parasitic bee mite control with conventional pesticides and current recommendations (e.g., fluvalinate and menthol crystals). Not only are the treatments expensive, there are continual problems with conventional pesticide use, including the development of mite populations that are resistant to registered (Apistan; fluvalinate) and Section 18 emergency use (CheckMite+; coumaphos) products, and the risk these products pose to honey and beeswax contamination.

A recent survey of 800 New Jersey honey bee colonies was conducted by Nasr (unpublished) to determine the prevalence and impact of parasitic mites on beekeeping practices in this and nearby states (northeastern US). In winter 2001, beekeepers lost more than 50% of their colonies, with tracheal mite infestation as the primary cause. In 2002, an inspection of commercial beekeeping operations (500 colonies or more) found that over 55% of the colonies had tracheal mites, and these colonies were relocated to Florida to increase winter survival rates. If these colonies had remained in New Jersey, all or nearly all of these infested colonies would have been killed. Moving colonies to warmer winter locations is not typically an option for hobbyist (1-50 colonies) and sideliner (50-300 colonies) beekeepers. Therefore, any beekeepers unable to move their hives are expected to lose a considerable proportion each winter, even when subjected to menthol crystal treatments. In 2002, all New Jersey bee colonies had varroa mite infestation levels that required treatment by the fall season. The same or similar trends are likely to be found throughout the northeastern US.

Nasr (unpublished) also conducted a questionnaire survey of beekeeper concerns and practices in New Jersey in 2001. Beekeepers were asked to rank bee pests by their impact, and catalog their current and desired parasitic mite management practices. Over 85% of the questionnaires were completed and returned by beekeepers that, collectively, manage approximately 65% of the honey bee colonies in New Jersey. The proportion of completed surveys illustrates the concern beekeepers have about their colonies, bee pests, and their businesses.

Beekeeper responses indicated that tracheal mites continue to be one of the most serious problems. Because the monitoring and detection of tracheal mite levels requires a relative degree of technical skill (body dissection), chemical solvents (potassium hydroxide) needed to dissolve flight muscle tissue to view trachea, and access to microscopes, tracheal infestations are often undetected by many beekeepers. Routine treatment with approved controls (menthol crystals) does not always provide adequate control in New Jersey and other northern states.

Varroa mites were considered equally destructive as tracheal mites. Beekeepers indicated frustration by the limited number of effective control options. Most of the beekeepers reported that they were "forced" to use CheckMite+ (coumaphos) for varroa control, because of suspected or known fluvalinate-resistance and unavailability of alternative treatments such as formic acid. Beekeepers using coumaphos listed safety to humans, contamination of beeswax, and residues in honey as very strong concerns.

Most beekeepers (87%) reported that they would prefer to utilize alternative methods for bee mite control. Organic acids were ranked the number one choice. Development of a safe and effective method to control mites was their number one priority. Respondents indicated that they are willing to adopt new pest management strategies, as long as the tactics are effective, safe, inexpensive, and environmentally sound.

The development of organic acid-based alternatives to control mites will require a considerable amount of work. Preliminary and existing studies on organic acid use in beekeeping (cited above) demonstrate that various factors must be taken into account, including environmental conditions, colony status, treatment dosage rates, and timing of application. These factors will likely vary by locality, and so need to be tailored to specific geographical areas, such as the northeastern region of the US.


Promoting Apple IPM Implementation in Eastern New York Orchards by Expansion of the Northeast Weather Association System

Project Director: Juliet Carroll
Funding Amount: $15,000

To conduct integrated pest management (IPM) for eight major pests, apple growers must use weather information and pest forecast models. The Northeast Weather Association (NEWA) can provide both for free, fostering IPM implementation, environmental conservation, and land stewardship. To expand NEWA into Eastern NY, four growers are committed to purchasing weather stations, connecting to NEWA, and serving as grower educators to promote IPM implementation and the sustainability of apple production in their region. In this critical steps project cooperating growers will learn how to use NEWA, source weather data, interpret weather data and pest forecast models, and integrate weather data with scouting and monitoring to improve IPM practices. The outreach plan will target all other apple growers in Eastern NY who will benefit from the expansion of NEWA into their region. The NEWA system will be upgraded to deploy the Oriental fruit moth model and to a database format to improve data collection and web delivery. The project will be evaluated through feedback during the growing season, grower satisfaction with the NEWA system, and analysis of IPM practice implementation, spray data and yield evaluations. Because current apple IPM practices require the use of pest forecast models and not every grower has a weather station, the advantages of the NEWA system's instantaneous outreach potential to all growers in Eastern NY are considerable.

Problem, Justification, and Background

The problem is the unavailability of the Northeast Weather Association (NEWA) in the apple-growing regions in Eastern New York. This is critical because, to conduct integrated pest management (IPM), growers must use weather information and pest forecast models. NEWA can provide both for free, fostering IPM implementation, environmental conservation, and land stewardship. Furthermore, we cannot underestimate the increasing demand of buyers, both internationally and domestically, for crop audit certification schemes that will, by definition of IPM, require growers to use weather information in pest management decisions.

IPM for the major pests of apple requires pest forecast models that use weather data (temperature, relative humidity, leaf wetness, and rain). NEWA is a network of grower-owned weather stations from which data is automatically collected and IPM pest forecast models uploaded to a website, http://newa.nysaes.cornell.edu/. The NEWA Apple Home Page, http://newa.nysaes.cornell.edu/apple_home.htm, has pest forecast models for the major pests of apple, including apple scab, fire blight, plum curculio, obliquebanded leafroller, codling moth, San Jose Scale, and spotted tentiform leafminer. However, NEWA weather stations are located only in the Lake Ontario apple-growing region of Western NY, making the NEWA network unavailable for critical IPM decision-support in the Eastern NY apple growing regions.

By expanding NEWA into Eastern NY, this project will promote the implementation of pest forecast models, non-pesticidal tactics, to measure pest risk. In addition, while it does not address the Phase I project report priorities on apple IPM in NY (Kovach et al 1995), it does address several fruit and apple stakeholder-identified IPM priorities for the Northeast (Anonymous 2003) and for NY (Carroll and English-Loeb 2003). These include the following: education regarding implementation of IPM programs, and monitoring techniques; Extension outreach programs; transition to web-based information delivery; IPM cost reduction; develop IFP; obliquebanded leafroller management, materials timing, and risk to "Honeycrisp" apples; internal lepidopteran management; fire blight management, and using models; apple scab management, management in wet years, and ascospore maturity.

This project supports a critical step in the implementation of apple IPM for the major pests of apple. Expansion of the NEWA system will increase the supply and dissemination of pest forecast model information and knowledge. By virtue of being a web-based network with free access, NEWA will enhance the seamless collaboration among apple growers, extension and research personnel, and consultants. The NYS Apple IPM Elements draft, recently sent for review to apple industry stakeholders, has already received commentary from one consultant that few growers have weather stations to implement the pest models. This proposal addresses this critical void in pest forecasting on the farm through expansion of NEWA and education of growers on sourcing and using weather data and pest forecast model information.

While weather monitoring and pest forecasts are only part of a sustainable apple production system, they require the use of rapidly evolving digital and web-based technology. It is crucial that we keep growers up-to-date in this advancing technological area. Growers must be able to make informed choices about weather information technology that fits their IPM needs and their bottom line. There are many sources of weather data: stand alone units or weather stations accessed directly in the field, weather stations accessed via radio waves or phone lines, and web-based weather information systems based on airport data and satellite imagery. NEWA offers the grower the ability to use a weather station on-the-ground without the need to travel out to the weather station, without the hassle of data collection and modeling, and without the added expense of software.

Growers using NEWA weather data will learn to select the weather information that is most useful to their production practices and will gain the ability to assess the rapidly advancing weather data collection technology, what it can offer and what sources of weather will suit them best. Beyond benefiting the grower who owns the weather station, NEWA provides free access to that data to any other grower, researcher or Extension office. This altruistic feature of NEWA and the NEWA-connected grower is extremely valuable in promoting IPM practices across a regional area. In this way, NEWA makes it possible for growers to share resources for weather data collection, analysis, distribution, archiving, and pest forecasts. NEWA also has potential multi-state and multinational impacts since growers in adjacent regions of VT, MA, CT, and Quebec will be able to access and benefit from the Eastern NY NEWA network.

This project does not address the NE-IPM annual emphases of weed and vertebrate management because weather data is not currently used to model and forecast weed and/or vertebrate development and associated management practices. However, NEWA does calculate and display a page with growing degree-days for each weather station. Thus NEWA is designed to provide information on weed management practices, should they be based on growing degree-days, a commonly used measure of plant development. All NE-IPM base priorities are addressed through the expansion of NEWA and dissemination of pest forecast models, as follows:

* Apple IPM practices require the use of pest forecast models for codling moth, obliquebanded leafroller, Oriental fruit moth, plum curculio, San Jose scale, spotted tentiform leafminer, fire blight, and apple scab, all of which can be delivered via NEWA to enhance environmental stewardship and risk management by growers and their advisors.

* The importance of the apple crop in NY is significant, being the second largest producer of apples in the USA, having a market value of $102 million in 2002. In Eastern NY 13,000 acres of apples are grown on 175 farms (Anonymous 2002). This project collaborates directly with four growers of 1216 acres of apples in Eastern NY. In addition, Eastern NY NEWA weather data and pest forecast models will be available to all growers throughout Eastern NY and the adjacent areas of VT, MA, CT and Quebec.

* The insects and diseases of apples for which forecast models are delivered via NEWA include eight major direct and indirect pests. Apple pesticide programs are targeted specifically to manage these pests and implementing NEWA pest forecast models will improve risk management and minimize pesticide inputs.

* Because the expansion of NEWA and implementation of pest forecast models is built on the commitment of the Commercial Tree Fruit Extension Specialists and four apple growers in Eastern NY it has a high probability of success in being widely implemented.

Four growers in Eastern NY are committed to purchasing weather stations, connecting to NEWA, and serving as grower educators to promote IPM implementation and the sustainability of apple production in their region and they deserve the support sought in this proposal. Their commitment will allow NEWA to collect temperature, relative humidity, leaf wetness and rain data from their orchards, run the data through the apple pest and disease models and make this information available on the web site to all other apple growers in the region. The growers' commitment will foster IPM and IFP observance so key to environmental protection and market preservation.

In order to expand NEWA most effectively, growers connecting to NEWA will have the support of the NYS Fruit IPM Coordinator and the Eastern NY Commercial Fruit Extension Specialists. They will assist growers in the placement of the weather stations on their farms, provide hands-on training in the use of NEWA's web-based information, and demonstrate how to access the weather station to obtain real-time weather data. Growers will learn to use weather forecasts to enhance IPM practices, to calculate and apply degree-day models for insect pests, and to access fire blight and apple scab forecast predictions. The integration of weather data with scouting and monitoring to improve IPM practices will be demonstrated and will become a key component of the pest management strategies in their orchards.

Cornell Cooperative Extension Specialists will utilize NEWA weather data from these four growers to inform other apple growers in the region about pest risk through their extension newsletters, improving IPM implementation across the region. These newsletters will also be posted on the NEWA Apple Home Page to inform other growers in the region about local interpretation of weather data and pest forecast models. Because growers will be an integral part of the expansion of NEWA into Eastern NY, it will be possible to receive direct feedback from them to improve NEWA's web-delivery. These improvements will benefit Western NY, as will deploying the Oriental fruit moth degree-day model (Hull et al 2002), since this pest is causing severe damage to apples and stone fruit in this region.

Direct involvement with the NEWA system will engage growers in exploring various sources of weather information and instrumentation. This will improve their inherent ability to assess the pros and cons of weather instrumentation and sources of weather data, making them more informed consumers of weather information. The growers involved in this project will serve as educators for other growers, informing them about NEWA, pest forecast models, and improved IPM implementation both informally and formally at extension-sponsored grower meetings. They will also inform the IPM decisions of other local growers because their weather data is available free via NEWA.

Improved IPM implementation will benefit a grower's need to certify their crop for market access. This has become a stark reality for many wholesale apple growers in NY racing to meet EUREPGAP? certification by January 2004 to qualify for export to the UK. IPM and integrated fruit production (IFP) standards have long been held as the foundation of market certification schemes to promote sustainable practices on the farm and in the marketplace. In the last year, Cornell University extension personnel have developed a set of Apple IPM Elements and an Apple IFP Protocol at the request of the NYS apple industry to meet the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) programs for conservation through IPM practices and the increasing demand for certified produce in a "buyer-driven" market. In apple IPM and IFP, weather data monitoring and pest forecast models feature prominently. As with all IPM practices, such pest forecasting models translate into improved environmental protection and stewardship by the grower, enhanced crop protection and yield, and the preservation and expansion of their markets through value-added market certification schemes.


Reducing Pesticide Inputs in Nurseries Using a Portable Hot Water Recirculation Immersion System

Project Director: Stanton Gill
Funding Amount: $9,770

This project involves controlling nursery pests early in the production cycle to reduce the need for pesticide inputs. In many cases nursery managers take cuttings from stock plants that have insects and mites present, often at levels undetectable to the grower. Growers place cuttings in mist systems where pest populations can survive and continue to increase as the plants move through the production cycle. Pest populations often build to levels that require the manager to apply repeated pesticide applications to bring the pest situation under control. Our method of treating plant cutting material with hot water at set temperatures and treatment times before it is moved to the propagation stages will control several of the major pests of nursery plants. This non-chemical system will reduce the pest population and reduce the pesticide inputs needed to produce a quality nursery plant.

With a grant from the Maryland Nursery and Landscape Association, we have modified Dr. Arnold Hara's basic technology to build a mobile, insulated tank with controlled hot water re-circulation system that works in temperate regions to treat pests on nursery plants at the propagation stage. We have started preliminary work with a Maryland nursery and Virginia nursery to establish what temperature and length of immersion that two species of nursery plants can tolerate without interfering with the propagation of the plant. The temperatures and length of treatment needs to be evaluated on plant material commonly grown in nurseries in the continental United States.

Problem, Justification, and Background

This project involves controlling nursery pests early in the production cycle to reduce the need for pesticide inputs. In many cases nursery managers take cuttings from stock plants that have insects and mites present, often at levels undetectable to the grower. Growers place cuttings in mist systems where pest populations can survive and continue to increase as the plants move through the production cycle. Pest populations often build to levels that require the manager to apply repeated pesticide applications to bring the pest situation under control. Our method of treating plant cutting material with hot water at set temperatures and treatment times before it is moved to the propagation stages will control several of the major pests of nursery plants. This non-chemical system will reduce the pest population and reduce pesticide inputs needed to produce a quality nursery plant.

Although many growers are practicing IPM to some extent, chemical pesticides continue to be the primary pest control method for the ornamental industry (Hudson et al. 1996). With increasing urbanization, the demands for nursery and greenhouse commodities and for landscape management are growing a rapid rate. Thus, even if average rates of pesticide use were maintained, aggregate use can be expected to increase as the industries grow (Raupp 1995). The potential for increased pesticide use attributable to green industries if non-chemical pest management alternatives are not explored.

Many nurseries start plant material as plant cuttings or divisions. If the stock plants become infested with insect pests then aggressive chemical treatment is necessary to control them. If the pests are present on the plant cutting or division then the nursery manager starts out with infested plant material that has the potential to increase to economic loss levels. Many nursery managers employ practices such as dunking plant cuttings in stock tanks with pesticides. A logical, improved, and more environmentally friendly control strategy for controlling pests in the propagation stage is greatly needed in the nursery industry.

An alternative, non-chemcial control tactic was investigated at the Hilo Experiment Station in Hilo, Hawaii by Dr. Arnold and his associates. Hara has developed a simple-to-build, cost effective device that provides a non-chemical method of killing soft-bodies pests such as mealybugs, aphids, spider mites, and soft and armored scales. Hara investigated a hot water immersion system that has been used successfully in controlling root mealybug, Rhizoecus falcifer, (Hara 2000  SAF Conference), green scale, Coccus viridis (Hara et al. 1994), and Pseduaulacaspis cockerilli (Hara et al. 1993). Pest control is obtained through a hot water treatment in a standard size water trough for less than 15 minutes. The hot water treatment of plant cuttings kills pests, but the plant material Hara investigated was not harmed. With a grant from the Maryland nursery and Landscape Association, we have modified Dr. Arnold Hara's basic technology to build a mobile, insulated tank with controlled hot water re-circulation system that works in temperate regions to treat pests on nursery plants at the propagation stage. We have started preliminary work with a Maryland nursery and a Virginia nursery to establish what temperature and length of immersion that two species of nursery plants can tolerate without interfering with the propagation of the plant. The temperatures and length of treatment needs to be evaluated on additional plant material commonly grown in nurseries in the continental United States.

A number of plants can be treated at one time making this method time efficient. The equipment cost is quite affordable for most nurseries and its operation appears to be quite feasible. This method of dealing with woody plant pests should be a cost-effective way to produce quality plants while maintaining a safe working environment for nursery workers.


Revision, Expansion, and Maintenance of the Internet Center for Wildlife Damage Management

Project Director: Paul Curtis
Funding Amount: $30,000

Human-wildlife conflicts are costly, significant, and pervasive in society. Principles of integrated pest management (IPM) can be applied in most situations to reduce damage and nuisance problems to tolerable levels. Unfortunately, the educational infrastructure for IPM has not been as well developed for dealing with vertebrate species as it has been for other pest species, commodities, and systems. As the number and significance of problems with wildlife increase, so too does the need for efficient transfer of information and technology. In 1995-1997, we developed the Internet Center for Wildlife Damage Management (ICWDM, http://icwdm.org). The website serves as a clearinghouse for all information on the worldwide web that deals with wildlife damage management. Funding for the project was provided by the Regional Integrated Pest Management Competitive Grants Program (North Central and Western Regions). The impacts of the ICWDM are significant and documented. Results from on-line surveys of ICWDM users indicate that a revision and expansion of the website would greatly improve the visibility, utility, ease of navigation, and impacts of the ICWDM. We propose to revise and expand the ICWDM. Efforts will be coordinated through the Project Director at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and will include contributions form three regional cooperators. The ICWDM is so extensive and widely linked that it includes elements that address all six priorities of the IPM Regional Competitive Grants Program. This Extension project is nation-wide and international in scope. Therefore, we are requesting support from all four IPM regions.

Problem, Justification, and Background

Nearly all segments of society experience problems with wildlife. Row crops, forages, rangeland, fruits, vegetables, ornamentals, turf, and livestock are all susceptible to damage by wildlife at various stages of production. Agricultural producers lose an estimated $45 billion dollars each year due to crop damage caused by deer, voles, blackbirds, and other wildlife species (Conover 2002). In addition, over 75,000 people are injured annually or become ill due to wildlife-related incidents (Conover et al. 1995). For most of these problems, IPM principles could be applied to reduce damage to tolerable levels (Hygnstrom et al. 1994). Pest monitoring is a critical aspect of managing wildlife damage and economic thresholds have been established for some vertebrate species. Pesticides are used occasionally to control problem wildlife, but alternative management systems including habitat modification, exclusion, frightening devices, repellents, trapping, and shooting are more commonly used. Unfortunately, the educational infrastructure for IPM has not been as well developed for dealing with vertebrate species as it has been for other pests, commodities, and systems. As the number and significance of human-wildlife conflicts increases, so too does the need for efficient transfer of information and technology.

The world-wide web provides an excellent opportunity to consolidate existing and future information on IPM and wildlife damage management. In 1995, we developed the Internet Center for Wildlife Damage Management (ICWDM, (http://icwdm.org/, Appendix 1), which serves as the clearinghouse for all information on wildlife damage management on the web. Our efforts were supported by grants from the Regional IPM Competitive Grants Program (North Central and Western regions) and the University of Nebraska IPM-Vertebrates Program. The ICWDM features current events, pages that describe damage issues involving more than 70 species of wildlife, and an on-line copy of the book, "Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage." The ICWDM links to cooperative extension publications in wildlife damage management at 40 universities. As of June 2002, users could search a rapidly growing database of over 900 full text articles or abstracts from proceedings of scientific conferences involved in wildlife damage management.

The ICWDM has attained a broad prominence on the Internet, as it is:
1) accessed over 1,200 times per day by individuals from commercial industry (22%), networks (22%), educational institutions (17%), government institutions (2%), military facilities (2%), and nongovernmental organizations (1%);
2) accessed by users from over 40 different countries each month; and
3) the number one hit in nine of the top fifteen Internet search engines when using "wildlife damage" as the key phrase.
4) In addition, over 150 web sites associated with state and federal agencies, private businesses, and organizations, have been linked to the ICWDM, including http://wildlifecontrol.info in the Northeastern U.S.;
5) 325 wildlife businesses from 43 US states and Canada have placed entries in the directory database; and
6) the ICWDM hosts websites for the National Animal Damage Control Association, The Wildlife Society-Wildlife Damage Management Working Group, and the Western Coordinating Committee of Vertebrate Pests in Agriculture, Forestry, and Public Lands.

The ICWDM has been tremendously successful since its inception in 1995. Results from on-line surveys of ICWDM users, however, indicate that a revision and expansion of the website would greatly improve the visibility, utility, ease of navigation and impacts of the website. So much information has been built into the current home page that it takes several seconds to scroll through all of the introductory information and links. We believe that a revised and expanded edition of the ICWDM will significantly increase public awareness and understanding of wildlife damage problems. It will facilitate distribution of management information to the public and increase communication among resource providers. Ultimately, the ICWDM will increase implementation of IPM practices that will lead to increased economic and environmental benefits. Our proposed extension project will impact more than the North Central Region; it is nation-wide and international in scope. Therefore, we are requesting extension support from all four IPM regions.


Using MARYBLYT to Manage Economic Risks of Fire Blight

Project Director: Herbert Aldwinckle
Funding Amount: $177,513

Fire blight, caused by the bacterium Erwinia amylovora, is one of the most destructive and difficult-to-control diseases of apple. Over the past 15 years, consumer and market demands have forced major changes in horticultural practices that have resulted in an overall increase in orchard risk for infection. These horticultural changes have not only increased the potential incidence of infection but also the level of damage likely to occur. Fire blight can be controlled to manageable levels in most years with the antibiotic streptomycin. Streptomycin is highly effective at controlling disease when applied at the appropriate timings. In the Northeast, this is achieved through the use of the forecaster MARYBLYT, a computer program for forecasting fire blight that predicts the four distinct types of infection events (i.e., blossom, shoot, canker, and trauma blight) as well as the appearance of symptoms that follow.

Blossom blight is the most destructive phase of the disease; providing inoculum for the shoot, root, and trauma blight phases. Consequently, management practices focus on controlling this phase. MB monitors four risk factors to identify possible infection events: 1) blossom development; 2) epiphytic inoculum potential (EIP, a measure of the pathogen population); 3) moisture in the form of rainfall or dew; and 4) average daily temperature. We are currently revising MB to calculate a system of "risk points" as function of the MB risk factors. This will incorporate greater flexibility in the model and allow management thresholds to be selected based on the accumulation of "risk points" that can be tailored to factors such as variety, inoculum pressure, and the users comfort for assuming risk. Ideally, however, management thresholds should be tied to a crop or economic loss function.

Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis can be used to achieve this goal. ROC analysis is a graphical approach for comparing and selection of "competing" forecasters or variations of the same forecaster. The ROC curve is a summary of the performance of a forecaster in terms of its "sensitivity" and "specificity" over the complete range of its output values. The "sensitivity" is the ability of forecaster to predict disease when disease occurs; the "specificity" is the ability of a forecaster to predict the absence of disease when disease does not occur. ROC curve analysis not only facilitates model selection, but the ROC curve itself provides a means for risk management.

The ROC curve can be described in a functional form (i.e., an equation) for any forecaster. Metz (1978), showed how the ROC curve can be used to select thresholds based on the economics of disease management and an estimate of disease prevalence. Specifically, the costs of correctly managing disease, the expected losses based on mismanagement, and a means to estimate disease prevalence are required. The objectives of this research are to: 1) Develop a spreadsheet to calculate the costs of disease management and the projected losses over the orchard recovery or reestablishment period under different risk scenarios; and 2) Develop a prevalence model for estimating inoculum pressure. Fulfillment of both objectives will provide the necessary information to optimize threshold selection in MARYBLYT or any other forecaster for which an ROC curve has been developed. In addition, completion of the first objective will provide a tool to assist growers in deciding whether trees in blocks affected by fire blight should be pruned or replaced.

Justification

With the increased level of interest in high-density orchards the economics of fire blight management are quickly becoming a driving factor in apple production (8,50). In an era where the Northeastern apple industry is struggling to compete, epidemics such as those that occurred in 1991 and 2000 are economically crippling to growers adapting to the changes of the industry. Add to this the fact that over the last 20 years spray expense per bearing acre is the fastest growing component of total farm costs next to labor in the Northeast (50). Growers must be able to make informed choices when managing fire blight. This means: (1) having a clear understanding of which blocks are at the greatest risk for damage when environmental conditions favor the development of fire blight; and (2) understanding how to select and order susceptible blocks for treatment so that the risk of economic loss is minimized; that is which blocks get sprayed first, which get sprayed last.

ROC analysis can be used to achieve this goal. The ROC curve is a summary of the performance of a forecaster in terms of its 'sensitivity' and 'specificity' over the complete range of its output values (see ROC theory below). The 'sensitivity' is the ability of forecaster to predict disease when disease occurs; the "specificity" is the ability of a forecaster to predict the absence of disease when disease does not occur. ROC curve analysis not only facilitates model selection (as used above), but the ROC curve itself provides a means for risk management. The ROC curve can be described in a functional form (i.e., an equation) for any forecaster; this forms the basis for the selection of optimal economic thresholds for disease management. Specifically, it is possible to integrate a cost function that can summarize the costs of correctly and incorrectly managing disease into the function characterizing the ROC curve. Entomologists have argued for over 20 years that management thresholds should be tied to a crop damage function or an economic indicator (33). It is interesting to note that neither MB, nor any other forecaster, considers the potential economic losses as criteria for deciding whether a spray is warranted or not. This research represents a fundamental step forward showing how the economics of disease management can be integrated with disease forecasting and represents a realization of "precision agriculture." The MARYBLYT disease forecasting system not only provides us with a "model system", but results from this research has the potential to significantly alter how one of the most destructive diseases of apple is managed.


Validation and Implementation of a Weather-based Spray Advisory Model for White Rust of Spinach

Project Director: Kathryne Everts
Funding Amount: $54,909

Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) was grown on more than 35,000 acres in the U.S. in 2002. It is an important crop grown for the fresh and processing markets in Maryland and Delaware where acreage has increased in the past ten years. Together Delaware and Maryland constitute the fourth leading spinach producing area in the U.S., with 2700 acres produced in Maryland alone; New Jersey and Virginia also have large acreages. A spinach stakeholders meeting was held in Milford, Delaware on December 13, 2002. Growers, processors, and University of Delaware and University of Maryland Cooperative Extension personnel attended the meeting. White rust (Albugo occidentalis G. W. Wils.) was cited as the most prevalent, and difficult to control, disease. There was near unanimous interest in adaptation of a weather-based fungicide application model for management of spinach white rust.

Despite widespread crop rotation and some, limited, use of host resistance, fungicide usage is very high on spinach in order to control white rust. Azoxystrobin, copper, mefenoxam, fosetyl-Al, and acibenzolar-Smethyl are used to control foliar diseases on U.S. acreage. Despite high fungicide usage, losses due to white rust persist due to poor timing of fungicides. In addition, fungicides are applied on a calendar schedule and are not always necessary, especially when the environment does not favor disease development.

A fungicide-application model based on the relationship between the environment and white rust on spinach was developed in Oklahoma. Our preliminary trials examining the model have clearly demonstrated that, although the model may result in better fungicide timing, delaying initial applications until disease is observed often results in unacceptable losses due to initial infections.

The overall objective of this project is to assist growers in adopting a weather-based fungicide application model for spinach through an improved understanding of i) presence and extent of over-wintering oospore inoculum, ii) identification of the optimum time to initiate fungicide applications, and iii) identification of fungicides or bio-fungicides that can be successfully used with a weather-based fungicide application model.

Problem, Justification, and Background

Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) was grown on more than 35,000 acres in the U.S. in 2002. It is an important crop grown for the fresh and processing markets in Maryland and Delaware where acreage has increased in the past ten years. Together Delaware and Maryland constitute the fourth leading spinach producing area in the U.S., with 2700 acres produced in Maryland alone; New Jersey and Virginia have large acreages, also. A spinach stakeholders meeting was held in Milford, Delaware on December 13, 2002. It was attended by growers, processors, and University of Delaware and University of Maryland Cooperative Extension. White rust (Albugo occidentalis G. W. Wils.) was cited as the most prevalent, and difficult to control, disease. There was near unanimous interest in adaptation of a weather-based fungicide application model for management of spinach white rust. White rust is consistently identified as a priority concern of growers in the mid-Atlantic region. Spinach was identified as a priority crop in Delaware's 1996 IPM needs assessment survey. During that needs assessment, improved foliar disease management and the development of a white rust prediction system were identified as priority research and extension needs. A Pest Management Strategic Plan (PMSP) Workshop for Spinach in Delaware, Maryland, and New Jersey will be held on January 5 and 6, 2004 in Harrington, DE (http://www.pestmanagement.rutgers.edu/NJinPAS/PMSP.htm). Again spinach white rust is expected to be the identified as the most important disease, in terms of economic loss.

Crop rotation is used on most of the spinach acreage in the U.S.; however, rotation alone is not adequate to control white rust (NAPIAP, 1994, Garrison, 2003). Host resistance has been successful in minimizing the impact of downy mildew (Brandenberger et. al., 1994, Dainello et al., 1990; Heineman et al., 1990). Recently cultivars that have moderate levels of resistance to white rust, and with fair agronomic characteristics, have been developed (Heineman and Dainello, 1990). A cultivar with moderate resistance to white rust (Vancouver) is now grown on limited acreage in Maryland and Delaware, and other moderately resistant cultivars are currently in University trials. Vancouver has "semi-savoy" leaf type, which limits how much can be used for the processing market. In addition, fungicide applications are necessary on moderately resistant cultivars to limit the incidence of white rust lesions that reduce leaf quality. Despite widespread crop rotation and limited use of host resistance, fungicide usage is very high on spinach in order to control white rust (NAPIAP, 1994). Azoxystrobin, copper, mefenoxam and fosetyl-Al are used to control foliar diseases on U.S. acreage. Acibenzolar-S-methyl is registered for use in some counties in Texas and California and is available through a Special Local Needs label (24c) in New Jersey and Virginia. Despite high fungicide usage, losses due to white rust persist due to poor timing of fungicide applications. In addition, copper fungicides and acibenzolar-S-methyl have caused phytotoxicity in some environments.

Fungicide applications may be reduced without incurring yield or quality loss in some environments and on some cultivars (Black et. al., 1992; Everts, 1998a & b). As the acreage of cultivars with moderate resistance increases, fungicide usage may be further reduced. The ability to schedule fungicide applications to coincide with periods of environmental conditions conducive to disease, would reduce application frequency and/or increase the efficacy of each application (Dainello and Jones, 1984; Jones and Dainello, 1983; Raabe and Pound, 1952 Sullivan, 1999; Sullivan et.al. 2002). A fungicide-application model based on the relationship between the environment and white rust on spinach was developed in Oklahoma (Sullivan, 1999). Temperature during periods of leaf wetness were used to time fungicide applications. This model was adapted and preliminary tests were conducted in the mid-Atlantic (Diagne et al., 2003). Several experiments were conducted in Maryland in 2002 to evaluate the ability of the weather-based fungicide application model to schedule sprays under mid-Atlantic weather conditions. Preliminary results indicate that the model may improve timing of fungicides. Preliminary results also indicate that the model would improve economic return for Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey and Virginia growers through reductions in disease incidence and therefore quality loss.

Despite preliminary success with the model, we concluded that initiation of the model through scouting was not adequate to effectively manage white rust. Control of white rust is also impeded because little information exits on the importance of oospores as initial inoculum, and the optimum time to initiate fungicide applications. Our preliminary trials examining the model have clearly demonstrated that, although the model may result in better fungicide timing, delaying initial applications until disease is observed often results in unacceptable losses due to presumed oospore infections. Identical experiments were conducted at the UM Wye Research and Education Center in Queenstown in adjacent fields. One field had been cropped to spinach in the spring of 2002; one had not. Both experiments were planted, treated and harvested on the same days. The experiment was scouted weekly and fungicide applications were initiated at the first sign of disease. White rust incidence was unacceptably high in the double-cropped field. The initial infections, presumably from oospores, resulted in spinach that would have been rejected for processors, despite whether it was sprayed weekly or according to the model. However, where initial inoculum was not high, plots sprayed weekly or according to the model significantly reduced white rust incidence. These studies illustrate the importance of initial infections in losses due to white rust. Improved information on spray initiation in white rust control is critical.


Verification of Web-based Real-time High-resolution Weed and Insect Predictive Models for Northeast IPM Programs

Project Director: Dennis Calvin
Funding Amount: $60,000

Many mathematical models of insect and weed development are available to help predict pest management activities. The use of these models, however, has been limited by the need for high quality weather data inputs and software to run them. In 2003, the first high-resolution real-time prediction models that use up-to-date spatially interpolated (10 km2 resolution) temperature data were made available through the Penn State Departments of Entomology and Crop and Soil Sciences websites. The underlying models were site verified at specific locations, but have not had wide-scale verification. Therefore, this project proposes to collect verification data from multiple climatic/crop production regions in Pennsylvania to assure the models are adequately tracking pest development at an accuracy required for pest management. The systems are designed as an early warning system to alert farmers and pest management professional to impending pest populations. Although the verification process is currently limited to Pennsylvania, the climatic zones represented are common across most of the field crop production region of the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic. If the models track properly across Pennsylvania, they are likely to be on target in other areas of the region. The maps are currently being provided to other cooperating states in the region.

Problem, Justification, and Background

Integrated Pest Management is defined as the use of multiple management tactics to maintain pest populations below economic levels in an environmentally and socially acceptable manner (Stern et al. 1959). Historically, however, synthetic pesticides have been the dominant tactic of choice, both to prevent and rescue crops from injury. Their relatively low cost has lead growers to use them as cheap insurance rather than when needed. The overuse of pesticides has lead to increased risk of adverse affects on the environment and human health and lower farm profits. Farmers have used this approach because of the profit risk they perceived, their lack of understanding of pest biology, and lack of reliable tools to predict timing of pest occurrence.

In order for farmers to move away from over reliance on pesticides, reliable economic thresholds, sampling methods, management tools, and tools to time pest management activities are needed. Although all these tactics are important for an IPM program, timing of key events is probably the most difficult yet also the most important component. Without accurate straightforward methods to time critical events, such as scouting and pest management intervention, significant inefficiencies develop that result in failure and reduced profit to growers.

Properly timing management tactics requires an understanding of environmental factors that drive development of key pest species. Insect and weed development increases as the temperature rises and slows as the temperature declines (poikilothermic). Weeds can also have moisture and light requirements for germination and growth. Arnold (1959) was the first to develop an index of temperature to drive crop and pest development. This was the heat unit or degree-day concept, which is a measure of the amount of heat available within a 24-hour period to drive an organism's development. The degree-day requirements of a specific organism are estimated by relating the rate of development, expressed as 1/days, at constant temperatures in a linear regression equation. Extrapolation of the linear line to the temperature where development is predicted to be zero provides the threshold of development (TD) for the species and for individual life stages of the species. These TDs typically vary from around 9 oC for cool temperature adapted species to 15 oC for warm temperature adapted species. Non-linear models can also be used, but degree-day accumulations remain the most widely used approach because of their simplicity. Once quantified, these mathematical models can be used to predict when an organism's population will reach key life stages that are important in pest management.

Because development of crops, insects and weeds are temperature dependent, their temporal occurrence during the season is greatly influenced by physical features of the region. (Appendix Ia). Appendix Ia illustrates the great topographic relief differences that exist in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions. The seasonal degree-day accumulations in this region are greatly affected by this variation in relief and the latitudinal gradient (Appendix Ib). It can be seen in Appendix Ib for Pennsylvania that the accumulation of degree days for European corn borer development varies spatially from 700 to 1400. This indicates that in the warmest areas of the state, there are twice the heat units for the pest population to development than in the cooler more northern region. In fact, the pest typically completes two to three generations in the southeast and south central regions of the state and only one in the north central region. Model simulation for the European corn borer have indicated that the second generation egg laying period can vary by up to five weeks between locations in the state and up to five weeks between years at the same location. Similar differences are seen for other insect pests.

This variation can also have a major impact on spring and summer weed emergence periods. In the warmer southern areas, weed emergence occurs earlier on average and may occur over a longer or shorter time period depending on species than in cooler northern areas. These differences can greatly influence the timing and effectiveness of weed management tactics. A farmer trying to optimize the timing of pest management activities would have a difficult time knowing when to begin and stop scouting and when to implement a control tactic (chemical, mechanical, or biological). Uncertainty surrounding when to implement pest management activity greatly increases the time for scouting and adds inefficiency into control efforts, which increases the cost of IPM programs and reduces the effectiveness of management tactics.



2003 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2003

Efficacy of Queen Replacement for Varroa IPM

Project Director: Nancy Ostiguy
Funding Amount: $142,255

The number of managed and feral honey bee colonies has declined due largely to the varroa mite, and external parasite of the honey bee. Growers and others who rely on feral and managed bees for pollination or honey have noticed this loss. The current method for varroa control is the application of one of two pesticides to which mites have become resistant. Lethal and sublethal bee effects may result from both pesticides. Additionally, these pesticides have been detected in hive products, e.b., honey and wax. Integrated pest management will provide an opportunity to control varroa without contaminating hive products or harming the honey bee plus resistance development can be slowed.

This project has two objectives: 1) test the efficacy of delaying queen release or caging queens to reduce varroa levels in honey bee colonies and 2) test the efficacy of delaying queen release or queen caging with screen bottom boards to reduce varroa levels in honey bee colonies. Delaying the release of or caging of a queen temporarily stops bee brood production; this has the potential to reduce the number of mites as brood is necessary for mite reproduction. Forty percent of mites found on the hive bottom are alive. Screen bottom boards can decrease the number of mites in a colony because mites are prevented from reattaching on a bee if a screen separates them from the bees. Combining brood interruption with screen bottom boards should lower mite levels in a colony such that pesticide application is unnecessary.


Integrating Behavioral Control with Reduced Area Treatment Approach for Managing Colorado Potato Beetle and Other Insect Pests of Potato

Project Director: Andrei Alyokhin
Funding Amount: $140,000

Insect pest management remains an important challenge in commercial potato production, with Colorado potato beetle being the most important defoliator in the Northeast. Currently, growers rely on insecticides for protecting their crops, but both economic and environmental considerations favor reduction of chemical use. Previous research has demonstrated that replacing uniform insecticide applications with the treatment of selected areas of the field is one possible way to decrease the amount of insecticides required for successful pest control. This will also delay development of insecticide resistance by creating refugia for susceptible individuals.

Several synthetic kairomone blends, based on the volatiles produced by potato plants, have been recently demonstrated to be attractive to both adult and larval stages of the Colorado potato beetle. Kairomones can be used for attracting beetles to insecticide-treated areas within a potato field, thus enhancing the efficiency of the reduced area treatment approach. Our preliminary studies yielded promising results, but large-scale testing under farm field conditions still remains to be done. Also, little is known about possible effects of these compounds on insects other than the Colorado potato beetles, including both pests and natural enemies.

We propose to develop economically feasible "attracticide" blends combining Colorado potato beetle plant attractants with low-risk insecticides, determine possible effects of these attracticides on non-target arthropods, such as potato pests other than the Colorado potato beetle and beneficial natural enemies, and evaluate efficiency and economic feasibility of reduced area treatment approach combined with attracticide blends.


Refinement and Delivery of Bio-Based Approaches to Reducing Insecticide Against Two Key Apple Pests

Project Director: Ronald Prokopy
Funding Amount: $150,000

The two key apple pests targeted here are Plum Curculio and Apple Maggot, each of which damages a majority of apples on unmanaged trees and both of which have been ranked by New England growers as arthropod pests of greatest importance to a commodity worth more than 225 million dollars annually in the Northeast. Currently, growers apply 3 organophosphate insecticide sprays in May and June to control plum curculio and 3 such sprays in July and August to control apple maggot.

Through research to be conducted in Massachusetts in 2003, this proposal aims to refine and finalize a simple and effective approach to monitoring plum curculio (an odor-baited trap tree approach) that will substantially reduce sprays for control and a simple and effective approach to directly controlling apple maggot (deployment of odor-baited spheres) that will completely eliminate need for sprays. Through extension to be carried out in Massachusetts and six other Northeastern states in 2004-2005, this proposal aims to validate and demonstrate in 25 commercial orchards the economic and environmental value of a trap tree approach to monotoring plum curulio and a sphere-deployment approach to controlling apple maggot. Through planned extension, there will be multiple forms of delivery of information to all apple growers in the seven participating states on the benefit of these new approaches to managing two key apple pests.


Threshold-based Cover Cropping Strategies for Weed Management

Project Director: Eric Gallandt
Funding Amount: $174,989

To manage weeds with reduced reliance on, or without herbicides, cropping systems require intervals during which rapid and significant reductions in the germinable portion of the weed seed bank occur or, if already small, seed banks should be managed to maintain a low equilibrium population density. Integrating tillage system and cover cropping practices, this project aims to develop management strategies that will lower the equilibrium density of the weed seed bank (see Figure, below). This systems approach promises an effective means for managing weed seed banks while maintaining or improving soil health.

Several lines of evidence indicate that cover cropping and green manuring strategies play and important role in managing weed seed banks, while maintaining or improving soil health, and in the case of leguminous green manures, providing an on-farm source of nitrogen for subsequent crops. Following incorporation, green manure crops release their chemical constituents into the soil, often killing seedlings of small-seeded species, an effect evident by subsequent reductions in weed establishment. Rye, Brassica spp., and numerous leguminous green manure crops, e.g., red clover, crimson clover, subterranean clover, and hairy vetch, have been shown to reduce weed establishment following their incorporation into the soil. Likewise, as a surface mulch, cover crop residues may also aid in the management weeds while reducing soil and water loss.



2002 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2002

Development of Alternative Darkling Beetle Management Strategies for Poultry Producers in the Northeast

Project Director: Donald Rutz
Funding Amount: $133,729

The darkling beetle and other "litter beetles" have emerged in recent decades as the most important arthropod pests of poultry production worldwide. The beetles are vectors of human and animal pathogens, cause costly damage to production facilities, and create public health/nuisance problems when they emigrate from farms or from land on which infested manure has been spread. The beetles are difficult to control with pesticides, of which only a few are available. The removal of any of the handful of remaining products registered for beetle control could create a crisis for the U.S. poultry industry.

We propose a multi-state project (New York and Maine) that will deliver critically needed management solutions to U.S. poultry producers. In Objective 1, the relative susceptibility of beetles to pesticides registered for their control will be documented from multiple populations. This information will be used to identify developing resistance problems and to determine the status of future beetle control after removal of organophosphate and carbamate insecticides. In Objectives 2 and 3, we will evaluate manure handling/management strategies (composting, tarping, and soil incorporation) that some producers are already employing as alternatives to pesticides. These proposed solutions are cost-effective and easily incorporated into existing production systems. We anticipate that implementation, facilitated through proposed Extension outreach activities and web site development would be rapid and widespread.


Feasibility of Implementing "Least Toxic" Alternatives as Components of an IPM Approach for Public Schools in the Northeast

Project Director: Paula M. Shrewsbury
Funding Amount: $143,246

The problem we address is not unique to the Northeast Region but is one common throughout the United States. It is the issue of children exposed to pesticides in schools. Concerns over pesticide use and the health and safety of students and staff have resulted in a plethora of legislative actions in the Northeast region and nationwide. Regulatory actions, both mandatory and voluntary, intended to decrease children's pesticide exposure are either already in place or are being considered in more than 30 states. The perceived benefits of IPM have resulted in several states adopting legislation that requires school systems to have IPM plans. Nationwide, 13 states have either mandatory or voluntary "IPM in Schools" laws. Most of these regulations advocate the use of least toxic approaches such as alternatives to pesticides or pesticides with reduced risk.The problem is with the exception of a limited number of reports summarizing impacts of IPM programs for indoor pests there are very few comparative studies that examine the feasibility of implementing IPM programs emphasizing the use of least toxic tactics for turf, landscape, and public health pests in public school systems despite the fact that these programs are being strongly promoted and in some cases mandated by law.

The objectives of this proposal are to determine the efficacy and cost effectiveness (feasibility) of "least toxic" control tactics and strategies for managing weed, insect, and disease pests in public school sites in Maryland and New York. Alternative least toxic tactics will be evaluated and demonstrated for three model systems:

1. human health - head lice infestations on students and staff

2. athletic fields and lawns

3. landscape beds and hardscapes.

Evaluations will include the economic and environmental changes associated with the implementation of a Least Toxic IPM approach. Comparisons will be made of non-pesticidal alternatives at demonstration schools under "Least Toxic" IPM programs with types and quantities of materials used at schools under "Conventional"IPM programs. Our extension goals are to summarize findings, produce educational materials, and deliver information via traditional sources such as print and electronic media. We will provide regional training to school administrators, IPM practitioners, and Extension Specialists and Educators in the Northeast

Findings from the proposed works should be relevant to public schools throughout the Northeast region and the nation and assist in the implementation of feasible pest management programs based on sound, research based information.


Infection Biology of Key Cranberry Fruit Rot Pathogens

Project Director: Frank L. Caruso
Funding Amount: $150,000

Cranberry fruit rot (CFR) is a potentially destructive disease complex in the field before harvest and in storage after harvest. Current management strategies usually provide satisfactory control. However, there exists significant opportunity to reduce grower reliance on fungicide usage. Without fungicides CFR could cause crop losses in excess of 50% within three years. Disease potential is greatest in the Northeast, although other cranberry growing areas are also vulnerable. Wisconsin, Washington and Oregon tend to have episodic outbreaks that occur when weather conditions favor disease. For example, in 1998 El Niño conditions led to high levels of CFR in Wisconsin. Little is known about the epidemiology of key fungi in the CFR complex. This lack of knowledge is due in part to the latent nature of infections until berries ripen and/or are harvested. The perennial nature of the crop, the fact that commercial beds can be in production for several decades, the potential for inoculum buildup, and the evolution of cranberry with North American fungi makes this pathosystem both unique and complex. There are at least 15 different species of fungi that cause CFR and the frequencies of each species vary among sites and years. The factors that determine which species will predominate in a particular location or season are unknown. In addition, it has not been possible to detect fruit rotting fungi at or near the time of infection using current isolation methods. These limitations have severely hampered quantitative studies of this disease. Recently a very sensitive technique, reverse dot blot hybridization (RDBH), was developed specifically for CFR fungi. The technique is based on the detection of species-specific DNA sequences amplified using the polymerase chain reaction. RDBH can be used to detect pathogens during the early stages of fruit infection, two to three weeks earlier than by conventional methods. The development of this technology represents a substantial breakthrough, and several studies not previously possible are now approachable.

We propose an epidemiological study of CFR to investigate one overarching hypothesis: cranberry fruit exhibit a distinct period of susceptibility during early development. We propose that infections occurring during this period have a high probability of eventually rotting fruit, whereas infections occurring later in the season have a lower probability of rotting fruit. If this is correct, then disease control could be achieved by applying fungicides during these critical periods, and applications later in the season could be reduced or eliminated. Specific objectives are to determine the important sources of inoculum, to characterize infection structures and latent forms for the fruit rot fungi, and to determine the timing of infection by the fruit rot fungi. In the Northeast, where growers currently apply fungicides three to six times per season, we envision a spray program of one to three applications to achieve the same level of control. This reduction in the number of fungicide applications will save costs for growers during current difficult economic times for the cranberry industry. It will also minimize pesticide contamination of the environmentally sensitive wetlands in which cranberries are cultivated and thereby protect surface water quality. Moreover, if we identify a distinct source of primary inoculum (e.g., leftover fruit from the previous year), we believe that it will be possible to manage beds to reduce this primary inoculum.


Multi-State Evaluation of Trichogramma ostriniae in Vegetable Production

Project Director: Michael Hoffmann
Funding Amount: $137,000

European corn borer (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis, is a damaging pest of vegetables in the northeastern U.S. and elsewhere. IPM needs assessments identified management of ECB in sweet corn, pepper and potatoes as priorities needing research.

Biological control of ECB can provide an alternative to reliance on insecticides. Trichogramma ostriniae is a small wasp that parasitizes ECB eggs, and research since 1996 provides impressive evidence that inoculative releases of T. ostriniae can successfully reduce ECB population levels and concomitant damage to sweet corn. The wasp has been shown to efficiently disperse and parasitize egg masses. Overall field parasitism can reach as high as 97%, ECB survival has been reduced as much as 30%, and ear damage has been reduced by 50%. Combining T. ostriniae with inclusion of egg parasitism in scouting protocols can substantially reduce the number of insecticide applications.

We propose to research and demonstrate augmentative biological control of ECB with R. ostriniae by evaluating its performance in Maine, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, New York, and Virginia. Testing efficacy over a wide range of environmental conditions is a prerequisite to commercialization of the tactic in the northeast and elsewhere. Specifically, we propose to:

There is high probability for implementation, and we anticipate that much of the sweet corn and pepper acreage in the Northeast and elsewhere might benefit economically from biological control of ECB with T. ostriniae. The proposed release method of T. ostriniae is simple, inexpensive, and can be incorporated into existing IPM programs. Most of the proposed research will be conducted on-farm and in cooperation with Cooperative Extension personnel and private advisors. Results from this research/extension proposal will impact the entire region. Widespread adoption is further assured, because a commercial insectory has agreed to mass produce and market T. ostriniae.


Regional Monitoring for Northeastern IPM

Project Director: Shelby Fleischer
Funding Amount: $50,000

Pest monitoring is the primary, but constantly changing, ecological information used for IPM, but monitoring programs are hard to develop and maintain in this agro- and social landscape due to farm and crop diversity, spatial segregation of farms in urbanizing landscapes, and the smaller size of many farms. This proposal advances the timely creation, management, delivery and utilization of pest monitoring information across numerous small farms nested in heterogeneous, often urbanizing landscapes. We propose to establish a regional human and information technology infrastructure for organization and delivery of agricultural pest monitoring information in the northeastern IPM region using integrated GIS and Web ("web-mapping") technology, using sweet corn as a model system.

We will use sweet corn as the model system based on needs defined in participatory activities, the importance of sweet corn in the region, and the potential for pesticide reduction. We will build from progress in monitoring technologies, phenology modeling, previous web/GIS infrastructure building, and advances in web-mapping informational technologies. The results will be directly incorporated into ongoing IPM programs in multiple states. We will evaluate impacts with web tracking and focus groups.



2001 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2001

Development of IPM Methods for Oriental Beetle Management in Multiple Crops

Project Director: Sridhar Polavarapu
Funding Amount: $99,678

The Oriental beetle has become a major pest of turfgrass, nursery stock, greenhouse ornamental crops, and blueberries in southeastern New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Connecticut. In addition, it is also known to infest cranberries, raspberries, strawberries, peaches, and sweet potatoes in this region. Within these systems, the Japanese beetle is considered the key pest species and has received much of the research attention even though a significant amount of the damage attributed to this species in the Northeast is actually caused by the Oriental beetle, Exomala orientalis (Waterhouse). The minor pest status often attributed to Oriental beetle is largely because adults are cryptic, and the larvae of Japanese and Oriental beetles are indistinguishable without magnification. In fact, larvae of the two species occur in mixed populations throughout most of their common area of distribution (Vittum et al. 1999), and in southeastern New York, New Jersey, and southern New England, the Oriental beetle has become the dominating white grub species (AMK, JHL, and SP, personal observations; R. Cowles, personal communication).

We propose to develop novel IPM methods for Oriental beetle management in three of these affected systems, turfgrass, nursery stock, and blueberries. These methods will comprise the whole spectrum from preventative to curative control including improved predictability of Oriental beetle outbreaks. We will develop mating disruption technology using sprayable, microencapsulated formulation and high-release widely spaced macrodispenser systems that can be used in a preventative approach. We will establish relationships between pheromone trap captures and larval density in the following generation that will help predict Oriental beetle outbreaks. Finally, we will develop effective and environmentally sound curative control options based on new highly pathogenic entomopathogenic nematode isolates and the synergistic combination of these nematodes with low-impact insecticides.

If successful, this project will provide additional tools that can be easily integrated in to current IPM programs in turfgrass, blueberries, and nursery crops. Based on the relationship between pheromone trap captures and grub density in the following generation, we will be able to delineate Oriental beetle outbreak populations and thereby reduce the prophylactic applications of insecticides where significant populations do not exist. The ability to identify Oriental beetle infestations even at low densities will save time by limiting the need for time consuming examination of roots. Cost comparisons of monitoring with pheromone traps and traditional methods will be made. The use of pheromone traps in identifying infestations will also prevent the export of infested rootstock to uninfested areas. The availability of alternative low-risk Oriental beetle management strategies such as mating disruption, entomopathogenic nematodes, and nematode-insecticide combinations will enhance environmental quality and reduce our reliance on organophosphate insecticides. Observations on nematode-insecticide synergy for Oriental beetle will also have implications for the control of other white grub species especially Japanese beetle. The cost of managing Oriental beetle with mating disruption, entomopathogenic nematodes, and nematode-synergist combinations will be compared with traditional treatment tactics. Considering that the three Principal Investigators are primarily responsible for research and training of extension professionals serving blueberries, nursery crops, and turfgrass systems, there is a high degree of probability that technology developed under this proposal will be transferred to relevant clientele in New Jersey and throughout the Northeast.

PROBLEM, BACKGROUND, AND JUSTIFICATION

INTRODUCTION:
In the northeastern United States, landscape and horticultural plants, and agronomic crops are subject to intense feeding pressure from a complex of scarab species. Within this complex, the Japanese beetle is considered the key pest species and has received much of the research attention even though a significant amount of the damage attributed to this species in the Northeast is actually caused by the Oriental beetle, Exomala orientalis (Waterhouse), which is the focus of this proposal. The Oriental beetle has been erroneously considered a relatively minor pest until recently because adults are cryptic and largely go unnoticed and the larvae of Japanese and Oriental beetle are indistinguishable without magnification. In fact, larvae of the two species occur in mixed populations throughout most of their common area of distribution (Vittum et al. 1999), and in southeastern New York, New Jersey, and southern New England, the Oriental beetle has become the dominating white grub species (AMK, JHL, and SP, personal observations; R. Cowles, personal communication).

The Oriental beetle, which is probably a native of Japan, was introduced to the Hawaiian island of Oahu around 1908, where it became a serious pest of sugarcane (Alm et al. 1995). On the US mainland, the Oriental beetle was first collected in 1920 in a New Haven, Connecticut, nursery where it was presumably imported from Japan in infested balled nursery stock (Vittum et al. 1999). The Oriental beetle has been reported in all coastal New England and Middle Atlantic States as well as Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Tennessee and Hawaii (Alm et al., 1999). The root feeding of the Oriental beetle larvae can result in complete destruction of the root system and death of host plant, especially when larval populations are high. The transport of infested nursery stock has the potential to spread this insect to uninfested areas in United States and Canada. The Oriental beetle has become the most important pest of turfgrass, nursery stock, greenhouse ornamental crops, blueberries, cranberries, raspberries, strawberries, peaches, and sweet potatoes, in the Long Island region of New York State, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Connecticut (Alm et al., 1999; AMK, JHL, and SP, personal observations). We propose to develop IPM methods for Oriental beetle management in three of these affected systems, turfgrass, nursery stock, and blueberries. Our methods, however, will also be applicable in other systems.

Turfgrass comprises a variety of grass species grown as a permanent or semi-permanent managed ground cover under a range of management systems (e.g., lawns, parks, cemeteries, sod farms, golf courses, athletic fields) covering > 30 million acres in the United States (Potter 1998). In its many forms, is estimated to be a $45 billion industry in the United States (Potter 1998). In New Jersey alone, there are > 870,000 acres of turfgrass, including 2 million home lawns, 250 golf courses, and 27 sod farms. With annual revenues of > $700 million, turfgrass represents a significant component of New Jersey's economy. Turfgrass is often the most intensively managed planting in the urban landscape. Although there are large variations in value, input, demands, and damage thresholds between systems, tolerances for pests are generally low, resulting in frequent pesticide applications. In the Northeast, a complex of white grubs are the most widespread and difficult to control turfgrass insect pests. The Oriental beetle has become the dominating species in turfgrass in southeastern New York, New Jersey, and southern New England. In a recent survey in New Jersey we found the Oriental beetle to be the dominant species in 9 out of 10 turfgrass sites. Of the total 15,500 larvae collected, 70% were Oriental beetle, 15% Japanese beetle, and 10% Northern masked chafer, the remainder being Asiatic garden beetle and European chafer (Koppenhöfer, unpublished data). Despite the proximity of turf to people, especially children, and pets, chemical insecticides are still the primary tool for the management of white grubs and other turfgrass insect pests. The need for the development of alternatives is apparent.

Nursery and greenhouse production is a multimillion-dollar industry and is the fastest growing segment of production agriculture in the United States. To serve their urban and suburban clientele, many nurseries and commercial greenhouses are located in close proximity to urban centers. Considering the impact of insecticide use in the urban environment, the importance of developing alternative strategies to manage Oriental beetles is apparent. New Jersey has a large and continually expanding nursery industry. In 1998, there were a total of 1,267 certified nurseries in New Jersey that accounted for over 14,000 acres in production. Most of this acreage is located in Monmouth, Burlington, Cumberland and Gloucester Counties. Nursery sales generate at least $200 million in sales annually. New Jersey nurseries present a highly diverse growing environment from field grown to the highly intensive pot-in-pot operations with the likelihood of hundreds of different types of plants grown at any one time and location. Azaleas, rhododendrons, arborvitae, juniper, daylilies are prominent species because they are among the most frequently requested plants by landscapers. Some individual potted ornamentals can reach values of $25/pot. No apparent host preference in perennial and/or woody ornamentals has been detected. A significant liability facing the nursery industry is the specter of interstate regulation for shipping infested material. The northeast region is facing difficulties from other regions when the nursery stock is found contaminated by Oriental beetle.

Blueberries are a major component of the southern New Jersey economy with an annual value of about $35 million. Blueberries are grown in approximately 8,000 acres, mainly in the ecologically sensitive pine barrens of New Jersey. In recent years, outbreaks of soil insect pests have increased tremendously in blueberries, especially in the light, sandy-loam soils of Atlantic County (Polavarapu 1996a. These outbreaks are generally attributed to the waning effects of organochlorine insecticides that were used on blueberries until the early eighties. This problem is accentuated by the lack of soil insecticides registered for use in blueberries. Bushes that have sustained damage to the root system by grubs show reduced vigor, are twiggy, have smaller leaves, and support fewer berries than uninfested bushes of the same age. In a recent survey conducted to determine the species composition of scarab grubs infesting blueberries, we found that Oriental beetle was the dominant species in 13 of 15 blueberry fields sampled (57 to 100%). Of the total 2,591 grubs sampled, 90% were Oriental beetle grubs, the remainder being Asiatic garden beetle, Maladera castanea, and Japanese beetle (Polavarapu 1996a).

DEVELOPMENT OF MONITORING AND MATING DISRUPTION METHODOLOGIES FOR ORIENTAL BEETLE MANAGEMENT:

The sex pheromone of Oriental beetle consists of a 9:1 blend of (Z)-7-tetradecen-2-one and (E)-7-tetradecen-2-one (Zhang et al. 1994; Facundo et al. 1994). Field studies have indicated that at concentrations > 10 micrograms, (Z)-7-tetradecen-2-one alone was as effective as a 9:1 blend containing both (Z)-7-tetradecen-2-one and (E)-7-tetradecen-2-one (Facundo et al 1994). More recent work conducted at Rutgers (Polavarapu, Villani and Roelofs, unpublished) and in Rhode Island (Alm et al. 1999) has indicated that Trécé (Salinas, CA) Japanese beetle trap baited with red rubber septa at 300 µg concentration of (Z)-7-tetradecen-2-one alone is adequate to monitor adult flight of Oriental beetle. These rubber septa are now commercially available from IPM Technologies (Portland, Oregon) and other insect monitoring supply companies.

Disruption of communication between opposite sexes by permeating the air with the sex pheromones has long been recognized as one of the most important applications of semiochemicals in pest management. Mating disruption with sex pheromones has been developed as an environmentally safe, non-toxic alternative to broad-spectrum insecticides for several insects (see Cardé and Minks 1995, for a review). Pest management programs based on mating disruption have been successfully developed and are commercially available for several lepidoptera including the pink bollworm (Staten et al. 1987), tomato pinworm (Trumble and Alvarado-Rodriguez 1993), oriental fruitmoth (Vickers et al. 1985), Codling moth, and grape berrymoth (Trimble 1993). However, mating disruption technology has not been shown to be effective for insects other than lepidoptera. Preliminary experiments conducted at Cornell University have indicated that application of the major component of Oriental beetle sex pheromone resulted in 64-90% reduction in trap catches in cages treated with the pheromone compared to catches in untreated cages (Facundo 1997).

Based on these preliminary studies, we requested the 3M Canada Corporate Laboratories to synthesize the two ketone pheromone components and encapsulate for a slow release of the pheromone using their proprietary controlled-release delivery technology. Because Oriental beetles are known to spend most of their adult life near the soil surface locating the opposite sex, mating and ovipositing, our goal was to permeate the soil surface with the sex pheromones of this species. Sprayable pheromone formulation is especially suitable for this purpose because the soil matrix is a good medium to absorb/adsorb the pheromone and continuously release the pheromone overtime.

We applied the encapsulated sprayable formulation at 40 g a.i./acre approximately at 9:1 ratio of Z:E components to one acre blueberry plots. There were three replicates. Three unsprayed one-acre plots served as controls. The pheromone was drenched in 300 gal/acre of water as 45-cm bands to both sides of the blueberry bushes. Four Pheromone traps baited with 300 µg of the (Z)-7-tetradecen-2-one were placed in all fields. (Z)-7-tetradecen-2-one alone at 40 g a.i/acre was evaluated in a nursery farm (mainly Rhododendrons and Azaleas). Pheromone formulation in nursery was broadcasted with a nursery sprayer using 300 gal/acre volume. The other protocols in the nursery were same as employed in blueberries.

Pheromone trap catches in treated plots were 92-98% lower in treated plots following the application of the pheromone, indicating communication disruption between males and females (Fig. 1). Four weeks after the single pheromone application, only a small number of beetles continue to be trapped in the treated fields in both blueberries and nursery. Application of the major component alone appears to be sufficient to disrupt communication in this species (Fig. 1B). These initial data are very promising and worthy of further evaluation of the potential of the sex pheromone in disrupting mating of Oriental beetle.

Fig. 1. Evaluation of (Z)-7-tetradecen-2-one and (E)-7-tetradecen-2-one in A) blueberries, and B) nursery. Arrows indicate the date of pheromone application.

Recently we were advised by USEPA that (Z)-7-tetradecen-2-one, being a ketone, does not qualify for tolerance exemptions allowed for lepidopteran pheromones that end in alcohol, acetate, or aldehyde moieties. This means that large scale testing of the sprayable ketone pheromone is not feasible in food crops (blueberries) without resorting to crop destruction. Considering the large plots required for mating disruption trials, it is cost prohibitive to pay for crop destruction at this time. This prompted us to explore other pheromone dispensing technologies that are exempted by EPA from tolerance requirements. We identified the macrodispensers produced by Chem Tica Internacional S. A., San Jose, Costa Rica (Dr. Cam Oehlschlager) as one possibility. The dispensers produced by this company are unique in that they release extremely high rates of pheromone from a reservoir covered by a proprietary film (polymer). Because of the extremely high release rates, the number of dispensers required per ha for this technology is about the lowest per unit area compared to other retrievable dispensers that are currently used in tree fruits.

During the 2000 season, we compared the efficacy of these widely spaced macrodispensers at a rate of 25 dispensers per ha with sprayable pheromone on one ha field grown nursery plots. Each dispenser was loaded with 3 g of the major component, for a total of 75 g a.i. /ha. Sprayable pheromone at the rate of 37.5 g a.i./ha was applied twice at 15-day interval for a total of 75 g a.i./ha. There were three replications. We also placed potted nursery plants (10 plants per replicate, five virgin females per plant) tethered with virgin female beetles in each replicate. We compared numbers of grubs in the following generation by retrieving these potted plants in the fall. Because of crop destruction requirements in blueberries for the sprayable pheromone, we were able to evaluate only the macrodispensers. All experimental protocols were similar in blueberries with the exception that each dispenser was loaded with only 300 mg of pheromone for a total of 7.5 g a.i./ha (10 times lower rate than nursery).

Fig. 2. Evaluation of sprayable pheromone and macrodispensers in nursery (A), and macrodispensers in blueberries (B). There were three replicates in both crops.

Pheromone trap captures in plots treated with sprayable pheromone and macrodispensers were 95 and 78% lower than in untreated nursery plots. The majority of the beetles in the macro dispenser treated plots were captured during the first few days after the deployment of the dispensers (Fig. 2A). This is probably because of initial slow release of pheromone from the dispensers. In blueberries where we used a 10X lower rate of pheromone, reduction in trap captures was equally impressive. Trap captures in the dispenser plots were 88% lower compared with untreated blueberry plots. Larval density in the following generation followed the same general trend as the trap shutdown in nursery (Fig. 3). Fewer grubs were present in both sprayable and macrodispenser treated nursery plots compared with untreated control plots.

Fig. 3. Larval density (Mean ±SEM) in potted nursery plants tethered with virgin oriental beetle females in plots treated with sprayable pheromone, macrodispensers and untreated control plots.

The preliminary data presented here provide for the first time evidence of the feasibility of mating disruption of a coleopteran pest. The development of mating disruption technology will further increase non-toxic pest management options in these cropping systems. This technology is also compatible with other pest management strategies and can be easily incorporated into current IPM programs. However, further work is required to resolve factors such as pheromone dose, dispenser deployment strategies, number of sprayable pheromone applications per season, and the relative efficacy of sprayable versus macrodispenser technology.

Trécé Japanese beetle traps baited with rubber septa (300 µg loading of the major component) are widely used for monitoring and delineating populations of Oriental beetle in blueberries and nurseries. Nurserymen and blueberry growers often request extension personnel to interpret Oriental beetle trap catches to determine if an insecticide intervention is necessary. Because we do not have data on the relationship between trap catches and grub densities in the following generation, it has often become a guessing game interpreting trap captures. Determination of the relationship between male trap catch and larval density will enhance our ability to interpret trap catches and delineate populations that require insecticide interventions.

DEVELOPMENT OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES AND NEMATODE-INSECTICIDE SYNERGESTIC COMBINATIONS FOR ORIENTAL BEETLE MANAGEMENT

Entomopathogenic nematodes offer an environmentally safe and highly IPM compatible alternative to chemical insecticides for the control of white grubs. When applied under the right conditions, these nematodes are as effective as chemical insecticides (Georgis and Gaugler 1991). Much of the work on using nematodes for white grub control in the United States, however, has concentrated on the Japanese beetle that appears to be among the most nematode-susceptible white grubs species (Koppenhöfer, unpublished data). Information on the nematode-susceptibility of the Oriental beetle is very limited, but generally this species appears to be less susceptible to the commonly used nematode species and strains such as Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and Steinernema glaseri (Koppenhöfer, Polavarapu, unpublished data). Because nematode efficacy appears to vary both with nematode and white grub species (Koppenhöfer, unpublished data; P. Grewal, Ohio State University, personal communication), it is important to screen additional nematode species/strains against the Oriental beetle. We have recently recovered new isolates of H. bacteriophora and a potentially new species of Steinernema from Oriental beetle larvae in NJ. Preliminary observations suggest that especially Steinernema spec. is highly pathogenic to Oriental beetle larvae (Table 1).

Table 1. Percentage mortality (± SE) of Oriental beetle 3rd instar exposed to 400 nematodes in 30 ml plastic cups filled with soil. Treatments were replicated 4 times with 10 cups per replicate.

Nematode species (strain)...7 DAT...14 DAT
Steinernema spec. (OB)...100 ± 0 a...100 ± 0 a
Steinernema glaseri (NC)...50 ± 9 b...68 ± 5 b
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (TF)...33 ± 8 b...48 ± 4 b

Means followed by same letter within columns are not significantly different (Tukey, P < 0.05)

Mortality in the control was 0%.

While new nematode isolates may prove to be more effective for Oriental beetle control than the older isolates studied so far, many turf and ornamentals situations require extremely high control efficacy that nematodes may only provide at uneconomically high application rates. Combination of nematodes with synergistic agents may be an avenue to establish nematode use also in the most stringent situations at reduced cost and insecticide use. Several studies have shown that the efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes to curatively control white grubs can be improved if they are integrated with other pathogens but these combinations have limitations. For example, the combination of nematodes and Paenibacillus (=Bacillus) popilliae Dutky (Thurston et al. 1994) is feasible only for long-term control in high economic threshold situations whereas the combination of nematodes and Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner Buibui strain (Koppenhöfer and Kaya 1997, Koppenhöfer et al. 1999) is feasible only for scarab species that are sufficiently susceptible to this bacterium. In addition, the Buibui strain is presently not commercially available.

A more efficient combination with wider applicability should be that of nematodes and the chloronicotinyl insecticide, imidacloprid (Koppenhöfer and Kaya 1998, Koppenhöfer et al. 2000a). Currently, imidacloprid is one of the most popular insecticides for preventative white grub control because of its high efficacy, relatively low vertebrate toxicity, low application rates, and long systemic persistence (Schroeder and Flattum 1984, Elbert et al. 1991). Because its efficacy declines with advancing white grub development (Potter 1998), imidacloprid is applied in a preventative approach, the optimum period for application being during the month preceding egg hatch until the time when grubs are beginning to hatch (Potter 1998). However, white grub outbreaks are difficult to predict because they tend to be localized and sporadic and the eggs and first instars are difficult to sample for. As a result imidacloprid is applied over large areas although often only small fractions of lawns may require grub control making its use very expensive. While the direct effect of imidacloprid on beneficial invertebrates in turf was relatively small in experiments (Kunkel et al. 1999), in the long-term its high efficacy against many turfgrass pest combined with its large-area application is likely to dramatically reduce predators and especially more specific parasitoids and pathogens by depriving them of prey/hosts. The combination of imidacloprid and nematodes would allow curative treatments against older white grub stages, and because these stages are easier to detect, treatments could be limited to infested areas only, reducing cost and environmental impact.

Koppenhöfer and Kaya (1998) and Koppenhöfer et al. (2000a) have shown that combined applications of the scarab-adapted entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema glaseri or Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and imidacloprid resulted in synergistic mortality of 3rd-instars white grubs. This interaction was observed over a range of imidacloprid rates, with simultaneous or delayed nematode application, and for five scarab species with different degrees of nematode susceptibility. The degree of interaction, however, was usually greater for S. glaseri than for H. bacteriophora. Koppenhöfer et al. (2000b) showed that the major factor responsible for this synergistic interaction is the general disruption of normal nerve function due to imidacloprid resulting in reduced activity of the grubs. This sluggishness facilitates host attachment of infective juvenile nematodes and subsequent infection. The above studies only included the Oriental beetle in one greenhouse experiment, but recent experiment confirmed the synergism for Oriental beetle under laboratory and field conditions (Koppenhöfer unpubl. data; Table 2).

Table 2. Effect of treatment with imidacloprid (330 g a.i./ha), H. bacteriophora (2.5x109/ha), and their combination on a mixed natural population of Oriental and Japanese beetle larvae (90% 3rd instar at application). Shown are mean numbers of larvae/0.1 m2 (% reduction) at 22 DAT (n=9).

Treatment...Oriental beetle...Japanese beetle
Control...2.2 ± 0.8 a...3.9 ± 0.9 a
Imidacloprid...0.9 ± 0.4 b (59)...1.4 ± 0.6 b (64)
H. bacteriophora...1.1 ± 0.5 ab (50)...1.1 ± 0.5 b (72)
Imidacloprid + H. bacteriophora...0.0 ± 0.0 c (100)*...
0.0 ± 0.0 c (100)

Means followed by same letter within columns are not significantly different (Tukey, P < 0.05)

*Significant synergistic interaction in the combination treatment (Chi-square test, P < 0.05 ).

While imidacloprid is still the only neonicotinoid insecticide registered for use in turfgrass, nurseries, or blueberries, several other compounds are in development (thiacloprid; a chloronicotinyl compound like imidacloprid) or are about to be registered (thiamethoxam; a thianicotinyl compound). Thiamethoxam has already been field-tested and has shown the same activity against white grubs including the Oriental beetle as imidacloprid, i.e., it is highly effective when applied preventatively but is not effective against 3rd instars (D. Cox, Novartis, personal communication). Thiacloprid has not been field tested yet, but has shown a similar activity spectrum in laboratory studies as imidacloprid (C. Silcox, Bayer Corp., personal communication). We propose to expand our studies on synergistic interaction to these new compounds and new nematode isolates with high pathogenicity for Oriental beetle larvae.

Our observations on the efficacy of new nematode isolates as well as the synergistic interaction of nematodes with new neonicotinoid insecticides for Oriental beetle management will also have implications for the management of other white grub species especially Japanese beetle in the turfgrass, ornamentals, blueberries, and other crops beyond New Jersey and the Northeast.


Improving the Environmental Impact Quotient: Evaluating Pesticides for Their Impact on Beneficial Organisms

Project Director: Curt Petzoldt
Funding Amount: $35,529

The Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ), an equation divided into Consumer, Farmworker, and Environmental effects of pesticides, was published in 1992 to enable farmers and agricultural professionals to compare pesticides on the basis of environmental risk. It has been widely used for this purpose by farmers, food processors, private consultants and those who analyze and compare pesticide use patterns over time. It has been updated regularly as new pesticides are registered. Most of the information used in the EIQ equation is available from pesticide manufacturers since it is required for registration. One piece of information critical to pest mangers that is not required and is not readily available is the impact of the pesticide on beneficial organisms. A database on beneficial arthropods from 1988 was used to develop the EIQ and it has not been updated since. Companies registering new pesticides are not required to develop this information for registration. We propose to devise a standardized technique to test pesticides against key beneficial organisms and test those pesticides currently listed in the EIQ plus several recently registered pesticides. We then plan to update the EIQ and make it available to users via the already heavily visited website and through professional meetings.

PROBLEM, BACKGROUND, AND JUSTIFICATION

Comparing the environmental impact of pesticides has been a difficult issue for many years. A number of attempts at comparison have been made over the years, some more successful than others. Levitan et al (1995) has reviewed some of the various methods of comparison. One of the most cited and used methods of comparison is the Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ) developed by Kovach et al (1992). The EIQ is an index that compares commonly used pesticides on the basis of three broad categories - Consumer effects, Farmworker effects, and Biological effects. Within these three categories various pesticide toxicity characteristics, properties in soil and water, and other data are indexed into a logical system resulting in an overall index or EIQ. The EIQ can then be used in combination with the percent active ingredient in a pesticide formulation and the rate used to calculate a Field Use EIQ. A farmer can use the Field Use EIQ to make a decision among several choices of pesticides that have differing environmental impact. This information has been available on the internet for several years and is updated annually to include recently registered pesticides (http://northeastipm.org/ny/program_news/EIQ.html).

The EIQ has also been widely cited and is used in many states in the US and internationally. Over 10,000 copies of the original hardcopy EIQ publication have been distributed upon request since 1992 and the EIQ website currently gets about 400 visits per month. It is used in several state pesticide recommendation documents - a field use EIQ value is reported for every listed pesticide in the New York State Integrated Crop and Pest Management Guidelines for Commercial Vegetable Production (Reiners et al 2000, Petzoldt et al 2000).

Studies of the impact of IPM have used the EIQ as a method to quantify the impact of changes in pesticide use (Stivers 2000, Suckling et al 1999, Bellinder et al 1998, Cooley et al 1996, Hoffmann et al 1995 ). Modifications to the EIQ for specific uses have been developed or are underway for turf (Kovach, personal communication) and in commercial settings (Stemilt, Reed personal communication.)

Most of the information that is used in the EIQ is relatively easy to obtain from pesticide manufacturers because they are required to submit it to the EPA for registration of the pesticide. One key item is not contained in the set of information - impact on beneficial arthropods. A large database from Thieling and Croft (1988) summarized studies of pesticide impacts on beneficial arthropods. This database was used in the development of the EIQ for the beneficial arthropod term. However, since the database is from 1988, no pesticides labeled in the recent past have this information available. EPA does not require information on impact on beneficial arthropods for product registration. Therefore as the EIQ has been updated, this piece of information has been treated as "missing" and an average of the value for all pesticides has instead been inserted into the EIQ calculation. In addition, the impact of pesticides on beneficial organisms other than just arthropods needs to be considered in the EIQ index.

Currently, little information on impacts of a diverse array of pesticides on beneficial fungi is available. There is a need to consider the impacts of various types of pesticide applications on the growth of such commercially available fungi as Trichoderma harzianum and Beauavaria bassiana or bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis. The EIQ is presented in a way on the website and in the publication so that one can utilize the overall EIQ index or one can use the index resulting from an individual component. The individual component index for beneficial organisms will be useful to those who apply beneficial organisms and then need to use a pesticide in order to manage a different pest or to provide additional control of the original pest. The EIQ beneficial organism index could then be used to make a pesticide choice that would preserve the activity of the beneficial while still providing the needed pest control.

Statements of priority from stakeholders: EIQ information has been included in the New York State Integrated Crop and Pest Management Guidelines for Commercial Vegetable Production for the past three years as a result of requests from growers to Cornell Cooperative Extension staff for information on which pesticides to apply that result in less environmental harm. In addition, Wegmans Supermarkets (a NE region supermarket chain in three states), Agrilink Foods (the largest frozen vegetable processor in the US) and about 100 vegetable farmers in the northeast make use of the EIQ annually as part of IPM labeling projects. It is important to these many stakeholders that the EIQ reflect accurate and up to date information in terms of impact on beneficial organisms and the effects of newly registered pesticides on these organisms. Additionally, the proposed work could impact all crops and pests on which pesticides are used by providing environmental impact information to help applicators choose among pesticides.

Priorities for research and implementation of biological control and the use of beneficial organisms in agricultural crops developed by stakeholders include the following:

Cabbage Research and Development Program 11/17/2000 - New York "High Priority - Biological Control of insects, diseases and/or weeds"

New York State IPM Program 2001 Priorities

Fruit - "Proposals will be funded that encourage the preservation of indigenous beneficial organisms that can regulate pest populations on the crop or in the soil and also the development or use of biological organisms that can be applied to cropping systems for pest control."

Livestock/Field Crops - "High Priority - improve grower awareness and confidence in comprehensive IPM strategies (cultural, biological, least toxic, and reduced pesticide) that minimize impact of all major pests in production system while optimizing net profitability and environmental impact."

Landscape and Nursery - "Biorational approaches to pest management."

Vegetable - "High - Improve our understanding of which are the most important natural enemies and how insecticides may affect them. The objective is to devise strategies to conserve the most important natural enemies through careful selection of any needed pesticide applications."

All of these stakeholder-developed priorities point to the need to improve our knowledge of the interaction of beneficial organisms and pesticides with the idea of protecting the effectiveness of the beneficial organisms. The proposed work will address these identified priorities by developing and refining a tool that can be used by growers to make decisions about which pesticides to choose to avoid damage to beneficial organisms.


Incorporating Bt-Corn Hybrids into Field Crop IPM Programs

Project Director: Dennis Calvin
Funding Amount: $99,898

The European corn borer (ECB) and corn rootworm are the two most important insect pest attacking field corn in the Northeast United States. In 2000, approximately 3.38 million acres of corn were grown in the Northeast with a value of about $866 million. It is estimated that injury from ECB feeding reduces corn yield by 13%, costing Northeast U.S. farmers $112.6 million per year in lost yield.

Amazingly with this magnitude of loss, less than 1% of cornfields in the Northeast were treated to control ECB populations prior to the introduction of Bt-corn hybrids. This attitude about treatment to protect the crop, however, was not unfounded. Insecticide programs were expensive ($15 to $20 per acre per application), difficult to time properly, and seldom provided economic returns. The introduction of Bt-corn offered a relatively low cost alternative that was highly effective at controlling the pest. In 2000, it was estimated that 20 to 30% of all corn acreage in the United States was planted to a Bt-corn hybrid. This rate of adoption of a new technology has been unprecedented in agricultural history. Bt-corn hybrids have been shown to provide good yield protection when ECB populations are at moderate to high densities. At low densities, however, the economic value of Bt-corn has been questionable. In many cases, the non-Bt hybrids have equaled or surpassed the yield of Bt-hybrids when ECB densities are low. A major question is whether the economic value of the technology justifies this level of adoption in the Northeastern U.S. In addition, significant controversy has been generated about non-target effects of Bt-corn on organisms and potential human health risks.
Because this variation in yield performance of Bt-hybrids has been linked to ECB density fluctuations, it is imperative that good data on frequency of infestation level be collected over time and geographic locations for the Northeast region. In addition, damage-loss functions for ECB on Bt and non-Bt hybrids must be established to estimate potential impacts once the frequency of infestation levels in the Northeast have been quantified. Hybrid testing plots using side-by-side comparisons of Bt-hybrids, their near isoline, and lead conventional hybrids will provide information on Bt-hybrid performance in the Northeast. Information from these studies will be used to calculate the economic value of Bt-hybrid use in IPM programs of Northeast U.S. farmers. The results will be published in an extension bulletin titled, "The Economic Value of Bt-corn Hybrid Technology in the Northeastern United States". In addition, demonstration plots will be established and used to train county agents, seed industry representatives, ag-input dealers, and farmers about ECB biology and the proper use of Bt-corn.

By providing unbiased information on the benefits of Bt-corn hybrid technology, strategies for use of these new and valuable non-pesticide based technologies will be formulated. Results of the proposed research will provide timely, localized and relevant information that extension agents and industry representatives in the region are requesting. Farmers identified research on the use of genetically altered crops for pest management as a top priority in the Northeast IPM Research and Extension Priority Needs Assessment of 1996. In addition, they listed the investigation of non-pesticide alternatives and demonstration programs for new technologies as high priorities. Quality information from this project will allow us to develop a proactive extension leadership position in the Northeast and help growers effectively utilize the technology.

PROBLEM, BACKGROUND, AND JUSTIFICATION

The two most significant pests of field corn in the Northeastern United States are the corn rootworm (CRW) complex, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (western Corn rootworm) and D. barberi (northern corn rootworm), and the European corn borer (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner). The corn rootworm complex is estimated to cause a 6.5% loss in corn yield annually because of its root-feeding behavior (Grey 1999). The European corn borer is also estimated to cause an average 6.5% annual loss in yield from stalk tunneling, ear droppage, and disease introduction (Calvin 1995). In 2000, approximately 3.38 million acres of corn were grown in the Northeast with an estimated value of about $866 million (NASS 2000). It is estimated that the combined yield lost from corn rootworm and ECB feeding is 13.0%, when the pests are left uncontrolled. This is a potential $112.6 million per year loss in income to farmers in the Northeast states. Nationally, protection against these two pests is estimated to be worth $2.6 billion. For this reason, seed technology companies have invested heavily in research to develop genetically modify corn hybrids that incorporate the Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin genes for resistance against these two major pests.

In 1996, the first transgenic corn hybrids, Zea mays L., for European corn borer management were commercially released by Ciba Geigy (currently Novartis) and Mycogen (Event - Bt176). This was followed in 1997 by the release of two Monsanto events (MON 810 and Bt11). All of these original events were based on the Cry1A(b) strain of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki (Bt), an entomophagous bacteria. More recently Dekalb and Aventis released hybrids from events that use Cry1A(c) and Cry9c protein toxins, respectively. Grower adoption of these Bt based technologies has been extemely rapid, with 20 to 25% of all cornfields in the United States planted to Bt-corn hybrids in 2000 (Paula Davis, personnel communication). Similar rates of adoption have been documented in the Northeast region (Rice et al. 1997 & 1998). This rate of technology adoption is unprecedented in history. Pioneer International is hoping to release hybrids from a new event that uses a Cry1F protein toxin in the next few years. These hybrids will have a broader spectrum of activity against Lepidopterous pests of corn, such as black cutworm.
Corn rootworm resistant corn hybrids have yet to be approved by the EPA. However, Monsanto is hoping for a 2001 growing season registration and Pioneer International is hoping for registration of its event by 2003. The two leading CRW events have incorporated the gene from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. tenebrionis (Cry 3B(b)). When commercially released, these toxins will be sold either as a single gene construct or as a stacked construct with a European corn borer cryprotein for broader spectrum protection. This will present farmers with a difficult decision concerning which type of corn hybrid to plant. A farmer will need to decide whether he/she needs one or both genes in a hybrid based on their anticipated pest pressure.

Although these two pests are estimated to cause similar losses in yield, effort to control corn rootworm has been substantially higher in the Northeast. Crop Management Association records for Pennsylvania between 1990 and 2000 suggest that between 35 and 40% of cornfields are treated with a soil insecticide to prevent corn rootworm injury, while > 1% of fields were treated with an insecticide for European corn borer prior to the commercial release of Bt-corn (Calvin et al. 1992). Similar levels of soil insecticides are used in other Northeast states. Because of the percentage of fields currently treated with a soil insecticide, seed technology companies optimistically anticipate >50% adoption of CRW transgenic corn hybrids. At an average cost of $15.00 per acre for a soil insecticide treatment, farmers in the Northeast are currently spending approximately $17.7 to $20.3 million annually to manage corn rootworm. Seed technology companies indicate that corn rootworm transgenic corn will have a competitive technology fee similar to the cost of a soil insecticide. Currently, the technology fee for European corn borer is between $8 and $10 per acre. For a CRW and ECB stacked hybrid, the total technology fee could be as high as $23.00 to $25.00 per acre, increasing the cost of a unit of seed by $65 to $70 (2.85 acres @ 28,000 seeds per acre). Given the current 25% adoption rate of Bt-corn in the northeast, farmer are spending approximately $6.8 to $8.5 million to control European corn borer. If in the future, farmers purchase corn hybrids with both ECB and CRW resistance genes for every cornfield currently treated for corn rootworm, they may spend between $27.2 to $33.8 million annually to manage both pests. The big questions are what percentage of cornfield will gain an economic yield and/or quality advantage through the use of both genes, what percentage of fields will gain economically for only one gene, and what percentage of fields will gain no economic advantage from either gene, and our there more economically viable non-GMO management alternatives for each pest.

The Seed Technology Industry's initial expectation of high market penetration has recently been setback because of the growing controversy surrounding the economic value and potential health and environmental problems identified with the technologies. Originally, the Bt-gene technology was sold as a human health and environmentally benign pest management tactic. Safety issues of Bt-corn hybrids are non-target effects on other non-pest species (monarch butterfly, lacewings, natural enemies of ECB, etc), the presence of antibiotic markers in some Bt-corn hybrids, potential protein allergens, and the release of the protein toxins into the soil during stalk and root system degradation. The scientific basis for many of these claims is preliminary or questionable, but these issues have had a great impact on the general public's perception of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Because of the great amount of recent negative publicity and consumer perception of GMO's, future markets for the technology are uncertain and farmers are faced with decisions about whether they should grow Bt-corn hybrids.

Prior to the development of Transgenic Bt-hybrids, Bacillus thuringiensis subs. Kurstaki was used as a biological control tactic for insects in the order Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies;since the 1970's). It was sold under numerous trade names and applied as a liquid or granular formulation. Bt was widely adopted by the organic food production industry because of its specificity to insects in the order Lepidoptera, which prevented mortality to valuable natural enemies of other insect pests, its low mammalian toxicity (near zero), and its low toxicity to other taxa (groups) of animals. They also liked the fact that Bt is a naturally occurring soil bacterium. Ironically, the organic food industry has been against the wide spread used of genetically altered crops, which incorporate the gene for Bt toxin production. They fear that throught high adoption of Bt-corn hybrids ECB and other major pests will become resistant to the toxin and eliminate the use of Bt as a pest control tactic for organic producers. They are also concerned about the consumer's willingness to purchase organic products that are genetically engineered.

The use of liquid and granular formulations of Bt in traditional crop production systems, however, has been limited because the product breaks down rapidly under UV light, only provides moderate to low levels of pest control in many cases compared to traditional insecticides, and multiple applications are typically needed for adequate control making it a high cost alternative.

These shortcomings of Bt spray and granular formulation were eliminated when the gene responsible for producing the Bt endotoxin was incorporated into the genome of the corn plant. Once incorporated as part of the plant's own DNA, the plant manufactures the toxin continually over its growth period at concentrations 100 to1000 fold greater than needed to kill 99% of the ECB larvae. This delivery mechanism assured excellent protection of the plant from the insect over its entire growing period. The gene also produced the toxin and not the pro-toxin that was sold as the active ingredient in the spray and granular formulations, eliminating the time required to convert the non-toxic pro-toxin into its toxic form in the alkaline mid-gut of the insect. Using the plant as the toxin delivery system reduced the technology's cost and greatly increased its efficacy.

As mentioned earlier in the paper, prior to the release of these genetically modified corn hybrids few farmers used insecticides as a control tactic against the Euorpean corn borer. So why the high level of adoption of Bt-corn hybrids? To understand this major change in farmer's attitudes toward management of the ECB in the Northeast, it is important to understand the history and economics of ECB pest management. When the pest was first introduced into North America from Europe in the early 1900's, it devastated cornfields, completely eliminating any yield from the crop. From the 1930's to 1970's, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) imported and released many of the ECB's natural enemies from Europe (Jones 1927, Baker et al. 1949, Hudon et al. 1989). Several species successfully established in North America and continue to help regulate populations of the pest. Losey (1992) conducted a survey of overwintering ECB larvae in Pennsylvania and found mortality levels from parasitoids and diseases to be as high as 80% at some locations.

Besides importation and release of natural enemies, the USDA established the ARS Corn Insect Research Laboratory at Ankeny, Iowa to develop corn varieties and hybrids with resistance to the pest. Since this breeding effort was started, several mechanisms of resistance have been identified and incorporated into most field corn hybrids. Chemical factors included: 1) DIMBOA (2-4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy, 1,4-benzoxaxine-3-one), 2) a shealth and collar resistance factor, and 3) a first generation resistance factor (Guthrie 1988, Barry & Darrah 1991). Physical resistance factors included stiffer stalks with higher lignin and silicon concentrations and a general higher level of tolerance to feeding injury. The combination of these traditionally incorporated resistance factors has resulted in hybrids with an overall high level of tolerance to injury from the pest. In a Pennsylvania study, Pajerski (1990) showed that under good moisture conditions corn hybrids can tolerant up to six ECB larvae per plant without a measurable yield reduction. Godfrey et al. (1991) showed the relationship between moisture level and impact of ECB stalk tunneling. With today's hybrids, it is now uncommon to find more than an average of one or two ECB larvae per plant in a cornfield, compared to earlier in this century when 15 to 20 larvae per plant were common infestations. The large majority of fields have less than one larva per plant, while an average infestation of four or more larvae per plant is considered high. The introduction of Bt-corn is just another brick to complete the wall of corn plant resistance against the pest. The impact of Bt-corn in reality is relatively small in comparison to the substantial gains made historically through traditional breeding programs and importation and release of natural enemies to control the pest's populations.

Management of the pest has included a number of cultural practices, such as tillage, stalk shredding, burning of stalk residue, and adjustment of planting and harvest dates. A survey of Pennsylvania farmers indicated that 8.2, 5.2, 23.0, 53.9, and 7.3% used resistant hybrids, adjusted planting dates, adjusted harvest dates, did nothing, or used other tactics, respectively, to control ECB populations prior to the introduction of Bt-corn (Rice et al. 1997). When cultural and genetic tactics failed to keep ECB populations below economic levels, insecticides were the primary tactic used to rescue the crop. The value of an insecticide control program, however, was questionable in many areas across the pest's geographic range, particularly in the Northeast United States (Tollefson & Calvin 1994). Management using an insecticide program was cost effective only in the western fringes of the Corn Belt and along the eastern seaboard (Calvin 1995). Based on the economic analysis conducted by Calvin (1995), the average corn producer in the Northeast would lose $11.63 per acre using an insecticide approach to manage the pest. They estimated that only about 3.0 and 12.0% of cornfields have first and second generation ECB populations high enough to justify the cost and effort involved in implementation of an insecticide control program. With the lower cost of Bt-corn and its higher efficacy, the economic thresholds dropped considerably, increasing the percentage of fields with infestation levels above threshold to 39 and 75% for first and second generation ECB, respectively (Calvin 1995). This economic assessment of Bt-corn hybrid value, however, was based on the difference in yield and control performance of Bt-corn hybrids and near isolines. The economics of Bt-corn compared to conventionally bred elite hybrids has not been fully assessed.

Many researchers have investigated the impact of ECB on field corn yields. Patch et al. 1941 estimated that ECB larvae cause an average yield loss of 3% per borer per plant. Calvin et al (1998) established a functional relationship between growing degree-days remaining from harvest when ECB feeding occurred and percentage yield reduction for field corn grown in Kansas. ECB larval feeding was greatest when plants were infested during the blister stage, causing an average 5.6% loss per larvae. Bode and Calvin (1990) duplicated the study in Pennsylvania, but included two vegetative crop growth stages. In their study, the average percentage yield reduction per larvae was about 6.0%, 5.0%, 3.0% and 2.5% when plants were infested during the 10th leaf stage, 16th leaf stage, blister stage, and dough stages of development, respectively. A comparison of these studies shows that ECB injury differs under variable growing conditions. In Kansas where daily high temperature are commonly in the high 80's and 90's and atmospheric demand on the plant is high, the impact of ECB larval feeding during the blister stage is twice that seen in Central Pennsylvania under milder conditions. In the Northeast, conditions similar to Kansas may occur in the Delmarva regions of Delaware and Maryland, but not in other areas. Losses from ECB in most of the Northeast region would be more similar to those seen in Central Pennsylvania.

Several authors have reported that ECB stalk tunneling increases injury from stalk and ear rot organisms. Keller et al. (1986) reported that ECB not only provide a site of ingress of the Anthracnose stalk rot organism, but that the larvae can vector the fungus. Their results agreed with Christensen and Schneider (1950), Chaing and Wilcoxson (1961), and Jarvis et al. (1982 who all studied the interaction of stalk rot organisms. In other studies, no association was found between ECB tunneling and invasion of stalk rots (Hudon et al 1992, Carson and Hooker 1981, and Foot and Timmins 1983). Althought there are some differences in the literature, there does appear to be a clear relationship between insect damage to corn ears and development of ear rot and mycotoxins in general and this association has been documented for European corn borer in particular (Christensen and Schneider, 1950; Smith and White, 1988). Thus, not only does corn borer damage contribute to yield reductions but it also impacts grain quality. In the Northeast region, dairy farmers are concerned about the effect of mycotoxins in feeds and forages on milk production and herd health. In Vermont, some herd consultants estimate that 20% of their clients have problems that are either directly associated with or presumed to be mycotoxin related at any one time (Gotleib, 1997). Additionally, they state that nearly all clients have mycotoxin problems at least once in every five year period (Gotleib, 1997). The most commonly occurring mycotoxins appear to be deoxynivalenol and zearalenone.

Deoxynivalenol and zearalenone are produced by Gibberella zeae (Fusarium graminearum) the causal agent of Gibberella ear rot of corn (White, 1999). Fusarium verticillioides (syn F. moniliforme) and F. proliferatum are also commonly associated with corn and cause ear and kernel rots as well (White, 1999). These two fungi produce the fumonisin class of mycotoxins. Fumonisins are considered probable human carcinogens (IARC, 1993) and cause the fatal diseases porcine pulmonary edema and equine leukoencephalomalcia (Harrison et al, 1990; Marasas et al., 1988). Fumonisins are found in corn grown in Pennsylvania sometimes at levels that are a concern for sensitive species such as pigs and horses (Nelson, 1995). Recently, a study conducted in Iowa documented a reduction in fumonisin levels in Bt-corn as compared with non-Bt isolines over several growing seasons (Munkvold et al., 1999). If mycotoxin levels in corn are reduced with use of Bt corn in the Northeast this would provide an additional impetus to grow these varieties. However, if mycotoxin and ear rot control is not observed in the Northeast as it is in the Midwest then decisions on economic value to farmers should be made solely based on yield factors as described herein.

Despite all that is known about ECB feeding injury, considerable controversy still exist regarding the economic benefits of Bt hybrid use in the Northeast region. In public (university) testing programs, Bt hybrids have provided excellent control of the ECB but have not consistently yielded better than normal hybrids. In a study conducted at four locations in Pennsylvania between 1997 and 1998, the average yield of three Bt hybrids was four bushels per acre higher than the average yield of three normal hybrids. In another two-year study conducted on two different planting dates, a three bushel per acre yield advantage was found for Bt-hybrids planted early and during the typical planting period and an 11 bushel per acre advantage was found for delayed plantings (Roth et al., unpublished field test data). From this study, it was concluded that the value of the Bt-corn technology was greater for late planting dates, because these plantings are more susceptible to attack by second generation ECB. A New York silage study showed no yield benefit to Bt hybrids (Cox, 1998). In a two year Wisconsin study that compared some early introductions of Bt hybrids to their normal counterparts, the near Bt isolines yielded similarly in one year but 12 bushels per acre less in the second year. The authors of this study concluded that in the future, as Bt genes are introduced earlier in the breeding process, yield competitiveness of Bt hybrids will likely increase. Based on an average corn market value of $2.33 per bushel (National Crop Growers Association data) and a $10.00 per acre premium for the Bt-corn hybrid seed, the break-even yield increase needed to justify using the technology is about 4.3 bushels per acre. From the limited testing of Bt-corn hybrids, it appears that the technology has marginal value to Northeast farmers. Similar results have been seen from university tests conducted in mid-western Corn Belt states. It is this question about the benefits of Bt-corn hybrids for ECB management that makes this research essential. If Bt-corn hybrids infrequently provide economic value to the grower, than a grower purchasing a stacked Bt hybrid will be paying for an expensive corn rootworm program.

In contrast to public and university hybrid testing programs, the seed industry has been reporting larger yield benefits to the Bt-corn technology of between 7 and 15 bushels per acre over numerous comparisons of hybrids and their Bt counterparts. The seed industry, in fact, has criticized university data sources because of their general lack of multi-location testing of the same hybrids. They claim to have shown these large yield improvements from Bt-corn hybrids by aggregating large numbers of hybrid tests from across the United States. This approach, however, does not provide information on hybrid performance under variable environments and within specific geographic areas. Also because the seed industry has a closed-door policy about sharing their actual test procedures and results, it makes one suspicious of the data and whether they pick and choose the tests they want to publicize. The only commonality between university and seed industry finding is that the technology provides a higher return when ECB population densities are at moderate to high level.

From both university and seed industry trials, it is clear that the technology's economic value is tied to ECB population density. Over the last three years, ECB populations have dropped dramatically across the United States. In 1996 and 1997 when the new technology first hit the marketplace, ECB populations were at moderate to high levels. In 1998, weather conditions in the Northeast and Corn Belt states caused ECB populations to collapse. The spring of 1998 was warm and very wet. Very few farmers were able to plant during the typical planting period, so the majority of corn was planted two to three weeks later than normal. The warm spring weather, however, accelerated ECB development leading to an early adult emergence period relative to corn development. Spangler (1999) showed that ECB females do not deposit their eggs in cornfields until they reach the V5 (five leaf) stage of development. This behavior is an adaptation to prevent young larvae from being killed by the DIMBOA concentrations found in most commercial corn hybrids. In 1998, very few fields had reached the V5 stage of development when ECB females were looking for hosts to deposit their eggs. Consequently, adult and larval mortality was extremely high leading to a population collapse. A collapse in insect populations is quite common and many times occurs on a regular cycle. European corn borers population densities tend to fluctuate over about a seven-year cycle (Ostlie, unpublished long-term records of ECB densities in Minnesota). The level of ECB pressure increased slightly in 1999, but in general remained quite low. In 2000, average ECB densities increased slightly over 1999. Given this cyclic pattern of insect numbers, it is important that we quantify the changing densities of ECB in the Northeast and gain a historic picture of variation in densities. Many of the tests comparing Bt-corn verses conventional hybrid yields have been conducted during this period of extremely low pressure. Therefore, although the recent economics of Bt-corn have been questionable, over the long run they may be quite favorable to the technology.

Gaining a clear picture of Bt-corn's true economic value has been difficult. Early tests (prior to commercial release) only allowed comparisons of Bt hybrids and their near isolines because EPA regulations were designed to prevent escape of the Bt-gene (i.e. a 660 foot buffer around plots was required). These comparisons provided good information on the Bt gene's ability to protect the plant's yield potential, but not on how Bt-corn hybrids yielded compared to conventionally bred hybrids. Side-by-side comparisons of Bt-hybrids and top yielding conventionally bred hybrids were not possible until Bt-hybrids were commercially released in 1996 and 1997. Even after their release, many seed companies were reluctant to provide seed to university researcher to compare Bt and non-Bt hybrids. They argued that traditional hybrid testing procedures did not provide a good measure of the technology's performance, because Bt-corn hybrids should only be compared to near isolines and not other hybrids. In some cases, the companies were worried about a "Halo Effect", where late instar ECB were able to colonize Bt plants by moving between plots. The companies argued that the Bt-gene only protects the yield potential of that hybrid's genetics. Farmers, however, are interested in which hybrids consistently have the highest yield potential irrespective of the presence of ECB injury or the Bt-corn gene. Conventional hybrid testing programs in the region have frequently evaluated Bt hybrids in a separate test, making comparisons to normal lines impossible. When Bt lines have been included in hybrid testing programs, isolines are generally not present so it is difficult to estimate whether the performance differences are due to the Bt gene or the hybrid's overall genetic background. For this reason, there is a great need to implement hybrid test plots that directly compare Bt and conventional hybrid yield potential.

The continuing debate about the economic value of Bt-corn hybrids in the Northeast region is costing farmers potential profits and could cost even more when genes become stacked in a hybrid. If they are using Bt-corn hybrids and do not need them, then they are spending limited dollar resources unwisely. If Bt-corn truly has an economic value, then farmers should be using it to improve their profit margin. The debate on value of Bt-corn can only be ended through the collection of scientifically sound yield performance information, the collection of good ECB density information, and the establishment of damage-loss functions for the wide array of Bt and lead conventional hybrids. It is possible that the genetics used in Bt-corn hybrids may be more susceptible to ECB injury than the genetics of lead conventionally bred hybrids. Therefore, the degree of yield protection would be higher in Bt genetics versus non-Bt hybrid genetics. Farmers need answers to these important economic questions. Without this type of research, the uncertainty surrounding the use of Bt-corn will continue and farmers will continue to be in a very risky position when they choose to grow a Bt-hybrid.

Answers to the public's concerns about GMO's effects on non target organisms and human and livestock health are being addressed by the NC-205 regional research project and the National USDA Monarch Research Team. If any of the current concerns about negative effects on human health and the environment by Bt-corn are substantiated, then it will be important to have solid economic benefits information for comparison with risks of using the technology. Seed corn company rhetoric and/or limited university research trials will not provide a good scientific foundation to evaluate the economic benefit of GMO's. By providing more unbiased information on the benefits of Bt-corn hybrid technology this project will help formulate strategies for proper use of Bt-corn hybrid technologies. Results of the proposed research will provide timely, localized and relevant information that extension agents and industry representatives in the region have requesting. Farmers identified research on the use of genetically altered crops for pest management as a top priority in the Northeast IPM Research and Extension Priority Needs Assessment of 1996. In addition, they listed the investigation of non-pesticide alternatives and demonstration programs for new technologies as high priorities. Discussions with farmers at winter meetings and field days typically focus on GMO related issues. Quality information from this project will allow us to develop a proactive extension leadership position in the Northeast and help farmer's effectively utilize this new and important technology.


Inoculative Releases of Trichogramma ostriniae for Control of European Corn Borer in Field Corn

Project Director: John Losey
Funding Amount: $156,709

European corn borer (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis, is the most damaging pest of corn in the U.S. and Canada. The insect also attacks other important crops, such as sweet corn, sorghum, cotton, potatoes, peppers, and beans. Overall yield losses and control expenditures associated with ECB cost U.S. growers >$1 billion annually. Although several insecticides are available, timing is difficult to optimize spray timing and the consequently economic and environmental cost associated with insecticides exceeds the yield benefit for most growers.

Transgenic Bt-corn hybrids provide season-long protection against corn injury by ECB which insecticide programs cannot economically provide. The commercial availability of Bt-corn has the potential to provide for the first time an economically-viable strategy for managing ECB in the Northeast. However, although Bt-corn has several attractive features, the technology also has several negative aspects including the potential for the development of resistant ECB populations, possible impact on non-target species, and lack of consumer acceptance. These negative aspects may substantially limit the adoption of this technology and thus it is imperative that researchers continue to develop other management options for this pest.

One alternative tactic for managing ECB in field corn is biological control with inoculative releases of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma ostriniae, a species we have been working with for several years in fresh market sweet corn. Research since 1996 has provided impressive evidence that inoculative releases of T. ostriniae can successfully reduce ECB population levels and concomitant damage to sweet corn. The wasp has a strong host preference for ECB, and has been shown to disperse rapidly in fields and efficiently locate egg masses. Once an ECB egg mass is found by a female T. ostriniae, 90% of eggs will be parasitized. The wasp reproduces quickly and passes through multiple generations, resulting in season-long suppression of corn borer infestations and damage. Control of ECB would not necessarily be complete, but T. ostriniae would cause enough mortality to reduce damage below economic levels in most cases. In 2000, inoculative releases of T. ostriniae were made in 9 fields of sweet corn in New York. Approximately 47% of the total ECB eggs deposited over the season were parasitized. Furthermore, ECB damage to ears was reduced 50% compared with non-release fields.

We are proposing to evaluate early-season inoculative releases of T. ostriniae for suppression of ECB in field corn in New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Virginia. We will also investigate the overwintering of T. ostriniae in each state and assess potential non-target effects of the parasitoid by evaluating parasitism of other lepidopteran eggs in and around release sites.

Successful inoculative releases and suppression of corn borer would provide an excellent biologically-based alternative to insecticides. Because of the much lower cost of Trichogramma releases compared with insecticide treatments, it is projected that nearly 60% of the field corn acreage in the Northeast might benefit economically from Trichogramma releases, while less than 13% would potentially benefit from the use of insecticides. The proposed release method of T. ostriniae is relatively simple, inexpensive, could be incorporated into existing IPM programs, and involves no risk to the grower. In addition, much of the proposed research will be conducted on-farm, which will greatly facilitate obtaining feedback from growers. Because the research will be conducted in four different states adoption by growers should be widespread. Because corn is planted throughout the northeastern U.S., results of this research will impact the entire region and they will have broad implications for other corn-growing regions and other cropping systems in which ECB is a pest.

PROBLEM, BACKGROUND, AND JUSTIFICATION

ECB Pest Status
Following its arrival from Europe early in this century, the European corn borer (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis, spread quickly across the U.S. and Canada and became one the most serious pests of field corn and a number of vegetable crops. Nationally, ECB is the second most damaging pest of corn causing an estimated average annual loss to farmers of $1.2 billion (Calvin 1995). During outbreak years and in years when corn market value is high, economic losses can reach as high as $2.0 billion. In the Northeast and mid-Atlantic states, ECB is responsible for causing an estimated annual yield loss of $116.3 million (NASS 1995; Anonymous 1990 -1995). Field corn is the largest acreage crop grown in the northeastern U.S. Across the twelve northeastern states, corn for grain is produced on over 2.4 million acres, and is valued at nearly $750 million annually (Table 1). An additional 1.4 million acres of field corn is grown for silage production in the region. Management of European corn borer in field corn was identified by several 1996 statewide IPM needs assessments as a priority area that needs additional research (http://neipm.nysaes.cornell.edu:591/NE_Needs/FMPro).

Losses of this magnitude are still seen even though major advances in the pest's management have occurred since its introduction. As little as 40 years ago, it was not uncommon to have 20 or more ECB larvae feeding in one corn plant, causing a complete crop loss. The combined effect of cultural, biological, and genetic management tactics has been a lowering of the average ECB population density in corn fields. Today, it is uncommon to find a field with more than an average of 2.0 larvae per plant. According to state survey information summarized by the NC-205 Regional Research Project, almost 80% of corn fields have less than 0.5 first generation larvae per plant and 75% have less than 2.0 second generation larvae per plant (45% have less than 1.0 larvae per plant).

Although average ECB density levels have been significantly reduced, the pest still commonly causes 5 to 40 bushel per acre yield reductions in Northeast corn fields (Greg Roth, unpublished data). At a corn value of $2.50 per bushel, this means farmers are still losing anywhere from $12.50 to $100 per acre from this pest. The ECB's impact on yield is a function of crop yield potential, water availability, crop value, plant developmental stage when tunneling was initiated, crop health, plant population, and management intensity. On average, a single ECB larva tunneling into the plant at V10 and V16 (10th and 16th leaf stages) reduces yield by 5 to 6%. Second generation ECB larvae that attack the plant between R1 to R5 (blister to beginning dent stages) can reduce yield from 1.5 to 4.0% per larva per plant (Mason et al 1996; Calvin et al. 1988; Bode and Calvin 1990). When plants are under drought stress the impact of ECB stalk tunneling can be as high as 12% per larva per plant during the reproductive stages (Calvin unpublished data). Based on national average infestation levels (0.37 and 1.56 larvae per plant for first and second generation, respectively), crop yield (122.89 bushel per acre), and market value ($2.33 per bushel), first and second generation are responsible for a 2.1 and 4.3% yield reduction (6.4% total loss) in the average corn field (Anonymous 1994; Calvin 1995). Therefore, the average per acre loss caused by this pest is 7.86 bushels or $18.33 per acre. Although many farms in the Northeast may have average yields lower than 100 bushels per acre, top farmers commonly maintain average yields above 135 bushels per acre with some averaging over 150 bushels per acre. On these farms, the average per acre loss from the pest would be $20.13 (135 bushel per acre) and $22.37 (150 bushel per acre). These average losses per acre more than justify the use of Bt-corn hybrids which costs between $7.00 to $10.00 per acre or inoculative releases of Trichogramma which is projected to cost less than $10.00 per acre.

Table 1. Field corn production in the northeastern U.S. (Data taken from USDA - NASS 1997)

State...Area(acres)...Corn for Grain Production (1000bu)...Value($1000)...Area(acres)...Corn for Silage Production(1000 tons)...Value($1000)
CT...-...-...-...35,000...630...10,560
DE...150,000...15,840...48,164...4,000...52...1,900
MA...-...-...-...29,000...464...860
MD...500,000...37,350...136,500...80,000...800...16,000
ME...-...-...-...23,000...460...8,960
NH...-...-...-...16,000...304...5,400
NJ...118,000...10,044...23,213...23,000...345...5,700
NY...650,000...75,400...179,340...545,000...8,175...135,800
PA...985,000...97,515...348,096...540,000...7,560...109,200
RI...-...-...-...2,000...35...900
VT...-...-...-...88,000...1,584...26,860
WV...37,000...3,515...10,800...25,000...300...6,900
Total NE: ...2,440,000...225,979...746,113...1,410,000...20,709...329,040

ECB Management
Over the last 40 years, a combination of cultural control, biological control and classically- bred resistant hybrids have greatly reduced overall levels of ECB damage. Although these methods have all made important contributions to the regulation and control of ECB populations, they do not reliably prevent yield losses caused by this pest. In spite of the impact this pest has had on corn production in the United States and the Northeast, few farmers attempt to protect their yield from the pest using insecticides (Calvin 1995). The main reasons that so few growers utilize insecticides are high costs and relatively low efficacy. The low efficacy of insecticides is due largely to the difficulty of timing the applications to correspond with the short window between larval hatching and boring into the stalk where they are relatively impervious to insecticides. In most cases, the cost of an insecticide application or applications exceeds the benefit derived from their implementation (Calvin 1995). Even if a viable insecticide control option were available, most farmers in the Northeast would not have the means to apply treatments to corn. Conventional on-farm spray equipment is inadequate and few commercial applicators are available. Aerial applications which are common in the Midwest are generally not cost-effective with the smaller field sizes of the Northeast, are risky to apply on rolling terrain, and are looked at unfavorably by the general public. For these reasons, most farmers have opted not to implement insecticide management programs despite the yield losses caused by ECB.

With the introduction of transgenic corn hybrids that produce the Bt toxin, the economics of ECB management was changed dramatically in the Northeast and throughout the United States. Research has shown that Bt-corn hybrids provide 95 to 100% control of first and second generation bivoltine and univoltine ECB larvae compared to 72% of first generation and 67% of second generation by insecticides. The cost to implement this technology is considerably lower than an insecticide based program and more reliable. The total per acre cost of Bt-corn ranges from $7.00 to $10.00 per acre depending of plant density compared to $30.00 to $40.00 per acre for both first and second generation control using an insecticide program. The result of this new technology entering the market place in 1996 and 1997 is a drop in the economic thresholds for the pest. Prior to the commercial release of Bt-corn hybrids, ECB exceeded economic thresholds only occasionally. Because of this new technology, ECB is expected to perennially exceed thresholds. The average economic thresholds for first and second generation ECB using an insecticide program were 1.39 and 3.2 larvae per plant, respectively, compared to the Bt-corn technology which lowered thresholds to 0.23 and 0.46 larvae per plant. With the introduction of the Bt-corn technology, 50 and 80% of corn fields in the Northeast have first and second generation ECB infestation levels, respectively, that exceed the economic threshold compared to 2.6 and 12.1% for an insecticide based program.

The Bt-corn technology that represents the most recent advance in ECB management, offers a highly effective, reliable, and affordable method to prevent yield losses from the pest. However, the history of pest management has demonstrated the danger of relying on any single tactic as a "silver bullet". There are several factors that could potentially limit the adoption and long-term viability of Bt-corn hybrids for ECB management. These factors include the potential selection for resistant populations, the possibility of non-target impacts, cross-pollination of organic corn, and lack of consumer acceptance. Thus it is imperative that researchers continue to develop other management tactics. One of the most promising alternatives to Bt-corn is the inoculative release of Trichogramma wasps. This strategy has already proven to be highly effective in sweet corn and the projected cost for commercial utilization is comparable to the use of Bt-corn (approximately $10/acre). This strategy represents the latest advance in the long history of biological control of this pest.

Biological Control of European corn borer:
Ever since its accidental introduction into North America, efforts have been made to introduce natural enemies of ECB (Clausen 1978). A number of parasitoids have been imported from Europe and Asia, but few have become established (Mason et al. 1996). A tachinid fly, Lydella thompsoni and two wasps, Macrocentrus grandii and Eriborus terebrans, are the major parasitoids attacking ECB in North America (Mason et al. 1994). These introduced parasitoids, and several natural predators may suppress ECB populations in some years and locations, but they generally do not control ECB populations below acceptable economic injury levels (Wressel 1973).

Augmentation of natural enemies, in particular releases of parasitoids may provide more predictable and effective control of ECB (Wang and Ferro 1998). Inundative releases of Trichogramma egg parasitoids have shown success at controlling European corn borer and the closely-related Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnicalis Guenee, in Asia and Europe (Wang et al. 1984, Smith 1996). In inundative release programs, Trichogramma are released three to four times per season at ~240,000/acre/release (Smith 1996). Wasps are not directly released into the field rather parasitized eggs (containing developing Trichogramma) are placed in the field. As the wasps emerge from these eggs they are "released".

In the U.S., several Trichogramma spp. have been evaluated for controlling ECB. Among the native Trichogramma species, only T. nubilale Ertle and Davis may be effective (Losey and Calvin 1990, 1995, Losey et al. 1995). Unfortunately, this species is not commercially available and it is relatively expensive to mass produce (Wang and Ferro 1998).

Research with Trichogramma ostriniae:
Trichogramma ostriniae is endemic to China where it has been shown to parasitize 70-96% of eggs of O. furnicalis (Wang et al. 1984, Chiang et al. 1986). The parasitoid has been identified as a strong candidate for augmentative biological control of ECB (Wang et al., 1984; Chiu and Chen 1986, Zhang 1988, Hassan and Guo 1991, Pavlik 1993). In the first field release trials in the U.S., Charles Mason and colleagues in Delaware recorded >97% parasitism of naturally occurring ECB eggs in sweet corn when experimental releases were made at a density of 202,000 T. ostriniae per acre (Mason et al. 1996). Similar releases in New York, showed parasitism of sentinel ECB eggs to average ~60% (Hoffmann et al. 1992) and parasitism of naturally-occurring ECB eggs to range from 70 to 80% (Seaman et al. 1997).

Subsequent research on T. ostriniae has demonstrated proficient dispersal and host-finding abilities in corn (M. P. Hoffmann, unpublished data) and a density-dependent functional response to O. nubilalis in the field (Wang and Ferro 1998). Wang et al. (1999) found that T. ostriniae were more efficient at finding O. nubilalis egg masses and to provide higher levels of parasitism within the field than T. nubilale.

Also, T. ostriniae can successfully parasitize ECB eggs throughout most of their embryonic development (Hoffmann et al. 1995), and the wasp does not lose fitness even after many generations of being reared on alternate hosts. Given all of these reports, T. ostriniae appears to be a very promising species for mass production and biological control of ECB.

Two potential drawbacks of the inundative release method are cost and optimizing the timing of release. To overcome this in China, researchers attempted an inoculative release strategy with the parasitoid T. dendrolimi for control of Asian corn borer (Fucheng et al. 1986, Xiao-Cheng et al. 1986). Releases of 6,250 T. dendrolimi per acre during the first generation of corn borer were just as effective as a release of ten times that many later in the season.

In New York, Hoffmann (1998) demonstrated the potential of inoculative releases of T. ostriniae for control of ECB in sweet corn. In four fields of sweet corn, two releases of 15,000 T. ostriniae were made a week apart to coincide with the first generation ECB moth flight. Parasitism of egg masses was recorded throughout the season (79 days total). From 14 days after the inoculative release to the end of the season, a total of 78 naturally-occurring ECB egg masses were collected from the four fields. Of the egg masses collected, 47 (60.3%) were parasitized by T. ostriniae. The parasitism rate on the one organic farm was 76.9% versus 54.5, 66.6 and 43.8 on the conventional farms, where one or more insecticide applications was made to the test fields. Many of the parasitized egg masses were recovered at distances of 100 to 300 ft from release areas. This study demonstrated that inoculative releases of relatively few T. ostriniae can establish the parasitoid in a field allowing them to reproduce on eggs of ECB, increase their numbers, and disperse.

Further evaluations of T. ostriniae releases were made last season (2000) in commercial sweet corn fields in New York by M. P. Hoffmann, T. P. Kuhar, and Mark G. Wright to measure the impact of parasitism on ECB population levels and damage. Following the protocol outlined in the Hoffmann (1998) study, releases were made in nine fields. Nearby fields of the same variety and planting date served as non-treated controls for each of the fields. Egg populations of ECB were monitored twice weekly from early-whorl stage to harvest. Approximately 47% of the total ECB eggs deposited over the season were parasitized in the release fields compared with 3.6% in the non-release fields (Table 2). Trichogramma ostriniae accounted for >95% of the egg parasitism. ECB damage was reduced more than 50% in the release fields compared with the non-release fields (Table 2).

Table 2. Evaluation of T. ostriniae inoculative releases on ECB damage in sweet corn planted in central, NY in 2000.

...Fields...% of ECB eggs parasitized...% ears damaged...
ECB tunnels per 100 stalks

Release...9...47.4 a...5.99 a...15.5 a
Non-release...9...3.6 b...12.82 b...30.3 b

Numbers within columns followed by a different letter are significantly different, Fisher's protected LSD at 0.05 level of significance.

Also in 2000, we (Hoffmann, Kuhar and Losey) evaluated inoculative releases of T. ostriniae in field corn. Six fields were sampled and analyzed using the same procedures as in the sweet corn study, except that yield was assessed as mass of grain (husked ears) per ha. Releases of T. ostriniae had a similar effect on ECB populations and reduced the number of stalk tunnels by 38% (Table 3).

Table 3. Evaluation of T. ostriniae inoculative releases on ECB damage and yield in field corn planted in central, NY in 2000.

...Fields...% of ECB eggs parasitized...ECB tunnels per 100 stalks...Yield(unhusked ears in MT/ha )

Release...6...26.0 a...18.3 a...0.91 a
Non-release...6...2.9 b...29.5 b...0.95 a

Numbers within columns followed by a different letter are significantly different, Fisher's protected LSD at 0.05 level of significance.

Based on the aforementioned research studies, inoculative releases of T. ostriniae should be pursued as a biological control strategy for ECB in sweet corn and field corn. There are some important questions that still need to be answered. Based on our preliminary research over two years, T. ostriniae does not appear to overwinter in New York, but it may overwinter in Delaware (C. Mason, unpublished data). The overwintering ecology needs to be investigated. Gou (1985) showed that T. ostriniae enter diapause and can survive prolonged cold storage. However, the primary host, ECB, does not overwinter in the egg stage, other potential hosts with overwintering eggs must be assessed for T. ostriniae parasitism. Hoffmann et al. (1995) demonstrated that in the laboratory under no-choice conditions, T. ostriniae will parasitize a relatively wide range of lepidopteran hosts, particularly members of the Pyralidae, Noctuidae, and Plutellidae families. To our knowledge, T. ostriniae parasitism of hosts other than Ostrinia spp. has not been reported in the field. Host range of T. ostriniae needs further investigation, particularly in the field. Parasitism of non-target hosts could be beneficial, in that other hosts could serve as a reservoir for T. ostriniae when ECB eggs are scarce. Conversely, parasitism of non-target hosts could be detrimental if the non-target hosts are endangered species, or are considered beneficial organisms (Van Driesche and Bellows 1996).
We are confident that once shown to be effective and optimized, inoculative release of T. ostriniae will be widely adopted in sweet corn as well as field corn across the northeastern US and possibly in other regions. We have been assured that if the market for T. ostriniae is adequate, Beneficial Insectary Inc., Redding, CA is willing to mass produce and market this species for control of ECB. This would greatly facilitate adoption of the biological control program.


Phytoseiids and Spinosad for Thrips IPM in Greenhouses: Efficacy and Compatibility

Project Director: Roy Van Driesche
Funding Amount: $38,232

Bedding plants (flowers and vegetable transplants for garden use) are a major crop nationally (Fig. 1, Appendix I) and in the NE U.S. alone, they generate a third of a billion dollars ($343,000,000) in annual sales. This is a "hidden" crop because it is composed of diverse plant material, but is unified by common production methods and timing and is a major contributor to the incomes of many small producers (458 in MA alone). In surveys, growers of bedding plants in MA have identified western flower thrips (WFT) (Frankliniella occidentalis) as their most important pest, as judged by pesticide application number (Smith 1998). This pest distorts flowers and infects plants with plant viruses (INSV, TSWV), ruining their aesthetic value and making them unsaleable. Growers in MA in a 1996 survey averaged 3.8 pesticide sprays to control WFT (in a crop that only lasts 10-12 weeks). In 1999, extension agent reports in MA suggested this approached 5-6 sprays per season. Crops infected with INSV may have to be destroyed, resulting in losses that have gone as high as $150,000 for single growers (Daughtrey unpub, Daughtrey et al. 1997). Currently one material, spinosad (Conserve®), is being relied on for thrips control by most producers, due to resistance to many older products. A clear need exists to develop an IPM program that incorporates natural enemies with selective pesticides, so that currently effective pesticides are not rendered ineffective by selection for resistance.

Work in MA in 2000 showed that the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris can control WFT in spring bedding plants (Fig. 1, Appendix I). However, there is not enough information from realistic field trials to rely on this control method at this time. (Our 2000 test was done at only 3 growers). Here we propose further work in commercial greenhouses to gain more knowledge on the degree of thrips control that use of predatory mites can provide in bedding plant crops. We proposed to compare the efficacy of two mite species and to study the potential of each to be integrated with spinosad, the key insecticide in current use against western flower thrips in greenhouse crops.

We propose to test both N. cucumeris and a promising new phytoseiid from Australia that has recently been brought into commercial production by Novartis (a species not yet publicly identified and known as "Ozzie #1). We will also run laboratory tests to determine the degree of compatibility of spinosad with both N. cucumeris and Ozzie #1. Finally, we will compare the level of control provided by the better of these two mites when used alone versus its efficacy when combined with one mid-season application of spinosad (Conserve®). These trials will significantly advance the goal of integrating biological control into western flower thrips control programs in flower production.

PROBLEM, BACKGROUND, AND JUSTIFICATION

THE PROBLEM
Bedding Plants Generate a Third of a Billion Dollars of Agricultural Sales Annually in the Northeast Region. Nationwide, bedding plants (e.g., marigolds, impatiens, petunias, begonias, etc., grown for landscapes and gardens) in 1998 produced sales of approximately 1.75 billion dollars, which was 51% of all greenhouse floriculture sales (Fig. 1, Appendix I, National Agricultural Statistical Service, 1999). In the northeast, bedding plants are also the dominant greenhouse crop, accounting in MA for 62% of all floricultural sales. In 1998 in MA, CT, NY, NJ, MD, PA, and VA combined, there were over a 1/3 billion dollars in bedding plant sales. Our region accounts for 20% of all bedding plant sales nationally.

Of these seven states, MA ranked number four in 1998, with $39,827,000 of bedding plant sales by growers with $100K or more in sales. When producers of all sizes are included, bedding plant sales in Massachusetts alone exceed $53 million.

In terms of larger economic effects, greenhouse businesses employ a sizable labor force, averaging 16 employees per business. Thus the 458 greenhouse operations in MA in 1999 (New England Agricultural Statistics Service, 2000) generated over 7000 jobs. At the regional level, this industry provides employment for tens of thousands. Finally, the industry is growing (Fig. 1, Appendix I). In MA, the industry has grown 61% since 1990.

This is an important industry whose pest control needs merit serious attention. Because climatic conditions and the level of greenhouse technology in MA are about average for the region, solutions that work in Massachusetts will work for the Northeast region as a whole. Greenhouse crops, pests and conditions are much more similar across the region than are outcrops and pests, which respond more to local variation in soils, temperatures and vegetation. Thus the work proposed here is directly relevant to the entire region.

THE PEST: WFT is the Key Pest of the Crop. Western flower thrips (WFT), Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is the most prevalent species of thrips attacking greenhouse crops (Robb 1989). Reasons for this high pest status include WFT's very large host range, rapid developmental cycle, high reproductive rate, and ability to spread plant diseases, especially INSV and TSWV (see Lewis 1973, Robb 1989, and Parker et al. 1995 for reviews). Frankliniella occidentalis feed on young seedlings and buds, which results in distorted growth. Even feeding on mature flowers may result in severe scaring. This damage to flowers and foliage significantly reduces the aesthetic quality of greenhouse flower crops, making the plants less valuable or even unmarketable (Parrella and Jones 1987). Also, WFT spreads impatiens necrotic spot tospovirus (INSV) and tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (TSWV), both devastating plant diseases (Milne and Francki 1984, German et al. 1992, Ullman et al. 1995). These diseases are present in most floriculture and nursery production areas of the United States, including the northeast (Law and Moyer 1989, 1990) and cause economically significant crop losses in the region (Daughtrey et al. 1997). Crops most commonly affected include chrysanthemums, cyclamen, exacum, impatiens, gloxinia, and reiger begonia (Parrella 1995). There have been complete losses of chrysanthemum crops in California (Parrella 1995) and gloxinia crops in North Carolina (Baker and Jones 1988). During the past several years, TSWV has caused severe damage to assorted crops (Daughtrey et al. 1997). Whole crops have at times had to be discarded, resulting in huge losses (e.g., in 1995 an east coast grower disposed of 30,000 potted exacum plants valued at $150,000 after thrips moved INSV into the crop from infected begonias; similarly, a west coast ranunculus grower lost a crop valued at $63,000 [Daughtrey et al. 1997]). Such losses are not a thing of the past: in spring 1999 a NY grower had to discard $150,000 worth of impatiens plugs (purchased from an out of state producer) because they were found to be INSV-infected on arrival. Control of these virus diseases in greenhouse crops is based on eliminating all infected plants and reducing numbers of WFT in the greenhouse as much as possible.

Chemical control has been the tactic of choice for WFT management by greenhouse growers, but failures of insecticides to control WFT have commonly occurred because of poor contact with thrips in flower buds and soil, and pesticide resistance. Robb (1989) and Robb et al. (1995) suggest F. occidentalis has developed resistance to chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, and cyfluthrin. Immaraju et al. (1992) have also demonstrated WFT resistance to four classes of insecticides, including two pyrethroids (permethrin and bifenthrin), an organophosphate (chlorpyrifos), a carbamate (methomyl), and a macrocyclic lactone (abamectin). Spinosad (Conserve®), a new macrocyclic lactone material, currently provides good control. However, single factor control programs, in which all control is provided by a chemical, select strongly for resistance and are not sustainable. To maintain the current utility of spinosad products, there is a need to develop an IPM program for bedding plants that integrates another form of control, such as predatory mites, with spinosad. To do this, we need further information on the efficacy of such mites in bedding plant crops and on the compatibility of spinosad and phytoseiids.

STAKEHOLDER ENDORSEMENT
In a 1998 survey, greenhouse producers in Massachusetts identified western flower thrips as the pest for which they most frequently applied pesticides to bedding plants (Smith 1998). The continued importance of this pest to MA flower growers was confirmed at the 1999 meeting of our MA Floriculture Team's Advisory Group (the Board of the MA Flower Growers Association, MFGA) at which western flower thrips was again identified as the most important insect problem of the industry. A letter attached here (Appendix II) from the MFGA attests to the facts that western flower thrips remains a key concern of growers and that development of an integrated IPM package combining predatory mites and compatible pesticides, such as proposed here, is a goal of this industry. Regionally and nationally, the floriculture industry has similar goals. For example in NY, the Cornell Greenhouse and Controlled Environment Agricultural Industry Advisory Board has also identified western flower thrips as the key pest of flower crops. Nationally, the industry group representing floriculture (the Society of American Florists) listed thrips as their top pest and integrated and biological control of thrips as their top pest research priority (see documents on this in Appendix IV). This was reconfirmed in SAF's February, 2000 priorities identification meeting in Chicago, at which thrips were unanimously viewed by all six participant breakout groups as a top priority for pest control research (see Appendix IV).

BACKGROUND:
Potential for Predatory Mites as Part of Thrips IPM in Bedding Plants
Past studies of the ability of predacious mites to suppress thrips in flower crops have produced mixed results in different parts of the United States. In California, releases of the predacious mites Neoseiulus cucumeris (Ouds.) or N. barkeri (Hughes) on chrysanthemum at 2.5 mites per leaf were unable to reduce western flower thrips densities below 2-7 per leaf (Hessein and Parrella 1990), an unacceptable level for mums. However, in Maryland, Gill (1994) found that releases of N. cucumeris in a slow release formulation reduced the number of pesticide applications needed for management of western flower thrips in bedding plants from 3.6 to only 0.4. In 2000 in Massachusetts and New York, a trial at three bedding plant growers found that N. cucumeris suppressed thrips to lower levels than did the use of insecticides (Van Driesche and Sanderson, unpublished). In the MA-NY trial, applications of 10,000 N. cucumeris per 1000 sq. ft. of greenhouse space, applied five times (in weeks 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7) in the 10 week bedding plant crop suppressed western flower thrips catches on sticky cards more than did the chemical controls applied by growers and provided acceptable control at all three sites (Fig. 2, Appendix I). At this rate of application, season long thrips control with this mite was achieved at a cost of only 2.9 cents per sq. ft. (=32 cents/m2) (given a price of $57.70 per 100,000 mites).

While several other phytoseiid mite species have been studied for thrips control in greenhouses, presently the only important species used commercially is N. cucumeris. Two other mites have received serious consideration, N. barkeri and Iphesius degenerans, but these are not presently serious contenders for practical use. N. barkeri is no longer commercially available, except on a very limited basis from one small firm in Europe. As a practical matter, growers in the U.S. are unable to obtain this mite. I. degenerans, while useful, has proven hard to rear and is dramatically more expensive than N. cucumeris. This limits use of I. degenerans to single inoculative releases in long term crops. It would not be practical in short term crops such as bedding plants.

A new mite species, however, is being brought into mass production and commercial distribution. In 2001, Novartis, a major supplier of natural enemies, will produce and sell a new predacious mite from Australia, called Ozzie 1 (whose species name is not yet revealed). This species is the result of a survey by Marilyn Steiner of Australian phytoseiids, undertaken with the express purpose of finding the most effective local species for western flower thrips control. Ozzie 1 is the best species that resulted from that effort. It is now going to be made available internationally. Nothing has yet been published on this species, but information presented by Steiner at international thrips and greenhouse IPM meetings (at which Roy Van Driesche attended) suggests that Ozzie 1 is a very promising species. For this reason we propose to compare it directly to N. cucumeris in bedding plants under northeast U.S. conditions. Assurances of adequate supplies of this mite and permits for legal importation to the U. S. have been provided by the Novartis representative (R. GreatRex) to Roy Van Driesche (see attached emails, Appendix III).
It is, however, possible that in some situations, such as crops with particularly high initial thrips densities, these mites may not provide sufficient control by themselves. Consequently, a compatible insecticide that could be used to supplement, but not replace, the biological control program would be useful. Western flower thrips is resistant to many older insecticides, but a member of new class of insecticides, spinosad (Conserve®), a macrocyclic lactone (Eger et al. 1998), is being used by greenhouse operators to suppress western flower thrips. Interestingly, this insecticide seems to have relatively little activity against mites, including phytoseiids (Cowles and Abbey 1999, Cowles et al. 2000). However a November 17, 2000 search of the literature (Agricola database) found no published articles on the impact of this material on phytoseiids. Also, on the same date, a search of Koppert's SideEffects List showed that spinosad was not included in that database. Thus a clear need exists to develop this information and see how compatible spinosad might be with the phytoseiid mites (either N. cucumeris or Ozzie 1) used for biological thrips control.

JUSTIFICATION
The justification for funding this proposal is as follows:
1. Greenhouse floriculture is an important, expanding segment of American agriculture, especially in the northeast.
2. Bedding plants are a major part of greenhouse floriculture, especially in the northeast.
3. Through advisory groups, such as the Massachusetts Flower Growers Association, and direct surveys, bedding plant growers have stated clearly that western flower thrips is their biggest insect pest.
4. Currently, control of western flower thrips is narrowly based, entirely chemical, and mostly reliant on a single effective pesticide (spinosad). This situation is not desirable and growers have stated that they would like to have either biological control options or IPM packages that combine biological and chemical control.
5. Within biological control options for western flower thrips, only predatory mites have performed well on flower crops.
6. Among predatory mites, the only commercially available viable option is use of N. cucumeris.
7. The only new mite being commercialized at the moment that has significant promise is Ozzie 1 from Australia.
8. MA greenhouses are fairly typical of the northeast in terms of crops, pests, level of technology used, and production conditions. Consequently, controls that work in MA will be useable in all of New England, NY, NJ, PA, DE, and VA without much need for modification or local research. In contrast, information from CA, TX and other out-of-region big greenhouse states is of relatively little use to us because of large differences in climate, pests, and greenhouse construction.
9. We have clear cut preliminary evidence from MA and NY in 2000 that the predatory mite N. cucumeris can control western flower thrips in spring bedding plant crops in the northeast (Fig. 2, Appendix I). Thus there is every reason to believe that the solutions proposed here for investigation have a high probability of being successful. We need the research, however, to gain a more robust knowledge of the system and to have more proof of efficacy, with which to promote grower adoption. We also need to develop information on compatibility of spinosad and these mites, as in some cases, such combinations would be needed.
10. Our proposal rests on all these preceding facts and proposes to conduct trials in a realistic setting (actual bedding plant crops of commercial producers) to test the relative value of N. cucumeris vs Ozzie 1 and, following laboratory tests to establish facts about compatibility of these species with spinosad, (2) to test the value of an integrated mite+spinosad package compared to mite releases alone.
11. This research will contribute to the following goals:
a. pesticide reduction (if mites replace insecticide control for thrips in whole or in part)
b. better thrips control leading to better crops and better profits
c. prevention or delay of development of pesticide resistance by western flower thrips to spinosad.


Reduced Antibiotic Use on Apples with Revised MARYBLYT Forecasting

Project Director: William Turechek
Funding Amount: $185,177

Fire blight is one of the most destructive and difficult-to-control diseases of apple. Over the last decade, major changes in horticultural practices have increased the chances for infection and level of damage likely to occur. A common approach to disease management in the Northeast is to time streptomycin antibiotic sprays during the blossoming period using the disease forecaster MARYBLYT. However, MARYBLYT does not account for varietal susceptibility, orchard age, or inoculum pressure (factors that may dramatically reduce (or increase) the risk of infection). As a result, disease management sometimes fails and, because outbreaks are so erratic, often results in unnecessary treatments when conditions do not support infection. While many growers are willing to forego the cost of possibly ineffective treatments as insurance against the potential losses of fire blight, unnecessary applications are costly and can lead to the appearance of resistant strains in the pathogen population. This project focuses on revising MARYBLYT, a computer forecaster for fire blight on apple and pear to account for varietal susceptibility, orchard age, or inoculum pressure.

PROBLEM, BACKGROUND, AND JUSTIFICATION

Fire blight, caused by the bacterium Erwinia amylovora, is one of the most destructive and difficult-to-control diseases of apple and pears (1,36,41). Throughout the nearly 200 year history of fire blight the disease has been an elusive malady in that sometimes severe epidemics develop in young orchards with no history of the disease and sometimes few symptoms appear in established orchards with a recent history of severe blight. Epidemics develop quickly, destroying blossoms, vegetative shoots, major limbs and, sometimes, whole trees. The 2000 growing season was perhaps one of the worst years for fire blight ever recorded in the Midwest and Northeast United States (5,17,29). In fact, that the US House of Representative's Agriculture Appropriations Conference Committee has appropriated $38 million in the fiscal 2001 agriculture spending bill (HR 4461) for losses incurred as a partial result of fire blight. It is years like these that emphasize the need to improve our understanding of fire blight so that we better develop our tools for disease management, especially in the face of a depressed and rapidly changing global market where a single unprofitable year can force a grower out of business (44).

Over the last decade, consumer and market demands have forced major changes in horticultural practices. These changes have not only increased chances for infection but the level of damage/infection likely to occur (41). For example, high density orchards of 250-500 trees/acre are replacing older orchards with 80 to 120 trees/acre. Clonal apple rootstocks with uniform susceptibility to infection (e.g., M.9, M.26) are almost exclusively used in newly-planted orchards. It is now known that systemic invasion of rootstocks resulting from blossom infection is common and, in a large proportion of instances, this invasion can cause girdling that can kill a tree within one season (26,41). The choice of rootstocks and management practices encourage early bearing (second to third leaf). Perhaps most important, is the widespread increase in new high market value apple cultivars like Gala, Fuji, Honeycrisp, Jonagold, Braeburn and others that are highly susceptible to fire blight (41).

Most contemporary control programs emphasize thorough orchard sanitation and dormant pruning to remove or reduce sources of inoculum, early season applications of copper materials, limited use of nitrogen to avoid an excess of succulent growth, insect control, and the frequent use of protective bactericide's through the highly susceptible flowering period every year to prevent primary infections (4). The most widely used approach in the U.S. is to apply a series of streptomycin antibiotic sprays at frequent intervals during the blossoming period (4,20); 2-4 routine treatments per year in most locations, but some use 8 or more when shoot blight is also targeted. This approach, while generally adequate, seldom affords complete control, sometimes fails and, because outbreaks are so erratic, often results in unnecessary treatments when the conditions do not support infection. While many growers are willing to forego the cost of possibly ineffective treatments as 'insurance' against the potential losses of fire blight, unnecessary applications are costly and the excessive use of antibiotics can lead to the appearance of resistant strains of the pathogen (18,19,20,41). Furthermore, the use of antibiotics as a means of pest control is problematic and is scrutinized by both the public (15) and scientific community (20).

Until recently, our ability to predict the onset of fire blight epidemics accurately and reliably has been the most limiting factor in improving the overall management of the disease. MARYBLYTTM (16,35) is a computer program for forecasting fire blight in apples and pears that predicts the four distinct types of infection events (i.e., blossom, shoot, canker, and trauma blight) incited by E. amylovora as well as the appearance of symptoms that follow (33,34). It was first introduced in 1989, released for commercial distribution in 1992 (16,35), and is now used by fruit growers and in various research, teaching and extension programs in 30 US states and over 20 countries worldwide. The program's popularity and widespread use are attributed to: 1) The destructive nature of fire blight and the high costs of control; 2) Its ability to predict specific infection events far enough in advance that protective treatments can be made and eradication measures can be timed for maximum effectiveness; 3) Data inputs are relatively simple and easy to acquire; 4) The program claims insensitivity to geographical climate differences, operates independently from calendar dates, and can be used with either U.S. or metric units; and 5) Predictions are obtained within minutes and are accompanied by a variety of visual and audio prompts are given with respect to risks and treatment warnings.

Blossom blight is the most threatening and destructive phase of the disease; providing the inoculum for the shoot, root, and trauma blight phases (1,4,33). As a result, management practices focus on controlling this phase. In the blossom blight submodel of MARYBLYT four risk factors are monitored to identify possible infection events. The risk factors and the associated minimum conditions necessary for blossom infection are as follows: 1) flowers open with stigmas and petals intact; 2) accumulation of at least 110 cumulative degree hours (CDH) greater than 18.3 C from the start of bloom; 3) a wetting event of at least 0.25 mm of rain or heavy dew or a rain of 2.5 mm or more the previous day; and 4) an average daily temperature of 15.6 C (33,41). MARYBLYT characterizes risk as either low, moderate, high, or infection depending on whether one, two, three, or all four of the risk factors have exceeded their minimum values. Observation has shown that when all 4 of these parameters were met, early symptoms of blossom infection could be predicted and observed with the accumulation of 57 degree days >12.8 C after an identified infection event. It was also found that the first symptoms of shoot blight occurred approximately 57 degree days >12.8oC after the appearance of either blossom blight symptoms, except in years when the appearance of the winged adults of the white apple leafhopper was delayed (33).

Despite its appeal, MARYBLYT is not a perfect forecaster. The model tends to predict infections when none occur, especially in less susceptible varieties and in areas with no history of fire blight; resulting in the needless applications of antibiotics (13,32,42). The excessive use of antibiotics promotes the development of antibiotic resistant strains of the pathogen and, potentially, in untargeted populations of bacteria (15,20). As output, the model only generates qualitative assessments of infection potential without regard to which risk factors have exceeded their minimums or, for those factors that have exceeded their minimums, to what degree have the minimums been exceeded. As Steiner observed: "When environmental conditions meet these criteria only marginally, the incidence of blossom blight infections is usually low with severity varying due to individual site differences (variation in bloom, elevation, local dews, blight history, grower management practices, etc.). By contrast, severe epidemics affecting large areas are most likely to occur when all or several of the criteria are well above the minimum activity thresholds" (33). This is particularly problematic when a grower attempts to factor in the influence of varietal resistance, orchard age, or inoculum pressure. These factors are known to play a role in fire blight susceptibility but are not taken into account by MARYBLYT (1,41). A newer fire blight forecaster, named Courgarblight, was developed by Tim Smith at Washington State University (32). The model was developed in response to the poor performance of other fire blight risk assessment models when used in the Pacific Northwest; MARYBLYT tended to over-predict infections. The inaccuracies of MARYBLYT were partially attributed to how MARYBLYT factors in 'average temperature' and its lack of consideration of inoculum pressure. Using three years of weather data, Breth et al. (4) compared the performance of MARYBLYT and Cougarblight under New York conditions and found that they performed similarly. Cougarblight shares some of the same shortcomings of MARYBLYT, for example varietal susceptibility is not explicitly defined in the model. However, Cougarblight is not (yet?) a stand-alone program like MARYBLYT; predictions are obtained using a 'lookup' chart. In truth, either of these two models could be targeted for improvement based on the limitations outlined below, but we chose MARYBLYT because of its wide usage and acceptability in the Northeast and it is ready availability as a stand-alone program.

Justification

Despite its wide-scale use, major limitations to MARYBLYT are: (1) objective aspects are limited to qualitative predictions (i.e., + an infection event); quantitative assessments depend on experience and subjective considerations (i.e, degree to which minimum thresholds are exceeded, rate and timing of epiphytic inoculum potential increase; level of previous fire blight and thoroughness of blight management program); (2) MARYBLYT assumes that each risk factor contributes equally to the risk of developing blossom blight; (3) the risk of infection does not increase relative to the degree in which individual risk factors exceed their minimums; (4) MARYBLYT assumes that risk the factors are uncorrelated i.e., the cumulative effect of the factors on blossom blight are considered neither synergistic nor antagonistic; (5) MARYBLYT lacks varietal specificity; i.e., all varieties are considered equally susceptible; (6) the model is based on the assumption of abundant inoculum; and (7) growers and extension agents often find the current DOS-based version of MARYBLYT out-of-date and difficult to use. Because of these limitations, growers sometimes make the decision to spray when it is not needed (e.g., because varietal resistance compensated for exceeding the MARYBLYT high risk advisory) resulting in the inefficient and/or excessive use of antibiotics and potentially fostering resistance development. Or growers failed to spray when needed resulting in economic losses to the grower (e.g., because the grower could not gauge the risk of infection, for example, when two of the MARYBLYT criteria greatly exceeded their minimums).

Other successful forecasters, such as those developed for powdery mildew of grapes caused by Uncinula necator (8), sclerotinia stem rot in oil seed rape caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (39), alternaria leaf blight of carrots caused by Alternaria dauci (7), late blight of potato caused by Phytophthora infestans (14), downy mildew of hops caused by Pseudoperonospora humuli (30), and apple scab caused by Venturia inaequalis (23) are based on the accumulation of 'risk points' (typically as a function of weather and important crop factors). When the summation of risk points exceed some target level (i.e., a threshold) then a management action is taken. The advantage of such an approach is that disease pressure is directly related to the accumulation of risk points. This incorporates flexibility in the model because action thresholds (based on the accumulation of risk points) can vary in accordance to a grower's comfort level for assuming risk, market fluctuations, varietal differences (if varietal susceptibility is not explicitly defined in the forecaster), etc.

Inherent to the success of these forecasters is the choice of appropriate risk factors. The risk factors chosen for the MARYBLYT blossom blight submodel came about as the result of extensive laboratory investigations and empirical field evidence (3,24,28,37,38,43,45,46). Thus, the set of risk factors is not in question, but rather the relationship among factors and their defined minimums relative to disease development, especially on different varieties. As apple production changes, so does the risk of fire blight. Some practices increase the risk, some may decrease it. MARYBLYT must be flexible in order accommodate these changes if we intend to use this model in the future. By evidence of its current widespread usage, MARYBLYT has the potential to greatly impact how we manage this disease. Failed predictions or numerous over-predictions will cause growers to abandon MARYBLYT. However, if we address the weaknesses now, MARYBLYT's use in the industry will expand, allowing efficient and minimal use of antibiotics for fire blight management.



2000 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 2000

A Pilot Project for Answering E-Mail Questions via the HGIC Web Site

Project Director: Mary Kay Malinoski
Funding Amount: $50,000

The Home and Garden Information Center is committed to assisting Maryland residents in solving their pest, plant and landscape problems. The Center's approach to this mission has been the development of self-help diagnostic tools that are included in web sites, audiotapes, fact sheets and a Master Gardener handbook. The problem we address in this study is not unique to the Northeast Region, but is common throughout the United States. It is the problem of providing high quality information on pest identification and non-chemical control options to a vast urban/suburban audience accustomed to solving pest problems through the application of pesticides. Until recently, a highly suitable method of transferring this type of high quality information was lacking. However, with the advent of electronic information delivery we now have the capability to reach a significant portion of our urban clientele. We intend to deliver IPM information through the World Wide Web that will enable homeowners to identify causal agents of plant and household problems and select management tactics other than pesticides to solve these problems. This in turn, will lead to adoption of alternative practices that will significantly enhance and protect environmental quality and reduce the risk of health and other problems associated with the use of pesticides in densely populated urban settings.

The World Wide Web has created new opportunities for land grant universities to reach vast new audiences with IPM information. HGIC has taken advantage of this new technology through our web site. A previous Northeast IPM grant resulted in the development of a unique plant diagnostic web site with IPM solutions. The success of this site has resulted in hundreds of unsolicited e-mail questions requiring IPM solutions.

The proposed pilot project will enable HGIC to extend a widely demanded e-mail question and answer service to the Northeast region. The project represents a cost-effective method for educating the public on IPM principles and practices while answering specific plant problem and pest control questions through a personalized service. HGIC has a solid 10-year track record for meeting the public's demand for accurate, up-to-date information and formulating specific answers to horticulture and pest management questions. We have categorized, through an Access database program, over 250,000 client phone calls where horticulture consultants answered specific client questions.

Consumers can now receive gardening information from many sources which vary significantly in quality on the World Wide Web 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The proposed pilot project is an opportunity for land-grant universities to bring our expertise and reputation for objectivity to the electronic marketplace of information to better serve our clientele.

THE PROBLEM, BACKGROUND, AND JUSTIFICATION

THE PROBLEM

The Northeast is the most densely populated region of the United States with an average of more than 300 persons living on each square mile of land. Of the 10 most densely populated states nine, including the District of Columbia, are in the Northeast region (USDC 1996). In these states and the District more than 80% of the population lives in urban areas. Numerous studies have indicated that the amount of pesticide used by homeowners, renters, pest control operators, and landscape mangers in urban settings is significant and high. (Bottrell 1979) summarized studies conducted in the 1970's which found that more than 90% of homeowners applied pesticides in and around the home each year. Rates of insecticides used in major urban centers including Philadelphia, Lansing, and Dallas were about 5 lbs. active ingredient/acre and exceeded those in nearby agricultural areas. Homeowners also used more fungicides and comparable amounts of herbicides to farmers (Bottrell 1979). In a study of more than 400 homeowners in New Brunswick, NJ, Dallas, TX, and Berkeley, CA, (Frankie et al. 1981 ) reported that the average home dweller used chemicals ten times each year for indoor problems and seven times each year for outdoor problems.

BACKGROUND - Sources and quality of information for basing management decisions

The Home and Garden Information Center was established in 1989 and has served as a unique model nationwide for delivering environmental horticulture and IPM information to the public. As Maryland's urban and suburban population has grown, so has the need to provide these burgeoning audiences with environmental horticulture information they can use in their homes and gardens. The Center provides information and answers to plant and pest questions via a toll free phone number to Maryland residents. Access to Extension information is available 24 hours a day through prerecorded, self-help problem diagnostic tapes. Phone consultants are available to assist the public five days a week through one-on-one personal service. Since 1990 the Center has received 450,000 phone calls. Of these over 250, 000 were assisted by trained phone staff.

Center faculty developed a web site in 1996 that included timely "tips" in 22 subject areas, a Master Gardener "page, a Chesapeake Bay "page", and fact sheets converted to a pdf format with color images of pests and damage symptoms. Users can also order publications on-line. In 1998 we received a NEIPM grant to fund construction of our Plant Diagnostic Website. The site provides visual diagnostic keys that employ color photos to aid users in accurately diagnosing problems. Solutions to the problems include detailed technical information on pests, diseases, and environmental problems. Included with the technical information are additional detailed photographic images and the latest IPM strategies and least toxic means of dealing with these problems. The site has been used widely as a teaching tool for the public, university faculty, students, green industry personnel and Master Gardeners. Eighteen individuals from universities and government agencies have contributed resources to the development of the site. In 1999 over 30,000 user sessions were logged on the HGIC's websites, with sessions averaging from 4.7-5 minutes.

Sources of Pest Management Information

Perhaps one of the most compelling explanations for the excessive use of pesticides in urban environments stems from the inability of homeowners and pest control services to properly identify and diagnose problems caused by insects, diseases, weeds, and cultural problems in and around the home. Homeowners are largely uninformed regarding the use of alternatives to pesticides for controlling pests in and around the home (Raupp 1983). They use sources of information for pest identification and management that are largely unreliable and depend on pesticides as their primary management technique (Raupp et al 1992, Raupp and Davidson, unpublished, Raupp and Shrewsbury, unpublished). . A more recent study by Raupp (unpublished) of homeowners in Maryland revealed that the most commonly used source of pest control information (approximately 30%) was home and garden centers. The second most common source of information was pesticide labels which were used by 25% of those surveyed. Extension ranked a distant fifth out of six possible information sources with only 8% of homeowners using extension as a source. In 1993 Ward et al. surveyed homeowners in Albuquerque and found that the most widely used source of information for pest control was nursery sales people. University and extension sources ranked third at 13% just behind friends and relatives (Ward et al. 1993). A similar survey conducted in California revealed that 22% of those surveyed obtained pest control information from nurseries while only 2% contacted UC Extension for information on home and landscape pest control (Pittinger and Lazaneo 1989).

At the 1996 Northeast and North Central Meeting on IPM a series of goals were identified that are pertinent to this proposal.

GOALS

III. Information Transfer Goal #1: Enhance the general public's awareness and knowledge of IPM e. Develop and use Internet Home Pages, Web sites, other computer-based information resources for the general public (take better advantage of existing channels, link/integrate with horticultural information sources)

IV. Information Transfer Goal #6: Make homeowners aware of the potential environmental/health impacts of their own or their contractors' landscape pest management actions a. Extension information needs to be reoriented, targeted to relay such information.

V. Information Transfer Goal #10: Improve the efficiency of extension IPM information, transfer technology, methods, approaches c. "Replace the Ortho Book," an attractive, user-friendly source of pest control information provided by the Ortho Company for use at garden centers (This is shorthand for the need for extension materials that have far greater public relations value than at present.) d. There is a need to develop Extension materials that "give answers" to pest management questions.

The Phase I working group suggested a variety of approaches to achieve these goals. For the purposes of this grant the following are the most important: VI. Coordination of regional extension materials VII. Computer technology for the various publics such as World Wide Web "Expert system home pages" which provide archival information on pests, ID, IPM, etc., self directed learning programs at home and at garden center booths, and automated telephone numbers for information

Importance and Value to the Region All states will benefit by having a web site that provides an individualized electronic question and answer service for pest identification and information on alternative IPM control tactics. As mentioned previously the Northeast Region is the most urbanized of all in the nation. It is estimated that there are 50 million people in the US with access to the World Wide Web (ACNielsen.com). In 1999, the Home and Garden Information Center web pages were accessed by over 30,000 users. The current average user sessions have averaged 4.7 - 8.5 minutes. This average use time indicates that people are using the site to get information. We believe that the web site is the best way to deliver high quality IPM information to the 24 million households in the region.

The adoption of non-chemical tactics under an IPM approach has produced reductions in pesticide use of as much as 99% (Raupp et al. 1992). Pesticide reductions can only help to ameliorate problems such as the evolution of resistance in pests and mortality of beneficial insect complexes. In the home landscape, the success that HGIC has had in providing IPM information and solutions has helped reduce unnecessary pesticide applications. A 1994 survey was conducted by HGIC faculty to determine how well people followed advice given over the phone. Of the randomly selected 120 people who responded to the survey, 51% received cultural advice and 49% received IPM advice. Of those who received IPM advice 58% followed the recommendations to use IPM control strategies for their problems and 42% were convinced not to use pesticides for their problems. Results of an automated phone survey conducted in 1995 indicated that 34% of the callers were able to solve their gardening problems without the use of pesticides as a result of contacting the Center.

Users of HGIC web sites are taught how to monitor problems, assess the relative importance of different pests, determine whether a problem is abiotic or biotic in cause, prevent common, predictable problems and employ least toxic solutions. Unfortunately, some commercial web sites (ex. www.ortho.com,) first direct users to chemical controls for pests of trees and shrubs, vegetables or indoor nuisance pests with minimal IPM information.


A Sanitation Procedure to Manage Scab, Leafminers, and Voles in Apple Orchards

Project Director: William MacHardy
Funding Amount: $89,231

Removing leaf litter, other debris, and drops from the orchard floor has the potential to drastically reduce or eliminate the pesticides applied to manage four important apple pests: Venturia inaequalis (the causal agent of apple scab) and the apple blotch and spotted tentiform leafminers that overwinter in apple leaf litter and the meadow vole that utilizes leaf litter and other debris for nesting material and establishing trails that help protect it from predators and eats drops as an alternative food source. The focus of all scab management programs, including IPM programs, is to prevent the leaves and fruit from becoming infected by keeping them protected with fungicide. This is a defensive tactic, and the main goal of nearly all scab IPM research, in orchards planted with susceptible cultivars, has been to improve the efficiency in scheduling fungicides rather than to replace fungicide with nonchemical practices. The IPM programs have increased the efficiency of fungicide usage, but they have also reached a plateau with respect to reducing the seasonal fungicide dose to control scab.

The Principal PI has presented talks to numerous grower organizations throughout the northeastern US and eastern Canada that included a discussion of our research designed to reduce the seasonal fungicide dose to control scab through sanitation (shredding or treating the leaf litter with urea). This is an offensive tactic aimed at reducing the source of the inoculum (ascospores) that cause the initial infections in spring. After every talk, two questions were always asked. The first question was. . . "why not just remove the leaf litter?" This is the obvious approach to manage scab (and also leafminers), but it has always been assumed that removing the leaf litter would be too daunting a task. However, we have found that equipment used on golf courses, parks, highways, and with other cropping systems can, when used in the proper combination, remove >90% of the leaves, debris, and drops from the orchard floor in a process that is practical for large apple acreage. The "blow-sweep-shred-vac" treatment we will test requires two trips through an orchard. In the first trip, a blower attached to the tractor's PTO will blow leaf litter, debris, and drops from under the tree canopies in one row to the row-alley downwind, and this will be repeated for all rows. In the second trip, duel leaf sweepers attached to the front of the tractor will sweep each row alley to form a windrow of leaves, other debris, and drops that will be shredded and vacuumed into an enclosed bin by a 'Versa-Vac' (Goosen Industries) unit attached to the tractor's PTO. The second question growers asked expressed concern that ascospores blown from a source outside an orchard that had received a sanitation treatment would not allow infection periods to go unprotected, regardless of how effectively sanitation reduced the ascosporic inoculum. Addressing that concern will be critical to the adoption of the proposed sanitation procedure, and, thus, is an important component of the proposal.

We now need to demonstrate the economic, environmental, and human health benefits that can be achieved through reduced pesticide usage in a 'sanitized' orchard. Thus, our objectives are to demonstrate that by removing >90% of the leaf litter, other debris, and drops, it will be possible to (1) eliminate the four-to-six fungicide sprays applied to control scab during the primary scab season and the three-to-five fungicide sprays applied to control scab during the remainder of the growing season, (2) eliminate the one or two costly insecticides applied to control leafminers, and (3) eliminate broadcasted rodenticide bait to control orchard voles that is also attractive to domestic pets, birds, and other non-target wildlife. There are several reasons in addition to environmental and human health concerns that justify increased efforts to reduce the seasonal pesticide dose through sanitation: growers can more easily (a) follow pesticide resistance-management guidelines, (b) omit or replace fungicides harmful to beneficials with fungicides compatible with beneficials in arthropod management programs that are becoming increasingly more "biologically based," and (c) improve pest and crop management programs to comply with Integrated Fruit Production (IFP) and Integrated Crop Production (ICP) guidelines or the guidelines of groups such as Core Values Northeast that are based on IFP or ICP guidelines.

Problem, background, and justification

Core Values Northeast is a project of Mothers and Others, and in 1999 was comprised of 43 leading apple growers from throughout the Northeast committed to producing high quality apples using biointensive IPM production methods based, in part, on Guidelines for Integrated Production of Pome Fruits in Europe but adapted to reflect the growing conditions and best farm practices of the Northeast. The Guidelines encourage safer, more ecologically sound ways to manage pests. This proposal specifically addresses one of the stated objectives of Core Values Northeast: use a diversity of production methods to manage pests through safer, more ecologically sound methods. One method encouraged by Core Values Northeast, disrupting a pest's life cycle, is used effectively to control some pests, e.g., pheromone to control codling moth through mating disruption, but this method is not used effectively to manage several other important pests even though there is considerable potential to reduce or eliminate the pesticides applied to manage them through sanitation aimed at disrupting or interrupting their life cycle. Four of these pests are Venturia inaequalis (the causal agent of apple scab), the apple blotch leafminer (Phyllonorycter cratuegella), and the spotted tentiform leafminer (P. blancardella) that overwinter in apple leaf litter and the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) that utilizes the leaf litter and other debris on the orchard floor for nesting material and for establishing trails that help protect it from predators.

Apple scab. Apple scab is the most important disease of apple worldwide, and the repeated application of fungicides to control scab is a main reason why apple ranks near the top among crops with respect to pesticide use per hectare. In the northeastern United States and in most apple growing regions, ascospores produced in overwintered scabbed leaves on the orchard floor in early spring cause the initial scab lesions, and conidia produced on lesions cause scab to build up on foliage and fruit during the remainder of the growing season. The main focus of all scab management programs, including IPM programs, is to protect the tree against infections by ascospores. These programs are centered on a warning system that predicts scab infection periods. This is a defensive management approach designed to provide timely applications of fungicide to protect the leaves and fruit from becoming infected. Its purpose is not to replace fungicides with other control practices; rather, it is to improve the scheduling of fungicides. This defensive approach has increased fungicide effciency in controlling scab, but it has also reached a plateau with respect to reducing the seasonal dose of fungicides to control scab.

Offensive approaches to control scab include any practice that reduces the ascosporic inoculum at the source or makes use of apple's natural resistance to scab: sanitation, biological control, scab resistant cultivars, and plantings of cultivar mixtures with partial resistance. In orchards planted with susceptible cultivars, an offensive approach is seen as the key to successful minimal fungicide or non fungicide scab management, because it reduces or eliminates the amount of inoculum that can infect the leaves and fruit. The sanitation procedure proposed here may not prevent ascospore production completely, but it does have the potential to reduce the ascosporic inoculum to a density that will require less, or perhaps no, fungicide the next growing season applied specifically to control scab. However, before growers are likely to embrace a broadened approach to scab management that integrates offensive and defensive tactics in a way that reduces the amount of fungicide used to control scab, a study is needed that will determine the minimum fungicide dose needed to control scab in an orchard that had received a sanitation treatment.

Why the proposed sanitation procedure has never been tested. In the 1930s and early 1940s, there were numerous reports of chemicals applied to leaves before or after leaf fall in autumn or to the leaf litter in early spring prior to budbreak that reduced the ascosporic inoculum >90%, and in many instances there was a comparable reduction in the number of scab lesions. Although such percentage reductions in inoculum are impressive, the treatments did not allow all fungicides to be eliminated, which was the ultimate objective of most of these studies. Consequently, sanitation was abandoned in the 1940's in favor of the more efficacious, less phytotoxic organic fungicides that were becoming available. Unfortunately, the sanitation studies were conducted in high-inoculum research orchards rather than in low-inoculum commercial orchards that had been reasonably well controlled for scab. Reducing the ascosporic inoculum >90% is impressive, but in an orchard with a predicted potential ascospore dose (PAD) estimated at 1,000,000 ascospores per meter of orchard floor (a low-inoculum density for a research orchard), the PAD would be >10,000 after sanitation that reduced the inoculum >90%, and studies conducted in several northeastern states have shown that an orchard with >10,000 PAD would require a full season fungicide program. However, reducing inoculum >90% in a commercial orchard with a predicted PAD <500 (a common prediction for commercial orchards) would lower the PAD to <50, and several studies have shown that an orchard with a predicted PAD <500 may not require any fungicide intervention during the primary scab season. With this understanding of expected inoculum levels, it is not unreasonable to hypothesize that removing >90% of the leaf litter in an orchard with a predicted moderate (500 3000 PAD) or low (<500 PAD) "scab risk," and perhaps even orchards with a greater predicted "scab risk," will eliminate the need for fungicide intervention. However, we are not aware of any studies that investigated the potential of leaf removal to reduce the fungicide dose to control scab, perhaps because it appeared that removing >90% of the leaf litter from several acres or more of apples was too daunting a task, even though the justification for doing it is obvious. What we have discovered is that equipment now used on golf courses, parks, highways, or with other cropping systems to remove leaves and debris can, when used in the proper combination, remove >90% of the leaves, other debris from the orchard floor in a process that is practical for large apple acreage. We now need to demonstrate the economic, environmental, and human health benefits that can be achieved with leaf removal through reduced pesticide usage.

Are there situations in northeastern US apple orchards in which the proposed sanitationlreduced fungicide procedure may fail? An unacceptable incidence of scabbed fruit (>1.0%) in unprotected subplots in a "sanitized" orchard could be due to primary conidial inoculum within the subplots, insufficient removal of the leaf litter, or ascospores dispersed to the subplots from an external source. Conidia of V. inaequalis have been found on budscale lesions, and it has been reported that conidia can overwinter internally in apple buds, but this was found only in four orchards that had been poorly managed for scab. Generally, the fungus does not survive winter (freezing conditions) when it is exposed on the surface of an apple tree, and even when mycelium does survive the winter, it apparently does not produce conidia. When the viability of conidia obtained from lesions on fruit and leaves in western NY was tested each month from October through May to determine when conidia on scab lesions die during winter, no viable conidia were detected in lesions examined during March or in subsequent examinations. In the study proposed here, an incidence of scabbed fruit <1.0% at harvest in "sanitized" plots that had not been protected with fungicide will be evidence that there was no significant supply of primary conidial inoculum within the block.

The Principal PI has presented talks to numerous grower groups throughout the northeastern US and in several foreign countries that included a discussion of studies on orchard sanitation. After every talk there was the inevitable question expressing concern that ascosporic inoculum from a source outside an orchard would not allow infection periods to go unprotected regardless of how effectively sanitation reduced the ascosporic inoculum within an orchard. Addressing that concern will be critical to the adoption of the proposed sanitation/reduced fungicide procedure, and, thus, is an important component of the proposal.

Apple blotch and tentiform leafminers. Apple blotch and spotted tentiform leafminer pupae overwinter in the apple leaf litter, and the adult leafminers that emerge early in the season mate and lay eggs on the underside of leaves. The larvae that hatch cause the initial "sapfeeding" mines. Thus, removing >90% of the leaf litter should reduce the initial leafminer population >90%, and it is expected that this will eliminate the need to apply the one or two costly insecticide applications growers now rely on to protect trees against these two insect pests. Many growers schedule insecticide applications to control leafminers based on action thresholds in the New England Apple Pest Management Guide. It is hypothesized that the number of leafminer adults trapped on red sticky traps during early season and the number of first generation and second generation sapfeeding mines detected during scouting later in the season will not reach the respective action thresholds for insecticide intervention in orchard blocks that had received the sanitation treatment. If the number of mines in the sanitation block is above the action threshold, scouting data from arent blocks will be analyzed to evaluate the possibility that the flight of leafminer adults from those blocks was responsible for the action threshold being exceeded in the "sanitized" block.

Meadow voles. Surface vegetation creates a sheltering habitat and nesting material for meadow voles. Maintaining in-row strips free of leaf litter and debris or free of surface vegetation (in herbicide strips) and row alleys free of leaf litter and debris will limit the supply of nesting material and, more importantly, greatly reduce or eliminate the network of surface trails through the groundcover, thus greatly increasing the exposure of voles to natural predators such as hawks, owls, and foxes. The sanitation procedure will also remove dropped apples, thus eliminating an important alternative food source for voles. It is hypothesized that the proposed sanitation program will reduce the meadow vole population in young orchards to a density that will not require broadcast rodenticide baits attractive to domestic pets, birds, and other non target wildlife.

Weed management. The proposed sanitation program can be considered part of a ground cover management system, and weed management should improve as a positive side effect of the efforts to remove the leaf litter and debris. However, there will be no attempt to evaluate improvements in weed control even though it is expected that increased attention to mowing and the sanitation procedure itself will likely result in improved weed management.

Reasons in addition to environmental and human health concerns that justify increased efforts to reduce the seasonal pesticide dose in an orchard through sanitation:

Managing pesticide resistance in a pest population has become an important and integral component of IPM programs, but selecting and scheduling appropriate pesticides in accordance with pesticide resistance strategies has become more complicated and difficult as insect and disease IPM programs have become more complex. The buildup of fungicide-resistant strains of the apple scab pathogen to several fungicides and the buildup of insecticide-resistant strains of apple blotch and tentiforrn leafminer populations have occurred. Concern for resistance buildup to new fungicides is evidenced by two current projects: a Hatch project in New York (Fungal resistance of Venturia inaequalis to antifungal strobilurins, W. Koeller) and a State funded project in Michigan (Diseases of tree fruit crops and their control, Jones et al.) that is evaluating methods for detecting and counteracting V. inaequalis resistant strains. The options available for selecting fungicides and reducing the number of fungicide applications to control scab in an orchard in which sanitation has drastically reduced the ascosporic inoculum of V. inaequalis will enable a grower to more easily follow a fungicide resistance management program. The proposed sanitation procedure conforms fully with the following guidelines for managing pesticide resistance presented to growers in Ontario (Publication 310): rotate between pesticide groups, do not exceed the recommended number of applications per season for plant diseases, reduce initial inoculum levels through good cultural practices, and apply pesticides only when necessary, i.e., when threshold levels are reached.

Eight to ten, or even more, applications of fungicide throughout the season to control scab are not unusual, even in programs labeled "IPM," and several popular fungicides are harmful to beneficials introduced to manage important insect and mite pests. The numerous applications of fungicides and the use of fungicides harmful to beneficials are counteractive to arthropod management tactics that are becoming increasingly more "biologically based," and it is likely that scab management prograrns will continue to counteract arthropod tactics that utilize beneficials unless nonfungicidal tactics, e.g., the sanitation procedure proposed here, are employed that enable the grower to control scab with a fungicide program compatible with arthropod IPM tactics.

The application of tank-mixed fungicides has become increasingly more common, and this has increased the seasonal fungicide dose and pest management costs. It should not be necessary to apply a tank mix of fungicides to control scab in a "sanitized" orchard. Finally, fungicide is accounting for a much greater proportion of the yearly pesticide dose in many apple IPM programs in recent years. This is due to the success of entomologists in developing economic thresholds for making spray decisions and replacing insecticides and miticides with beneficials, and this is placing a greater burden on plant pathologists to improve disease management programs for compliance with Integrated Fruit Production (IFP) and Integrated Crop Production (ICP) guidelines or the guidelines of groups such as Core Values Northeast that are based on IFP or ICP guidelines.


Developing an Integrated Strategy for Corn Flea Beetle and Stewart's Wilt Management in Sweet Corn

Project Director: Michael Hoffmann
Funding Amount: $80,790

Sweet corn is a vegetable crop of major importance in NY and the northeast. Across the twelve northeastern states, sweet corn is produced on over 137,000 acres by 6800 producers, accounting for 19% of the nation's production and 30% of its producers. Stewart's wilt disease of sweet corn can result in yield and quality losses throughout the region; producers suffered severe losses in New York and other northeastern states in 1999. Sweet corn processors estimate that Stewart's wilt resulted in 15,000 tons in decreased yield of processing sweet corn across the state, with a value of over $1 million. This translates to a $20 loss per acre due to Stewart's wilt over all varieties, and a $58 loss per acre due to Stewart's wilt among susceptible varieties. Individual grower losses were frequently much higher. Additional losses were suffered by fresh market producers. Corn flea beetle and Stewart's wilt control was identified by the NY Vegetable Research Council and the NY Processing Sweet Corn Advisory Committee as its highest research priority for sweet corn in 2000.

Stewart's wilt is caused by the bacterial pathogen Erwiniastewartii, first identified in 1895 by F.C. Stewart, a mycologist at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva. The bacterium is vectored by the corn flea beetle Chaetocnema pulicaria, which occurs across much of the eastern US. The disease can cause wilting, stunting, seedling death, and losses in yield and quality.

Current IPM recommendations for Stewart's wilt management rely on an integrated approach including plant resistance, timing of planting, scouting, monitoring, use of thresholds, and selective use of insecticides. Producers have encountered several difficulties when trying to follow these recommendations, especially in 1999 under high corn flea beetle populations. Resistant varieties are not always available, plant resistance can fail under early infections, forecasting predictions can be misleading, scouting can be difficult, and systemic and foliar insecticides are not always effective.

In this project, we propose to develop tools to help growers better predict and assess potential corn flea beetle infestations, including a more accurate predictive model, an easier sampling technique, and an improved action threshold that takes into account the effects of plant growth stage. We also seek to improve current integrated control strategies, including evaluation of sweet corn varieties for susceptibility to Stewart's wilt under New York conditions, and evaluation of corn flea beetle control strategies. An improved understanding of the biology and distribution of both the vector and the pathogen are essential for refining an effective management strategy. This proposal has been developed in close collaboration with a team of researchers in Michigan.


Double Ringed Trap Crop System: Completely Pesticide-Free IPM Program for Peppers

Project Director: T. Jude Boucher
Funding Amount: $88,416

Description of the problem: Our food-based IPM systems are stuck in a phase where we are reliant on pesticides as the ultimate solution. The academic institutions and chemical industry have improved cooperative efforts in recent years to help produce more environmentally sound pesticides (especially microbial products), but we seem to be mired in the idea that the magic bullet can be purchased in a bottle, while farm profitability continues to decline.

The problems identified by our stakeholders (National IPM Initiative Phase I Project - IPM for Diversified Fresh Market Vegetable Producers in NY, NJ and PA) concerning pepper production epitomize the extent of the problem. Aphids, a completely induced secondary pest problem on peppers (Foster and Flood 1995), are listed as the most frequent insect pests (52% of respondents identified aphids as a key pest). Many other secondary pests were identified as serious problems in pepper production, including leafminers, mites, thrips, and whiteflies. The greatest primary pest on peppers, European corn borer, was rated a distant second, while other primary pests (pepper maggot, corn earworm, fall armyworm, etc.) problems were barely acknowledged (possibly because they are masked by heavy pesticide use and the persistence of preventative cover sprays). As IPM decision-makers we have to ask ourselves, have we accomplished our goals if we only succeed in swapping one set of pests for another? The secondary pests mentioned above reproduce quicker, tend to develop resistance faster and are less likely to be controlled with pesticides. A review of client-identified problems on peppers in the recently created NAPIAP web site confirms that secondary pest status increases, with pesticides use and pest pressure, as we move from north to south. Opportunity for IPM: New trap crop strategies have proven themselves highly effective on tough pests in other cropping systems in recent years, when implemented by completely encircling the main crop. Preliminary tests on the pepper maggot indicate that proper placement of a highly attractive host may succeed in controlling pests which must enter the crop arena from the periphery (such as the PM and ECB). Trap cropping for multiple pepper pests, combined with cultural/mechanical controls and resistant varieties, offers the potential to create the first zero-pesticide IPM system that maintains or increases crop quality compared with conventional production methods. Even if we fail to control all pests as proposed, we should still substantially reduce pesticide use with a cheaper, simpler, user-friendly system that eliminates many off-farm inputs and expenses. Also, this technology should be easily transferable to other crops/pests and regions. Project objectives: To simultaneously control all direct and secondary pepper pests through a combination of alternative strategies, including multiple trap crops, resistant plants, and cultural/mechanical controls. To demonstrate and implement this second-level IPM system on commercial farms as we conduct the research. To produce a paradigm shift from a bottled solution to an altered crop system approach. (See section D for more details on objectives). Description of methods (effort): Research on the combined trap crop system will be conducted on a commercial farm with a history of the insect problems mentioned. In one field the trap crops (only) will be sprayed (the conservative approach) while in another field, a completely pesticide-free system will be tested. A second farm (2,000 acres of total crops, 800 acres vegetables, up to 39 acres peppers), run by one of the most successful and respected producers in the state, will attempt to implement the combined system for his entire pepper crop immediately, as part of our Extension effort to accelerate adoption of the new approach.

Description of the problem, background and justification:

Current practices:

Current pesticide use on peppers is quite high. Some conventional pepper producers in the northeast use more than 14.6 pounds of active ingredient per acre to combat pests on this crop (excluding fumigants - up to 200 lbs. AI/acre). Total pesticide use in the Northeast region on over 9,000 acres of peppers is estimated to exceed 184,000 pounds of active ingredient. Many of the most commonly used pesticides (e.g. methomyl, endosulfan, diazinon, metalaxyl, metam-sodium, methyl bromide, acephate, dimethoate, imadicloprid, maneb, and permethrin) have high or moderate leaching potentials, may be present in trace amounts at harvest (long residual periods), are highly toxic, expensive and hard on natural enemies.

Key pepper pests in the Northeast include weeds, bacterial leaf spot, phytophthora blight, European corn borer (ECB), green peach aphid, pepper maggot, and occasionally in the mid-Atlantic states, corn earworm, fall, and beet armyworm. In a best-case scenario, most of these pests can be managed with a combination of cultural and biological controls. Cultivation and plastic mulch are used for weeds; hot-water seed treatment, resistant varieties, crop rotation, proper site selection and water management help prevent the two major diseases; monitoring, thresholds and selective insecticides (spinosad, tebufenozide, and Bacillus thuringiensis) are effective for the corn borer and other caterpillars; and natural enemies control aphids (Foster and Flood 1995) and most secondary pests on peppers in the absence of broad-spectrum pesticides.

Inadequacies of current technologies and practices: In recent years, IPM programs have been criticized for an over-reliance on pesticides. Farm profitability continues to decline because crop prices remain low while production costs continue to rise. Some of the new selective or microbial pesticide "solutions" sell for over $500 per gallon (i.e. spinosad) or cost more than $70 per application (i.e. imadicloprid). Conventional/IPM growers report induced secondary pests as common problems on peppers, while complaining they haven't enough time to adequately scout for and monitor pests. Growers continue to incur additional costs for sprays aimed at secondary pests. Extension specialists and agents increasingly have assignments across all vegetable crops, or all green-industry and horticultural crops, leaving little time to develop the depth of knowledge necessary to implement complicated and detail-oriented IPM programs. We need a simpler but more complete solution to the pest complex problem.

In addition, all too often growers are reluctant to switch to new selective pesticides which they consider to be more costly, too specific and less effective than older broad-spectrum pesticides. A continued reliance on preventative broad-spectrum cover sprays creates many of the secondary pest problems that are so common in the mid-Atlantic states and further south. However, when calendar-based, broad-spectrum insecticide applications are actually removed from the production system, the pepper maggot (PM) becomes a significant problem on over half the pepper farms in New England (and exists in all states along the East coast). This pest has infested up to 90% of the crop in unprotected pepper fields. Because its potential damage is often masked by calendar-based spray programs, the PM has often been considered a minor pest, and no alternative control measures have been developed. PM damage is likely to increase as IPM programs recommend the use of selective growth regulators or microbial insecticides for corn borer control. Multiple applications of broad-spectrum and systemic materials are currently the only controls available for the maggot.

Northeast region identified stakeholder needs: The National IPM Initiative Phase I Project, 'IPM for Diversified Fresh Market Vegetable Producers in NY, NJ and PA', survey identified peppers as the fourth most commonly produced vegetable crop in the three states (raised by 43%) and first in NJ (raised by 54%). Survey respondents identified the following important issues in discussions: declining prices, regulations, spraying costs, the many different sprays [pesticides] required for crops, and fear of public condemnation due to spraying. However, these growers identified aphids, an induced secondary pest on peppers (Foster and Flood 1995), as the most frequent insect pests (52% of respondents identified aphids as a key pest while ECB, the main primary pest, was rated a distant second at 39%). Many other secondary pests were identified as problems, while other primary pests were barely acknowledged. When growers in New England were asked "what pest problems should IPM concentrate on in peppers", 64%, 61%, 55% and less than 33% indicated insects, diseases, weeds, and all other categories, respectively (MA Pepper Survey 1996). When asked "what insects were responsible for crop damage" 83%, 28%, 11% and 11% responded ECB, PM, aphids and other, respectively. The Northeast IPM Needs Database identified better management options and environmentally-friendly alternatives for ECB and PM as stakeholder priorities for peppers.

Proposed improvements in IPM system:

A relatively new trap crop strategy, together with other second-level (alternative control based) IPM techniques, offers the potential to minimize or eliminate the use of pesticides on peppers and preserve natural enemies that control aphids, while simultaneously maintaining or increasing crop quality and yield. However, to increase IPM implementation, adoption, and farm profitability, we must simplify the system.

Literature review:

Trap crop techniques have been improved in recent years, resulting in a dramatic improvement in efficacy against insects that must enter the crop arena from the outside. The idea is simple: intercept and/or kill the insect by completely encircling the crop with something that is more attractive to the pest (Aluja and Liedo 1986). This concept has been successfully tested by many different researchers in recent years using baited traps (Prokopy et al. l990, Duan and Prokopy 1995), and trap crops (Aluja et al 1997b, Derridj et al. 1988, Hunt and Whitfield 1996, Mitchell et al. in press, Srinivasan and Krishna Moorthy 1991, Boucher unpublished data). In addition, economic analysis on trap cropping always shows that it result in higher net profits for growers (Hokkanen, 1991).

Studies have shown that the diamondback moth (DBM) is more attracted to collards than other crucifers (Harcourt 1957, Mitchell et al. 1997). Mitchell et al. (in press) encircled nine 5 to 12 ha cabbage fields with two rows of collards as a trap crop barrier and found that DBM larvae (alone) never exceeded the action threshold in the cabbage, although they did in the trap crop (89% of the time) and in nearby control fields (60%). Trap crops reduced insecticide sprays 56% (there were sprays for other insects) for a net savings of $117-156 per ha in pesticide costs alone. Mitchell (Boucher and Mitchell, in press) also found that when local growers unintentionally left breaks in the trap crop barrier surrounding the cabbage, the gaps acted "like gates had been left open and the diamondback moth moved further into the field [beyond the trap crop] from these areas causing extensive damage to the cabbage." Srinivasan and Krishna Moorthy (1991) successfully protected cabbage from DBM in India by encircling fields with Indian mustard.

Hunt and Whitfield (1996) planted tomato plots with or without a single row of potatoes in exterior rows for Colorado potato beetle control. The trap crop effectively concentrated the beetle population in the potato row and increased crop yield on the unsprayed tomato plots 61 - 87% compared to control plots without the trap crop.

Aluja et al. (1997a) showed how papaya fruit flies take refuge in the canopy of native vegetation along orchard margins and found oviposition and fruit damage to be highly aggregated on plants in closest proximity to shelter sites. When a single row of a highly attractive papaya variety was planted around the perimeter of an experimental papaya orchard, trees in the main crop had 86% fewer damaged fruit (97% clean fruit) than those in the trap crop margin (Aluja et al. 1997b). Prokopy et al. (1990) and Duan and Prokopy (1995) successfully protected apples from apple maggot attack by hanging highly attractive visual/baited traps in the outer row of trees around the periphery of the orchard.

Many Extension workers have observed how, on occasion, an unsprayed pepper field in close proximity to a sweet corn planting does not become infested with ECB despite extensive damage to the corn (Walker and Hazzard personal communication, Boucher unpublished data). Derridj et al (1988) encircled commercial corn fields with highly attractive (susceptible varieties) trap plant strips of maize, and compared them with solid stands of less susceptible corn (= commercial variety). They succeeded in concentrating ECB oviposition on the trap crop barrier plants: twice as many egg masses were found in the strip than in the main crop. They concluded that to limit egg mass density it is necessary to grow the trap crop all the way around the maize field. They also made suggestions for improving the degree of efficacy by increasing the width of the trap crop border where necessary, using different growth stages or more attractive varieties of maize, and by growing other (a mix of) susceptible crop species. Udayagiri and Mason (1995) explored plant constituents as ECB oviposition stimulants and found that borers preferred corn over pepper when offered a choice between foliar extracts.

Preliminary experimental results: Boucher et al. (submitted) showed that native tree canopies serve as shelter sites for PM flies when they are not in the crop. The pest was reliably monitored with baited sticky traps in nearby maples trees, but the same traps did not work in pepper fields. In 1998 and 1999, unsprayed bell pepper fields (0.7-1.3 acres) were used to document the spatial distribution of maggot oviposition relative to native vegetation (nearest treeline). Infestation declined with increasing distance from the treeline and was dramatically lower more than 30 meters from the trees (Boucher et al. unpublished data). This insect also has a strong preference for hot cherry pepper fruit over bells (Hazzard et al. 1997).

In 1999, two 0.7 acre pepper fields were planted on a single commercial farm: one with four rows of hot cherry peppers on three sides of the main crop (bells) and a wider barrier of 20 trap plants closest to the woodline, the second a solid stand of bell peppers. The hot cherry pepper trap crop was left untreated for the first two weeks of oviposition and then sprayed with acephate two and four weeks later, while bell pepper plants in each field were left unsprayed. Fruit from plants were sampled in a grid pattern across both fields and examined for stings and maggot infestation as larvae matured. When just the bells in the trap crop field were compared to the same inner positions (only) in the all-bell field (at positions away from the edge at 30, 457 60, 75 meters from the trees), there was an 81 % reduction in maggot infestation in the bell peppers surrounded by hot cherries. When just the bells in the trap crop field were compared with all the sample sites in the all-bell field, there was a 96% reduction in PM infestation using the barrier. In both fields, stings and maggot infestation in bell fruits declined as distance from the treeline increased. In cherry peppers, stings and maggot infestation declined in the first 30 meters from the treeline, but then stayed relatively constant to the far end of the field. The fact that flies were willing to follow the 4 rows of cherry peppers out along the edge of the field for 90 meters, while causing little to no damage to adjacent bells at the same distances, demonstrates just how attractive the trap crop was to the fly. Trap cropping as an alternative control for pepper maggot holds tremendous potential based on these preliminary results. The authors believe the same may be true for ECB and other pests that enter the crop arena from the outside.


Identifying Field-specific Characteristics that Lead to Successful Postemergence Weed Management in Corn

Project Director: William Curran
Funding Amount: $169,661

Postemergent applications of herbicides are increasingly important for managing weeds in com. Postemergence (POST) strategies can target specific weed species, stage of growth, and can be based on weed severity by adjusting rate and application timing. In addition, a total POST approach can reduce the number of trips across the field and can be environmentally positive, compared to using soil-applied herbicides. However, the risk of poor weed control and reduced crop yield is generally considered greater with a POST approach compared with a soil-applied approach. A single or one-pass nonresidual POST application offers a greater risk of failure compared with soil applied or multi-pass POST herbicide programs. Therefore, this strategy has not been widely accepted in corn production systems. However, previous experience by both university scientists and farmers suggests that one-pass POST programs can succeed in some situations. Identifying field specific characteristics that lead to successful POST weed management in corn is the focus of this project.

The proposed research and education activities in this proposal will be conducted at multiple locations in the Mid-Atlantic Region. The primary goal of the work outlined in this proposal is to develop a Decision Guide that will help growers assess their potential for eliminating soil applied herbicides, while relying on postemergence control of weeds in corn. In order to accomplish this goal, four objectives have been identified. The proposed research will specifically determine the effect of tillage system on rate and duration of weed species emergence at locations in Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. A weed emergence model will be developed in this process. Secondly, we will examine the effect of weed severity and POST timing on weed control and corn grain yield at these locations. Thirdly, the extension portion of the project, we will demonstrate the impact of varying management, soil type, climate, and weed infestation on POST weed control and corn grain yield, and lastly, a decision guide will be developed to help assess the relative importance of field parameters (weed species severity, tillage system, soil characteristics, planting date, herbicide program, and climatic conditions) for successful POST weed control without soil residual herbicides. It is intended that the decision guide will be easily accessed in electronic or paper format. In this process, we will demonstrate and extend weed management guidelines along with the Decision Guide through outreach education activities.

The proposed project includes scientists and extension personnel from three northeastern states. County agents will play an integral part in this project. The results of this research and extension project will help growers save money, reduce their reliance on soil residual herbicides such as atrazine, and thus help preserve water quality, and promote IPM practices that base weed management on pest species and severity.

Problem, Background and Justification

Rationale. This proposal addresses issues specifically mentioned in the Northeastern Regional IPM Program Priorities. Corn is the most widely grown agronomic crop in the northeastern region of the US. To date, corn producers have not used a total postemergence (POST) herbicide program in corn. Greater reliance on total POST treatments will allow producers to more fully implement an integrated pest management approach by tailoring a weed management tactic to the emerged weed community rather than using prophylactic tactics. The ability to recommend a total POST herbicide program in corn will allow producers to reduce or eliminate soil-applied herbicides that have the greatest potential to move into water sources; use herbicides that are less likely to leach into groundwater supplies; and possibly reduce the overall amount of herbicides used by-producers. This research will be applicable to a wide range of farmers in the Northeastern Region.

Current situation. In the United States, 95% of the corn and soybean acreage is treated with herbicides each year (Burnside 1993) and greater than 200 million pounds of herbicide active ingredient is used annually in corn and soybean production. Most Northeast farmers rely heavily on soil applied residual herbicides for weed management in corn (Anonymous 1997; Hancock 1998). Atrazine and other triazines and the chloroacetamide herbicides including metolachlor and acetochlor account for the majority of corn herbicides applied in the Northeast Region as well as throughout the Corn Belt (Anonymous 1997). Certain soil residual herbicides have been continually examined and criticized as potential environmental threats to water quality (Baker 1985; Wu et al. 1983). In addition, soil applied residual herbicides are often considered less suited than POST herbicides for developing more integrated weed management programs based on weed species and threshold density. This project will assess the potential success of foliar or POST control of weeds in corn based on field specific characteristics. We believe that soil residual herbicides are not always necessary for the management of weeds in corn.

Postemergence weed control. The potential for successful POST weed control in corn has improved with the introduction of herbicide resistant crops (HRCs). Prior to their introduction, few options existed for managing both grasses and broadleaves after corn emergence. Use of non-selective herbicides in HRCs can provide cost effective weed control, increase the flexibility of crop rotations, improve crop yields, and also offer compatibility with minimum tillage systems (Wilcut et al. 1997). In these proposed experiments, glyphosate resistant corn will be used along with the herbicide glyphosate. Glyphosate resistant corn allows for the use of this nonselective herbicide for control of most weeds postemergence. Glyphosate's positive environmental profile makes it an excellent candidate for weed management in corn. Although glyphosate will be used in these experiments, a number of effective herbicides are available today for POST control in corn for both HRC and conventional corn hybrids (Curran et al. 1999).

Weed interference in corn. The corn grower has some control over weed interference by choosing the time and method of weed control. If a grower adopts total POST weed control, the time of herbicide application is important to ensure successful weed control and to prevent crop yield loss. Studies examining the relationship between weed density and corn yield have been conducted for a number of weed species (partial list includes: Beckett et al. 1988; Camacho et al. 1990; Cardina et al. 1995; DeFelice et al. 1988; Knezevic et al. 1994; Moolani et al. 1964; Scholes et al. 1995; Wilson and Westra 1991; and Zanin and Sauin 1988). Much of the previous duration of interference research in corn examined single weed species and used hand pulling and hoeing to remove weeds by a certain period of time after corn and weed emergence (DeFelice et al. 1988; Knake and Slife 1969; Moolani et al. 1964). A limited number of critical weed-free period studies on corn have been conducted with mixed weed species in the United States and Canada (Carey and Kells 1995; Hall et al. 1992; Zimdahl 1988).

Researchers in Canada investigated early-season competition from mixed weed infestations on corn yield in seven experiments (Hall et al. 1992). Weed density was strongly correlated with the critical period, with sites having high weed populations generally having shorter critical periods than sites with low to moderate infestations (Hall et al. 1992). More recently, interference research has examined the use of selective herbicides such as nicosulfuron for weed removal (Carey and Kells 1995). In a Michigan study, a combination of nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil prevented reductions in corn yield when applied to weeds 10 cm or less in height (Carey and Kells 1995). Corn yield and weed control was more variable if this combination was applied to weeds 15 to 20 cm tall. Penn State research looking at one-pass application timing of glyphosate in glyphosate resistant corn determined that application to 15 cm weeds or about 4 weeks after planting provided the most consistent weed control (Voight et al. 2000). Similar experiments were conducted at 22 sites in the North Central region during 1998 (Loux et al. 1998). The critical period ranged from 10 to 30 cm tall giant foxtail, with a 15 cm height being the most common stage where yield losses were first observed. The differences between the Penn State and North Central Region experiments demonstrate the importance of region specific data to more accurately estimate the influence of weed species and severity on critical weed-free period.

The results of these studies illustrate the complexity of crop-weed interactions. The time at which weeds begin to impact yields is influenced by many factors with both weed density and early season soil moisture availability perhaps the most important. Because few competition experiments have been conducted in the Northeast or included common weed species found in the mid-Atlantic region, accurate critical period information is lacking for this region. None of the studies cited in this review were conducted on coastal plain soils, which have limited water-holding capacity. Objective 2 in this proposal will help identify; the critical period for one-pass POST application at multiple locations in the mid-Atlantic region, including water-limiting soils.

Seed bank effects. Many weed species typically emerge during certain periods of the year (Ogg and Dawson 1984; Roberts and Boddrell 1983). This period of emergence is influenced by several factors including seed dormancy status and soil environmental conditions (Baskin and Baskin, 1985; Bouwmeester and Karssen 1989). Temperature broadly influences time of germination and is the basis for generally categorizing some plants as summer or winter annuals (Egley and Williams 1991). More recently, field experiments have been conducted across the Corn Belt measuring weed seed bank emergence along with daily values for air and soil temperature and precipitation (Forcella et al. 1997). Variation among site-years for some species could be attributed to microclimate variables thought to induce secondary dormancy.


Parasitoid Evaluations: A New Paradigm

Project Director: Richard A. Casagrande
Funding Amount: $100,000

The lily leaf beetle, Lilioceris lilii, first officially reported in the U.S. in 1992, has become a serious pest of native and cultivated lilies throughout its New England distribution. It is now present in every state in New England and is spreading rapidly. With no effective North American natural enemies, this exotic insect is eliminating native lilies from its range and causing growers to use insecticides or remove lilies from landscapes. It is capable of spreading throughout North America. Based upon the severity of the problem and the probability of solving it through biological control, the USDA in 1999 ranked the lily leaf beetle 7th among national biological control priorities.

In four seasons of research in Europe, we have determined that this insect is under natural control there and we have identified 6 European parasitoids. Several of these may have potential for introduction into North America. We propose to continue researching biological control of this pest. We have already released Tetrastichus setifer, a host-specific parasitic wasp that is widely distributed throughout Europe. This parasitoid shares many characteristics with T. julis which was so successful in solving the cereal leaf beetle problem in the in the Midwest in the 1970's. We plan to follow T. setifer establishment and measure its spread and impact from the initial release site near Boston. We also plan two additional releases of this parasitoid to determine its effectiveness over a larger geographic area.

While we assess the impact of the already-released parasitoid, we will conduct studies in our quarantine lab and direct field and laboratory studies in Europe to allow ranking of the additional parasitoids for their potential as biological control agents in North America. Studies on host specificity, fecundity, synchrony, European distribution, and competitive interactions will allow us to develop a profile on each species and its potential to interact with the host and other parasitoids. This will allow an orderly introduction of additional parasitoid species, if they are needed. It may also serve as a prototype for future evaluations of potential biological control agents and may provide some insight into the selection of additional European parasitoids against some closely related criocerine pests, including the two species of asparagus beetles.

We believe that studies of chemical ecology of pests, plants, and parasitoids can be very useful in predicting parasitoid behavior and that they can be an important supplement to host specificity studies. We propose to continue preliminary research showing that some of our parasitoids are highly attracted to lily leaf beetle-damaged plants and that they lay their eggs in response to the fecal shields which lily leaf beetle larvae carry on their backs. A parasitoid that is so intimately related to its insect host and its host plant, is highly unlikely to attack some other host in a new environment.

We expect that T. setifer will result in a high level of parasitism, eventually reducing populations of L. Iilii and the damage they cause in the Northeast. We plan to distribute parasitoids throughout the region through cooperation with the Massachusetts Horticultural Society, the North American Lily Society, and bulb distributors.

THE PROBLEM, BACKGROUND, AND JUSTIFICATION

The Pest. The lily leaf beetle, Lilioceris lilii, has one generation per year in New England, overwintering as an adult before emerging in April/May when it begins feeding. Adults cause minor feeding damage and oviposit primarily during May. Larvae feed extensively from late May to mid July. The 5/8 inch long larvae carry their excrement on their back (referred to as a fecal shield). This behavior is effective in repelling many predators, but makes them highly repulsive to gardeners. Without suppression efforts lilies are totally defoliated by larvae and most growers respond by using insecticides or eliminating their lilies. Adult beetles emerge and feed in late summer before overwintering.

Host Plants. Lilioceris lilii defoliates all species of Lilium in its host range, including L. giganteum, L. martagon, L. tigrinum, L. candidum as well as Asiatic and Oriental hybrids. It extensively damages Fritillaria sp. and causes minor damage to several Solanum species, including S. tuberosum, potato). In addition to damaging cultivated lilies, L. Lilii impacts native plant communities. There are 21 species of lilies that are native to North America including 8 that are found east of the Rocky Mountains). Three of these species lie within the current range of L. Lilii ( Lilium canadense, Lilium philadelphicum, and Lilium superbum). Wild populations of these native plants will be severely impacted by L. Lilii throughout their range as they have near Boston.

As the lily leaf beetle continues to spread throughout North America, pesticide use against this pest will increase and fewer gardeners will grow lilies. The use of insecticides against L. Lilii can expose applicators, generally untrained gardeners, to organic phosphate and carbamate insecticides. (Most Boston gardeners use diazinon or carbaryl against this pest.) This presents some risk to these individuals and their families, particularly if the insecticides are improperly applied or stored.

Natural Enemies. To date, no insect natural enemies have been reported on L. Lilii in North America. We have seen no evidence of parasitism in 6 years of examining L. Lilii life stages from the Boston area. In Europe, where L. Lilii is native, it is not considered a problem. We have found it to be under good natural control there from the actions of 6 species of parasites: 5 wasps and a parasitic fly. Our plan is to evaluate these parasitoids and determine which would work best, either singly or in combination to control L. Lilii in North America. We will then work through appropriate USDA procedures for securing release permits, make releases and follow-up studies, and make further releases as necessary.

Research Goals and Obiectives. The long-term goal of our research on L. lilii is to bring this pest under biological control in North America and in the process, to advance the science supporting classical biological control. Lioceris lilii is a serious problem, but not an emergency. It affords us the opportunity to carefully evaluate European natural enemies and to make important advances in this process. Our research program has progressed to a point where we have released one parasitoid in New England and we have 5 other European parasitoids to consider. We have 3 objectives for which we seek support in this proposal.



1999 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 1999

Bio-Based Methods of Reducing Insecticide Use Against Two Key Apple Pests

Project Director: Ronald Prokopy
Funding Amount: $100,000

Apples are among the most valuable and widely grown crops in the Northeast, worth about 400 million dollars annually. The apple maggot and the plum curculio, both native to the Northeast, are key pests of apples, each damaging a great majority of fruit on unmanaged trees. In recent surveys, northeast orchardists ranked plum curculio first and apple maggot second in importance among arthropod pests attacking apple trees. Because as yet there is no effective alternative, apple growers annually apply 3 sprays of organophosphate insecticide in July and August to control apple maggot and 3 sprays of organophosphate insecticide in May and June to control plum curculio (no other insecticides are as effective). This represents more than 75% of all insecticide applied annually to apple trees in much of the Northeast.

There is only one alternative approach that has been demonstrated to have potential in providing commercial-orchard control of apple maggot nearly equal to that provided by organophosphate sprays: placement of a single odor-baited sticky red sphere (=a highly attractive odor/visual mimic of an apple) on every perimeter apple tree in an orchard to intercept apple maggot flies immigrating into orchards from infested unmanaged host trees outside of orchards (very few flies originate within orchards). This proposal aims to evaluate various patterns of deployment of odor-baited spheres for apple maggot control. Information obtained will serve as a guide toward optimal patterns of sphere deployment using minimal numbers of spheres to achieve effective apple maggot control in orchard blocks of a given tree size, cultivar composition and fruit load. Specifically, during the first 2 years, we plan to evaluate different amounts of synthetic fruit odor, different numbers of sticky spheres and different arrangements of odor-baited sticky spheres on perimeter apple trees for their ability to intercept color-coded apple maggot flies released onto trees in areas bordering commercial orchards. For the third year, we plan to validate patterns of sphere deployment judged (from information obtained during the first 2 years) to be optimal for controlling apple maggot flies in blocks of small vs. medium-size commercial orchard apple trees consisting of cultivars of low vs. middle vs. high susceptibility to apple maggot. In addition, for the third year we plan to substitute pesticide-treated biodegradable spheres (coated with a very small amount of safe pesticide) for sticky spheres as fly-controlling agents. The end result should be a bio-based system of apple maggot control that is a simple, reliable and affordable alternative to organophosphate sprays, and whose deployment can be tailored to specific characteristics of any orchard block.

For plum curculio, there is an urgent need for attractive odor/visual traps that can be used first for the purpose of delineating locales in orchards which do and do not require spray treatment against curculios, and second which can be used to directly control curculios in a way analogous to that of traps used for apple maggot control. Like apple maggot flies, nearly all plum curculios immigrate into orchards from sites outside of orchards, few arising within orchards. During the first 2 years, we plan to evaluate (in commercial orchards) traps comprised of known attractive odor and visual stimuli for the ability of trap captures to reflect damaging vs. non-damaging populations of curculios. Also, during the first 2 years, we plan to develop a multivariate regression model for predicting the optimal timing of sprays against curculios should trap captures indicate populations requiring treatment. For the third year, we plan to validate use of traps in conjunction with the predictive model for determining need and timing of curculio control in blocks of commercial orchard trees. Finally, in both the second and third years, we plan to apply the approach used to date for bio-based apple maggot control and place attractive odor/visual traps for plum curculios on every perimeter tree of small blocks of apples in commercial orchards and evaluate their ability to directly control curculios in the absence of insecticide sprays. This would be an essential first step toward eventual large-scale control of plum curculio using traps.


Creation of a Distance Learning Center to Aid Grape IPM Adoption

Project Director: Timothy Weigle
Funding Amount: $45,808

Grapes are ranked second in value of production among fruit crops in both New York and Pennsylvania. Approximately 30,000 acres of grapes are grown by 800 growers in the Lake Erie grape growing region of western New York and northwestern Pennsylvania. Ninety percent of this acreage consists of Native American V. labrusca varieties such as Concord and Niagara which are used for juice, jam, and other fresh and fermented grape products. The combined annual value of Labrusca grapes is over $33 million with yields averaging 5 tons per acre. Public concern over food and environmental safety, whether justified or not, are intensifying and costs of vineyard inputs are increasing. To maintain viability of the industry, growers must adopt economically and environmentally sound integrated pest management practices.

The Lake Erie Regional Grape Program is a cooperative effort between Cornell University, Pennsylvania State University, and the local extension offices in Chautauqua, Cattaragus, Niagara and Erie Counties in New York and Erie County Pennsylvania. The Lake Erie Regional Grape Extension team has the responsibility of providing education to producers of grapes in a two state region. The Lake Erie grape belt runs from the northern most part of Niagara County, NY on Lake Ontario along Lake Erie to the western side of Erie, PA. This large geographical region makes timely information transfer difficult, and personal attention almost impossible. Traditional means of information transfer include: newsletters, recorded voice mail messages, twilight meetings, in-depth short courses, coffee pot meetings, a winter grower conference, telephone conversations, office visits, and, if possible, one-on-one visits with growers. The large geographical area that the extension team covers has created a need to develop new methods to transfer specific, timely, information to the grape industry throughout the growing season and into the winter months.

The demographics of Lake Erie region grape growers make it difficult to plan educational activities appropriate for this diverse audience. A recent survey conducted as part of a 5-year review of the Lake Erie Regional Grape Program produced 153 responses from grape growers (both extension members and non-members), processors and industry representatives.1 The average acreage of respondents was 57.1 (range 2-400 acres). Barry Shaffer, Farm Business Management Specialist, has determined that a minimum of 60, preferably 100 acres of grapes, is needed to make a full-time family living as a processing juice grower in this region.2 Therefore, growers with 60 acres or less will typically have an off-farm job. Using this criteria, 67% of survey respondents would be considered part time growers. The need to work an off-farm job creates a struggle for these growers to attend traditional educational events such as meetings during the day or evening due to conflicts with their off-farm jobs or the business of growing grapes once they get back from "work". Electronic communication has been shown to provide educational opportunities to a diverse audience, and has no time restrictions of when the information can be accessed. Information can be make accessible at any time for growers, large and small, novices or experienced, and part-time or full-time.

The development of a web-based distance learning center for easy access of weather information along with the volumes of commodity and pest related information placed on the web by universities and cooperative extension agencies is a stated need by the Lake Erie grape industry. The New York State Wine and Grape Foundation and the LERGP Processor funding group has provided funding for a half-time position to develop a framework for a distance learning center for this region. The goal of this proposal is to fill in the framework with the information necessary for grape growers to make informed IPM-based decisions in their vineyards.


Economic Decision-Making and Biological Management of European Corn Borer in Potatoes

Project Director: Ellie Groden
Funding Amount: $52,997

Potato is the most important horticultural crop in the Northeast. Heavy use of insecticides against Colorado potato beetle has been the standard practice and has also suppressed a secondary pest, the European corn borer. This changed abruptly in 1995 when imidacloprid was registered and rapidly replaced all other means of chemical control. Because this insecticide is ineffective against corn borer, economic problems with this pest have drastically increased in recent years, and wide-spread outbreaks occurred in the southern portion of Aroostook County, ME, in 1998. This pest is likely to continue to be a problem with the introduction of more specific management tactics for the primary pests, such as Bt transgenic potatoes. Growers have adopted a conservative insecticide program for managing corn borer, with little or no knowledge of the economic impact of this pest. The systemic action of soil-applied imidacloprid has increased the abundance of natural enemies of aphids and other secondary pests in potatoes, but the use of broad-spectrum foliars for control of corn borers negates this advantage. Because of these concerns, this pest/crop system was identified as a priority for IPM research in four Northeast states in 1995, and at least two additional states since then. This proposal addresses the following three objectives, findings from which will enable us to implement sound pest management programs for corn borer in the Northeast, and provide a biologically-based alternative for potato growers.

1. Determine the influence of timing of European corn borer infestion and varietal response of potatoes to damage and its effects on tuber yield. . The impact of corn borer damage on potato yield is unknown for the Northeast. We will conduct experiments using insecticide-manipulated and manually infested plots in Maine and Virginia to determine the damage/yield loss relationships and varietal susceptibility to corn borer injury. These relationships will enable us to compute a range of treatment thresholds that account for the variable yield and market prices experienced by Northeast potato growers. Such knowledge will result in more effective insecticide use and enhanced natural enemies populations.

2. Evaluate two types of pheromone traps to determine the most effective for predicting European corn borer incidence in commercial potatoes. Pheromone traps have been widely used in sweet corn IPM programs to detect corn borer flight activity as an indicator of when to initiate more time-consuming damage sampling in the crop. However, there are some conflicting reports on which design of pheromone trap is the most effective for monitoring corn borer in potatoes. We will evaluate two traps currently used for corn borer in the Northeast, to determine which is the better predictor of oviposition activity and larval damage in potatoes.

3. Evaluate the potential to manage European corn borers in potatoes with the fungal pathogen, Beauveria bassiana. B. bassiana is a natural pathogen of the corn borer which has been shown experimentally to suppress pest populations in corn. Given the feeding behavior of corn borer in potatoes and the favorable microenvironment for infection in this crop canopy, B. bassiana may be more effective at suppressing borer populations in potatoes. Furthermore, sublethal dosages of imidacloprid have been shown to synergize the pathogenicity of insect pathogenic fungi, including Beauveria bassiana. As imidacloprid is currently the most widely used insecticide in potatoes in the NE and it has been shown to have only sublethal effects on corn borers, there is potential for enhanced activity with this biological material.


Impact of Weed Management Approaches on Population Shifts

Project Director: Mark VanGessel
Funding Amount: $95,928

Weed community composition and density are often in flux. Shifts in weed species composition are likely to occur as a result of selective forces of weed management. The development of herbicide resistant crops (HRCs) is a recent technological innovation. Most herbicide-resistant crops provide the in-crop use of broad-spectrum postemergence herbicides. HRCs facilitate the implementation of IPM approaches to weed management with attributes that minimize environmental risks.

There is concern that repeated use of any weed management approach, including HRCs, can select for weed species that survive or adapt to those weed management treatments, leading to population shifts. HRCs and their respective herbicide programs can result in a range of weed species that are not adequately controlled. Changes in weed population often intensifies the perception of risk to cropping systems and can lead to inappropriate management decisions. We propose to investigate the potential weed species shifts that may result from long-term rotation of herbicide-resistant corn and soybeans as well as conventional herbicide programs. Treatments will provide a range of weed management scenarios with an emphasis on glyphosate-resistant soybeans and corn.

Our first objective is to study impacts of various weed management programs on weed population dynamics with emphasis on glyphosate-resistant crops. Selected treatments will result in various approaches to weed management and differing levels of weed management. The second objective is to determine the temporal changes of weed seedbank of a long-term cropping system. Experimental sites consist of a diverse flora representing monocots and large and small-seeded dicotyledonous species.

The proposed research will improve understanding of weed population shifts by identifying species that are favored as weed management practices are changed. As a result, weed management systems that target the appropriate weed species can be developed. This research will also identify if species shift is due to inadequate control or selection of more adoptive species. Data obtained from this research will serve as a guideline to develop environmentally and economically sound, long-term sustainable integrated weed and pest management systems. This research is timely, and especially important given the rapid commercialization and increasing popularity of HRCs. The proposed project is in the research category and conforms to the goals of the IPM Grants Program by providing information to implement a profitable and environmentally sound IPM system over the long-term, and to understand and conserve the quality and diversity of ecosystems.

This study was initiated in 1996 with limited support from Delaware Soybean Board (DSB). Delaware Soybean Board agreed to provide initial support for three years.


IPM for Aerial Dispersal Risk of Potato Late Blight IPM, Phytophthora infestans

Project Director: Don Aylor
Funding Amount: $149,628

Strategies for controlling Potato Late Blight with fewer applications of chemical pesticides require improved methods for predicting risk of infection. The major goal of this project is to improve understanding of the aerial dispersal of Phytophthora infestans sporangia and use this knowledge to predict infection probabilities and improve management of Potato Late Blight through integrated use of sanitation, scouting, weather forecasting, resistant varieties, and fungicides.

The aerial transport of P. infestans sporangia to IPM managed fields from off-farm sources presents a potential risk of crop loss due to Late Blight infection that may preclude full implementation of IPM practices. We will develop a mathematical model and collect data that will be used to: 1) quantify the escape of sporangia from infected potato or tomato fields in terms of sporangia production, both in time and space, 2) develop an improved biophysical spore transport model incorporating Lagrangian simulation and K-theory (previous modeling efforts have used the Gaussian plume model with an assumed source strength) which incorporates temporal patterns of sporangia production, release and escape from the canopy, survival of sporangia during transport in the atmosphere, and deposition and infection probabilities to predict chance of infection as a function of distance from a source, 3) to use the improved model to evaluate the importance of outside inoculum sources compared to in-field (e.g., a low level of contaminated seed, or a volunteer plant) or near-field (cull piles) sources. These findings can then be integrated into a set of decision-rules for determining risk of blight infection from outside inoculum sources. Importantly, the model will allow an area-wide (regional) evaluation of disease spread potential and can be linked to other information sources either to give warnings or to suggest options for regional cropping plans. The results to be obtained here are complementary to, and help consolidate results from, other projects in the Northeast currently addressing integrated management of Potato Late Blight. The framework developed here should also be useful in evaluating risks of disease spread in other crop systems.


Sweet Corn IPM in Diversified Cropping Systems

Project Director: Shelby Fleischer
Funding Amount: $149,905

Vegetable production in the northeastern exists on diversified farms (growing >1 crop) with an emphasis on direct retail marketing to nearby urbanizing areas. The challenge is to design and implement IPM programs that affect multiple crops simultaneously. One approach would be to start with the major crop, where IPM on that crop would improve IPM on related crops. Sweet corn meets these criteria. Improved management in this crop could directly influence peppers, snap beans and other highly ranked crops grown on the same farmscape. Currently, insecticides remain an essential component for commercial production on the great majority of vegetable farms in the northeast. Reliance on pesticides, however, is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain due to resistance and regulatory changes, notably the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA). In vegetables, however, the great majority of registered materials rely on modes of action that may not be sustained during the implementation of FQPA. Biorationals with novel modes-of-action could dramatically change commercial production recommendations, and the most notable of these in sweet corn is transgenics. Concurrently, improved monitoring and educational programs have the potential for simultaneously reducing pesticides in sweet corn and the other high-ranked crops in the same farmscape.

The goal of this project is to advance the IPM information on diversified fresh-market vegetable farms by focusing on sweet corn with pests relevant to multiple crops grown on the same farm. The work will emphasize monitoring programs, and experiment with the opportunity of capitalizing on the diversified cropping structure when implementing transgenic sweet corn. Specific objectives include (1): Improved information access and organization with WEB-based structures for multistate collaboration, and incorporation of phenological predictions into monitoring programs, and; (2) Capitalizing on the in diversified crop structure in the implementation of transgenic host plant resistance.

We will conduct adaptive work related to trapping moths, and targeted educational programs at specific audiences, including those producing IPM-labeled produce. Data from trapping sites will be coordinated through Extension using modern methods, including WEB delivery of georeferenced trap count data visualized through a map interface, and phenology models that predict the time of occurrence of major pest life stages. Map images will be maintained on the WEB, and will provide a clickable access to a time-series to see how populations are changing over time. Transgenic sweet corn will be tested for its influence upon pest immigration and pesticide management in neighboring vegetable crops. This project, therefore, will provide the basis for moving IPM forward on diversified fresh-market vegetable farms by focusing on education, monitoring pests related to sweet corn and other highly ranked crops, and the influence of implementation of trangenic sweet corn at the farmscape level.



1998 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 1998

A Diagnostic Web Site for Plants, Pests, and Landscapes

Project Director: Mary Kay Malinoski
Funding Amount: $35,250

The problem we address in this study is not unique to the Northeast Region but one common throughout the United States. It is the problem of providing high quality information on pest identification and non-chemical control options to a vast urban audience accustomed to solving pest problems through the application of pesticides. Until recently, a highly suitable method of transferring this type of high quality information was lacking. However, with the advent of electronic information delivery made available to the urban population through the world wide web, we now have the capability to reach a significant portion of our urban clientele. It is through this medium that we intend to deliver IPM information that will enable homeowners to identify causal agents of plant and household problems and select management tactics other than pesticides to solve these problems. Through the widespread adoption of alternative practices we will significantly enhance and protect environmental quality and reduce the risk of health and other problems associated with the use of pesticides in densely populated urban dwellings.

The Home and Garden Information Center is committed to assisting Maryland residents in solving their pest, plant and landscape problems. The Center's approach to this mission has been the development of self-help diagnostic tools that are included in audiotapes, fact sheets and a Master Gardener handbook. The Center's web site currently includes timely information, updated horticultural and pest control tips and lists of available audio tapes and fact sheets. Construction of a diagnostic web site was begun in 1996. The addition of diagnostic web pages combining text and color photos would greatly enhance the public's ability to accurately diagnose plant and pest problems. This web site would also help users adopt IPM control strategies or least toxic solutions, resulting in reduced pesticide use. The diagnostic pages would be unique and useful to homeowners, commercial horticulture industries, students, master Gardeners and Extension personnel regionally and nationally.


A Training Program to Predict the Risk of Scab in Apple Orchards

Project Director: William MacHardy
Funding Amount: $11,980

Apple scab is the major disease of apples in the Northeastern United States and in most areas worldwide where apples are grown. Historically, fungicides have been applied repeatedly throughout the growing season according to a calendar schedule, fruit bud phenological stages, or the occurrence of scab infection periods. In 1996, two new scheduling strategies were added to the New England Apple Pest Management Guide: (i) a "scab-risk" action threshold that identifies when the first fungicide is needed to control scab and (ii) a "sanitation" action threshold that identifies when sanitation can be employed to reduce inoculum (ascospores) of the pathogen to a level that will allow fewer early-season fungicide applications. For the first time, growers can base their decision-making for scheduling fungicides and employing sanitation practices on a scientifically-based prediction of "scab-pressure." The new strategies are the result of 15 years of research that established a relationship between the number of scabbed leaves counted in autumn and the level of "scab-risk" in spring. If done correctly, the "risk-assessment" procedure will improve fungicide efficiency by (i) eliminating unnecessary early-season fungicide applications in a "low-risk" orchard, (ii) employing sanitation practices to economic advantage in a "moderate-risk" orchard, and (iii) alerting the grower to prepare for a full-season fungicide schedule in a "high-risk" orchard. If the autumn assessment is done incorrectly, however, a decision to eliminate early-season fungicide sprays may result in crop loss and loss of revenue, and growers, crop consultants, and Extension Fruit and IPM Specialists have voiced concern that they do not have the confidence to make the autumn "scab-risk" assessment. In response, autumn workshops were conducted in Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire over the past two years to train growers to assess scab, but the workshops were not well attended because harvest is not a good time for a workshop that will require nearly one full day of a grower's time. Thus another technology-transfer approach is needed.


Area-wide Decision Support System for Potato Late Blight (Phytophthora infestans)

Project Director: William Fry
Funding Amount: $48,012

Potato production in the northeast United States has been compromised by late blight, a disease caused by the oomycete Phytophthora infestans. This is the same disease responsible for the Irish Potato Famine during the mid-nineteenth century (3,12). The disease is devastating and total crop loss is not unusual if proper control measures are not taken. Recently, late blight epidemics in the United States and Canada have become worse as a result of migrations of more aggressive strains of P. infestans into and throughout North America (21). The immigrant (=new) strains of the pathogen are more aggressive than the ones previously found (8,35,37) and are usually resistant to metalaxyl (26), the most effective systemic fungicide for the control of late blight.

Growers are aware of the explosive nature of the disease and to minimize the risk of late blight infection they rely on frequent fungicide applications, usually on a weekly basis, but depending on the weather and proximity of diseased fields, even two or three times a week. This strategy not only results in higher production costs but also may bring detrimental consequences to the environment. These intensive fungicide application schedules could be modified if reliable risk assessment techniques were available such that the user could be warned with probabilistic estimates of risks. Additionally, since there might be situations in which more than one course of action could be taken, it would be helpful to simulate the outcomes of alternative scenarios related to both management strategies and environmental conditions.

Our long range goal is to develop more sustainable (based on economic and environmental concerns) management strategies for late blight. The objective of the present proposal is to develop a computer-based decision support system (DSS) for the management of potato late blight caused by P. infestans on an area-wide basis. The DSS will be based on a complex computer simulation model that integrates the three components of the plant disease triangle, the environment (weather variables as well as fungicide), the pathogen (population present and probability of influx and establishment), and the host. The DSS will be used as a tool for risk analysis in which the outcome of a management strategy can be analyzed under different scenarios to assist in decision-making. The unique aspect of the approach proposed here is that the risk of late blight will be probabilistically estimated as a function of inoculum availability for disease development, environmental conditions (past, current and future weather, fungicide applications, redistribution and weathering), and host resistance all integrated via the simulation model.


Comparison of Herbicides, Fabric Discs and Mulches for Preventing Weeds in Nursery Containers

Project Director: Timothy Abbey
Funding Amount: $55,665

Weed management in the production of ornamental plants in containers has not received as much research attention as that for weed management in field-grown crops. The concept of integrated weed management as the application of numerous weed control practices, which include cultural, genetic, mechanical, biological and chemical measures, has been discussed as a legitimate management strategy for vegetables and forage crops (Baldwin & Santelman 1980, Elmore 1996, Swanton & Murphy 1991 and Wyse 1994). However, most non-chemical weed management practices possible for field crops such as tillage, cover crops, planting patterns and crop rotation are not options for container-grown nursery plants. Thus, herbicide-based programs are currently the standard for nurseries growing ornamentals in containers.

The last census of agriculture in the United States (1987 to 1992) showed increases in the following statistics for nursery crops (which the census combines with greenhouse, mushroom and sod production): 21% increase in the number of farms; 17% increase in open production acres; and a 24% increase in sales (US Dept. Come. 1994). With the increased growth and value of the ornamental plant industry, and the actual or perceived threat of chemical pesticides, non-chemical control options must be explored for container weed management.

Two possible weed management options for container-grown nursery crops involve the placement of fabric discs or mulches on the surface of the potting mix. We propose to examine these materials for efficacy in preventing weeds, and practical utility in terms of cost, time and convenience. Experiments will be conducted at two nurseries in Connecticut: Summer Hill Nursery in Madison, CT and Planters' Choice Nursery in Newtown, CT.

The proposed 3-year study consists of a randomized complete block design with four replications per treatment. Each plot will contain three containers each of two newly-potted woody ornamental species. Treatments will include an untreated check, two herbicide treatments (standard granular and spray treatments), two types of fabric discs, and two different mulch materials. Herbicide treatments will be applied, according to label recommendations, three times during the growing season of each year. Treatment evaluations will consist of ornamental plant vigor and injury, weed control, numbers and weights of weeds by species; and the time needed to hand remove weeds. An economic analysis will be conducted to determine the efficiency of each treatment in terms of overall cost.

Any non-chemical weed management methods shown to be effective would expand from the model nurseries to others in the state via lectures, on-site demonstrations and written material. The long-term goals of this project are to provide nurseries with non-chemical weed management alternatives, and to reduce the environmental impacts and human exposure to herbicides. Off-site movement of herbicides is of particular concern in Connecticut because agriculture is in close proximity to urban and suburban areas.


Development of a Model IPM Recommendation Document (1998)

Project Director: Curt Petzoldt
Funding Amount: $19,250

This project was a continuation of a 1997 project, focusing on Objectives 3 and 4.

This project proposes to accomplish a major revision of the Cornell University Pest Management Recommendations for Vegetable and Potato Production in order to have the document include alternatives to pesticides as well as pesticide information, cultural practices, fertility practices, and variety information. Achieving the goal will allow users of the document to more easily understand and make use of all IPM options rather than just pesticides. At the same time we propose to make the document compatible and easily usable with the "Elements of IPM" for various crops. "Elements of IPM" are lists of IPM practices which are being used by a supermarket chain and others to identify products as IPM grown to consumers. Also, we propose to load the revised document onto the World Wide Web and make a template of the document available to other states should they need to make similar changes in their recommendations documents.


Evaluation and Implementation of Glandular-Haired Alfalfa for Pest Management

Project Director: William Lamp
Funding Amount: $95,000

New alfalfa cultivars with glandular hairs on the stems are now being introduced with true resistance to potato leafhopper, the major insect pest of alfalfa in the Northeast. Alfalfa is a major component of the livestock industry, with an estimated value as a crop of $840 million per year in the Northeast. Prior to the introduction of glandular-haired cultivars in 1997, most state Agricultural Experiment Station scientists had no previous exposure to these cultivars. University field trials indicated that the resistant germplasm reduced leafhopper injury, but leafhoppers colonized, reproduced, and developed in resistant cultivars. The impact on forage yield and quality remains to be clarified, as well as its impact on nontarget insect, weed, and pathogen pests and beneficials. However, growers are being encouraged to adopt this new technology and Extension Specialists and agents are being pressed to advise growers on their value with minimal independent or unbiased information, including the lack of economic guidelines.

The overall goal of the project is to enhance the implementation of this new form of host plant resistance by documenting both the benefits and potential pitfalls. In this joint research and extension proposal, scientists in Maryland and Pennsylvania plan to: 1) quantify leafhopper response to resistant cultivars using large plot field studies, 2) assess the impact of resistant cultivars on nontarget insect pests and natural enemies, 3) measure the agronomic performance of the resistant cultivars in field plots including the impact of leafhopper and weed suppression, 4) compare the economics of the use of resistant and susceptible cultivars, 5) develop "on-farm" demonstration sites using side-by-side resistant and susceptible alfalfa fields, and 6) establish a web site to inform growers of recent information about new cultivars. The project is expected to greatly improve the implementation of this biologically-based pest management tactic through: 1) the development of unbiased data on pest management and economics of the new cultivars, 2) the direct involvement of county extension agents and cooperating producers, and 3) the cooperative education and efforts of the seed industry.


Evaluation of Non-corn Plants as Refugia in a Resistance Management Program for ECB on Bt-corn

Project Director: John Losey
Funding Amount: $92,102

The European corn borer (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner), is a major pest of field corn in the northeastern United States. Although a combination of control methods have been used over the last forty years to reduce ECB population levels, ECB continues to cause substantial yield losses each year. A new technology in which a gene from a bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), is spliced into the DNA of corn plants is now available that can further reduce ECB populations and its effect on corn yield. This technology is an improvement over past control tactics because it integrates the best aspects of biological control and host plant resistance with the effectiveness, efficiency, and reliability of an insecticide based program. Furthermore, Bt-corn hybrids provide season-long protection against corn injury by ECB which insecticide programs cannot economically provide. The commercial availability of Bt-corn has the potential to provide for the first time an economically-viable strategy for managing ECB in the Northeast. Among the positive attributes of Bt-corn hybrids are high selectivity, ease of use, and negligible risk of environmental contamination. The Bt toxin is selective for ECB and is non-toxin to humans, livestock, and wildlife. However, there are two potential problems with the widespread adoption of Bt-corn hybrids, the development of resistant ECB populations and the possible elimination of hosts for several important ECB parasitoids. The potential development of Bt resistant populations has lead the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to require a resistance management program as part of the product's registration. To meet this requirement, researchers and industry representative have met to develop a consensus on how a resistance management program should be implemented. The theory behind a resistance management program is to set aside a certain percentage of crop acreage as "refugia" where ECB are not exposed to the Bt toxin to ensure a pool of susceptible individuals that can mate with any resistant survivors to delay or prevent the development of resistance. The recommendation for refugia developed as a consensus by the University-Industry Task Force was for farmers to set aside 20 to 30% of corn acreage. The tactical implementation of this refugia, however, was not well defined because many important aspects of ECB biology and behavior are not understood. One issue is the importance of non-corn hosts as refugia for susceptible ECB. ECB has a host range of over 200 plants and these plants could act as untreated refugia. The relative abundance of these non-corn host plants varies widely between regions in the U.S. Hence, a resistance management program developed for the Midwest, with a predominance of corn and soybeans as a ground cover, may not be appropriate for the Northeast region because of the much high vegetational diversity. Specifically, refuge requirements designed for the Midwest may be unduly large and costly for farmers in the Northeast if adequate refugia exists outside their corn fields.

Unfortunately, little is known about the suitability of non-corn plants as hosts for ECB. This lack of knowledge has prevented researchers from factoring the value of non-corn refugia in to the design of a resistance management program. To address this knowledge gap we propose research that will 1) determine the proportion of ECB adults that develop on plants other than corn, 2) determine the probability that ECB that develop on corn will mate with ECB that develop on other plants, and 3) determine the importance of non-corn plants as sources of ECB hosts for parasitoids. Once this information is available we will be able to develop a program for the long-term sustainable use of this new technology which is specifically tailored to agroecological conditions in the Northeast.


Integrated Management of Shoot and Rootstock Phases of Fire Blight on Apple

Project Director: Herbert Aldwinckle
Funding Amount: $99,970

Apple is the most important fruit crop in the Northeast with a farm gate value of $140 million. currently most apple growers in the Northeast are replanting orchards into expensive high density systems using scion varieties and rootstocks that are very susceptible to fire blight. In New York, losses resulting from a fire blight epidemic in newly established high density orchards were estimated at $3,571 per acre (Momol et al. 1997a).

Fire blight develops in several phases, of which blossom blight is the most studied and best understood. Satisfactory control of blossom blight largely depends on several streptomycin applications during bloom times according to the Maryblyt" forecasting program. By contrast to blossom blight, the shoot and rootstock phases of fire blight are not well understood and lack adequate control measures. This research project will use several strategies to develop integrated management of the shoot and rootstock phases of fire blight in high density apple orchards.

The proposed research will be carried out by a team of plant pathologists and horticulturists, in both New York and Pennsylvania, and will include the involvement of extension personnel to insure that the results will be readily implemented in commercial fruit farms. Dr. Herb Aldwinckle's research team has extensive experience in several aspects of fire blight research, especially in the study and development of host resistance.

The results of the investigation will be presented orally or by poster at grower and extension educator meetings, in bulletins and trade journal and county extension newsletter articles for growers, and in scientific format for the use of IPM educators and researchers. This work will produce economic, practical and effective management of these economically important phases of fire blight on apple that are impossible to control at present. Our proposal supports the national goal of having 75% of US agriculture under IPM by the year 2000, and will enhance the sustainability of apple production in the Northeast Region.


Mite Biological Control in Apples Through Distribution and Augmentation of Typhlodromus pyri

Project Director: Jan Nyrop
Funding Amount: $99,842

European red mites are significant pests in most commercial apple plantings and orchardists typically rely on chemical pesticides to control them. In addition to being costly and potentially harmful to the environment, this management strategy has not proved to be sustainable because European red mite have quickly and repeatedly developed resistance to chemical pesticides. For the first time though, biological control may be a no cost and sustainable alternative to chemical pesticides for mite control in northeast orchards.

When the mite predator Typhlodromus pyri is conserved in orchards, there is no need for any chemical pesticides to control European red mite. Unfortunately, T. pyri is not common in the northeast except for in western and central New York, Nova Scotia, and a few orchards in Massachusetts and Vermont. In 1996 we began a project to introduce T. pyri from western New York into 40 orchards located throughout the northeast. The objective of this work was to determine whether populations of T. pyri capable of providing biological control could be established and sustained. Each release site consisted of a plot of six trees into which the predators were placed and a plot of six control trees. To measure the effectiveness of the releases, leaves were collected from the release and control sites and shipped to Geneva, NY 2-3 times in 1996 and 3-5 times in 1997. At Geneva predators and pest mites were collected from the leaves, counted and identified.

The results from this work are very exciting. T. pyri have been recovered from 36 of 40 release locations. In 1997 these predators reduced European red mite densities, 2, 5 and 10 fold at approximately two thirds, one third, and slightly less than one third of the sites, respectively. Average numbers of T. pyri in release plots increased twofold from 1996 to 1997 (from an average of 0.17 per leaf to an average of 0.41 per leaf). At 17 locations T. pyri were recorded at over 1 per leaf in the release plots. Surprisingly, T. pyri were also found in 23 control plots, however, at densities 10 fold lower than in release plots.

The results from our work over the past two years indicate that sufficient numbers of T. pyri can probably be established in most northeast orchards to realize complete biological control of European red mite. To follow up on this work, three questions should be answered. 1) Do T. pyri in northeast orchards regulate European red mite below plant damaging levels? The rational for this question is obvious. 2) Are T. pyri indigenous to the northeast more susceptible to certain pesticides than T. pyri from New York that were released into the target orchards? If this question is affirmed, then there are no climatic limits to using T. pyri as a biological control agent throughout the northeast. 3) Can improved methods of collecting and storing T. pyri and enhancing predator population increases be devised? These technologies would hasten implementation of mite biological control.

To answer these questions we will do the following: 1) In 1998 and 1999 we will continue to monitor European red mite and T. pyri numbers in the release and control plots in the 41 sites where the predator has been established. In the release plots no miticides, including dormant oils, will be used. 2) Typhlodromus pyri will be collected from control plots in 7 locations and from the source orchard in Geneva, NY and bioassayed with carbaryl, azinphosmethyl, chlorpyriphos and mancozeb to determine if differences in susceptibility occur between released predators and indigenous strains. 3) We have discovered that T. pyri attempt to over winter in large numbers beneath burlap bands affixed to trees. This provides a method for collecting and storing large numbers of these predators for release into orchards. Experiments will be conducted to measure survival of T. pyri in the tree wrap bands under several conditions with the objective being to identify a procedure that can be easily used by orchardists. We have also discovered that fungi and yeasts may be important supplemental foods for T. pyri . Establishment of predator populations may be speeded if these foods were readily available. We will conduct experiments to determine whether predator population growth can be augmented by the addition of yeasts or fungi.


Row Cultivation for Zone-till: Implications for Reduced Inputs and Soil Conservation

Project Director: Robert Gallagher
Funding Amount: $56,201

This research will evaluate row cultivation for zone-tilled corn and soybean. Zone-till is a simultaneous tillage/planting operation that removes crop residues from a 15 inch area over the row and minimally tills this area while leaving the inter-row region undisturbed. Zone-till is an alternative to no-till in regions that are not well suited to no-till due to cool spring soil temperatures. Row cultivation in zone-till is made possible by a new breed of cultivators designed to operate in untilled soil with high levels of surface residues. These cultivators have the potential to greatly reduce herbicide inputs, enhance crop productivity, and improve the efficiency of farm operations. Furthermore, these benefits may be achieved without severely compromising the soil conservation benefits of the system (ie. surface residues and soil macropore development). The proposed research is needed to provide weed and crop management alternatives of Northeast Region that address the issues of soil erosion and off-site movement of agricultural chemicals associated with conventional tillage systems. The objectives of this research are to optimize the operating parameters of row-cultivation in zone till to provide adequate weed control while minimizing the impact on soil conservation. This technology will be evaluated through a broad-based coalition of growers, cooperative extension personnel, industry representatives, and university researchers. These objectives will be achieved by 1) replicated research station experiments, 2) on-farm trials with grower and extension cooperators, 3) grower meetings, and 4) outreach publications. Rigorous evaluation of row cultivation in zone-till by a broad agricultural audience will be necessary determine the feasibility of this system for the Northeast Region.



1997 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 1997

A Reduced Pesticide IPM Strategy for Control of the Parasitic Honey Bee Mite, Varroa jacobsoni

Project Director: Nicholas Calderone
Funding Amount: $100,000


AIM: An Interactive, Dynamic Apple Information Manager for New England

Project Director: Lorraine Berkett
Funding Amount: $84,985

Apple Information Manager (AIM) is a collaborative project involving apple growers and university extension and research personnel from the six New England states. This project features a New England Apple IPM website.


Determining the Impact of an IPM Educational Effort to Field Crops Producers

Project Director: J. Keith Waldron
Funding Amount: $12,855


Development of a Model IPM Recommendation Document (1997)

Project Director: Curt Petzoldt
Funding Amount: $25,000

This project proposes to accomplish a major revision of the Cornell University Pest Management Recommendations for Vegetable and Potato Production in order to have the document include alternatives to pesticides as well as pesticide information, cultural practices, fertility practices, and variety information. Achieving the goal will allow users of the document to more easily understand and make use of all IPM options rather than just pesticides. At the same time we propose to make the document compatible and easily usable with the "Elements of IPM" for various crops. "Elements of IPM" are lists of IPM practices which are being used by a supermarket chain and others to identify products as IPM grown to consumers. Also, we propose to load the revised document onto the World Wide Web and make a template of the document available to other states should they need to make similar changes in their recommendations documents.


Integrating Crop Rotation and Plant Resistance in Onion Pest Management (1997-1999)

Project Director: Martha Mutschler
Funding Amount: $65,124

This project follows a related project funded in 1996.


Integrating Disease and Mite Management in Apples and Grapes

Project Director: Greg Loeb
Funding Amount: $86,885

Small-scale experiments will be conducted on apples and grapes to look at the influence of timing and seasonal application rates of EBDC fungicides (mancozeb) on establishment and persistence of the predaceous mite, Typhlodromus pyri, during the season.


Linking Northeast Pest and Crop Models to Electronic Bulletin Boards

Project Director: Curt Petzoldt
Funding Amount: $13,379


Northeast Pepper IPM Project

Project Director: T. Jude Boucher
Funding Amount: $100,000

Weed interference can result in significant reductions in yield and quality of peppers. This project will determine the critical period and threshold of injury for weeds in peppers grown in black plastic.


Quantifying Infection Probability to Improve Integrated Management of Apple Scab

Project Director: Don Aylor
Funding Amount: $90,175

This research will contribute to IPM in the Northeast by helping to integrate practices which reduce inoculum, such as sanitation and mulch-mowing, into scab management programs, and by developing models to predict occurrence and abundance of scab for the purpose of making sound decisions about fungicide use. This work is complementary to other projects in the Northeast, and the model framework will be developed to readily accommodate information on degree of susceptibility to scab of various apple cultivars.


Technology Transfer of Biologically Based Controls: Fungal Diseases of Greenhouse Tomatoes

Project Director: Jana Lamboy
Funding Amount: $91,616

The purposes of this project are 1) to develop biologically based management strategies for control of gray mold, powdery mildew, and Cladosporium leaf spot in greenhouse tomato, and 2) to produce documentary and explanatory materials, including videos, for the use of educators. This study began in conjunction with a local grower and the County Extension Educator (Carol MacNeil) in response to an epidemic in a pesticide-free tomato production greenhouse. The extension component of the proposal includes on site work, routine pruning and tying tomato plants, and harvesting tomatoes at the commercial greenhouse; demonstration of improved cultural practices; and dissemination of information about biological control. The communication of the results of the project will include Cornell Cooperative Extension publications, and outreach to growers through trade journal articles and presentations at vegetable grower and plasticulture meetings. The research component consists of specific investigations designed to deliver information for evaluation of nonpesticidal methods for management of three fungal diseases of greenhouse tomato.



1996 Program Year

[to top]

RFA: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern - 1996

Adapting Cultural Practices for Management of Arthropod & Nematode Onion Pests

Project Director: Charles Eckenrode
Funding Amount: $68,500

Onion is the most economically important vegetable crop in New York, and has a history of heavy dependence on pesticides. Two serious invertebrates, the onion maggot and the northern root know nematode, threaten this commodity yearly. This project will use greenhouse tests to determine the host status of several grasses including sudangrass, barley, wheat, rye, oats, Kentucky bluegrass, ryegrass, and tall fescue to the nematode; and we will clarify the influence of these grasses and their green manures on the onion maggot. Those grasses that reduce these pests then will be compared as cover crops and windbreaks in commercial fields with the assistance of collaborating growers.


Deployment of Use/Risk Reduction Practices for Imidacloprid in Colorado Potato Beetle Management

Project Director: Galen Dively
Funding Amount: $28,304


Developing Traps and Fruit Volatile Lures for Monitoring Blueberry Maggot Fly

Project Director: Steve Alm
Funding Amount: $96,000

The blueberry maggot is generally considered the most important insect pest of commercially grown low and highbush blueberries in the eastern and midwestern United States. The standard method of control is to apply three to five insecticide treatments against the adults. At present the treatment program followed by most growers is designed to prevent any possible injury, irrespective of whether or not maggot flies are actually present. Blueberry growers are faced with the problem of not knowing when or how often insecticides are needed for control of the blueberry maggot fly. The proposed research is designed to develop a sensitive monitoring trap and lure system which will maximize control and profit, and minimize pesticide applications. These actions in turn will reduce pesticide residues in fruit and maximize farm worker protection.


Development of a More Comprehensive Weed Management Approach for Lima Bean Production

Project Director: Mark VanGessel
Funding Amount: $60,000


Insect Growth Regulators and Biological Control Agents for Control of Whiteflies on Poinsettia

Project Director: Roy Van Driesche
Funding Amount: $19,150


Integrated Crop Rotation and Plant Resistance in Onion Pest Management (1996-1997)

Project Director: Thomas W. Walters
Funding Amount: $30,000

Botrytis leaf blight (BLB) is a major disease of onions. Resistant and susceptible onions will be planted in controlled field experiments with full and reduced fungicide protection to determine the potential for leaf blight control with resistant varieties. Additional experiments in commercial fields previously rotated out of onions will determine the rate and extent of re-colonization of these fields by onion maggot, as well as their level of Lorsban resistance. Finally, a long-term study evaluating the benefits of Sudex rotation in a commercial onion field will be initiated.


Integrated Management of Immigrant Phytophthora infestans: Area Wide Systems

Project Director: William Fry
Funding Amount: $50,430

The major goal of this project is to develop an area-wide late blight management system that is sensitive to weather forecasts and is adjusted to the characteristics of the immigrant strains. In order to accomplish this overall objective, it is important to understand the characteristics of immigrant strains and to develop knowledge of dispersal.


IPM of Beetle Pests of Cucurbits

Project Director: Michael Hoffmann
Funding Amount: $93,731


Selling the Nursery Industry on Sustainable Trees and Shrubs

Project Director: Brian Maynard
Funding Amount: $76,417

The objective of this project is to further IPM in northeastern nurseries by encouraging them to grow and sell more pest-resistant plants, and encouraging consumers and landscapers to buy those plants. Our efforts with nursery stock producers will dovetail with our efforts in IPM outreach and education for the green industry and homeowners.





Northeastern IPM Center
340 Tower Road
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
NortheastIPM.org

USDA NIFA
Developed by the Center for IPM
© Copyright CIPM 2004-2026
Center for IPM