For 2020 and newer grants, please go to https://grants.ipmcenters.org/
PPMS
Home       Current RFAs       PD User Guide       Projects       Login      

Funded Project
Funding Program: Regional IPM Competitive Grants - Northeastern
Project Title: Threshold-based Cover Cropping Strategies for Weed Management
Project Directors (PDs):
Eric Gallandt [1]
Chris Reberg-Horton [2]
William Curran [3]
David Mortensen [4]
Mary Barbercheck [5]
Lead State: ME

Lead Organization: University of Maine
Cooperating State(s): Pennsylvania
Extension Funding: $27,318
Research Funding: $147,671
Start Date: Jul-01-2003

End Date: Jun-30-2006
Pests Involved: weeds
Area of Emphasis: cover crops
Summary: To manage weeds with reduced reliance on, or without herbicides, cropping systems require intervals during which rapid and significant reductions in the germinable portion of the weed seed bank occur or, if already small, seed banks should be managed to maintain a low equilibrium population density. Integrating tillage system and cover cropping practices, this project aims to develop management strategies that will lower the equilibrium density of the weed seed bank (see Figure, below). This systems approach promises an effective means for managing weed seed banks while maintaining or improving soil health.

Several lines of evidence indicate that cover cropping and green manuring strategies play and important role in managing weed seed banks, while maintaining or improving soil health, and in the case of leguminous green manures, providing an on-farm source of nitrogen for subsequent crops. Following incorporation, green manure crops release their chemical constituents into the soil, often killing seedlings of small-seeded species, an effect evident by subsequent reductions in weed establishment. Rye, Brassica spp., and numerous leguminous green manure crops, e.g., red clover, crimson clover, subterranean clover, and hairy vetch, have been shown to reduce weed establishment following their incorporation into the soil. Likewise, as a surface mulch, cover crop residues may also aid in the management weeds while reducing soil and water loss.

Objectives: Field experiments and case studies of innovative growers in Maine and Pennsylvania will address the following three objectives:

1) Evaluate the impact of increasing cover cropping system intensity on weed seed bank dynamics.

2) Determine the effect of varying germinable seed bank densities on the efficacy of weed control and yield loss in a subsequent test crop.

3) Assemble innovative cover cropping systems concepts or techniques into case studies and conduct on-farm research that demonstrates key pest and soil management benefits.

USDA CRIS data

Proposal

Progress Report 2005

Final Report 2006



Close Window


Northeastern IPM Center
340 Tower Road
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
NortheastIPM.org

USDA NIFA
Developed by the Center for IPM
© Copyright CIPM 2004-2026
Center for IPM